Functionalism
See the good in everything
Society is like a car: You need all the different parts to make it work. e.g. the law They are structuralists (macro is like a steering wheel they say sociology). In other words, and the media is the bodywork.
education affects everything in society, not just elements of society
They view society as a CONSENSUS: we all agree on certain things, based on the norms and values we have been taught through primary socialisation
View society as made up of smaller components (functions) that all work together to make society functional
Functionalism
Functionalist attitude to youth culture
Individuals need to be integrated into society to feel a sense of belonging. This is known as social integration. Without social integration, society would begin to break down. This is known as anomie individuals lacking a sense of belonging.
Where do young people get a sense of belonging from?
Functionalist attitude to youth culture
Functionalists argue that a key role of youth culture is to promote social integration for young people by offering a transitory phase between childhood and adulthood.
Parsons (1954)
A functionalist, he argued that the transitory stage offers youth a chance to become independent from adults whilst achieving their own status. Youth gain a little bit of financial independence from having part time jobs. The skills linked with money management mean that this period of life is a RITE OF PASSAGE.
Youth, therefore,
Parsons (1954)
Parsons notes that the shift from the comfortable home life to the competitive world of work is a difficult one. He argues that youth culture smoothes this transition, making it easier to adjust to the adult world.
What do you think of Parsons ideas?
Is youth culture a pleasant period of ones life that gently smoothes the transition to adult life?
Eisenstadt (1956)
Argued that most youth need to find a way to distinguish themselves from their parents. Eisenstadt argued that childhood offers an ascribed status, whereas adulthood offers an achieved status. However, breaking from the home is emotionally stressful, so Eisenstadt agreed with Parsons that youth culture offers a mechanism for doing so. This is because other youth - with the same style, attitudes and values - are experiencing the same thing.
Functionalists therefore see youth culture as one homogeneous age group. Can this position be criticised?
Eisenstadt (1956)
Youth culture also offers a sense of togetherness and binds young people into society. Furthermore, it could be seen to offer an outlet for tensions young people may experience on the road to independence. Basically, youth culture smoothes over all the rough edges of becoming an adult. Youth culture also acts as a social glue for young people, bringing people of the same age together (social integration).
What criticisms can we make about the functionalist approach to youth culture?
It ignores the clear differences between different youth subcultures. Marxists argue that these differences are class based and should therefore not be ignored. Functionalists focus on age. They are therefore ignoring the fact that youth is a state of mind that can occur from ones early teens to their twenties. They ignore gender. They are describing other people like themselves: white, middle-class Americans.
What is the purpose of youth culture according to functionalists?
Do you think youth culture is a useful function of society?