[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Alaska’s north slope. Some Native Alaskan groups have also opposed the project over fears it will adversely impact the abundant local wildlife.
Alaska’s north slope. Some Native Alaskan groups have also opposed the project over fears it will adversely impact the abundant local wildlife. Photograph: The Washington Post/Getty Images
Alaska’s north slope. Some Native Alaskan groups have also opposed the project over fears it will adversely impact the abundant local wildlife. Photograph: The Washington Post/Getty Images

Biden officials condemned for backing Trump-era Alaska drilling project

This article is more than 3 years old

DoJ says decision to approve project in northern Alaska was ‘reasonable and consistent’ and should be allowed to go ahead

Joe Biden’s administration is facing an onslaught of criticism from environmentalists after opting to defend the approval of a massive oil and gas drilling project in the frigid northern reaches of Alaska.

In a briefing filed in federal court on Wednesday, the US Department of Justice said the Trump-era decision to allow the project in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska’s north slope was “reasonable and consistent” with the law and should be allowed to go ahead.

This stance means the Biden administration is contesting a lawsuit brought by environmental groups aimed at halting the drilling due to concerns over the impact upon wildlife and planet-heating emissions. The US president has paused all new drilling leases on public land but is allowing this Alaska lease, approved under Trump, to go ahead.

The project, known as Willow, is being overseen by the oil company ConocoPhillips and is designed to extract more than 100,000 barrels of oil a day for the next 30 years. Environmentalists say allowing the project is at odds with Biden’s vow to combat the climate crisis and drastically reduce US emissions.

“It’s incredibly disappointing to see the Biden administration defending this environmentally disastrous project,” said Kristen Monsell, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the groups that have sued to stop the drilling. “President Biden promised climate action and our climate can’t afford more huge new oil-drilling projects.”

The Arctic is heating up at three times the rate of the rest of the planet and ConocoPhillips will have to resort to Kafkaesque interventions to be able to drill for oil in an environment being destroyed by the burning of that fuel. The company plans to install “chillers’ into the Alaskan permafrost, which is rapidly melting due to global heating, to ensure it is stable enough to host drilling equipment.

Monsell said the attempts to refreeze the thawing permafrost in order to extract more fossil fuel “highlights the ridiculousness of drilling in the Arctic”. Kirsten Miller, acting executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, said Willow “is the poster child for the type of massive fossil fuel development that must be avoided today if we’re to avoid the worst climate impacts down the road”.

The Willow project will involve drilling up to 250 wells and associated infrastructure, such as a processing facility, hundreds of miles of new pipelines and roads and an airstrip, in the north-eastern corner of the petroleum reserve, which is a federally owned tract of land roughly the size of Indiana.

Trump’s administration approved the drilling late in the former president’s term and activists hoped Biden would reverse this decision to meet his climate goals. A recent landmark report by the International Energy Agency found that there can be no new fossil fuel projects anywhere if the world is to avoid dangerous global heating.

Some Native Alaskan groups have also opposed the project over fears it will adversely impact the abundant local wildlife, such as polar bears, fish and migrating caribou.

“This project is in the important fall migration for Nuiqsut,” said Rosemary Ahtuangaruak, a resident of Nuiqsut, a community in the north slope. “It should not happen. The village spoke in opposition and the greed for profit should not be allowed over our village.”

[The following paragraphs were added on 4 June 2021:] After publication of this piece, the office of Alaska’s congressman, Don Young, wrote to note that there is also a body of support for the Willow project among the area’s Native Alaskans, most of whom are Iñupiat.

Documents provided included recent calls for approval of Willow from the self-described regional tribal government (the Iñupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, ICAS), the mayor of the overall North Slope Borough, and two of the borough’s cities (Atqasuk and Utqiagvik). All mentioned dependence on oil and gas infrastructure taxes from which the North Slope Borough says it derives about 95% of its revenue.

  • This article was amended on 4 June 2021 to include mention of support for the Willow project among some Iñupiat of Alaska’s north slope.

Most viewed
Most viewed