.
SCHOOL OF POST_GRADUATE STUDIES
DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY
PROGRAM OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
COURSE NAME : BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
TITLE: CLIMAX THEORIES FOR VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION
POINT OF VIEW .
SUMITTED TO SEEKEBIRHAN T. (DR)
SUMITTED BY STUDENT ID
TAMIRAT HAILE PRNS/062/12
JAN 10
OUT LINE
I. introduction
II. objective
III. Types of climax theories
1. Monoclimax theory
2. Polyclimax theory
3. Polyclmatic climax theory
4. climax pattern theory
5. site climax theory
IV. Conclusion
V. Reference
I. INTRODUCTION
Tansley (1920) “The opinions and practices of syn-ecologists in
regard to the classification of vegetation appear superficially to be
in as great a confusion today ,still holds true today.
Shimwell (1972), who reported that the classification of vegetation
suffers greatly from over statement ambiguity(unclear), and
inevitably some misinterpretation and one may ask why we need
classification.
Fosberg (1967) vegetation classification serves to facilitate the
recording of information, to provide for intelligent discussion of
vegetation, and to enable people to communicate vegetation
information easily (clear).
Odum (1971) indicated that the degree of deviation from a theoretical
climax can be measured a vegetation classification based on climax
establishes a basis for decision making and evaluating the effects of
resource management.
Clements (1936) he proposed that nature of climax depend on the
climate .
Hall (1970) reported that the separation of climax and seral
continuum gradients (intermediate stage) is essential for
management, silvicultural guides, and field application of research
results.
The climax concept is an accepted basis for many land
management agencies and worldwide vegetation classification
systems. UNESCO , vegetation classification and for the
vegetation element of the Ecological Land Classification.
USDA Soil Conservation Service range site descriptions and
Land Management soil vegetation inventory.
Objective
To determine /known/ the types of climax theories for the
vegetation classification and management
TYPES OF CLIMAX THEORIES
monoclimax,polyclimax, polyclimatic climax, Climax pattern,
site climax.
1. Monoclimax Theory developed by Clements. is often described as the
origin of dynamic ecology. He also presents climate as the major factor
to determine the climax community .
The major (3) three assumptions of the monoclimax theory are:
I. All successions of a region lead through time to the same adult
organism (the climax) regardless of earlier site differences.
II. Climatic factors determine the dominant species that can be present
in a region, and completion results in selection of one or more
species as the final dominants
III. climax is permanent because of its harmony with a
stable habitat, the equilibrium is dynamic and not static
Clements viewed the successional development of a xerosere and
hydrosere that occurred under the same macroclimate as
eventually ending in a similar mesophytic community.
Criticisms/limitation/ of the monoclimax theory
that plant communities formed in an open water body and those
developed on bare rock will eventually forma single climax
community within a macro climatically uniform region.
2. Poly-climax Theory
Tansley is credited with developing the polyclimax theory to
its full perspective.
The polyclimax theory states that there may be a number of
different climax communities within a climatic region.
proposed the poly- climax theory, in which a climax
community exists but consists of a mosaic controlled by local
soil moisture, nutrients, parent material, topography, slope
exposure, fire, and animal activity .
The polyclimax theory accepts a fire climax where naturally occurring
fires periodically arrest the development of vegetation, permitting fire
adapted species to dominate. The resulting plant community is termed
disclimax
Recognition of fire by the poly-climax theory differs little from the
mono-climax theory. Clements recognized a plant community that was
periodically arrested by fire as subclimax.
major difference between the mono-climax and poly-climax
hypotheses is terminology , disclimax and subclimax, both being
deviates).
3. THE POLY-CLIMATIC CLIMAX THEORY
developed primarily by Tuxen , modified version of the
polyclimax theory
The poly-climatic climax recognizes that more than 1(one)
climatic climax community can exist in a macroclimatic region.
Two major propositions of the polyclimatic climax theory are:
I. Any macroclimatic region may contain more than 1 climatic
climax due to the different mature soil types that may occur in
the region.
II. The different mature soils, which may result from different
parent material
Disadvantage of the poly-climatic climax theory is that it is
impossible for a plant community to be considered climax unless it
occurs on a well-developed or mature soil.
community stability must be seen as equal to stability in soil
development and geomorphological development.
4. Climax Pattern Theory
developed by Whittaker ,as a modification of the poly-climax
The climax-pattern hypothesis combines community and
environmental gradients to yield a variety of climax stands in an area
that forms part of a continuous mosaic and proceeds toward one of
an infinite number of alternative climax communities
3 major propositions on the nature and structure of climaxes and
their relativity:
1. The climax is a steady state /unchanging condition/of community
productivity, structure, and population, with the dynamic balance
of its populations determined in relation to its site.”
2. The balance among populations shifts with change in environment,
more or less diverse according to diversity of environments and
kinds of populations in the pattern
3. Affects populations may affect climax composition, determined by
all factors of the mature ecosystem properties of each species.
It is clear from these 3 propositions, that Whittaker rejected the
basic units of vegetation which were an integral part of the
monoclimax, polyclimax, and polyclimatic climax theories.
rejects vegetation classification into discrete communities,
it does allow it to be arranged along a continuum according to the
degree of similarity among the vegetation stands
Another major distinction between the climax pattern theory and
the monoclimax, polyclimax, polyclimatic climax theories is that it
does not require geomorphological equilibrium
5. SITE CLIMAX
Dyksterhuis (1949, 1958a) discussed a climax theory in relation
to range site classification. The term “site climax” will be used to
refer to this theory
He reported: "We accept products of man- caused erosion along
with intrazonal and azonal soils as potentially stable soils or sites
and consider the relatively stable plant community in equilibrium
with such soils as climax.
Dyksterhuis (1958b) pointed out that climax vegetation for a site
can be measured (quantitatively) to show the differences between
sites resulting from different soils and climate
The major difference between the site climax theory and the
monoclimax, polyclimax, polyclimatic climax theories is that it
does not require geomorphological equilibrium and soil maturity.
In this respect, it resembles the climax pattern theory
site climax and climax pattern theories are similar in basic
philosophical concepts, they differ in their approach to fulfilling
these concepts. The climax pattern theory follows the continuum
approach while the site climax theory follows the discontinuous
approach.
CONCLUSION
The five climax theories version mono-climax developed by
Clements and is nature climax depend on the climate
Poly-climax is the states that number of different climax
communities within a climatic region
Poly-climatic climax is states that more than 1(one) climatic
climax community can exist in a macroclimatic region
the climax pattern the the states that combines community and
environmental gradients to yield a variety of climax and infinite
number of alternative climax communities
site climax theory in relation to range site classification
.
Thank you for your
Attention
REFERENCE
A. DONALD 0. MEEKER, JR., AND DANIEL L. MERKEL
(1984) Climax Theories and a Recommendation for
Vegetation Classification-A Viewpoint.
