[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views4 pages

GP All Formats

The document outlines a structured approach for answering global perspectives questions, detailing specific requirements for perspective, significance, research strengths and weaknesses, testing claims, and evaluating arguments. It emphasizes the importance of clarity, ethical research, and the use of both primary and secondary methods for gathering evidence. Additionally, it defines key terms such as opinion, fact, value judgment, bias, vested interest, and prediction to aid understanding.

Uploaded by

Pranav gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views4 pages

GP All Formats

The document outlines a structured approach for answering global perspectives questions, detailing specific requirements for perspective, significance, research strengths and weaknesses, testing claims, and evaluating arguments. It emphasizes the importance of clarity, ethical research, and the use of both primary and secondary methods for gathering evidence. Additionally, it defines key terms such as opinion, fact, value judgment, bias, vested interest, and prediction to aid understanding.

Uploaded by

Pranav gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

​GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES​

​Q.N​ ​Answer:​​Keywords​ ​Marks​

​1 c)​ ​ ERSPECTIVE QUESTION (90-100 words)​


P ​ marks/6​
6
​1c) 5-6 Points​ ​minutes​
​Candidates may describe the following elements of the perspective:​
​• Issue​
​• Causes​
​• Consequences​
​• Values​
​• Action​
​• Source / Insert connection​

​1 d)​ ​ OST SIGNIFICANT QUESTION (140-150 words)​


M ​8 marks/8​
​1d)​​4 Developed points by clubbing the following points​​:​ ​ inutes​
m
​Candidates may give the following reasons to justify their opinion:​
​A • Has the greatest impact​​PLUS​
​• Affects the most people locally, nationally or internationally.​
​B• Has multiple negative consequences.​​PLUS​
​• Creates a vicious circle.​
​C• Ethically or morally most important.​​PLUS​
​• Affects other aspects of life for different groups in society.​
​D• Reflects expert opinion.​
​• Is the most difficult to solve.​

​2 a)​ ​ TRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF RESEARCH (140-150 words)​


S ​ marks/8​
8
​Strengths: ANY 4​ ​minutes​
​• Clear purpose of research. • Research was ethical – permission was given by an​
​expert/authority • Primary research. • Notes were taken to record the interview accurately. •​
​Case study may provide detailed information. • Research based on authentic, personal​
​testimony and experience. • The source of evidence / respondent is clearly related to the​
​research purpose/question. • Uses a quotation from the interview as evidence.​
​Weaknesses: ANY 4​
​• No clearly stated research question.​
​• Only one research method – interviews.​
​• Data may not be complete as it was difficult to hear the interviewee.​
​• No opportunity to verify or check data (triangulation).​
​• Small sample size – may not be typical.​
​• Interviewee may be biased or have a vested interest that makes data​
​unbalanced/untypical/exaggerated.​
​• The presence of other people may influence the interviewee's responses​
​– lack of confidentiality.​
​• Quotation may be selective and not typical.​

​2 b)​ ​TEST A CLAIM with primary & secondary methods (140-150 words)​ ​8 marks/8​
​ inutes​
m
​>PRIMARY - 2 methods and 2 evidences minimum:​
​1​
​ ethods:​
M
​• Interviews of relevant experts or people​
​• Observation.​
​• Questionnaires.​
​• Surveys.​
​Evidence:​
​• Statistics/information on attitudes of people​
​• Individual testimony or personal experience.​
​• Primary research data and information.​
​• Qualitative research data and information.​
​> SECONDARY - 2 methods and 2 evidences minimum​
​Methods:​
​• Review of secondary sources / literature / research / documents.​
​• Internet and media search.​
​• Case studies of experts​
​Evidence:​
​• Material from organizations​
​• Material from pressure groups / charities / governments / international​
​organizations • Secondary research data and information.​
​• Quantitative research data and information.​
​• Research reports.​

​3​ ​ HOSE ARGUMENT IS MORE CONVINCING (225-250 words)​


W ​16​
​2 different points per person so total 8 points per person.​ ​ arks/16​
m
​(use highlighters to colour code the strengths and weaknesses in the source​ ​minutes​
​) Strength of reasoning: (Pick data/statistics from the insert)​
​• logic​
​• structure​
​• balance​
​• claims​
​Use of language: (Pick data/statistics from the insert)​
​●​​Define the tone – emotive, exaggerated, precise,​​measured​
​●​​Define which is clearer​
​Evidence: (Pick data/statistics from the insert)​
​• state range of information and depth​
​• relevance​
​• sufficiency – sample size​
​• source – media; internet​
​• date – how recent​
​• different types of information – fact, opinion, value, anecdote​
​• testimony – from experience and expert​
​Sources of bias or vested interest: (Pick data/statistics from the insert)​
​• local interest​
​• economic​
​• personal values​
​• experience​

​2​
​Key Term : Definition​

​ pinion​
O
​● An opinion is generally defined as an​​individual’s​​p​oint of view or belief which is​
​not necessarily shared by others/supported by evidence.​

​ act​
F
​● A fact is something which can be​​checked or proved​​;​​something that is true and​
​which can be verified from experience and observation; a piece of information​

​ alue Judgment​​(Group)​
V
​●​​A​​value​​judgment​​is​​a​​particular​​type​​of​​opinion.​​It​​is​​a​​subjective​​assessment​​based​​on​​a​
​code​​of​​values​​concerning​​what​​is​​right​​and​​wrong;​​a​​decision​​based​​on​​moral​​principles​​or​
​beliefs;​​an​​opinion​​based​​on​​an​​individual’s​​beliefs​​or​​views​​of​​what​​is​​desirable,​​important​
​or highly regarded and not upon facts which can be checked or proved. We can’t check if​
​value judgments are true but we can think about whether they are reasonable and whether we​
​accept them and why.​

​ ias​
B
​● Inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, considered to be unfair.​

​ ested Interest​
V
​● If you have a personal stake in something which causes you to be biased toward​
​it, you have a personal interest in it.​

​ rediction​
P
​● A prediction is generally defined as a statement suggesting something which is likely to​
​happen in the future.​
​3​

You might also like