[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
141 views10 pages

Wilkins Case Solution

Wilkins produces water control products and faces seasonal demand that causes production capacity constraints during peak seasons. The company aims to reduce inventory levels by 30% using either a level or chase production strategy. The level strategy maintains consistent production levels throughout the year by using inventory, overtime, or subcontracting to meet fluctuating demand. The chase strategy adjusts production levels and workforce to directly match demand changes. Analyzing the costs of each strategy, the chase approach reduces average inventory levels by 87% compared to 34% for level, making chase the recommended aggregate production planning method.

Uploaded by

Sri Hari Krishna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
141 views10 pages

Wilkins Case Solution

Wilkins produces water control products and faces seasonal demand that causes production capacity constraints during peak seasons. The company aims to reduce inventory levels by 30% using either a level or chase production strategy. The level strategy maintains consistent production levels throughout the year by using inventory, overtime, or subcontracting to meet fluctuating demand. The chase strategy adjusts production levels and workforce to directly match demand changes. Analyzing the costs of each strategy, the chase approach reduces average inventory levels by 87% compared to 34% for level, making chase the recommended aggregate production planning method.

Uploaded by

Sri Hari Krishna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

WILKINS, A ZURN COMPANY: AGGREGATE PRODUCTION PLANNING

GROUP-6

Anirban (188031)
Ankit(188034)
Ankur (188039)
Nishant (177128)
Pratyush(188183)
Rahul (188189)
Rohit (188149)
Shantnu (177128)
Tarun (177219)
Nature of Wilkins business

 Wilkins is in high quality water control products


 PVB is a seasonal business with max demand in Q3. Fire Valves is a business
with high demand uncertainty
 PVB made to stock (54% FG) and Fire Valves are made to order (85% RM)
 FG Inventory was spread across 52 locations in USA. Thus, it had
decentralized distribution
 Demand for the company’s product is growing
 Currently production capacity constrains in peak season and excess
capacity in other season due to seasonal demand
 Low labor cost
Major Challenges

 Seasonal demand of PVB causing production capacity constraints


in peak season and excess capacity otherwise
 Irregular demand of Fire Valves
 Excess inventory at plant
 No inter supplier transfer
Target to reduce the inventory by 30%

Assumptions for the year 2005


• δq1 = 1877, δq2 = 3361, δq3 = 3851, δq4 = 8154. (where q1 –quarter 1, q2-quarter
2, q3 – quarter 3, q4 – quarter 4)

• Customer Service Level of 99% and Lead Time of 2 weeks

• 6 Employees of PVB cell manage both Dept 101 which supplies Machine
Castings to the PVB cell and Dept 104 which produce PVB cell

CSL 99% z value 2.326347874


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Std Dev. 1877 3368 3851 8154
Safety Stock 1712.703765 3073.194609 3513.916995 7440.269846
GIVEN DATA
Holding Cost 20%
Std. Cost($) 25.65
Holding Cost($/unit/quarter) 1.2825
Inventory Value($) 1523789
InventoryValue(units) 59407

Production Rate(unit/day/employee) 100


Labour Usage 82.40%
Production Rate(units/quarter) 5356
Hiring Cost per employee ($) 580
Level Strategy
0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Forcast(Units/week) 4,120 7,480 9,341 5,983

Forecast(Units/Quarter) 53,560 97,240 1,21,433 77,779

Safety Stock 1,713 3,073 3,514 7,440

Regular Production (/ Quarter) 74,511 74,511 74,511 74,511

Ending Inventory(units) 59,407 80,358 57,630 10,708 7,440

Number of Employee 6 14 14 14 14
New Employee 8 - - -
Cost of Hiring 4,588.81 - - -

Cost of Regular Production 19,11,215.43 19,11,215.43 19,11,215.43 19,11,215.43


Holding Cost 1,03,059.52 73,909.99 13,732.94 9,542.15

Total Cost 20,14,274.95 19,85,125.42 19,24,948.37 19,20,757.58

Total Annual Cost 78,45,106.32


Chase Strategy
0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Forcast(Units/week) 4,120 7,480 9,341 5,983

Forecast(Units/Quarter) 53,560 97,240 1,21,433 77,779

Safety Stock 1,877 3,368 3,851 8,154

Regular Production (/ Quarter) - 1,04,293 1,12,384 82,082

Ending Inventory(units) 59,407 5,847 12,900 3,851 8,154

Number of Employee 6 - 19 21 15

New Employee -6 19 2 -6

Cost of Hiring - 11,293.87 876.17 -

Cost of Regular Production - 26,75,116.00 28,82,649.60 21,05,403.30

Holding Cost 7,498.75 16,544.25 4,938.91 10,457.51

Total Cost 7,498.75 26,91,660.25 28,87,588.51 21,15,860.81

Total Annual Cost 77,02,608.31


Level Strategy

Results
Average Inventory 39,034
Average Inventory Reduction 34.29%
Chase Strategy

Average Inventory 7688


Average Inventory Reduction 87%
“Chase” and “Level” strategy

 In level strategy changes in demand are met by inventory, overtime subcontracting,


etc.
 In chase demand workforce level or production rate is changed in order to meet
demand.
 The planning on choosing the strategy depend on which cost is higher cost of hiring
and firing is high or cost of subcontracting.
 In level strategy we can manage with 2 shifts as the upper limit of 7 employees to be
employed at the PVB cell in a single shift
 In chase strategy we will have to plan for both hiring and firing also going with the 3
shifts.
Thank you!

You might also like