Amara Waheed
Assistant Accounts Officer
Pakistan Audit & Accounts Academy
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Public Financial Management is the system
by which financial aspects of public services’
business are directly controlled and
influenced to support of the sectors’ goal.
Public Financial Management refers to the set
of laws, rules, systems and processes used
by sovereign nations, to mobilize revenue,
allocate public funds, undertake public
spending, account for funds and audit
results.
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Effective systems of public financial
management (PFM) play a crucial role in the
implementation of national policies
concerning development and poverty
reduction.
Good PFM is the linchpin that ties together
available resources, delivery of services, and
achievement of government policy
objectives. If it is done well, PFM ensures that
revenue is collected efficiently and used
appropriately and sustainably.
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
It encompasses a broader set of functions
than financial management and is commonly
conceived as a cycle of six phases, beginning
with policy design and ending with external
audit and evaluation.
PFM CYCLE AND KEY ACTORS
INVOLVED
POLICY
EXTERNAL BUDGET
AUDIT FORMULATION
ACCOUNTING BUDGET
APPROVAL
BUDGET
EXECUTION
WHY IS PFM IMPORTANT
A strong PFM system is an essential aspect of
the institutional framework for an effective
state.
Effective delivery of public services is closely
associated with poverty reduction and growth.
Countries with strong, transparent, accountable
PFM systems tend to deliver services more
effectively and equitably.
Regulate markets more efficiently and fairly.
In this sense, good PFM is a necessary, if not
sufficient, condition for most development
outcomes.
WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE
PFM SYSTEM?
It is generally accepted that a PFM system
should achieve four objectives:
The maintenance of aggregate fiscal discipline is
the first objective of PFM system: it should
ensure that aggregate levels of tax collection
and public spending are consistent with targets
and do not generate unsustainable levels of
public borrowings.
Secondly, PFM system should ensure that
operational efficiency is achieved, in the sense of
achieving maximum value of money in the
delivery of services.
WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE
PFM SYSTEM?
Thirdly, Fiduciary Risk Management. A fiduciary
is a person who holds a legal or ethical
relationship of trust with one or more other
parties. Typically, a fiduciary prudently takes
care of money or other assets for another
person.
Finally, the PFM system should follow due
process and should be seen to do so, by being
transparent, with information publicly accessible,
and by applying democratic checks and balances
to ensure accountability.
DIMENSION 1: FISCAL
SUSTAINABILITY
Structural Fiscal Deficit:
Current level of revenues are inadequate to
sustain level of government expenditure, and
choices have to made between borrowings,
increasing taxation or reducing expenditure.
Fiscal Risk:
Fiscal outturns owing to shocks such as deviations
of economic growth from expectations, terms of
trade shocks, natural disasters, calls on
government guarantees, or unexpected legal
claims on the state. In many instances, failure to
disclose and prepare for such risks has caused
additional government obligations, larger public
debts, and, occasionally, refinancing difficulties
and crises.
DIMENSION 2: OPERATIONAL
MANAGEMENT
Effective Performance Management:
A major constraint of PFM is that the accounting
model of “Not for profit”. So public sector has to
develop non-financial measures of performance.
PFM should ensure effective performance
management system which links useful
performance measures to the resources used to
achieve performance objectives.
VALUE FOR MONEY
The UK Department for International
Development (DFID) defines Value for Money
(VFM) as “maximising the impact of each
pound spent to improve poor people’s lives.”
(DFID, 2011).
UK National Audit Office’s define VFM: “the
optimal use of resources to achieve intended
actual outcomes”. A key element in both
definitions is to make the best use of
available resources to achieve sustainable
development outcomes.
VALUE FOR MONEY (VFM)
Achieving value for money can be described
as using public resources in a way that
maximizes public value.
The use of public resources is defined as
public sector capital, expenditure,
stewardship of assets.
Public value is defined as the total well-being
of the public as a whole . In a transport
context, this covers all the economic (e.g.
travel time, vehicle costs, tax revenues);
social (e.g. health, safety, accessibility); and
environmental (e.g. noise, air quality,
landscape) impacts of a proposal.
VFM ANALYSIS
On the basis of a set of standard indicators,
which can help programme implementers and
funders assess whether or not their programmes
are making the best use of available resources
and whether the use of resources for these
programmes are most beneficial from the public
purse’s point of view.
Answering those questions is neither an easy nor
an immediate task: it requires conducting a “VFM
analysis”, i.e. collecting and analysing data on
the costs and results of the particular programme
and interpreting the VFM indicators generated in
such a way by comparing them with those of
other programmes.
VFM ANALYSIS
Interpreting the results of a VFM analysis
requires putting VFM indicators into context.
Indeed, costs and results are context-
specific: Construction of railway track on hilly
areas will be more expensive as compared to
orange train. So in this case, high input costs
do not necessarily mean that the programme
could be run in a more cost-efficient manner:
they would simply reflect different operating
conditions.
VFM ANALYSIS
It results that a VFM analysis should consider
all contextual elements for the programme: it
is essential to gather as much information as
possible on the operating conditions for the
programme, its operating modalities and
approaches.
LOGIC MAP OF A PROPOSAL WITH
EXAMPLE
CONTEXT INPUT OUTPUT OUTCOME IMPACT
Context Refers to the problems the proposal aims to address.
Input Refers to the resources required to deliver the proposal. It
typically includes thing such as staff, engineers,
consultants, materials, land.
Output Refers to the tangible deliverables of the proposal. It
typically includes things such as roads, railways, stations
built or maintained.
Outcom Refers to the short- and medium-term results of the
e proposal which may affect public value.
Impact Refers to the longer term effects of the proposal on the
well-being of the public. It is the wider public value
attributable to the proposal
LOGIC MAP OF A PROPOSAL WITH
EXAMPLE
From this logic map, it follows that value for
money is primarily driven by how
economical the purchase of inputs is; how
efficiently those inputs are converted into
outputs; and how effectively those outputs
achieve outcomes.
DRIVERS OF VALUE FOR MONEY
EFFECTIVENES
ECONOMY EFFICIENCY S
• Are inputs • How well • How well
of are inputs these
appropriate converted outputs
quality into outputs achieved
bought at a outcomes
minimized
price
MANAGING WITHIN BUDGET
Public sector is budget driven. Without
budget government lack legal authority to
raise revenues or to make expenditures.
Over spending is a regulatory issue.
Under spending represents a failure to utilize
allocated resources.
Operating within the budget is a constant
challenge.
DIMENSION 3: FIDUCIARY RISK
MANAGEMENT
Fiduciary Risk: the risk of public money being
stolen, used for purposes other than those
intended, or used corruptly.
Effective Financial Control:
Internal controls within an organization, e.g
payment authorization process, managing
against budgets, reconciliation process, and so
on.
The oversight system established by the
management of an organization in accordance
with international standards of internal audit.
FINANCIAL CONTROLS
Financial controls are the means by which an
organization’s resources are directed,
monitored, and measured.
Financial controls play an important role in
ensuring the accuracy of reporting,
eliminating fraud and protecting the
organization’s resources, both physical and
intangible.
Class activity
Write down Financial/Internal Controls over
Purchases/Pay & Allowances/Inventory
FIDUCIARY RISK MANAGEMENT
Compliance with constitutional legal and
regulatory requirements:
Typically govt. operate within a rule bound
environment. The hierarchy of regulation starts
from constitution and moving down through
laws, detailed financial rules, instructions and
procedures. This bureaucratic structure is
another element of fiduciary risk management to
minimize the scope of activities which are not in
accordance with public policy.
PROPER OVERSIGHT OF PUBLIC
FINANCES
Typically a committee of legislature, e.g. a
public Accounts Committee” will review
financial and audit reports of individual units
within government.
DIMENSION 4- GOVERNANCE
Public sector governance has to meet the
needs of all stakeholders e.g. civil society,
lenders, multilateral organizations.
Governance structure must reflect the
interest of stakeholders. This can be
addressed through a number of different
approaches:
Participation by stakeholder representatives,
particularly in the management of unelected
agencies.
Ex-ante involvement in resource allocation
decisions
Ex post involvement in scrutiny and oversight.
DIMENSION 4- GOVERNANCE
Transparency:
Transparent information includes all
published budgets, financial statements and
audit reports as well as other financial
statements published by government.
However transparency is more than data, but
the messages within data must be made
explicit.
DIMENSION 4- GOVERNANCE
Accountability:
Accountability goes beyond
transparency and involves identifying
individuals responsible for actions.
Accountability can be seen as the end point
of a participative and transparent process.
PERFORMANCE OF PFM SYSTEM
Ideally one would assess the PFM system by
measuring performance against these four
objectives.
The achievement of fiscal discipline is
straightforward to measure at international
level,
and open budget index provides a reasonable
proxy for transparency.
However the allocative and operational
efficiency requires special studies.
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE & FINANCIAL
ACCOUNTABILITY
The PEFA framework is a methodology for
assessing and reporting on the strengths and
weaknesses of public financial management
(PFM). It identifies 94 characteristics
(dimensions) across 31 key components of
public financial management (indicators) in 7
broad areas of activity (pillars).
PFM REFORMS
Medium-term expenditure frameworks
(MTEFs): MTEFs are multi-year strategic
budgeting exercises that are often seen as a
way of reconciling aggregate fiscal discipline
and public spending plans.
Fiscal rules: Many governments have
introduced rules to limit spending (or debt
and deficits).
Budget classification systems: The more
detailed the budget classification system
used, the more it will provide a
comprehensive and useful picture of
government operations.
PFM REFORMS
Independent revenue collection agencies:
Revenue reforms in the past few decades
commonly focus on improving the efficiency
and transparency of revenue policy making
and collections. Reforms aim to create
independent revenue and customs bureaus,
and to streamline and simplify tax and
customs policies and processes.
Treasury Single Accounts (TSAs.
Centralize financial stocks and flows in
governments, ensuring that revenue is stored
in one place and payments are consolidated
as well.
PFM REFORMS
Public procurement: Many countries have
undergone procurement reforms that create
independent bureaus that determine and
oversee rules governing public procurement. The
rules typically promote transparent bidding
processes and competitive procurement (where
multiple bids are provided and a process ensures
competition between bids).
Internal control, internal audit, and monitoring:
Many countries have introduced or strengthened
internal controls in the past decades, intending
to improve the formality of the PFM process and
enhance compliance with formal process
requirements.
PFM REFORMS
Accounting and reporting reforms: Reforms
involve standardizing charts of accounts and
professionalizing the accounting function
across government.
External audit and external accountability
reforms: It is common to find countries
creating or strengthening the role of
independent entities charged with doing
assurance exercises.
Budget and spending transparency:
Transparency and accountability reforms have
more recently become the focus of increased
attention and activity in the PFM reform arena.
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ACT, 2019
CHAPTERS OF PUBLIC FINANCE
MANAGEMENT ACT, 2019
Chapter1- Preliminary
Chapter 2- Budget Management
Chapter 3- Development Projects and
maintenance and use of public assets
Chapter 4- Control of Public Finance
Chapter 5- treasury Management
Chapter 6- Special purpose funds
Chapter 7- Accounting and Reporting
Chapter 8- Public Entities
Chapter 9- Removal of difficulty and power to
make rules
CONTROL OF PUBLIC FINANCE
CONSOLIDATED FUND AND PUBLIC ACCOUNT
All remittances should be submitted without
any delay
Controller General of Accounts (CGA) shall be
responsible for its proper accounting.
Proper sanction of expenditure from competent
authority is required.
Provision of expenditure through
Schedule of authorized expenditure
Supplementary grant and technical supplementary
grant
Re-appropriation
No authority can transfer public money from
one account to other without proper approval.
CONTROL OF PUBLIC FINANCE
CONSOLIDATED FUND AND PUBLIC ACCOUNT
Every grant shall lapse at the end of financial
year.
Finance division can approve delegation of
financial powers based on following
principals.
Powers balance financial authority with
responsibility
Powers accorded to enhance public service
delivery
Delegation of powers to sub-ordinate officials.
Appointment of Chief Finance and Accounts
Officer
Appointment of Chief internal auditor.
TREASURY MANAGEMENT
Treasury
management (or treasury operations)
includes management of an enterprise's
holdings, with the ultimate goal
of managing the firm's liquidity and
mitigating its operational, financial and
reputational risk.
TREASURY MANAGEMENT AT PUBLIC
SECTOR
Objective of Govt. Treasury Management:
To ensure both efficient implementation of
their budgets and good management of their
financial resources.
Spending agencies must be provided with
the funds needed to implement the budget in
a timely manner, and the cost of government
borrowing must be minimized.
Sound management of financial assets and
liabilities is also required.
ACTIVITIES OF GOVT. TREASURY
MANAGEMENT
Cash management.
Management of government bank accounts.
Accounting and reporting.
Financial planning and forecasting of cash
flows.
Management of government debt and
guarantees.
Administration of foreign grants and
counterpart funds from international aid.
Financial assets management.
CASH MANAGEMENT
Cash management has the following
purposes:
Controlling spending in the aggregate
Implementing the budget efficiently
Minimizing the cost of government
borrowing,
Maximizing the opportunity cost of resources.
ISSUES OF CASH MANAGEMENT IN
PAST
In past, governments did not pay sufficient
attention to issues related to efficient cash
management.
Budget execution procedures and the
management of cash flows focused on issues
of legal regularity and compliance, while
daily cash needs were met by the central
bank.
Spending units were not concerned with
borrowing costs since their interest payments
were already taken account of in the budget
prepared by the ministry of finance.
ISSUES OF CASH MANAGEMENT IN
PAST
Release of funds through an imprest system,
spending agencies sometimes accumulate
idle balances in their bank accounts. These
idle balances increase the borrowing needs
of the government, which must borrow to
finance the payments of some agencies,
even if other agencies have excess cash.
loosen constraints on credit.
TREASURY SINGLE ACCOUNT
Cash balances are efficiently centralized
through a “treasury single account” (TSA).
This is an account or set of linked accounts
through which the government transacts all
payments.
CASH MANAGEMENT & TREASURY
SINGLE ACCOUNT POLICY 2019-20
Policy Objectives:
T o ensure availability of cash when it is required
To manage cash balance in the government bank
accounts effectively by:
Borrowing to cover expected cash short falls, and
avoid “idle” balances
Investing during period of surplus
Minimizing borrowing cost
To neutralize impact of the government’s cash
flows on the domestic banking sector ensuring
that:
There are no large and unexpected change in
liquidity in the banking system
Overall monetary policy is not under-mined
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN
PAKISTAN
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The existing structure of public financial
management (PFM) is continuation of the system
that Pakistan inherited from the British colonial
rulers, who designed it, mainly, for effective control
on taxes collected from the local populace.
The colonial government had to control a
population of over 600 million with a meagre staff
of less than fifty thousand expatriates.
The key instrument was centralized administration
through a dominant role for Ministry of Finance
(MoF) with minimal delegation of powers.
Except for routine operations, MoF approved all
expenditures.
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN
PAKISTAN
During the last seven decades, except for
cosmetic changes, the basic philosophy of
the PFM remains intact.
It is still being managed dominantly by MoF.
Public managers in line ministries and
departments (LMs) seek MoF approvals even
for many budgeted expenditures.
PILLARS OF PUBLIC FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN
Ministry of Finance (MoF)
MoF is responsible, mainly, for preparing
budget, collecting taxes, arranging funds
through public debt and controlling
expenditure of line ministries and
departments (LMs).
Control over expenditure is a remnant of the
colonial days, when the PFM was centralized
and LMs had minimal authority to spend
even the budgeted funds.
Besides, MoF is responsible for providing
additional funds by re-allocating resources
among LMs.
PILLARS OF PUBLIC FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN
Line Ministries And Departments
LMs propose annual budget under guidance of
Financial Advisors’ organization. The expenditure
budget has two main segments:
(i) Current expenses like salaries, maintenance of
assets, travel and communications;
(ii) Development expenses for new programs.
(iii) After approval of the budget, LMs can spend
money on routine expenses but, in many cases,
development expenses require approval of MoF.
The Accountants General’s (AGs) offices make
payments and maintain accounts. LMs have a
minimal role in payments and accounts.
PILLARS OF PUBLIC FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN
Controller General of Accounts (CGA)
CGA is, mainly, responsible for arranging payments
and consolidating accounts prepared by district
account offices (DAOs) as well provincial accounts
generals (AGs). CGA prepares two sets of accounts:
i. Appropriation Accounts, which compare the
budget with the actual in respect of revenue and
expenditure;
ii. Finance Accounts, which consolidate data on
assets, liabilities and public funds such as general
provident fund, public deposits, pension funds,
zakah, etc.
CGA is the controlling officer for all account offices
in federal, provincial and district governments.
PILLARS OF PUBLIC FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN
Auditor General Of Pakistan (AGP)
AGP is responsible for auditing accounts of
federal, provincial, district governments and
public sector enterprises. The audit consists
of:
i. Certification of financial statements
ii. Compliance with rules
iii. Performance of projects.
Reports of AGP are placed before Public
Accounts Committees.
PILLARS OF PUBLIC FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN
Public Accounts Committees (PACs)
Federal and provincial legislatures select
members to act as PACs.
AGP presents his or her reports to respective
PACs.
Federal or provincial secretaries of LMs
respond to AGPs audit reports.
PACs have the authority to recommend
corrective action or order recoveries but have
no executive powers. AGP also presents
compliance report on directives of PACs in
subsequent meetings.
ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK
NATIONAL FINANCE COMMISSION
As per article 160(1) of Constitution of Pakistan for
distribution of Revenues between the Federation and
the Provinces, National Finance Commission was
established.
Duty of the National Finance Commission to make
recommendations to the President as to—
i. The distribution between the Federation and the
Provinces of the net proceeds of the taxes
ii. The making of grants-in-aid by the federal
government to the provincial governments;
iii. The exercise by the federal government and the
provincial governments of the borrowing powers
conferred by the constitution; and
iv. Any other matter relating to finance referred to the
commission by the president
NATIONAL FINANCE
COMMISSION(NFC)
These resource transfers can be broadly
categorized as systematic (formula based) method
of resource transfer and the other being random
method (grants etc.).
Under the systematic basis there are four stages
i. Firstly, revenue sharing occurs at federal and
provincial government through national finance
commission (NFC),
ii. Secondly, from provincial government to local
government through provincial finance
commission (PFC);
iii. Thirdly, from federal to local government
iv. Local to local government (e.g. District
government to tehsil municipal administration).
NATIONAL FINANCE
COMMISSION(NFC)
On the other hand random transfers include:
development/special grants, executive’s discretionary
funds and parliamentarian funds, etc.
The resources transfer includes revenue shares, grants,
straight transfers and loans.
Among the revenues that are shared come from income
tax, sales tax, custom duties, and excise duties.
In addition there are other types of revenues, called
straight transfers, are collected by federal government
but paid to provinces, e.g. royalties etc.
On the other hand from revenue consideration
provinces are also assigned collection of minor tax
assignments such as agricultural tax, stamp duties,
motor vehicle tax etc and others which are levied and
retained by provincial govt.
CRITERIA FOR RESOURCE
DISTRIBUTION
Population had remained the sole criteria for
resource distribution the whole time, which is not
the best practice around the world.
Throughout the period, smaller provinces have
asked for adoption of a judicious formula with the
inclusion of factors such as revenue generation,
poverty, backwardness, area etc. in the revenue
distribution criterion but nothing concrete have
taken place.
The Ministry of Inter-Provincial Coordination on
3rd March, 2007 has also suggested for the
inclusion of two additional factors (backwardness
and poverty) as revenue sharing elements while
announcing NFC award.
STANDARDS OF FINANCIAL
PROPRIETY
Every officer incurring or authorizing
expenditure from public funds should be
guided by high standards of financial
propriety.
Every public officer is expected to exercise
the same vigilance in respect of expenditure
incurred from public moneys as a person of
ordinary prudence would exercise in respect
of expenditure of his own money.
The expenditure should not be prima facie
more than the occasion demands.
STANDARDS OF FINANCIAL
PROPRIETY
No authority should exercise its powers of
sanctioning expenditure to pass an order
which will be directly or indirectly to its own
advantage.
Public moneys should not be utilized for the
benefit of a particular person or section of
the community unless.
1. the amount of expenditure involved is
insignificant or
a claim for the amount could be enforced in a
court of law or
the expenditure is in pursuance of a recognized
policy or custom
WHAT IS THE MEANING OF FINANCE?
In General:
Finance is the management of money and
other valuables which can easily be
converted into cash
According to experts:
Finance is a simple task of providing
necessary funds (money) required by the
business
WHAT IS PUBLIC FINANCE?
Public Finance is the study of the income and
expenditures of a governmental entity. It
deals solely with the finances of the
government.
Scope of Public Finance consists in the study
of the collection of funds and their allocation
between various branches of government
activities which are regarded as essential
duties or function of that particular
government.
WHAT ARE SOME DIFFERENCES IN
PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE ENTITIES?
Public Entity Private Entity
Motive to satisfy collective Motive to satisfy personal
wants of the people wants of owners
Income is adjusted to the Income is adjusted to gain an
public expenditure amount of income
Government can make drastic Deliberate changes in income
fluctuations in its budget or expenses in large amounts
are not easy
During times of war or During times of war or
depression the government will depression the private entity
have a deficit budget can adjust expenses to predict
a surplus
Managers are elected for a Managers are hired and
duration and for a particular compensated for profit and
service performance
WHAT ARE THE 3 PARTS OF PUBLIC
FINANCE?
Public Expenditures
Public Revenues
Public Debt
WHAT ARE PUBLIC EXPENDITURES?
The term Public Expenditure refers to the
expenses incurred by the government for its
own maintenance and also for the
preservation and welfare of the society and
economy as a whole. It refers to the
expenses of the public authorities, for
protecting the citizens and for promoting
their economic and social welfare.
SEVERAL RESONS FOR INCRESING
GOVT. EXPENDITURES
o Intensification of traditional functions:
Need has arisen to manage the entire
government machinery by professional experts
supported by expensive equipment, etc. All this
has added to the budgetary needs of the
government.
Extended coverage of government
activities
Governments aim at maximizing aggregate
social welfare like subsidies and age pensions.
Ensuring adequate provision of merit goods and
infrastructure facilities
ADDITIONAL FACTORS
Growing populations is becoming a major
contributory factor in the growth of public
expenditure.
Growing urbanization entails a much larger per
capita expenditure.
Prices have a secular tendency to go up. This also
adds public expenditure even if the scale of
activities remain unchanged.
Tendency to run into debt leads to substantial
increase in public expenditure
CLASSIFICATION OF PUBLIC
EXPENDITURE
Accounting Classification:
It may be departmental and according to heads
of expenditure.
This classification provides effective control and
check over public expenditure.
Such classification is helpful in auditing and
safeguarding against misappropriation, but it
does not help in understanding its effect and
productive usefulness.
CLASSIFICATION OF PUBLIC
EXPENDITURE
Obligatory and optional expenditures:
Only highlight the constraints under which
government’s budget policy has to work and
cannot bring out fully the possible effects of
different expenditure policies
CLASSIFICATION OF PUBLIC
EXPENDITURE
Productive and unproductive
expenditure: This distinction emphasizes
that while some expenditure are in the
nature of consumption, others are in the
nature of investment and help the economy
in improving its productive capacity.
CLASSIFICATION OF PUBLIC
EXPENDITURE
Transfer and non transfer expenditure:
A transfer expenditure is a payment without
corresponding receipt of goods and services
by the state. Examples are interest
payments, old age pensions and
unemployment benefits.
Non- transfer expenditure is that by which
the state pays for its purchases or use of
goods and services.
CANONS OF EXPENDITURE
Canon of economy:
Resources are insufficient for its need. No
wastage should be permitted.
Public expenditure is the financial counterpart of
the resources which the government uses up
directly.
So the public expenditure should not involve the
use of resources more than what are just
necessary.
CANONS OF EXPENDITURE
Canon of Sanction:
No public funds should be used without proper
authorization and further that funds must be
used only for the purpose for which they have
been sanctioned.
Such restriction avoid unwanted expenditure and
will also be a check against misappropriation of
funds.
CANONS OF EXPENDITURE
Canon of Benefit:
Every item of expenditure ought to be viewed in
context of its expected benefits which can take
several forms.
In practical this canon poses several hurdles in
form of subjective concepts, data and
information, administrative service and like.
CANONS OF EXPENDITURE
Canons of Surplus:
Government should avoid deficit budgeting, at
least a persistent one. It should always try to be
prudent and should aim at meeting its current
expenditure needs out of its current revenue. It
should not over spend and run into a debt.
PUBLIC RECEIPTS
Every government needs funds to finance its
activities. They may raised from various sources,
important of them are:
Taxation
Government borrowing/Debt
International Aid
Public Private Partnership
Sale of public assets
Interest receipts
Income from currency
PUBLIC RECEIPTS AND REVENUE
As Professor Dalton describes public receipts
includes receipts of government from all
sources while public revenue is narrow
concept and excludes public borrowing,
income from sale of public assets or receipts
from use of printing press.
CLASSIFICATION OF RECEIPTS
Revenue Receipts: Include routine and earned
ones. They do not include borrowings and
recovery of loans from other parties, but they do
include tax receipts, dividends, interest receipts,
grants, donations, fees and fines.
Capital Receipts: Cover those items which are
basically of non repetitive in nature and have the
effect of altering government’s financial
assts/liabilities.
TAXATION
Tax is mandatory financial charge imposed
upon a taxpayer by the governmental
organization in order to fund various public
expenditure.
MEANING OF CANONS OF
TAXATION:
By canons of taxation we simply mean the
characteristics or qualities which a good tax
system should possess. In fact, canons of
taxation are related to the administrative
part of a tax. Adam Smith first devised the
principles or canons of taxation in 1776.
TYPES OF CANONS OF TAXATION:
Canon of Equality
Canon of Certainty
Canon of Convenience
Canon of Economy
Canon of Productivity
Canon of Diversity
Canon of Elasticity
CANON OF EQUALITY:
The word equality here does not mean that
everyone should pay the exact, equal
amount of tax. What equality really means
here is that the rich people should pay more
taxes and the poor pay less. This is because
the amount of tax should be in proportion to
the abilities of the taxpayer. It is one of the
fundamental concepts to bring social equality
in the country.
CANON OF CERTAINTY:
The tax payers should be well-aware of the
purpose, amount and manner of the tax
payment. Everything should be made clear,
simple and absolutely certain for the benefit
of the taxpayer.
It is believed that if the canon of certainty is
not present, it leads to tax evasion.
CANON OF CONVENIENCE:
Canon of convenience can be understood as
an extension of canon of certainty.
Where canon of certainty states that the
taxpayer should be well-aware of the
amount, manner and mode of paying taxes,
the canon of convenience states that all this
should easy, convenient and taxpayer-
friendly. The time and manner of payment
must be convenient for the tax payer so that
he is able to pay his taxes in due time.
CANON OF ECONOMY:
The canon of economy states that the cost of
collecting taxes should be as minimum as
possible. There should not be any leakage in
the way.
In this way, a large amount of the collections
will go directly to the treasury, and therefore,
will be spent in the government projects for
the welfare of the economy, country and the
people.
CANON OF PRODUCTIVITY:
By virtue of the canon of productivity, it is
better to have fewer taxes with large
revenues, rather than more taxes with lesser
amounts of revenue. It is always considered
better to impose the only taxes that are able
to produce larger returns. More taxes tend to
create panic, chaos and confusion among the
taxpayers and it is also against the canon of
certainty and convenience to some extent.
CANON OF ELASTICITY:
An ideal system of taxation should consist of
those types of taxes that can easily be
adjusted.
Taxes, which can be increased or decreased,
according to the demand of the revenue, are
considered ideal for the system.
An example of such a tax can be the income
tax, which is considered very much ideal in
accordance with the canon of elasticity.
CANON OF DIVERSITY:
Diversification in a tax structure will demand
involvement of the majority of the sectors of
the population.
TYPES OF TAXATION
Direct Tax:
Burden of taxation is on the person on whom levied.
e.g. income tax
Indirect Tax:
Burden of tax is shifted by the person on whom levied
to other persons. e.g. sale tax
Proportional Tax:
Levied with the same percentage. e. g. sales tax
Progressive Tax:
Rate of tax increases as the income increases. e.g.
income tax
Value Added Tax:
Levied at each stage of value addition. e.g. sales tax
GOVERNMENT
DEBT/BORROWINGS
Public debt includes all financial liabilities of
the government.
Public debt is a loan raised by the
government and is a source of public finance
which carries the obligation of repayment
along with interest.
WHY PUBLIC DEBT
Government revenues and expenditures may
not match during any given time period, such
imbalances create self erasing short term
loans.
In the event of war or natural calamity, etc,
the government may be forced to suddenly
increase its expenditure and finance it by
borrowing.
WHY PUBLIC DEBT
Some times government may adopt deficit budget
to achieve a variety of objectives including
economic growth and stabilization.
The government of underdeveloped countries
have to play an active role in accelerating the
process of capital accumulation, this may be done
through borrowing and investing funds in
development projects.
TYPES OF PUBLIC DEBT
Short term debt: It comprises debt
obligations like treasury bills of a maturity of
less than one year at the time of issue.
Floating debt: These debt items do not
have any pre determined maturity.
Permanent/dated/funded debt: These
loans have a maturity of more than one year.
in practice their maturity is between three to
thirty years.
TYPES OF PUBLIC DEBT
External debt: obligations owed to foreigners-
government, institutions, firms and individuals are
called external loans. More precisely, they are
loans raised from outside the country.
Internal debt: It is that part of government debt
which is owned or held by the residents of a
country.
TYPES OF PUBLIC DEBT
Marketable and Non marketable loans:
loans are called marketable if existing holders
can sell them to others.
Non marketable loans are those which have been
issued in favour of specified debt holders only
and cannot be transferred to others.
TYPES OF PUBLIC DEBT
Interest bearing and interest free loans:
An interest bearing loan may carry a fixed
coupon, i.e., a fixed periodic interest entitlement,
or the coupon may be a variable one.
A loan may be issued at a discount through bids.
Such loans are termed zero coupon bonds.
LIMITS OF RAISING PUBLIC DEBT
In most countries public debt has registered
a continuous upward trend during the last
few decades.
Question arises as to whether there are any
definite limits beyond which government
cannot raise loans?
We shall distinguish between the will and
capacity of the government to raise loans
both in short run and long run.
LIMITS OF RAISING PUBLIC DEBT
It is expected that modern government will
not borrow to satisfy the whims of individual
running the government. Instead it is
expected to borrow only for meeting real
needs of the society.
In some cases there may also be specific
legal restrictions on the public borrowings.
LIMITS OF RAISING PUBLIC DEBT
Given loanable funds, govt. borrowings add to
their demand and cause an upward pressure on
interest rates. Thus higher interest cost can act as
deterrent against borrowing program of the
authorities.
In long run total volume of public debt can
increase gradually in line with growth in national
income. No definite limit may be stated to exist
for the nominal volume of public debt.
LIMITS OF RAISING PUBLIC DEBT
However a government may resort to excessive
borrowing and get into a debt trap.
It is a situation in which government has to borrow
afresh to service its existing debt.
This state of affairs may eventually raise interest
cost to unmanageable proportions to its revenue
receipts.
In case foreign debt country resources also get
drained.
PUBLIC DEBT AND INFLATION
Public debt and inflation:
Public borrowings from the market only divert
funds into the hands of the government.
As result there is no net addition in
aggregate demand.
However this reasoning is quite misleading.
PUBLIC DEBT AND INFLATION
Firstly, economic productive resources get
diverted from production of consumption
goods to capital goods. Investment goods
industries have longer gestation period
therefore during the intervening period, the
demand for consumption goods tends to
exceed their supply.
PUBLIC DEBT AND INFLATION
Borrowing used for war activities, to meet
natural calamities and other relief measures
are most likely to be inflationary in their
impact because they are basically
consumption oriented.
When the government borrow from central
bank, there is an addition in supply of legal
tender money which in turn adds to demand
and pushes up prices.
PUBLIC DEBT AND INFLATION
Holding of public debt by commercial banks
can also leads to an addition in demand and
inflationary pressure. Banks rates
government securities as highly liquid and
increase their loans and advances.
PUBLIC DEBT VS. TAXATION
The choice of dept financing and tax
financing is under debate.
Under some circumstances debt financing
become unavoidable or preferable like during
war and emergencies.
PUBLIC DEBT VS. TAXATION
For some projects, debt financing meets the
test of cost-benefit analysis. Such project are
benefited to some specific areas or section of
people who are expected to bear the cost of
project out of benefits they would receive.
Such projects are financed through public
borrowings, and than recovered from the
beneficiaries through a levy or some other
means.
PUBLIC DEBT VS. TAXATION
Debt financing when compared to tax financing
has its own limitations.
Public debt by definition has to serviced. And adds
to future budgetary committeemen's of the
authorities.
It is the richer section only which can subscribe to
the public debt, debt servicing becomes a
medium for redistributing national income in favor
on rich.
DEBT REDEMPTION
The traditional thinking prescribed a policy of
paying off debt as soon as possible, however
the current thinking places debt retirement in
context of overall debt and fiscal policies of
govt. under normal condition.
One simple way of ending debt obligation is
to repudiate the debt.
DEBT REDEMPTION
Two systematic approaches for retiring public
debt:
Sinking Fund: In which government regularly put
aside some money and uses the accumulated
fund for periodic and partial retirement of the
debt.
This method can succeed in retiring the debt
only if the government has a substantial
budgetary saving every year.
DEBT REDEMPTION
Second approach is regularly retiring small portion
of debt every year. This approach may be effected
in two ways:
The public debt may be in form of serial bonds.
The second method adopted is earmarking a portion of
the budget for the debt retirement, purchasing the
bonds in market and cancelling them.
DEBT REDEMPTION
When government does not want to reduce
its outstanding debt obligations, it may fund
the maturing loan.
This means that existing debt is converted
into a new one of longer maturity.
RECEIPT OF PUBLIC MONEY
All monies received as revenue of the
Government, must be banked in the name of
the Government without delay and included
in the Consolidated Fund of the respective
Federal or Provincial Government.
Public Account receipts, other than revenue,
must be banked in the name of the
Government without delay and included in
the Public Account of the respective Federal
or Provincial Government.
All receipts should be identified in
accordance with the Chart of Accounts
specification.
RECEIPT OF PUBLIC MONEY
Amounts due to the Government should only
be tendered at branches of the State Bank of
Pakistan or at branches of the National Bank
of Pakistan, acting as an agent for the State
Bank of Pakistan, unless otherwise
authorized by the Government.
Officers receiving public money will be held
accountable for all public monies received by
them and must maintain a proper record of
receipts.
All amounts to be deposited into the
Government’s bank account must be
accompanied by a receipt voucher.
RECEIPT OF PUBLIC MONEY
Any person making a payment to the
Government is entitled to receive proof of
payment, through the issue of an official
receipt drawn and signed by the receiving
officer.
Collection of public monies must not be
mixed with collection of private monies. For
example, no private monies should be kept in
official safes or bank accounts.
Public monies may be collected at a post
office for specified classes of receipt, as
determined by the Government.
RECEIPT OF PUBLIC MONEY
Public monies received in cash, cheque or
any other form of payment will not be
accepted by Government entities at their
own offices, unless specifically authorized by
the Government. In cases where receipting at
Government offices is permitted, the
Principal Accounting Officer of the concerned
entity must ensure proper control and that
record of receipts is maintained and public
monies are promptly deposited into the
Government’s bank account.
RECEIPT OF PUBLIC MONEY
Any public monies received by a Government
office, where permitted under the above
direction are not revenues on the part of the
collecting entity. No public monies received
by a Government office will be retained to
meet departmental or other forms of
expenditure unless otherwise permitted by
the Government
SYSTEM OF PAYMENT OUT OF PUBLIC
MONEY
Sanction of expenditure
Preparation of claim voucher
Approval of expenditure
Registration of purchase order/claim voucher
Certification (pre-audit) of claims
Authorization of payment
Issue of payment
Recording of expenditure in the accounting
records.
SANCTION OF EXPENDITURE
Every expenditure must be sanctioned by an
officer of the Government who has the authority to
approve proposals to incur expenditures.
Must exercise due care and diligence, and should
not incur expenditure (or enter into commitment)
in excess of the amount appropriated by the
National or Provincial Assembly.
The sanction process comprises two functions;
namely a Budget Availability Review and the
raising of a Purchase Order. The Budget Availability
Review will be performed for all expenditures,
whereas Purchase Orders will be raised for
contingent expenditures only.
VOUCHER PREPARATION
o A prescribed claim voucher form (bill) (form
4B) must be prepared by the incurring officer
for supplies, services rendered and work done
under a contract or other arrangement over
the specified limit.
o A duplicate claim voucher must not be issued
except where the original has been lost or
destroyed. Also refer to FTR 145 (chapter I of
Part V) for detailed instructions on this matter.
o Travelling expense claims should be
accompanied by all prescribed receipts.
Travelling claims should be submitted within
one month of the completion of journey
APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE
Every claim voucher (bill) must be approved by
an officer (other than the sanctioning officer and
who shall be different from the DDO) within the
entity incurring the expenditure, in accordance
with procedures set out in section 4.5.4.
The approving officer will be held personally
responsible for the correctness of all claim
vouchers bearing his/her signature.
The approving officer must ensure that for the
expenditure being claimed, an approved
purchase order (where applicable) was
previously raised and a copy is attached to the
claim voucher.
CERTIFICATION (PRE -AUDIT) OF
EXPENDITURE
Every claim voucher (bill) must be certified
by an officer in the relevant District Account
Office/Accountant General Office/Accountant
General Pakistan Revenue Office and who
shall be deemed to be the certifying officer.
The certification (pre-audit) process
comprises two functions; namely a
verification function and an audit function.
The verification function involves: · the
certifying officer ensuring that the claim
voucher has been duly approved by a
delegated approving officer in the entity
CERTIFICATION (PRE -AUDIT) OF
EXPENDITURE
The certifying officer verifying the validity of
the claim voucher, in accordance with
procedures set out in section 4.5.5, and
ensure it correctly identifies the account
head to which payment will be charged
the certifying officer initially checking that
the funds are available to make the relevant
payment.
The audit function involves: scrutinising of
the claim voucher to identify possible fraud
and irregularities that a reasonable person
would be expected to discover.
AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT
Once certified (pre-audited), the claim
voucher (bill) may then be authorized for
payment, by an officer in the District Account
office/Accountant General office/Accountant
General Pakistan Revenue office and who
shall be deemed to be the certifying officer.
The authorizing officer must not authorize a
claim unless it has been duly certified and
sufficient funds are available in the
concerned budget head to make the
payment.
ISSUE OF PAYMENT
Payment must only be made for those claims that have been
duly approved, certified and authorised.
All expenditures must be classified in accordance with the Chart
of Account, under the appropriate expenditure head. No
transaction exceeding the value of available funds can be
passed for payment.
Payment of approved claims must be made only to the claimant
as indicated on the claim voucher.
Only Government cheque books should be used when making
payments by cheque.
All cheques must be signed by two delegated officers. The
cheque signing officers should be independent of officers
involved in voucher certification, voucher authorisation and
cheque preparation,
Every officer authorised to draw cheques or sign or countersign
cheques, must send a specimen of his/her signature to the
designated bank branch through the Accountant General (or his
delegated officer)
THANK YOU