1.
ASSURANCE SERVICES
   DEFINITION
     An Assurance service is an independent professional service that
    improves the quality of information for decision makers.
     Such services are valued because the assurance provider is
    independent and perceived as being unbiased with respect to the
    information examined.
     Individuals who are responsible for making business decisions seek
    assurance services to help improve the reliability and relevance of the
    information used as the basis for their decisions.
 ASSURANCE SERVICES PROVIDED BY CPAs
     Attestation Services
           Audit of Historical Financial Statements
           Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
           Review of Historical Financial Statements
           Attestation Services on Information Technology
           Other Attestation Services That May Be Applied to a Broad Range of Subject
            Matter (assurance about the companys compliance with the financial provi-
            sion of the loan; attest to the information in a clients forecasted financial
             statements, which are often used to obtain financing.
     Other Assurance Services
                                                                                             1
                1. ASSURANCE SERVICES
          Controls over and risks related to investments, including policies related to
           derivatives
          Mystery shopping
          Assess risk of accumulation, distribution, and storage of digital information
          Fraud and illegal acts risk assessment
          Organic ingredients
          Compliance with entertainment royalty agreements
          ISO 9000 certifications
          Corporate responsibility and sustainability
     Certain Management Consulting
   NONASSURANCE SERVICES
       Certain Management Consulting
       Other Management Consulting
       Accounting and bookkeeping services
       Tax services
                                                                                           2
                      1. NATURE OF AUDITING
   DEFINITION
      Auditing is the accumulation and evaluation of evidence about information
       to determine and report on the degree of correspondence between the
       information and established criteria. Auditing should be done by a
       competent , independent person
   Information and Established Criteria
      There must be information in a verifiable form: (i) companies financial
       statements, individuals income tax returns (quantifiable information), (ii)
       effectiveness of computer systems and efficiency of manufacturing
       operations (subjective information)
      There must be some standards (criteria), that is vary depending on the
       information being audited: (i) GAAP, IFRS (in the audit of historical financial
       statements); (ii) Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
       Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission-
       COSO (in the audit of internal control over financial reporting); (iii) Internal
       Revenue Code (in the audit of of tax returns by Internal Revenue Services).
   Accumulating and Evaluating Evidence
      Evidence is any information used by the auditor to determine whether the
       information being audited is stated in accordance with established criteria.
                                                                                          3
                     1. NATURE OF AUDITING
        Electronic and documentary data about transactions
        Written and electronic communication
        Observations by auditor
        Oral testimony of the auditee (client)
   To satisfy the purpose of the audit, auditors must obtain a sufficient quality and
    volume of evidence.
      The critical part of every audit and the primary subject of this lecture is: Auditors must
       determine the types and amount of evidence necessary and evaluate whether the
       information corresponds to the established criteria.
   Competent, Independent Person
   Auditors must be qualified to understand the criteria used and must be competent to
    know the types and amount of evidence to accumulate in order to reach the proper
    conclusion after examining the evidence.
   Auditors must also have an independent mental attitude (The competence of those
    performing the audit is of little value if they are biased in the accumulation and
    evaluation of evidence)
   Auditors strive to maintain a high level of independence to keep the confidence of
    users relying on their reports.
                                                                                                     4
                1. NATURE OF AUDITING
   Reporting
   The final stage in the auditing process is preparing the audit report,
    which communicates the auditors finding to users.
   Report differ in nature, but all must inform readers of the degree of
    correspondence between information audited and established criteria.
   Reports also differ in form and can vary from the highly technical type
    usually associated with financial statement audits to a simple oral
    report in the case of an operational audit of a small departments
    effectiveness.
DISTINCTION BETWEEN ACCOUNTING AND AUDTING
   Accounting is the recording, classifying, and summarizing, of
    economic events in a logical manner for the purpose of providing
    financial information for decision making. To provide relevant
    information, accountants must have a thorough understanding of the
    principles and rules that provide the basis for preparing the accounting
    information.
   Auditing focus on determining whether recorded information properly
    reflects the economic events that occurred during the accounting period
                                                                               5
      1. ECONOMIC DEMAND FOR AUDITING
  The complexity of the society lead to make decision makers are
    more likely to receive unreliable information. There several
  reason for this: remoteness of information, biases and motives
  of the provider, voluminous data, and the existence of complex
                       exchange transactions.
 REDUCING INFORMATION RISK
   User Verifies Information By Themselves
   User Shares Information Risk with Management
   Uses an Independent Audit
                                                                   6
     1. SUMMARY OF THE AUDIT PROCESS
          PHASE- I: Plan and Design an Audit Approach:
1.   Accept client and perform initial planning
2.   Understand the clients business and industry
3.   Assess client business risks
4.   Perform preliminary analytical procedures
5.   Set materiality and assess acceptable audit risk and inherent risk
6.   Understand internal control and assess control risk
7.   Gather information to assess fraud risks
8.   Develop overall audit strategy and audit program
                                                                          7
      1. SUMMARY OF THE AUDIT PROCESS
PHASE-II: Perform Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions
1.  Plan to reduce assessed level of control risks?
    Yes: 2. Perform tests of controls*
    No : 3. Perform substantive tests of transactions
4.  Assess likelihood of misstatements in financial statements
(*)    The extent of testing of controls is determined by planned reliance on controls. For
       public companies, required to have an audit of internal control, testing must be
       sufficient to issue an opinion on internal control over financial reporting.
PHASE-III: Perform Analytical Procedures and Tests of Details of Balances
        LOW                MEDIUM           HIGH OR UNKNOWN
      1.   Perform analytical procedures
      2.   Perform tests of key items
      3.   Perform additional tests of details of balances
                                                                                              8
     1. SUMMARY OF THE AUDIT PROCESS
     PHASE-IV: Complete the Audit and Issue an Audit Report
1.    Perform additional tests for presentation and disclosure
2.    Accumulate final evidence
3.    Evaluate results
4.    Issue audit report
5.    Communicate with audit committee and management
                                                                 9
             1. TYPES OF AUDIT and AUDITORS
   Operational audit
      E xample    : Evaluate whether the computerized payroll processing for a
                     subsidiary is operating efficiently and effectively.
      Information : Number of payroll records processed in a month, costs of the de-
                     partment, and number of errors made.
     - Established : Company standards for efficiency and effectiveness in pay-
       Criteria       roll department
     - Available    : Error reports, payroll records, and payroll processing costs
        Evidence
   Compliance audit
      Example     : Determine whether bank requirements for loan continuation have
                     been met.
     - Information : Company records
     - Established : Loan agreement provision
       Criteria
     - Available : Financial statements and calculations by the auditor.
       Evidence
                                                                                        10
           1. TYPES OF AUDIT and AUDITORS
 Financial Statement Audit
    Example : Annual audit of a firm financial statements
    Information: The firms financial statements
    Established: Generally accepted accounting principles
     Criteria
   - Available : Documents, records, and outside sources of evidence
     Evidence
                         TYPES OF AUDITORS
   -   Certified Public Accounting Firms
      Government Accountability Office Auditors
      Internal Revenue Agents
      Internal Auditors
                                                                       11
    2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
ACTIVITIES OF CPA FIRMS:
 Audit Services
 Other Attestation and Assurance Services
 Additional Services: (accounting and bookkeeping services, tax
   services, management consulting services).
 New product and services development: (Financial planning,
  business valuation, forensic accounting, information technology
  advisory services)
STRUCTURE OF CPA FIRMS
   CPA firms vary in the nature and range of services offered, which affects the
    organization and structure of the firms.
   Three main factors influence the organizational structure of all firms:
      The needs for independence form clients (permit auditors to remain
        unbiased in drawing conclusions about financial statements)
      The importance of a structure to encourage competence (permits auditors
        to conduct audits and perform other services efficiently and effectively)
      The increased litigation risk faced by auditors (increasing in litigation-related
        costs; some organizational structures afford a degree of protections to
        individual firm members)
                                                                                           12
    2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
Organizational Structures
    Six organizational structures are available to CPA firms. Except for
     the proprietorship, each structure results in an entity separate from
     the CPA personally, which helps promote auditor independence. The
     last four organizational structures provide some protection from
     litigation loss.
    Organizational forms:
           1.   Proprietorship
           2.   General Partnership
           3.   General Corporation
           4.   Professional Corporation
           5.   Limited Liability Company
           6.   Limited Liability Partnership
       The organizational hierarchy-the hierarchical nature of CPA firms
        helps promote competence.
          Staff Assistant; 0  2 years Senior or in-charge auditors; 2  5 years
          Manager;        5  10 years Partner;                   10+ years
                                                                                    13
  2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT AND PCAOB
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (triggered by the bankruptcies and alleged audit
  failures involving such companies as Enron and WorldCom) is
  considered by many to be the most important legislation affecting
  auditing profession since 1933 and 1934 Security Acts. The provisions
  of the Acts dramatically changed the relationship between publicly held
  companies and their audit firms.
 The Sarbanes-Oxley Acts established the Public Company Accounting
  Oversight Board (PCAOB), appointed and overseen by the SEC. The
  PCAOB provides oversight for auditors of public companies,
  establishes auditing and quality control standards for public company
  audits, and performs inspections of the quality controls at audit firms
  performing those audits.
 The PCAOB conducts inspections of registered accounting firms to
  assess their compliance with the rules of the PCAOB and SEC,
  professional standards, and each firms own quality control policies.
                                                                            14
  2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Assist in providing investors with reliable information upon which to
  make investment decisions.
 The SEC Act of 1933 - requires most companies planning to issue new
  securities to the public to submit a registration statement to the SEC for
  approval.
 The SEC Act 1934  provides additional protection by requiring public
  companies and others to file detailed annual reports with the
  commission. The commission examines these statements for
  completeness and adequacy before permitting the company to sell its
  securities through the securities exchanges.
 The SEC Acts 1933 and 1934 require financial statements,
  accompanied by the opinion of an independent public accountant, as
  part of a registration statement and subsequent reports.
 The SEC has considerable influence in setting GAAP and disclosure
  requirements for financial statements as a result of its authority for
  specifying reporting requirements considered necessary for fair
  disclosure to investors, such as the recent requirement to begin filing
  financial statement data in XBRI format
                                                                               15
    2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
   The SEC has the power to establish rules for any CPA associated with
    audited financial statements submitted to the commission. The SEC
    requirements of greatest interest to CPA are set forth in the
    commissions Regulation S-X, Accounting Series Releases, and
    Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. Its constitute
    important regulation, as well as decisions and opinions on accounting
    and auditing issues affecting any CPA dealing with publicly held
    companies.
   Of special interest to auditors are several specific reports that are
    subject to the reporting provisions of the securities acts:
      Form S-1  - must be completed and registered with the SEC when a
                   company plan to issue new securities to the public.
      Form 8-K - filed to report significant events that are of interest to public
                   investors (acquisition, sale of subsidiary, change in officers)
      Form 10-K - filed annually within 60  90 days after the close of each fiscal
                    year, depending on the size of the company.
      Form 10-Q - filed quarterly for all publicly held companies. It contains
                   certain financial information and requires auditor reviews of
                   the financial statements before filling with the commission.
                                                                                       16
    2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
   CPAs licensed by the state in which they practice, but a significant
    influence on CPAs is exerted by their national professional
    organization, the AICPA. Membership of the AICPA is restricted to
    CPAs, but not all members are practicing as independent auditors.
   The AICPA sets standards and rules that all members and other
    practicing CPAs must follow. Four major areas in which the AICPA
    has authority to set standards and make rules
    1.   Auditing standards
    2.   Compilation and review standards
    3.   Other attestation standards
    4.   Codes of Professional Conduct.
    Writing and grading the CPA examination
    Performs many educational and other functions (research)
    Publish a variety of materials (journals, industry audit guides for
     several industries, periodic updates of the Codification of Statements
     on Auditing Standards, and the Code of Professional Conduct)
                                                                              17
  2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
THE ROLE OF ISA (International Standards on Auditing)
 Auditing standards are general guidelines to aid auditors in fulfilling
  their professional responsibilities in the audit of historical financial
  statements. (They include: consideration of professional qualities, such
  as competence and independence, reporting requirements, and
  evidence).
 There are three main sets of auditing standards (in the U.S)
     International Standards on Auditing issued by the International Auditing
      and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) of the International Federation of
      Accountants (IFAC). ISAs applicable to entities outside the US.
     AICPA Auditing Standards (US Generally Accepted Auditing Standards-
      GAAS). AICPA Auditing Standards established by the ASB of the AICPA.
      The US GAAS are referred to Statements on Auditing Standards (SASs)
      are applicable to private entities in the US.
     PCAOB Auditing Standards issued by PCAOB and are applicable to U.S
      Public Companies and other SEC registrants.
                                                                                 18
    2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS
 Historically, auditing standards (issued by ASB of the AICPA) have
  been organized along 10 generally accepted auditing standards
  (GAAS) that fall into three categories:
      General standards
      Standards of field work
      Reporting standards
   As part of its Clarity Project, the ASB also issued a new Preface to the
    Codification of Auditing Standards which contains the Principles
    Underlying an Audit in Accordance with GAAS. The principles provide
    a framework to help auditors fulfill the two objectives when conducting
    an audit of financial statements:
      Obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a
       whole are free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or
       error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the
       financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in
       accordance with an applicable reporting framework; and
                                                                                  19
   2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
          Report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by GAAS, in
           accordance with the auditors findings
Principles in AICPA Auditing Standards
(1) Purpose of an Audit         -Provide an opinion about the financial statements.
(2) Responsibilities            -Possess appropriate competence and capabilities
                                -Comply with ethical requirements
                                -Maintain professional skepticism and exercise
                                 professional judgment
(3) Performance                 -Obtain reasonable assurance about whether financial state-
                                 ments are free of material misstatement.
                                -Plan work and supervise assistants.
                                -Determine and apply materiality level or levels.
                                -Identify and assess risks of material misstatement
                                based on understanding of entity and its environment,
                                including internal control.
                                - Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
(4) Reporting                   - Express opinion on financial statements in a written
                                  report
                                -Whether financial statements were presented fairly in
                                 accordance with financial reporting framework
                                                                                              20
    2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
Linkage of AICPA Principles Underlying an Audit to PCAOB Generally
                     Accepted Auditing Standards
    Principles in AICPA                          PCAOB
    Auditing Standards                  Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
   Purpose of an Audit                                    -
   Responsibilities                    General Standards
   Performance                         Standards of Field Work
   Reporting                           Standards of Reporting
QUALITY CONTROL
 The methods used to ensure that the firm meets its professional responsibilities
  to clients and others.
 Quality control is closely related to but distinct from auditing standards. To
  ensure that the principles in auditing standards are followed on every audit, a
  CPA firm follows specific quality control procedures that help it meet those
  standards consistently on every engagement.
 Quality control are established for the entire CPA firm, where as auditing
  standards are applicable to individual engagements.
                                                                                     21
  2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
Elements of Quality Control
    Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm (tone at the top).
    Relevant ethical requirements
    Acceptance and continuation of clients and engagements
    Human resources
    Engagement performance
    Monitoring
Audit Practice and Quality Centers
    Established by the AICPA as resource centers to improve audit
     practice quality. The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) is an
     autonomous public policy organization affiliated with the AICPA
     serving investors, public company auditors, and the capital markets.
    The Centers mission is to foster confidence in the audit process and
     to make public company audits even more reliable and relevant for
     investors (SEE FIGURE 2-3: Relationships Among Auditing
     Standards, Quality Control, AICPA Practice Centers, and Peer
     Review).
                                                                                  22
    2. THE AUDIT STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
         Ways the Profession and Society Encourage CPAs
              to Conduct Themselves at a High Level
                           (Figure 2-4)
   Auditing Standards
   CPA Examination
   Quality Control
   Peer Review
   PCAOB and SEC
   Codes of Professional Conduct
   AICPA Practice and Quality Centers
   Legal Liability
   Continuing Education Requirements
                                                          23
                        3. AUDIT REPORTS
   Reports are essentials to audit and assurance engagements because
    they communicate the auditors findings. Financial statements users
    rely on auditors report to provide assurance on the companys financial
    statements. The auditor will likely be held responsible if an incorrect
    audit report is issued.
   The AICPA Auditing Standard Board (ASB) sets standards for non-
    public entities, and the PCAOB sets auditing standards for public
    companies. Since the PCAOB adopted the existing AICPA standards
    as interim standards, auditing standards, including those related to
    audit reporting, were similar for public companies and non-public
    entities.
   However, as part of the AICPA Clarity Project, the ASB modified audit
    reporting for non-public entities to be similar to reporting under
    international auditing standards. As a result, the format of audit reports
    for public and non public entities currently differ, although the overall
    substance of the content in the report is similar under both AICPA and
    PCAOB auditing standards.
                                                                                 24
                      3. AUDIT REPORTS
Standard Unqualified Audit Report for Non-public Entities
 The AICPA auditing standards provide uniform wording for the
   auditors report of non-public entities. Different auditors may alter the
   wording or presentation slightly, but the meaning must be the same.
 The auditors standard unqualified audit report contains 8 distinct parts:
        Report title
        Audit report address
        Introductory paragraph
        Managements responsibility (including: Scope paragraph)
        Auditors responsibility
        Opinion paragraph
        Name and address of CPA firm
        Audit report date
   The standard unqualified audit report is issued when 4 conditions have
    been met;
                                                                               25
                       3. AUDIT REPORTS
      All statements (BS, IS, SCSE, SCF) are included in the financial statements
      Sufficient appropriate evidence has been accumulated, the auditor has
       conducted the engagement in a manner that enables him or her to conclude
       that the audit was performed in accordance with auditing standards.
      The financial statements are presented in accordance with the U.S GAAP
       or other appropriate accounting framework (This also means that adequate
       disclosures have been included in the footnotes and other parts of the
       financial statements).
      There are non circumstances requiring the addition of an explanatory
       paragraph or modification of the wording of the report.
   The standard unqualified audit report is sometimes called a clean
    opinion because there are no circumstances requiring qualification or
    modification of the auditors opinion. The standard unqualified report is
    the most common audit opinion.
   Sometimes circumstances beyond the clients or auditors control
    prevent the issuance of a clean opinion. However, in most cases,
    companies make the appropriate changes to their accounting records
    to avoid a qualification or modification by the auditor.
                                                                                     26
                       3. AUDIT REPORTS
   If any of the requirements for the standard unqualified audit report are not met,
    the standard unqualified report cannot be issued.
   Four categories of audit reports that can be issued by the auditor:
1. Standard Unqualified        -The four conditions stated have been met.
2. Unqualified with Empha-     - A complete audit took place with satisfactory
   sis-of-matter Explanatory     results and financial statements that are fairly
   Paragraph of Modified         presented, but the auditor believes that it is
   Wording                       important or is required to provide additional
                                 information.
3. Qualified                   - The auditor concludes that the overall financial
                                  statements are fairly presented, but the scope
                                  of the audit has been materially restricted or
                                  applicable accounting standards were not
                                  followed in preparing the financial statements.
4. Adverse or Disclaimer       - The auditor concludes that the financial
                                  statements are not fairly presented (adverse),
                                  he or she is unable to form an opinion as to
                                  whether the financial statements are fairly
                                  presented (disclaimer), or he or she is not independent
                                  (disclaimer)
                                                                                            27