[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
12 views9 pages

Constitutional Development...

The document discusses the Panama Papers case involving Imran Khan Niazi and Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, focusing on issues of legality regarding properties and the Prime Minister's qualifications. It outlines the dissenting views and the final verdict from the Supreme Court, which initially found insufficient evidence to disqualify Sharif but later ruled him dishonest and disqualified him from public office based on a joint investigation team's report. Key constitutional articles and legal questions are referenced throughout the case.

Uploaded by

Waniya Umar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views9 pages

Constitutional Development...

The document discusses the Panama Papers case involving Imran Khan Niazi and Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, focusing on issues of legality regarding properties and the Prime Minister's qualifications. It outlines the dissenting views and the final verdict from the Supreme Court, which initially found insufficient evidence to disqualify Sharif but later ruled him dishonest and disqualified him from public office based on a joint investigation team's report. Key constitutional articles and legal questions are referenced throughout the case.

Uploaded by

Waniya Umar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

CONSTITUTION

DEVELOPMENT

ANUM ILYAS

L1F19LLBH0036

SECTION A
PANAMA PAPER CASE
(OFFICIAL TITLE).

IMRAN KHAN NIAZI


VERSUS
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ
SHARIF
What is panama paper?

FA C T S
FILE AN APPEAL FOR
D I S Q U A L I F I C AT I O N O F P R E S I D E N T.
ISSUES:

I. Whether all the propertise and companies


mentioned are legaly earned?
II. Whetherthe prime minister is not liable to hold
the public office?
III. Whether the prime minister is sadik and ameen?
IV. Whether the daughter of nawaz sharif dependent
on him?
V. Whether they have family bussiness relations with
qatar royal?
VI. Whether the prime minister can be questioned on
the basis of panama papers?
RATIO
PETITIONER: DEFENDANT:
Official judicial commissionwas not Bokhari question F.M about property.

formed. Maryam shows dependent on father


as zero tax.
All the property is legal.
Hussain nawaz gave 810 million to
Family bussiness relation father with zero tax.
Bokhari statedsharief guilty In M.L in
with royal qatar.
Hudaibiya paper mills 2000.
Qatari Letter (12 million Justice khosa question FBR for M.L
and fail to satisfy the court similarly
dirham cash).
(NAB failed to report appeal regarding
Amount paid in cash hudaibia criminal reference).
ARTICLE REFEERED

ARTICLE REFEERED :
Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution of Pakistan.

Section 12(2)(f),19(f) of the Representation of


People Act, 1976.
Article 184 (3)

Article 63 (2)

Article 225
DISSENT VIEW

Asif saeed khan stated that ( The secret of a great


success for which you are at loss to account is a crime that has
never been found out because it is proproly executed.

Gulzar Ahmad also supported and stated that Mian


nawaz sharief is not sadiq and ameen and shall be disqualified
on the basis of Article 62(1)(f) of the constitution of pakistan.
JUDGMENT
Initial verdict Final verdict
Supreme court ruled that On the basis of JIT
the evidence are not report the court order
sufficient to remove sharief
unanimous decision and
from public office and form
declare the sharief
a joint investigation team
dishonest and
JIT commision to submit
there report regards to this. disqualified the prime
minister from holding
public office.

You might also like