[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views33 pages

CA STOMACH Kiu

Stomach cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with significant variations in incidence based on geography, ethnicity, and social class. Risk factors include dietary habits, infections (notably H. pylori), genetic predispositions, and chronic conditions such as atrophic gastritis. Early detection is crucial for survival, with treatment options ranging from endoscopic therapies to surgical interventions and chemotherapy, though prognosis remains poor for many patients at diagnosis.

Uploaded by

Kandy Emmy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views33 pages

CA STOMACH Kiu

Stomach cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with significant variations in incidence based on geography, ethnicity, and social class. Risk factors include dietary habits, infections (notably H. pylori), genetic predispositions, and chronic conditions such as atrophic gastritis. Early detection is crucial for survival, with treatment options ranging from endoscopic therapies to surgical interventions and chemotherapy, though prognosis remains poor for many patients at diagnosis.

Uploaded by

Kandy Emmy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

CANCER OF THE

STOMACH
Epidemiology
 2nd commonest cause of Ca related mortality worldwide
 700,000 deaths per yr worldwide
 In 2002 (USA) – 22K new cases, 12k died

 Predilection for elderly pts (50–70s)


 Males > females
 Marked geographic and ethnic variations in incidence
 Blacks x 50% increased risk cf whites
 Inversely related to social class

 In Uganda – 2nd commonest GI ca (1st Ca oesophagus )

 Ca has decreased in the west – bacterial eradication,


improved sanitation
Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, et al. GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer incidence,mortality
and prevalence worldwide, Version 2.0. IARC CancerBase No. 5. Lyon:
Risk factors- host, bacterium, environment
 Diet

- High salt/ smoked/ poorly preserved


foods : salt suppresses parietal cells, and
salty diets cause gastric atrophy
- low fresh friut/ vegs: Presence of vits C, E,

carotenoids and flavanoids- antioxidant,


inhibit nitrosamine formation, dilute or bind
carcinogens
- Foods rich in nitrates, nitrites, secondary

amines – combine to form nitroso amines=


carinigenic

- Green tea – anti carcinogenic


-
 Infectious agents
1. EBV – in all types, but more linked to
undifferentiated form called
lymphoepithelioma – like carcinoma.
(histology like nasopharyngeal ca)

2. H. pylori (class 1 carcinogen)


– inflammation,
- Genotypic variants: Vac A toxin, CagPI,

- (type 1 strain). Also baba2 gene more


virulent
 Low acid predisposes to cancer via
various mechs:
- Impaired Vit c absorption
- Overgrowth of salivary and intestinal
bacteria within the stomach.

Proximal gastric ca (at the gastro-


eosophageal jxn) is associated with
normal acid output.
 Distribution of gastritis determines acid
secretion and clinical outcome of infection.

 Gastric atrophic pangastritis – ass with h.p


is the most risk factor for distal ca.

 About 20% cancers are multicentric


Correa’s model of gastric
carcinogenesis
 Genetic predisposition / make up of the host
- 1st degree with ca = x2-3 risk
- Same exposure?

 Hereditary non polyposis colon cancer syndrome (lynchh


syndrome 11)

 Hereditary diffuse Ca syndrome

 Polymorphism in pro-inflammatory cytokines

 Familial adenomatous polyposis

 Germline mutations of E- cadherin – true herediatary ca –


implicated in hereditary diffuse ca; therefore screen,
prophylactic gastrectomy

 Gastric adenomatous polyps

 Peutz Jeghers syndrome


 Pernicious anaemia

 Partial gastrectomy
- long term risk of ca is increased. Low in first 15-20yrs
- Billroth II > I
- Decreased gastric acid = increased bacteria esp
anerobes which convert dietary nitrates to nitrites
- Bile reflux promotes gastric epithelial proliferation =
metaplasia

 Menetriere’s disease (giant hypertrophic


gastritis)

 Smoking

 Chronic atrophic gastritis

 Intestinal metaplasia
 Exogenous chemicals

 Intra-gastric synthesis of
carcinogens

 Blood group A
Classification
Location
DISTAL PROXIMAL (CARDIA)

Areas with high More in Caucasians and


incidence of ca low incidence of ca
stomach

Related to H.Pylori Consequence of chronic


infection GERD and Barrett’s
esophagus
Macroscopic appearance –
(Borrmann)
 Type 1
Polypoid lesions without necrosis or
ulceration
 Type 2

Fungating cancers, may have ulceration


 Type 3

Ulcerated lesions infiltrating the stomach wall


 Type 4

Diffusely infiltrating tumours or linitis plastica


LP- aggressive infiltrating tumour ass with a
marked desmoplastic reaction = rigid
leather bottle stomach. Poor prognosis
WHO histology typing
Early gastric cancer
 Cancer confined to the mucosa / sub-
mucosa- diagnosed before it has
penetrated the full thickness of the
stomach wall or metastasized
 < 5% in the west
 With aggressive mgt- > 90% survival
The African enigma:
 Low rates of Ca despite high H.pylori
prevalence ?
- Concurrent helminthic infection converts the
T helper cell (Th 1 response) which normally
promotes cell mediated immune responses
and tissue injury to a less damaging Th2
response

- So the progression of Helicobacter


associated gastric atrophy, a premalignant
lesion is changed.
Symptoms
 Asymptomatic

 Pain, epigastric (80%) - like PUD, advanced –


back below scapula.

 Anorexia, weight loss


 Vomiting: persistent – antral tumours with GOO
 Dysphagia: Cardia tumours
 Early satiety – infiltrative ca= loss of
distensibility

 GIT bleeding: Hematemesis, melena


Signs
 No signs
 Cachexia / weight loss / Anaemia
 Epigastric mass
 Left supra-clavicular node (Troisier’s sign) – rare
 Irish node – axilla
 Symps and signs of metastases- liver, ovary

 Paraneoplastic symps
- Acanthosis nigricans: Dark skin in axilla and neck
- Membranous GN
- Microangioapathic hemolytic anemia
- Arterial and venous thrombi ( Trousseau syndrome)
- Seborrhoiec dermatitis (Leser Trelat sign)
- Dermatomyositis
Investigations

 Endoscopy and biopsy


- Diff to tell benign and malignant ulcers- so take several biopsies (6-10)
from all parts of the ulcer
- Brush cytology adds sensitivity

 Ba meal- double contrast


- For anatomy and degree of obstruction
- Diagnosis of linitis plastica- can be missed at endoscopy
- If dysphagia- do Ba swallow also

 CT, Laparascopy and endoscopic u/s- done for staging esp pre-
surgery

 U/S

 Light induced fluorescence endoscopy (LIFE)

 MRI
 PET – preferential emission by tumour cells
 Biochemical markers
- CEA
- Pepsinogen – low levels ass with

gastric atrophy
- Serum gastrin levels > 200ng/L- low

sensitivity but is specific


- Serum protein profiling
Choice of mgt
 General health and nutrition
 Staging
 Facility capabilities
Endoscopic therapy

ENDOSCOPY
MUCOSAL
RESECTION /
ENDOSCOPIC
STRIP BIOPSY (T1
STENTING -
tumor)
OTHERS:
- ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION
-LASER ABLATION
-ARGON PLASMA COAGULATION
SURGERY
 Removal of primary tumour
- Total Vs Distal / proximal gastrectomy
/ oesophago-gastrectomy

 Lymph node dissection

 Laparascopic surgery for gastric


resection
 Chemotherapy
- Preop (neoadjuvant), intra- or post-op
- Agents: 5-fluor-uracil, cisplatin, hydroxyurea,
adriamycin
- Combination / single drugs- varying effectiveness
- Systemic or intra-peritoneal admin

 Radiotherapy
- Most are unresponsive

 Chemo-irradiation

 Full Package
- Pain mgt- including celiac plexus blocks
Spread
 Local extension
- Gastro-colic fistula = vomiting faecolith
material, pass ingested food in stool

 Lymphatic
- Early
- Virchow’s node

 Hematogenous: Liver, bone, brain

 Peritoneal
- Sr. Mary Joseph node
- Krukenburg tumour
- Blumer shelf (tumour mass in cul de sac)
Prognosis
 About 50% are incurable at diagnosis

 Regional nodes – 5yr survival after


gastrectomy is 10%
 Only perigastric nodes – 30%
 Confined to stomach – 70%
 Only 10% hepatic mets survive for 1 yr

 Proximal ca has worse prognosis than


distal ca
Issues
 Chemo-prevention: interventions with
pharmaceuticals, vits, minerals or other natural /
synthetic chemicals at any stage of carcinogenesis
to reduce ca incidence
- H.pylori eradication- ? No role in preventing
progression but prevents metaplasia/ pre- ca
lesions
- Supplementary anti-oxidants (ß carotene, ascorbic
acid) – regression of metaplasia and atrpohy

 Screening – target high risk groups

 ? Pts who are H.pylori positive and have cancer-


Role of eradication
Other gastric tumours
 Gastric lymphoma
- B cell non Hodgkin
- Low grade mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma
(MALT) - low grade gastric B cell lymphomas arising from
mucosa. Driven by T cell stimulation which is driven by H. pylori
antigen stimulation. Can occasionally improve on antibiotics and
PPI
- Large cell diffuse lymphoma

 Mesenchymal tumours of the stomach


 Endocrine tumours of the stomach
- Gastric carcinoid tumours

 Gastric polyps
- Hyperplastic polyps
- Adenomas
- Leimyomas
 Fundic gland polyps- Commonest non neoplastic polyp in the
stomach
Asymptomatic and no risk of malignant change
Usually incidental findings on upper GI endoscopy
References
1. Textbook of Gastroenterology – 5th
edition. Edited by Tadataka Yamada

2. Principles of Clinical Gastroenterology

3. Uemura, Okamoto et al: H. pylori


infection and the development of
gastric cancer. N Eng J Med.
2001;345:784-9. PMID: 11556297

You might also like