This document summarizes guidelines for the seismic design of tall buildings that were developed as an alternative to prescriptive code procedures. It recommends using nonlinear analysis and performance-based design adapted from ASCE 41. Key aspects of the guidelines include developing analytical models of maximum considered earthquake shaking, evaluating service and MCE level performance, and requiring a rigorous peer review process. The goal is to ensure tall buildings are safe and useable after future earthquakes.
This document summarizes guidelines for the seismic design of tall buildings that were developed as an alternative to prescriptive code procedures. It recommends using nonlinear analysis and performance-based design adapted from ASCE 41. Key aspects of the guidelines include developing analytical models of maximum considered earthquake shaking, evaluating service and MCE level performance, and requiring a rigorous peer review process. The goal is to ensure tall buildings are safe and useable after future earthquakes.
This document summarizes guidelines for the seismic design of tall buildings that were developed as an alternative to prescriptive code procedures. It recommends using nonlinear analysis and performance-based design adapted from ASCE 41. Key aspects of the guidelines include developing analytical models of maximum considered earthquake shaking, evaluating service and MCE level performance, and requiring a rigorous peer review process. The goal is to ensure tall buildings are safe and useable after future earthquakes.
This document summarizes guidelines for the seismic design of tall buildings that were developed as an alternative to prescriptive code procedures. It recommends using nonlinear analysis and performance-based design adapted from ASCE 41. Key aspects of the guidelines include developing analytical models of maximum considered earthquake shaking, evaluating service and MCE level performance, and requiring a rigorous peer review process. The goal is to ensure tall buildings are safe and useable after future earthquakes.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 20
Seismic Design
Guidelines for Tall Buildings Ronald O. Hamburger Senior Principal Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc.
Quake Summit 2010
October 8, 2010
Purpose
Recommended alternative to the
prescriptive procedures for seismic design of buildings contained in ASCE 7 and the International Building Code (IBC). Intended for use by structural engineers and building officials engaged in the seismic design and review of individual tall buildings.
The new breed of tall buildings
Designed without dual moment-resisting frames
Justified using nonlinear analyses and performance-based procedures adapted from ASCE 41
The Source
The Approach
Design per the building code with
a few exceptions
Develop nonlinear analytical model
Exceed height limits for structural systems
Use different R values Neglect redundancy requirements
MCE (2%-50 year) shaking
Conservative values on acceptable parameters
Rigorous Peer Review
Purpose
Suggest improved design criteria that will
ensure safe and useable tall buildings following future earthquakes based on:
Recent design experience
State-of-art research
Development Team Research
Jack P. Moehle Yousef Bozorgnia Jonathan Stewart Helmut Krawinkler
Practice
Ronald Hamburger James Malley C.B. Crouse Farzad Naeim Ron Klemencic
General Performance Objectives Design Process Design Criteria Seismic input Conceptual design Design Criteria Document Service Level Evaluation MCE Level Evaluation Presentation of Results Peer Review
Scope
Design of tall buildings:
Fundamental periods >> 1
second Significant mass participation and response in higher modes Slender aspect ratio
Large portion of drift due to flexural
behavior as opposed to shear behavior
Performance Intent
Similar to that historically contained in SEAOC
Blue Book & ASCE-7 for Ordinary Occupancies
Small risk of collapse (perhaps 10%) in MCE shaking
Limited risk (50%) of loss of cladding in MCE shaking Negligible risk to life for design shaking Negligible risk of occupancy loss for Service level shaking
Other Objectives
Possible Need to modify these criteria on project-specific basis
Design Criteria
Formal written criteria required
Building description Codes and standards Performance Objectives Gravity Loading Seismic Hazards Wind Loading Load Combinations Materials Analysis Procedures Acceptance Criteria
