RP M S - P P S T

A . NE C I O , EdD
BLESILDA
EPS II – HRD
D O C a m a r in e s Norte
S
RPMS CYCLE
RPMS CYCLE First week of January
2021

Adjusted
RPMS Cycle
Timeline
only for
 
July 2021
Year-round (coaching &
mentoring);
  March 2021
(mid-year review)

SY 2020-2021

A week
  after graduation/ third
week of June 2021
I PERFORMANCE PLANNING
AND COMMITMENT
ACTIVITY:
•DISCUSSION/ISSUANCE OF RPMS
TOOLS; SELF-ASSESSMENT
FORMS:
•IPCRF, E-SAT, IPCRF-DEVELOPMENT
PLANS
OUTPUT:
•SIGNED IPCRF-DEVELOPMENT School Head Teacher
PLANS BASED ON E-SAT
e ek of
•SIGNED IPCRF First w 2021*
a n ua ry
J
e-SAT
e-SAT
e-SAT

Filename Format
DepEd Prescribed e-SAT SY 2020-2021-SEC-NECIO, BLESILDA e-SAT
Filename Format

DepEd Prescribed e-SAT SY 2020-2021-LEVEL-SURNAME, FIRSTNAME

DepEd Prescribed e-SAT SY 2020-2021-JHS-NECIO, BLESILDA

e-SAT
 Sample Development Plans (Part A)

Source: RPMS Updated Manual 2019 (pg. 53)

 Sample Development Plans (Part B)

Source: RPMS Updated Manual 2019 (pg. 53)

 January
to March*
 Performance monitoring shall provide
key inputs and objective basis for
rating. It shall facilitate feedback and
provide evidence of performance.

PERFORMANCE COACHING AND

FEEDBACK ARE AN ONGOING
PROCESS.
MID-YEAR REVIEW
* All presented Means of Verification (MOVs) shall be
obtained from January 2021–March 2021 (for RPMS
Objectives 1, 5, 7) and from October 2020-March 2021
(for RPMS Objectives 2, 3, 4, 6, 8-12).

*Based on the adjusted RPMS Cycle timeline only for SY 2020-2021

 Sample Performance Monitoring and
Coaching Form (PMCF)

Source: RPMS Updated Manual 2019 (pg. 48)

 Mid-year Review Form (MRF)

Source: RPMS Updated Manual 2019 (pg. 49)

 Year-End Review
** All presented Means of Verification
(MOVs) shall be obtained from January
2021–May 2021 (for RPMS Objectives 1, 5,
7) and from October 2020-May 2021 (for
RPMS Objectives 2, 3, 4, 6, 8-12).

• Rater evaluates ratee’s performance

based on evidences of competencies
measured against performance
targets agreed during Phase 1.
• The rater points out the ratee’s
strengths and weaknesses, and gives
a tentative rating.
• The rater and ratee discuss
performance data and agree on the
final rating.
• This phase is based on the results
of Phase 3.
• The rater and ratee discuss
accomplishments and
corresponding rewards and
incentives.
• They also discuss competency
gaps and jointly come up with a
development plan to address
these.
 qualitative comments

observations

recommendations

Source: RPMS Updated Manual 2019 (pg. 202)

RPMS TOOLS
THERE ARE TWO (2) RPMS TOOLS OR TEACHER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
INSTRUMENTS:
1. RPMS TOOL FOR TEACHER I-III (PROFICIENT TEACHERS); AND
2. RPMS TOOL FOR MASTER TEACHER I-IV (HIGHLY PROFICIENT TEACHERS)

Take Note: Ratees and raters

must use this version of the
RPMS tool for SY 2020-2021
which states “RPMS Tool…in
the time of COVID-19”.
 Next 11 RPMS objectives for SY 2020-2021
Teacher I-III Master Teachers I-IV
(Proficient Teachers) (Highly Proficient Teachers)
1. Modelled effective applications of
1. Applied knowledge of content within
content knowledge within and across
and across curriculum teaching areas curriculum teaching areas
2. Ensured the positive use of ICT to 2. Promoted effective strategies in the
facilitate the teaching and learning positive use of ICT to facilitate the
process  teaching and learning process

3. Applied a range of teaching strategies 3. Developed and applied effective

to develop critical and creative teaching strategies to promote critical
thinking, as well as other higher-order and creative thinking, as well as other
thinking skills higher-order thinking skills

4. Established a learner-centered culture 4. Exhibited a learner-centered culture

that promotes success by using
by using teaching strategies that
effective teaching strategies that
respond to their linguistic, cultural,
respond to their linguistic, cultural,
socioeconomic and religious socioeconomic and religious
backgrounds  backgrounds
 Next 11 RPMS objectives for SY 2020-2021
Teacher I-III Master Teachers I-IV
(Proficient Teachers) (Highly Proficient Teachers)

5. Planned and delivered teaching strategies that 5. Evaluated with colleagues teaching strategies
are responsive to the special educational that are responsive to the special educational
needs of learners in difficult needs of learners in difficult
circumstances, including: geographic circumstances, including: geographic
isolation; chronic illness; displacement due to isolation; chronic illness; displacement due to
armed conflict, urban resettlement or armed conflict, urban resettlement or
disasters; child abuse and child labor practices disasters; child abuse and child labor practices

6. Usediseffective
6. Used strategies for providing timely,This objective strategies
especially for providing
selected for thistimely,
accurate
school year and constructive
as learners (and the feedback
peopleto
accurate and constructive feedback to encourage learners to reflect on and improve
improve learner performance across the globe
their in general) have been
own learning
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The way
7. Selected, developed, organized and teachers
used 7.adjust and
Advised andmodify
guidedthe teaching
colleagues and
in the
selection,isorganization, development
this year’sand use
appropriate teaching and learning learning delivery captured in
of appropriate
RPMS. teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to address resources, including ICT, to address specific
learning goals learning goals
 Next 11 RPMS objectives for SY 2020-2021
Teacher I-III Master Teachers I-IV
(Proficient Teachers) (Highly Proficient Teachers)
8. Modelled to colleagues the setting of
8. Set achievable and appropriate achievable and challenging learning
learning outcomes that are aligned outcomes that are aligned with learning
with learning competencies competencies to cultivate a culture of
excellence for all learners

9. Built relationships with parents/ 9. Guided colleagues to strengthen

relationships with parents/ guardians
guardians and the wider school
and the wider school community to
community to facilitate involvement in maximize their involvement in the educative
the educative process  process

10. Participated in professional networks 10. Contributed actively to professional

to share knowledge and to enhance networks within and between schools to
practice  improve knowledge and to enhance practice

11. Developed a personal improvement plan 11. Initiated professional reflections and
based on reflection of one’s practice and promote learning opportunities with
ongoing professional learning colleagues to improve practice
 THERE ARE TWO (2) TYPES OF MEANS OF
VERIFICATION (MOV):
1. MAIN MOV
This refers to the non-negotiable MOV needed to
demonstrate the attainment of the objective.

2. SUPPORTING MOV
This refers to the list of MOV ratees can choose from to
support the Main MOV in the attainment of the Objective.

For RPMS SY 2020-2021, only Objective

11 for both RPMS tools has Main MOV
and Supporting MOV.
KRA 1 | Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
OBJECTIVE 1
KRA 1 | Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
OBJECTIVE 2
KRA 1 | Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
OBJECTIVE 3
KRA 2 | Diversity of Learners & Assessment and Reporting
OBJECTIVE 4
KRA 2 | Diversity of Learners & Assessment and Reporting
OBJECTIVE 5
KRA 2 | Diversity of Learners & Assessment and Reporting
OBJECTIVE 6
KRA 3 | Curriculum and Planning
OBJECTIVE 7
KRA 3 | Curriculum and Planning
OBJECTIVE 8
 Community Linkages and Professional Engagement &
KRA 4 | Personal Growth and Professional Development

OBJECTIVE 9
 Community Linkages and Professional Engagement &
KRA 4 | Personal Growth and Professional Development
OBJECTIVE 10
 Community Linkages and Professional Engagement &
KRA 4 | Personal Growth and Professional Development
OBJECTIVE 11
KRA 5 | Plus Factor
OBJECTIVE 12
 SUMMARY
Required/expected number
KRA Objective Q E T of MOVs
1 2 COs
KRA 1 2 2 Supplementary materials
3 2 Supplementary materials
4 2 Supplementary materials
KRA 2 5 2 COs
6 2 evidence
7 2 COs
KRA 3
8 1 MOV
9 *4 MOVs
KRA 4 10 *4 MOVs
11 *4 MOVs
KRA 5 12 *4 MOVs
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL
AND THE ALTERNATIVE
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
3 INDICATORS
INDICATOR 1 – OBJECTIVE # 1
INDICATOR 2 – OBJECTIVE #5
INDICATOR 3 – OBJECTIVE # 7
COT-RPMS Rubrics

Take Note: Ratees and raters

The PPST-based COT is used
must use thisto assess
version all
of the
COT-RPMS
classroom observable for SY 2020-2021
indicators.
which states “COT-RPMS…in
the time of COVID-19”.
RPMS Tool STRAND 1.1 CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
AND ITS APPLICATION WITHIN AND ACROSS CURRICULUM
AREAS

Classroom Observation Tool

 RPMS Tool
Strand 3.4 Learners in difficult
circumstances

Classroom Observation Tool

 RPMS Tool Strand 4.5 Teaching and
learning resources, including ICT

Classroom Observation Tool

 CLASSROOM OBSERVABLE OBJECTIVES
❑ There are 7 classroom observable objectives for both
Proficient and Highly Proficient teachers.
❑ The performance indicators of these objectives are identifies
for Quality, except for Objective 6 which has Quality and
Timelines.
❑ Objectives 1, 5, and 7 require means of verification from a
classroom observation. Only 2 classroom observations are
required for the entire school year.
CLASSROOM OBSERVABLE OBJECTIVES
❑ Objectives 2, 3, and 4 require supplementary materials as
MOV while Objective 6 require evidence that show
feedback to learners.
❑ Only 2 MOVs that show evidence of each objective are
required for the entire school year.
NON-CLASSROOM OBSERVABLE OBJECTIVES
❑ There are 4 non-classroom observable objectives for
both Proficient and Highly Proficient teachers.
❑ The performance indicators are identifies for Quality
in Objective 8 and Quality and Efficiency in
Objective 9 to 11.
❑ Plus factor is Objective 12.
ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM
OBSERVATION
 GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE RPMS ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM
OBSERVATION
(Considered only for SY 2020 – 2021 due to the absence of or limited capacity for face-to-face
learning)

Alternative Classroom
Guidelines
Observation

1. Online ∙ This applies to teachers who will adopt online

observation synchronous learning regardless of the
number of classes and learners.

2. Observation of a ∙ Consider this mode of observation only when

video lesson option 1 is not possible.
  ∙ This applies to teachers who will adopt online
asynchronous learning in any of their classes
and learners.
 RPMS ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM
OBSERVATION
On Option #2:
Video lesson
•used in the lesson delivery as supplementary material or as learning
material for online asynchronous learning
•not the same as the video lesson for TV-based instruction
•SLM-based or MELC-aligned
•a video recording of a teacher while teaching a lesson
•can be stored in a cloud (e.g., Google Drive) or any storage device
(e.g., flash drive), or uploaded to an online classroom (e.g., Google
Classroom) or a Learning Management System
RPMS ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION

Alternative
Guidelines
Classroom Observation
3. Observation of a • Consider this mode of observation only
demonstration when options 1 and 2 are not possible.
teaching via • This applies to teachers who will adopt
Learning Action Cell pure modular learning (print/digital),
(LAC) radio-based instruction, and TV-based
instruction.
RPMS ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION
On Option #3:
Learning Action Cell (LAC)
•In DepEd’s BE-LCP in the time of COVID-19,

“a support mechanism shall be established for teachers and school

leaders to have access to relevant on-demand technical and administrative
advice and guidance which come in many forms…including professional
learning communities through the LAC”
(DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020, p. 41).
❑ There should be 2 classroom observations for the entire
school year.
❑ Ratees should submit 2 classroom observation tool
(COT) rating sheets/inter-observer agreement forms as
MOV for objectives that require such (Objectives 1, 5,
and 7).
❑ The alternative classroom observations should follow this
time frame:
- COT 1 – between January and March 2021
- COT 2 – between April and May 2021
ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PROCESSES
ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PROCESSES
ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PROCESSES
ALTERNATIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PROCESS AND PROTOCOLS
Note:
For highly proficient teachers, a proof of attendance during observation is part of
their MOV. The following protocols should be observed:
1)Online observation – (i) Invite your colleague/s to sit in your online class. (ii)
Have an attendance sheet signed after the class.
2)Observation of a video lesson – (i) Give a copy of your video lesson to your
colleague/s which they should view. (ii) Have an attendance sheet signed
afterwards. (Note: Observer/s must ensure that colleague/s view the video lesson.)
3)Observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC – (i) Invite your colleague/s
to observe your demonstration teaching during a LAC session. (ii) Have an
attendance sheet signed afterwards.
 What is the role of the supervisors in the classroom
observation process?
The supervisors (e.g., PSDS, EPS) may use the COT-
RPMS rubrics and observe teachers. Their feedback may
be used to provide technical assistance to the school head
of the observed teacher. However, their ratings will not
form part of the teacher’s RPMS rating and portfolio.

Based on DO 2, s. 2015 (Annex A, pg. 18), only

the master teacher, head teacher, and school
head can rate the teacher.
HOW TO COMPUTE YOUR
RATING?
LEVEL OF EXPECTATION
❑ PROFICIENT TEACHERS (Level 3 to 7)
LEVEL OF EXPECTATION
❑ HIGHLY PROFICIENT TEACHERS (Level 4 to 8)
RPMS 5-POINT RATING SCALE
❑ PROFICIENT & HIGHLY PROFICIENT
TEACHERS
HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)
❑ COT Rating Sheet 1 : 6 = 4
❑ COT Rating Sheet 2 : 5 = 3
7 / 2 = 3.500 = 4 VS
CONVERT TO 5-POINT
RPMS 5-POINT RATING each objective 8%x4 = 0.320
Scale
Level 3 = 1
Level 4 = 2
Level 5 = 3
Level 6 = 4
Level 7 = 5

OBJECTIVE 1, 5, & 7
HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(HIGHLY PROFICIENT)
❑ COT Rating Sheet 1 : 6 = 3
❑ COT Rating Sheet 2 : 6 = 3
6 / 2 = 3.000 = 3 S
CONVERT TO 5-POINT
RPMS 5-POINT RATING
Scale
each objective 8% x 3 = 0.240
Level 4 = 1
Level 5 = 2
Level 6 = 3
Level 7 = 4
Level 8 = 5

OBJECTIVE 1, 5, & 7
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)
❑ MOV1:ACTIVITY SHEET : 4
❑ MOV2:LOCALLY CRAFTED SLM: 3
7 / 2 = 3.500 = 4 VS
each objective 8% x 4 = 0.320

Please refer to the performance indicator of the RPMS Tool.

OBJECTIVE 2, 3, 4, & 8
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(HIGHLY PROFICIENT)
❑ MOV1:ACTIVITY SHEET : 5
❑ MOV2:LOCALLY CRAFTED SLM: 4
9 / 2 = 4.500 = 5 O
each objective 8% x 5 = 0.400

Please refer to the performance indicator of the RPMS Tool.

OBJECTIVE 2, 3, 4, & 8
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)
❑ MOV1:ACTIVITY SHEET : 3 QUALITY
❑ MOV2:PERFORMANCE TASK : 4
7 / 2 = 3.500 = 4 VS
❑ MOV1:ACTIVITY SHEET : 5
❑ MOV2:PERFORMANCE TASK : 5
TIMELINESS
10 / 2 = 5.000 = 5 O
AVERAGE = 9/2 = 4.5 X 8% = 0.360
Please refer to the performance indicator of the RPMS Tool.

OBJECTIVE 6
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)
❑ MOV no. 1 : 5 (NOTE: 2 or more MOVs no. 1
or 2)
❑ MOV no. 2: EFFICIENCY
QUALITY
Submitted any 4 of the acceptable MOVs
5
AVERAGE = 10/2 = 5 X 8% = 0.400
Please refer to the performance indicator of the RPMS Tool.

OBJECTIVE 9
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)
❑ MOV 1: 5 (NOTE: 2 or more MOVs no. 1 or 2)

❑ MOV 2: EFFICIENCY
QUALITY
Submitted any 2 of the acceptable MOVs
3
AVERAGE = 8/2 = 4 X 8% = 0.320
Please refer to the performance indicator of the RPMS Tool.

OBJECTIVE 9
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)
❑ MOV 1: 4 (NOTE: 1 MOV no. 1 or 2)
❑ MOV 2:
EFFICIENCY
QUALITY
Submitted any 1 of the acceptable MOVs
1
AVERAGE = 5/2 = 2.5 X 8% = 0.200
Please refer to the performance indicator of the RPMS Tool.

OBJECTIVE 9
HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)
Get the average of the
Quality and Efficiency
Ratings based on the
performance indicator
and multiply the
result to its weight
(8%).

OBJECTIVE 10
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)

Get the average of

the Quality and
Efficiency Ratings
based on the
performance
indicator and
multiply the result
to its weight (8%).

OBJECTIVE 11
 HOW TO COMPUTE THE RATING
(PROFICIENT)

Get the average of

the Quality and
Efficiency Ratings
based on the
performance
indicator and
multiply the result
to its weight
(12%).

OBJECTIVE 12
RATEE, RATER, AND APPROVING AUTHORITY IN THE RPMS
Q&A
Link

http://bit.ly/RPMSPPST20202021
 References
Department of Education. (2015, Feb 6). Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the Results-based
Performance Management System (RPMS) in the Department of Education [DO No. 2, s.2015].

Department of Education – Bureau of Human Resource and Organizational Development. (2019). Results-based
Performance Management System (RPMS) updated manual for teachers and school heads.