Etifoxine
Etifoxine
Etifoxine
Evaluation
Etifoxine
Molecule Information
• Molecule name : Etifoxine
• Innovator brand name: Innovator brand name is unknown but other brand
name is STRESAM®(France).
Regulatory Status
• Malta
• Bulgaria
• Romania
Status in India
(Applicable only if not approved by DCGI)
Recommendations of the SEC (Neurology & Psychiatry) made in its 82nd meeting held on 21.07.2022 at CDSCO (HQ), New Delhi
11/25/2024 05:17:43 AM 5
Indication and Dosage
• Indication of STRESAM®: Psychosomatic manifestations of anxiety such as
autonomic dystonia.
• According to WHO: In 2019, 301 million people were living with an anxiety disorder
including 58 million children and adolescents.
• Indian data from World mental health survey 2005 estimated the 12
month prevalence of Anxiety disorder to be 3.41%.
Manjunatha et al. Prevalence and its correlates of anxiety disorders from India’s National Mental Health Survey 2016. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 64(2):p 138-142, Mar–Apr 2022.
Mechanism of action
Objective : To determine whether etifoxine, a non-benzodiazepine drug of the benzoxazine family, is non-
inferior compared with clonazepam in the treatment of anxiety disorders.
• The primary objective was a non-inferiority comparison between etifoxine and clonazepam in the decrease
of anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) at 12 weeks of treatment.
• Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of medication side effects (UKU), anxiety symptoms at 24
weeks of treatment, and clinical improvement (CGI).
Intervention :The experimental group received 150 mg/day of Etifoxine and the control 1 mg/day of
clonazepam, both in three daily doses for 12 weeks.
HMA :Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, UKU :Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser, CGI :Clinical global impression
Results
Intervention 191 outpatients (mean age: 43, female: 66%) were assigned to receive etifoxine (50 mg tid) or
lorazepam (0.5-0.5-1 mg /day) for 28 days. Efficacy was evaluated on days 7 and 28 of the treatment.
Results:
• The two drugs were found equivalent in efficacy on Day 28 (respective HAM-A score decrease: 54.6% vs 52.3%).
However, more etifoxine recipients were responders to the treatment (HAM-A score decreased by 50%).
• Clinical improvement (based on CGI,SAS-SR, and Sheehan scores) was observed in both treatment arms, but was
better in etifoxine group with regard to percentage of patients improved markedly and of patients with markedly
diminished anxiety without side effects.
Results
10.5
Results :
10
• Patients were treated for 4 weeks with etifoxine (150- 9.5
9.48
Choi, Y.M. and Kim, K.H. (2015) “Etifoxine for pain patients with anxiety,” The Korean Journal of Pain, 28(1), pp. 4–10.
Advantages
Choi, Y.M. and Kim, K.H. (2015) “Etifoxine for pain patients with anxiety,” The Korean Journal of Pain, 28(1), pp. 4–10 .
Advantages
• The average dosage is 150 mg per day for no more than 12 weeks.
• Rare severe liver injuries and toxidermia have been suspected to be associated with
Etifoxine treatment.
• It can also cross the placental barrier , it is not recommended to use Etifoxine during
the pregnancy whatever is the term.
Contraindicated in patients :
• States of shock.
• Severely impaired liver and/or renal function.
• Myasthenia gravis.
• The tolerability profile of etifoxine is better than that of BZDs, notably because of a lack of effect
on memory and vigilance. In addition, treatment cessation does not induce drug dependence,
withdrawal, or rebound anxiety
Nuss P, Ferreri F, Bourin M. An update on the anxiolytic and neuroprotective properties of etifoxine: from brain GABA modulation to a
whole-body mode of action. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Jul 3;15:1781-1795.
• In a study among patients with ADWA conducted in Russia, the efficacy of etifoxine was compared with
that of phenazepam, an anxiolytic BZD commonly used in Russia for the treatment of Ads
• This multicenter, open-label, randomized study recruited 90 patients, who received either etifoxine (150
mg/day) or phenazepam (1 mg/day) for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was HAM-A on Day 42, adjusted
to Day 0
• Results indicated that tifoxine was superior to phenazepam (p=0.003 for HAM-A score on Day 42); More
etifoxine recipients than phenazepam recipients showed a tendency to marked improvement (CGI score
<3) on Day 42
• The CGI-Severity score fell in both groups, with a significant difference favoring etifoxine on Day 42
(p=0.004). The CGI-Efficacy Index on Day 42 was also better for etifoxine (p=0.004)
• Significant difference was observed between the two treatment arms with respect to the number of
adverse effects leading to discontinuation (8 in the phenazepam group vs 0 in the etifoxine
group; p=0.002)
• Concerning withdrawal symptoms after treatment cessation, three patients in the etifoxine group vs 26
in the phenazepam group experienced rebound anxiety between Days 42 and 49, according to the
irHAM-A scores
Nuss P, Ferreri F, Bourin M. An update on the anxiolytic and neuroprotective properties of etifoxine: from brain GABA modulation to a
whole-body mode of action. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Jul 3;15:1781-1795.
• Thank You..!!!!