Understanding and Analyzing Texts
Vocabulary
Connecting/transitional words (cohesive devices)
Reference words
Inference and deduction
Restating, Describing, Interpreting
Managing difficult words
Keep your dictionary at hand when you're studying.
Look up unfamiliar words and work to understand what they mean.
If an approximate meaning is enough,
try to guess the meaning using word function, context (immediate
and wider) and word form
Examples
The frigid water made Elizabeth’s teeth chatter.
A. cold B. clean C. green D. warm
Typewriters became obsolete with the development of personal computers.
A. popular B. out-dated C. careful D. round
If the exact meaning is needed,
use a dictionary
If you're reading large amounts of difficult technical
material
it may be useful to use or compile a glossary.
keep this beside you as you read.
An Example of Glossary
Accuracy A term used in survey research to refer to the match between the target population
and the sample.
ANCOVA (Analysis of Co-Variance) Same method as ANOVA, but analyzes differences
between dependent variables.
ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) A method of statistical analysis broadly applicable to a number
of research designs, used to determine differences among the means of two or more groups on a
variable. The independent variables are usually nominal, and the dependent variable is usual an
interval.
Apparency Clear, understandable representation of the data
Bell curve A frequency distribution statistics. Normal distribution is shaped like a bell.
Case Study The collection and presentation of detailed information about a particular
participant or small group, frequently including the accounts of subjects themselves.
Connecting / Transition words and phrases
English transition words are essential:
-They connect ideas
-They also introduce a certain shift, contrast or
opposition, emphasis or agreement.
They are also called: cohesive devices
semantic markers
transitional markers
Agreement / Addition / Similarity
These transitional words add information, reinforce ideas, and express agreement with
preceding material.
Examples
In the first place
not only ... but also
as a matter of fact
in like manner
in addition
coupled with
in the same fashion / way
first, second, third
in the light of
not to mention
equally important
again, also, then, identically, moreover, as well as, together with
of course
likewise, similarly, furthermore etc
Opposition / Contradiction
Transition phrases show that there is evidence to the contrary or point out
alternatives,
and thus introduce a change in the line of reasoning (contrast).
Examples:
although
in contrast
different from
on the other hand, on the contrary
In spite of, even so / though
but, unlike, while, albeit, besides, instead, whereas, despite, conversely,
however, rather
nevertheless, nonetheless, regardless, notwithstanding
Cause / Condition / Purpose
These transitional phrases present specific conditions or intentions.
Example:
in the event that
granted (that)
as / so long as
on (the) condition (that)
for the purpose of
with this intention
in order to
in view of
If... then, unless
because of, since, while, lest, in case
provided that, given that, so that, so as to, due to
Examples / Support / Emphasis
These transitional devices introduce examples as support, to indicate importance or
as an illustration so that an idea is cued to the reader.
Examples
to point out
notably
including
like
namely
especially, specifically
in general
in particular, in detail
for example, for instance
to demonstrate, such as
Effect / Consequence / Result
Some of these transition words are time words that are used to
show that after a particular time there was a consequence or
an effect.
Examples:
as a result
thus
hence
consequently
therefore
henceforth
Conclusion / Summary / Restatement
These transition words and phrases conclude, summarize and / or restate ideas,
or indicate a final general statement.
Examples:
given these points
after all
in summary
in conclusion
in short
in brief
to summarize
altogether
overall
to sum up, on the whole, all in all
Reference Words
In grammatical analysis, the term reference is often
used to state a relationship of identity which exists
between grammatical units.
E.g. Pronouns (i.e. it, them, these, him, his etc.)'refer' to
nouns or noun phrase.
Anaphoric
(referring upward to previously mentioned words)
Cataphoric
(referring downward to subsequent words)
Exophoric
(referring to something outside the
Examples of reference words
The concepts and ideas which we get from a study of Mechanics are things that
keep occurring when we try to interpret physical phenomena, and therefore
some understanding of them is essential.
That, left to its own devices, a body continues in a state of rest or of uniform
motion in a straight line, assuming there are no external forces such as the
force of gravitation acting on it.
Eating with your mouth closed has several benefits. Most importantly, it keeps
people from turning away in disgust.
After he had received his orders, the soldier left the barracks.
Inference
The ability to use two or more pieces of information
from a text in order to arrive at a third piece of
information that is implicit.
Inferences are based on evidence.
To infer, we must collect evidence.
And evidence is collected by the process of analysis.
Analysis is a process of investigating something by
breaking it into parts for closer examination
Inferences may be guesses
but they are educated guesses based on supporting evidence
Inferences tend to reflect prior knowledge and experience as
well as personal beliefs and assumptions
Thus inference involves:
1. Educated guess based on evidence
2. Prior knowledge and experience
3. Personal beliefs and assumptions
Examples
Katy dropped the vase. She ran for the dustpan and brush to sweep up the pieces.
You can infer that the vase is broken
A detective enters the house, which has been ransacked. He sees blood on the
floor, and it leads out the back door.
You can infer that a crime has occurred in the house.
When you enter a house, you see backpacks by the door, small shoes scattered
near them. You see an art easel, and a room with a doll house and a toy box.
You can infer that there are children in this family.
Your friend walks past you without smiling. Her head is hanging down. She wipes
a tear away from her eye, and looks at her report card.
You can infer that your friend did not have good grades on her report card.
Deduction
Deductive reasoning is based on premises and if the premises are
true, then the reasoning will be valid.
Examples:
Elephants have cells in their bodies and all cells have DNA, so
elephants have DNA.
All cars have at least two doors and a Ford Focus is a car, so the
Ford Focus has at least two doors.
All horses have manes and the Arabian is a horse; therefore
Arabians have manes.
To deduce is to go from general information to
specifics.
To infer is to go from specific information to
generalizations.
Levels of Reading Analyzing Text
1. Restatement
2. Description
3. Interpretation
Restatement: Reading What a Text Says
Reading what a text says is concerned with basic
comprehension
It is simply following the thought of a discussion.
Focus is on understanding each sentence, sentence by
sentence, and on following the thought from sentence
to sentence and paragraph to paragraph.
There is no attempt to assess the nature of the
discussion and no concern for an overall motive or
intent.
Reading what a text says is involved with rote learning.
Restatement generally takes the form of a summary or paraphrase
Reading what a text says is common under a variety of
circumstances:
when learning the definitions and concepts of a new discipline
when there is agreement on the facts of a situation and their
interpretation
when a text is taken to offer a complete and objective presentation,
or
when the word of a specific author or source is accepted as
authoritative.
Readers simply accept what a text states.
When first studying any academic topic, your initial goal will be to understand what others
have discovered before you.
Introductory courses ask students to learn terms, concepts, and data of the particular area
of study.
You are expected to use your imagination and your critical faculties to understand the
concepts; you are not expected to question the assertions.
The goal is to learn the commonly accepted paradigm for discussing topics in that field of
study.
Finally, remember that repeating the assertions of a text need not suggest a denial of
critical thinking, merely a postponing of, or preparation for, critical thinking.
Description: Describing What a Text Does
Here we are concerned with describing the discussion:
what topics are discussed?
what examples and evidence are used?
what conclusions are reached?
Example
Read an essay about AIDS, and you think about AIDS.
But you can also think about the essay.
Does it discuss preventive strategies or medical treatments? Or
both?
Does it describe AIDS symptoms or offer statistics?
Is the disease presented as a contagious disease, a Biblical
scourge, or an individual experience?
What evidence is relied on?
Does it quote medical authorities or offer anecdotes from
everyday people?
Does it appeal to reason or emotions? These are not
questions about what a text says, but about what the text
does.
They are not about AIDS, but about the discussion of AIDS.
This second level of reading is concerned not only
with understanding individual remarks, but also with
recognizing the structure of a discussion.
Here, you examine what a text does to convey ideas.
Understand how a particular conclusion is justified.
Look at the broad portions of the text to identify the
structure of the discussion as a whole
On completion, you can not only repeat what the text
says
But can also describe what the text does.
Identify how evidence is used and how the final points
are reached.
Interpretation: Analyzing What a Text Means
This final level of reading infers an overall meaning.
You examine features running throughout the text to see how the
discussion shapes your perception of reality.
You examine what a text does to convey meaning:
How patterns of content and language shape the portrayal of the
topic
And how relationships between those patterns convey underlying
meaning.
Readers infer as much, if not more, than they are told.
Readers go beyond the literal meaning of the words to
find significance and unstated meanings
Is it... good or bad...? Quality (how good/how bad)
... correct or incorrect...? Correctness (is it right)
... effective or ineffective...? Effectiveness (producing
successful/intended results)
... relevant or irrelevant...? Relevance (connected with the
subject/situation)
... clear or unclear...? Clarity (expressed clearly)
... logical or illogical...? Logic (sensible reasons)
... applicable or not applicable...? Applicability (is it true in a
particular case)
... proven or not proven...? Proof (is there any
information/documents to support it)
Reviewing Text
The following questions may be usefully asked
about any text you are reading for effective
revision or critiquing.
A: Purpose and background
B: The author and the text
C: Evidence used
D: Assumptions made
A: Purpose and background
Why are you reading this text? What is your purpose?
What type of text is it: research report, essay,
textbook, book review?
What do you know about the subject of the text?
What else has been written on the subject of the text?
What controversies exist in this area? How does this
text fit in?
B: The author and the text
Who is the author? What do you know about the author?
What authority does the author have?
Who is the intended audience?
What is the author's purpose? Why has the text been
written?
What is the source of the text? Is it reputable? Who is the
publisher? What reputation do they have?
What is the date of publication? Is it appropriate to the
argument?
What is the writer's attitude towards the topic?
What conclusions are drawn?
C: Evidence used
Is there a clear distinction between fact and opinion?
Is evidence used to support arguments? How good is the
evidence? Are all the points supported?
In an experimental study, was the sample size adequate and
are the statistics reliable?
Are there any unsupported points? Are they well-known facts
or generally accepted opinions?
How does the writer use other texts and other people's ideas?
Are the writer's conclusions reasonable in the light of the
evidence presented?
How do the conclusions relate to other similar research?
D: Assumptions made
What assumptions has the writer made? Are they valid?
What beliefs or values does the writer hold? Are they
explicit?
Look at the language that is used, e.g. active/passive
verbs, pronouns, articles, etc.
Look for emphatic words such as, it is obvious, definitely
Look for hedges (to avoid verbal commitment): possible,
might, perhaps
Look for maximisers: completely, absolutely, entirely, or
minimisers: only, just, hardly, simply, merely
Reading Habits
The average adult reader employs reading skills
learned as a child but not adjusted to the world of
adult reading;
Most adult readers have 3 Really Bad Reading Habits:
Polysyllabic Word Fixation
Subvocalization
Habitual Regression
BAD HABIT NUMBER I
Polysyllabic Fixation
----many words in our language are polysyllabic, and the
term itself is self-explanatory--fixated on the syllables.
Most adult readers recognized 1,000's of words immediately,
and many of these words are polysyllabic like hospital,
hippopotamus etc
Research has shown that poor readers feel a need to actually
"read" each polysyllabic word each time they see it.
That means they "decode" the already known word and
really do not have to as they know it and can recognize it
immediately
you need not really decode/decipher them when
reading, but
very quickly pass over them, taking in all the rest of
the stuff with your brain-eye coordination and
memory
BAD HABIT NUMBER II
SUBVOCALIZATION
Talking while you read, either in your mouth, your throat, and or in your
head--or all three at some point.
Subvocalizing is not always bad given what and why you are reading.
This may originate in the way people learn to read by associating the sight
of words with their spoken sounds.
but in most cases, since you already know many of the words and
structures you are reading, sub vocalizing is a bad habit.
It offers you some security that you think you may need, but for the
average student who needs to read a lot of stuff, it can be deadly.
There is a time and place for sub vocalizing, but it does
indeed limit your reading speed to 350 words per
minute or lower, because that is about as fast as you
can talk!
Reading aloud, and subvocalization do have their
place in the reading process, but it should be limited
and not the norm for one who needs to digest large
qualities of material.
At the slower reading rates (100-300 words per minute), subvocalizing
may improve comprehension
Subvocalizing or actual vocalizing can indeed be of great help when one
wants to learn a passage verbatim
Tests suggest that full and permanent elimination of subvocalizing is
impossible
Advocates of speed reading generally claim that subvocalization places
extra burden on the cognitive resources, thus, slowing the reading down
BAD HABIT III: Habitual Regression
A reader is moving along from left to right, and then
stops because an unknown word or phrase appears
The reader stops, ponders the word, thinks about it
for a while and then has to go back to someplace to
reread what was read before the impasse
This is short-circuiting the memory skills you have,
leaving little to chance or context(two things good
readers MUST do)
You are going slower than you need to, also causing
other cognitive abilities to slow down
Don't put the book down and look-up the word in a
dictionary—it kills efficient reading
That should take place in most instances in the Pre-
Reading PREVIEW time, or after a really efficient first
read
Materials
Reading skills (slides)
Understanding text (slides)
Evaluation Example
Reading at University (handout)
www.criticalreading.com (website)
WISH YOU
WISH YOU ALLALL THE
THE BEST
BEST