[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
124 views6 pages

Problems On Normal Forms With Solutions

Uploaded by

geetagayatriv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
124 views6 pages

Problems On Normal Forms With Solutions

Uploaded by

geetagayatriv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Problems on Normal Forms with Solutions

Problem 1:
Relation:
Student (RollNo, Name, Course, Instructor, InstructorPhone)

Functional Dependencies:

1. RollNo → Name, Course, Instructor


2. Instructor → InstructorPhone

Question: In which normal form is this relation?

Solution:

 1NF Check:
o All attributes are atomic (no multi-valued or repeating groups). ✔
o So relation is in 1NF.
 2NF Check:
o Candidate Key = RollNo (since RollNo uniquely identifies each student).
o Non-prime attributes (Name, Course, Instructor, InstructorPhone).
o RollNo → Name, Course, Instructor (full dependency, no partial). ✔
o But Instructor → InstructorPhone is a transitive dependency (RollNo →
Instructor and Instructor → InstructorPhone). ❌
o So it violates 2NF.
 Final Answer: Relation is in 1NF only.

Problem 2:
Relation:
Order (OrderID, ProductID, ProductName, Quantity, CustomerID, CustomerName)

Functional Dependencies:

1. OrderID → CustomerID, CustomerName


2. ProductID → ProductName
3. (OrderID, ProductID) → Quantity

Question: In which normal form is this relation?


Solution:

 1NF:
o All attributes atomic. ✔
o In 1NF.
 Candidate Key: (OrderID, ProductID)
 2NF:
o Partial dependencies exist:
 ProductID → ProductName (ProductName depends only on part of key
ProductID). ❌
 OrderID → CustomerID, CustomerName (depends only on OrderID). ❌
o Violates 2NF.
 Final Answer: Relation is in 1NF, not in 2NF.

Problem 3:
Relation:
Employee (EmpID, DeptID, DeptName, ManagerID)

Functional Dependencies:

1. EmpID → DeptID
2. DeptID → DeptName, ManagerID

Question: In which normal form is this relation?

Solution:

 1NF:
o All attributes atomic. ✔
 Candidate Key: EmpID
 2NF:
o No partial dependency (only single attribute key). ✔
 3NF:
o Transitive dependency exists:
 EmpID → DeptID and DeptID → DeptName, ManagerID
 So EmpID → DeptName, ManagerID via DeptID. ❌
o Violates 3NF.
 Final Answer: Relation is in 2NF, not 3NF.

Problem 4:
Relation:
Book (BookID, Title, Author, Publisher, PublisherAddress)

Functional Dependencies:

1. BookID → Title, Author, Publisher


2. Publisher → PublisherAddress

Question: In which normal form is this relation?

Solution:

 1NF: ✔
 Candidate Key: BookID
 2NF: ✔ (since key is single attribute, no partial dependency).
 3NF:
o Transitive dependency exists: BookID → Publisher → PublisherAddress. ❌
 BCNF Check:
o Publisher → PublisherAddress is a violation, since Publisher is not a super key. ❌
 Final Answer: Relation is in 2NF, not in 3NF/BCNF.

Problem 5 (Tricky):
Relation:
Supplier (SupplierID, PartID, SupplierName, PartName, Price)

Functional Dependencies:

1. SupplierID → SupplierName
2. PartID → PartName
3. (SupplierID, PartID) → Price

Question: In which normal form is this relation?

Solution:

 1NF: ✔
 Candidate Key: (SupplierID, PartID)
 2NF:
o Partial dependencies exist:
 SupplierID → SupplierName
 PartID → PartName
o These depend only on part of composite key. ❌
 Final Answer: Relation is in 1NF, not 2NF.

Problem 6:
Relation:
Hospital (PatientID, PatientName, DoctorID, DoctorName, Department)

Functional Dependencies:

1. PatientID → PatientName, DoctorID


2. DoctorID → DoctorName, Department

Solution:

 1NF: ✔ (atomic attributes)


 Candidate Key: PatientID
 2NF: ✔ (single attribute key, no partial dependency)
 3NF:
o PatientID → DoctorID and DoctorID → DoctorName, Department
o So, PatientID → DoctorName, Department (transitive). ❌
 BCNF: DoctorID → DoctorName, Department is a violation since DoctorID is not a
superkey. ❌
 Final Answer: 2NF only.

Problem 7:
Relation:
Project (ProjID, EmpID, EmpName, ProjName, Role)

Functional Dependencies:

1. ProjID → ProjName
2. EmpID → EmpName
3. (ProjID, EmpID) → Role

Solution:

 1NF: ✔
 Candidate Key: (ProjID, EmpID)
 2NF: ❌ (since ProjID → ProjName and EmpID → EmpName are partial dependencies)
 Final Answer: 1NF only.

Problem 8:
Relation:
Course (CourseID, CourseName, Credits)

Functional Dependencies:

1. CourseID → CourseName, Credits

Solution:

 1NF: ✔
 Candidate Key: CourseID
 2NF: ✔ (single key, no partial dependency)
 3NF: ✔ (no transitive dependency)
 BCNF: ✔ (all determinants are superkeys)
 Final Answer: BCNF.

Problem 9:
Relation:
Bank (AccountNo, CustomerID, CustomerName, Balance)

Functional Dependencies:

1. AccountNo → Balance, CustomerID


2. CustomerID → CustomerName

Solution:

 1NF: ✔
 Candidate Key: AccountNo
 2NF: ✔ (single attribute key)
 3NF: ❌ (transitive: AccountNo → CustomerID → CustomerName)
 BCNF: ❌ (CustomerID is not a superkey)
 Final Answer: 2NF only.

Problem 10:
Relation:
Library (BookID, MemberID, IssueDate, ReturnDate)

Functional Dependencies:

1. (BookID, MemberID) → IssueDate, ReturnDate


Solution:

 1NF: ✔
 Candidate Key: (BookID, MemberID)
 2NF: ✔ (all attributes fully depend on composite key)
 3NF: ✔ (no transitive dependency)
 BCNF: ✔ (all determinants are candidate keys)
 Final Answer: BCNF.

You might also like