INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Clmentine BABONNEAU Alice BEZIRARD Lna BITTON Carole GUIMBART Maxime HUBIN
How can PEPSICO improve its diversification strategy in 2008?
Strategic Diagnosis  External analysis  Internal company analysis Alternatives Recommendations
EXTERNAL ANALYSIS
-MARKET TRENDS -PESTEL -OPPORTUNITIES & THREATS -PORTERS 5 FORCES -KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
Diet and reduced calories food Non-carbonated beverages
Great-tasting Gourmet flavor Styles
Consumer health and wellness concern
Consumers want to reward themselves
Ready to eat and ready to drink consumption
Consumer desire to escape from the norm and taste snacks from a wider, often global palate
Political
  
Protectionism in emerging markets High growth potential of emerging markets Butstrong competition to enter Healthier lifestyles promote different patterns of consumption and represent new product opportunities Butless interest in sodas with high sugar content Strong R&D departments to develop new products
Economic Social
Technological
Ecological
Environment friendly packaging solutions
More and more protected consumers Stricter legislation to defend against obesity
Legal
Source: Xerfi, and case study
Consumer lifestyle:
 Better for you  Good for you opportunities  Changing lifestyles of consumers  Taste preferences from country to country: adaptation to the local tastes
International Expansion  Emerging markets: developing countries China, India, Russia, Mexico, Brazil  Developed countries: growing markets in healthy snacks outside US : new consumers needs and expectations: reduce saturated fats, cholesterols, trans fats, simple carbohydrates China and Brazil would be the 2 largest international markets for snacks Potential growth of markets:
 Increasing consumption of water bottles in US  Increasing consumption of savory snacks like Cheetos cheese (expectation: +27% by 2013)  Broadening the products: Avoid the dependence on US markets by going abroad
Awareness for healthy, sugar and salt free meals  Decline in Carbonated Drink Sales
Potential Negative Impact of Government Regulations  Legal barriers to enter new markets : protectionism  Legislation involving environmental, health, and safety may force a reorganization in the industry Intense Competition  Fast-food industry: fierce price competition and low profit margins  High rivalry between powerful global companies (The Coca-Cola Company, Nestl, Danone, Kraft Foods...). Risk of influence on pricing pricing, advertising, sales promotion initiatives Potential Disruption Due to Labor Unrest  In 2008 a strike in India shut down production for nearly an entire month
Threat of new entrants
-Low power of new entrants Few multinational groups own the largest part of the market share Possible entrants for niche markets or local markets ++ Very high bargaining power (retailers) -Power of brand recognition as an argument to attract the final customer who is loyal -Depends on the size of the retailer
+/Medium bargaining power -Dependence on raw materials -Buta lot of suppliers available
Bargaining power of suppliers
Rivalry among existing competitors
Bargaining power of buyers
+ High -All kind of food depending on the taste -Pay attention to healthy and wellness categories
Threat of substitute products
++ Very high rivalry -High diversification from each competitor -Few strong groups control the market
 Share
information and be transparent regarding the stakeholders  Be able to forecast the trends at a local and global level  Adapt to customer lifestyle and needs  Product innovation and diversification  Be visible everywhere  Good control over the manufacturing process to achieve economies of scale
INTERNAL ANALYSIS
-ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE -CORE COMPETENCIES -COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES -STRENGHTS & WEAKNESSES
PepsiCos organizational structure & Net Revenues for each Business Segment (in $ millions) in 2007:
$11,586
Frito-Lay North America
$15,798
Quaker Foods North America
$10,230
PepsiCo Beverages North America
$1,860
Pepsi International
Salty Snacks brands
Oat Food and Cereals brands
Non Alcoolics Beverages brands
Organizational profile: Diversification strategy = multi products & multi markets
Market Research R&D: Product Innovation Efficient Information System International expansion Strategic acquisitions
 PepsiCo constantly improved its knowledge on the consumer behaviour by identifying trends such as healthier products:  New brand value: PepsiCos better-for-you & good-for-you products
 Launch of less saturated fat and less salted products answering to the trends found it by  Consumer Insight dept   Introduction of Lays traditional flavour with 50% less saturated fat
 Close relationships with suppliers & customers under the Power of One program that allow PepsiCo to have direct information from both retailers & customers
 PepsiCo has succeed in creating an international exposure especially with Beverages & Salty snacks (increase of 22% in 2007)
 Those acquisitions allowed PepsiCo to gain synergy in its whole business
Brand equity
Differentiation: -High value products -Strong positioning
Differentation
Brand equity: -Awareness -Recognition -Perception
Product diversity
Product diversity: - 3 Business Units - A wide and deep range of products
Competitive Advantages
Wide range of products Efficient identification of trends  Proactive instead of Reactive International Exposure High profit margins Total control on the several steps of the supply chains (allow them to control & reduce the production and delivery costs)
Relatively unsuccessful in increasing the worldwide awareness of Quaker Foods Wide In 2006, only 6 countries represented 75% of Quaker Foods International sales out of US Difficulties to find a synergy between their restaurants & beverages they sold
Total Net revenues of PepsiCo Inc. from 1998 to 2007: increased by approximately 77%
Net revenues by activity (2004-2007):
Frito-Lay North America=21% PepsiCo beverages North America=23% Pepsi International=60% Quaker Foods North America=22%
Price in the stock exchange was about $33 in 1999 & about $64 in 2008 (+ 120%)
GOOD FINANCIAL HEALTH WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO SELF FINANCE THEIR GLOBAL EXPANSION
-MAIN STRATEGIC CHOICES -ACTUAL STRATEGY -PEPSICO DIVERSIFICATION -PEPSICO CHALLENGES -PEPSICO DIFFICULTIES
1997 Restructuration of PepsiCo Focus on snacks and beverages
Since 1997 Diversification and acquisition strategies
Result 2008 Strategic realignment in order to improve the PepsiCo Profits
Strategic International acquisitions
Strong presence in mature and emerging markets
Focus on snacks and beverages
Large diversification of PepsiCos products
Relevant innovations in R&D
Make healthy and wellness products
Product differentiation to respond to health concerns (use of healthier oils, natural salty snacks) Research on new flavors and new recipes: in order to attract more customers With International acquisitions, PepsiCo offers a different kind of food and beverages
A GREAT SUCCESS
China and Brazil would be the two largest international markets for snack
Understand local taste
To increase the market share in developing countries and continue the strong development in emerging countries
To succeed in adapting to the customer tastes of customers worldwide
To manage efficiently the new six reporting segments
Frito lay North America, Quaker Foods North America, Latin American Foods, PepsiCo Americas Beverages, UK and Europe, Middle East, Africa & Asia
To innovate in order to improve the quality of their products while keeping going through the large diversification
new flavors, health and wellness products
 Stock
Price: in 2008 PepsiCo Drops his stock price in order to improve overall profitability brand: under distributed in international market only one brand in growing market, its not enough! margin are not maximized
 Quaker
 Gatorade:
 Operating
Industry Attractiveness Factor
Weight
Attractiveness Rating 7 8 5 6
Weighted Industry Rating 1.5 1.6 0.75 0.90
Market size and projected growth Intensity of competition Strategic fits and resource fits with other industries in portfolio Resource requirement
0.15 0.20 0.15 0.15
Emerging industry opportunities and threats Seasonal and cyclical influences
Social, political ,regulatory, and environmental factors Industry uncertainty and business risk Sum of weights
0.10 0.05
0.15 0.05 1.00
4 2
3 4
0.4 0.1
0.45 0.20
Industry attractiveness rating
5.9
According to the rating scale, a result of 5.9 industry attractiveness rating is a bit more than the average (all SBUs has been taken together).
 We
have defined 3 SBUs:
Frito Lays Beverages Quaker
 We
considered both american and international markets
high
Frito lays AMERICA
Question marks
Market Growth Rate
LEGEND GREY : AMERICA BUSINESS Pink: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
Frito lays Int
Bever ages Int
Stars
Beverages AMERICA Quaker AMERICA
Quaker Int
Low
Cash cows 1
Garbage can dogs
Relative Market Share
-OBJECTIVES -OUR ALTERNATIVES
Increase International Sales
Improve operating margin
Reinforce the international presence
Manage the stock price
Choice number 1:
 Adapt their products to the local customers
Choice number 2:
 International acquisitions
Choice number 3:
 Forecast new trends:  Improve the healthy products or make ecological packaging for egs
 Adapt
their products to local customers Understand the consumer taste preference
Key to expand into international market Taste are different in function of each country Follow the customer s taste in order to attract them, in Mexico : spicy food, in Europe: healthy food with less saturated fat
 International
acquisitions Increase PepsiCo presence
Reinforce their presence on new markets = Internationalization Increase the relationship with local companies in order implement easier New target: emerging countries
 Forecast
the trends: Rely on marketing intelligence and research & development
 New customers expectations  Nowadays, the customers taste is changing:
PepsiCo has to focus on healthy products in order to respond to consumer health and wellness (reduce the consumption of statured fats, cholesterol, trans fat, and simple carbohydrates).  Improve the packaging in order to follow more and more environmental criteria  Communication more about the sustainable efforts
Criteria
COST CONTROL RISK TIME INTERNATIONALIZATION BRAND EQUITY FOLLOW CUSTOMERS NEW NEEDS
Weight
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
0,20 0,10 0,15 0,10 0,20 0,05 0,20 1
4 6 3 5 9 8 5 5,55/10
1 7 2 2 10 9 4 4,65/10
5 8 4 3 5 10 9 6,2/10
TOTAL
ALTERNATIVE 1. Adaptation to local customers
ALTERNATIVE 3. Forecast the trends
ALTERNATIVE 2. International acquisitions
According to our analysis, the best choice for the company would be:
To try to forecast customers trends and to anticipate by providing new products through innovation How to do it ?
Rely on marketing research in order to detect new customers needs
Rely on R&D to create new products suiting the needs