010 Change Control1
010 Change Control1
010 Change Control1
Control
Overview
Changes Good or bad? Forced or voluntary?
The Importance of Change Control
Major Changes to both legacy company documents
Scope and Responsibilities according to our new Directive
General Requirements
The Process with the detailed Requirements
Even the smallest changes can cause very high risk if not
properly controlled
Scope
Responsibilities (1)
Site Management is responsible for ensuring that
any modification to their operations is
documented, evaluated and approved from a
technical, scientific, quality and regulatory point of
view
Site Quality Management along with other appropriate
functions are responsible for coordinating change
control activities in their respective areas to ensure
that there is an assessment of all proposed changes
and that approved changes are communicated to all
affected parties.
Responsibilities (2)
The site Quality Head is responsible for
ensuring that there are systems and
procedures to comply with applicable
Directives
The site Quality Head is responsible for
approving or rejecting a proposed change
at site level following an assessment by
the site Change Control Committee.
Responsibilities (3)
It is the responsibility of site Quality Management (QM) to ensure
that the regulatory evaluation assesses any potential impact the
change may have on the registration file
If the change has a potential regulatory impact, it is the
responsibility of the Regulatory Site Officer (RSO) to involve the
appropriate functions for further activities
If the change has a no regulatory impact, the implementation
/closing is handled by the site QM/RSO
For non-local products (i.e. products under the responsibility of
Corporate), the RSO is responsible to initiate the assessment of the
proposed change via the Corporate Change Control Committee
A Strong Reminder
Change made and intended to improve can result in a
worse situation or even in a disaster. Therefore, all
consequences must be considered
With a good change you can create other related
problems and also high amount of costs
Even minor changes or those that are considered to be
minor, can have a big impact to product quality and
regulatory compliance
And finally, all changes need to be closed-out.
be
reported to the Committee through an
addendum of the initial CCRF for new
assessment
Compilation of Documentation
Supporting
Changes with Regulatory Impact
On receipt of filled-in and signed-off CCRF from either Corporate
Change Control Committees or local Change Control Committees ,
the Affiliate Regulatory Affairs or regulatory site officer must prepare
or support the preparation of submission ready documents based on
the agreed regulatory assessment of the change and must provide
them to the appropriate regulatory function for review and approval
for file ability
The appropriate regulatory function must submit the provided
documentation to the appropriate Health Authorities
The Affiliate Regulatory Affairs or the site regulatory officer must
inform the change control committee, as applicable, of the receipt of
regulatory notification or approval or rejection of submitted changes.
Implementation of Changes
at Site Level (1)
For changes without regulatory impact, the site Change
Control Committee must decide about the prerequisites
and implementation timelines as well as informing the
respective unit in which the change will occur. A change
must only be implemented after receipt of the written
approval documented on the CCRF
For changes with regulatory impact, the release of the
batch after implementation of the change must only be
made after notification or approval of the submitted file
by the respective Health Authorities (except in case of
an annual reportable change for the US).
Implementation of Changes
at Site Level (2)
The regulatory site officer must
inform affiliate regulatory affairs of
the date of implementation of such a
change with the specific batch
number reference
The change request form must be
archived by site Quality Management.
Thank You
Any Questions