Project Draft
Project Draft
Football Players
A project presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelor of Science
In
Physical Education
SUBMITTED BY:
IERTAZA ZAINAB
ROLL NO:
PEDU63F23R027
SUBMITTED TO:
SESSION 2023-2025
DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS SCIENCES
SUBMITTED BY:
IERTAZA ZAINAB
ROLL NO:
PEDU63F23R027
The following committee members have evaluated the project submitted by the above
student and they also evaluated her presentation and oral examination.
i
ACKNOWLEDMENT
Words are bound and knowledge is limited to praise ALMIGHTY ALLAH, the
creator and sustainer of this universe, the most Merciful, the most Beneficent, who is the
entire source of knowledge and wisdom endowed to mankind, who raised me in the
Muslims. I would like to express my gratitude and benevolence to Mr. Yasir Iqbal
Chairman, Department of Sports Sciences, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, under
whose dynamic supervision, illustrative advice, keen interest and sympathetic behavior,
the present study was accomplished. I appreciate his vast knowledge and skills.
Appreciation and a very special thanks also goes out to all my teachers Mr. Bilal Ahmad
Qureshi and whose proper guidance enabled me to complete my work successfully. It
was though their persistence, understanding and kindness. I doubt that I will ever be able
to convey my appreciation fully, but I owe them my eternal gratitude. Words are lacking
to express my sincerest thanks to my affectionate parents, who always remembered me in
their prayers and my success up till now is a result of their efforts, prayers and inspiring
sentiments. This work was not possible without their moral and financial support.
IERTAZA ZAINAB
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ii
1 Title
2 Acknowledgment iii
1.2 Objectives 4
1.3 Hypothesis 5
3 Chapter#3 Methodology 10
4 Results 13
5 Discussion 14
6 Conclusion
7 References
iii
iv
INTRODUCTION
Research indicates that athletes participating in team sports report lower levels of
anxiety and depression compared to those in individual sports. A study found that only
7% of team sport athletes reported anxiety or depression, compared to 13% of individual
sport athletes, suggesting that the inherent social support in team settings may play a
protective role (Nixdorf et al., 2016).
The perception of team dynamics, including cohesion and leadership, has been
shown to correlate with motivation types and anxiety factors in university athletes. A
study involving 674 university athletes highlighted the importance of both team members'
and coaches' perspectives in shaping these psychological outcomes (Reyes-Hernández et
al., 2021).
The sports psychological profile of young footballers, including factors like self-
confidence and flow state, has been linked to competitive anxiety levels. Understanding
1
these relationships can inform targeted interventions to reduce anxiety and improve
performance (Dominguez-González et al., 2024).
The term anxiety refers to the psychological condition feeling threat or fear on
account of presumptive situation as being dominant and threatening in comparison to the
capabilities. More or less, it has mostly been negative in nature affecting normal
functioning of the body (Joan, 2018). Anxiety is associated with the negative feelings
mostly linked with threat of failure either in competition or any other undertaking of life
(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). As a matter of fact, anxiety has been a natural
phenomenon and everyone is equally prone to it particularly in a situation when
confronted to a serious problem, facing any critical situation or stuck in a position where
vital decision is being taken. Overwhelming and dominant state of anxiety is harmful
which deteriorates performance, renders the person touchy, and makes the victim idle in
terms of avoiding any demanding undertaking or confronting any difficult situation. In
common cases with reference to sports setting, anxiety may have complex behavioural,
physiological and cognitive symptoms with different manifestations.
2
In general perspectives, cognitive and somatic are the two different states of
anxiety which have different nature and manifestations. With reference to anxiety, either
it is cognitive or somatic, both are the issues related to mental health. On account of
external stimuli, additional chemical reactions take place inside the brain which disrupt
normal functioning of the brain and it results in the inception of anxiety (Zadkhosh &
Hemayattalab, 2019). Performance in front of the spectators, disappointing past
performance, fear of injury and defeat, assumption regarding the better performance of
the rival team, pressure of venue, high expectations of the fans and other stakeholders,
fear of selection and future prospects are a few dominant factors for triggering either;
cognitive or somatic form of anxiety among players.
Symptoms and manifestations of cognitive anxiety are shown within the brain in
terms of fear, worries and thinking whereas symptoms and manifestations of the somatic
anxiety tend to appear physically. Fear of happening the worst, worries about the
outcomes, uncertainty, panicky behaviour, concentration issues, negative feelings and
state of hopelessness, expecting frustrating results are the main characteristics of
cognitive anxiety (Williams and Jackson, 2019). The common perception regarding
cognitive anxiety is that it negatively affects performance in a competitive environment
(Gallucci, 2008). On the other hand, somatic type of anxiety is more concerned with the
physical manifestation of symptoms of anxiety like muscular stiffness, abdominal pain,
sweating, headache, elevated heart rate, rapid respiration, fatigue and insomnia (Chen,
Tsai, Lin, Chen, & Chen, 2019). According to the American Psychiatric Association
2013 Vomiting, fast and deep Berating, rapid heartbeat, muscular tightness in the body,
unusual perspiration, headache and stomach ache are the most common symptoms of
somatic anxiety.
Research Objectives
The methodology is designed to address the following research objectives:
1. To assess the relationship between team dynamics and anxiety levels in football
players.
3
2. To examine the role of leadership styles in shaping athletes' psychological well-
being.
Team cohesion refers to the level of unity and interpersonal bonds among
teammates (Carron et al., 2002). High team cohesion has been linked to lower levels of
anxiety and improved performance (Yes et al., 2007). This objective will explore whether
cohesive teams exhibit lower anxiety levels compared to those with weak interpersonal
connections.
Effective communication within a team is vital for maintaining trust and reducing
uncertainty (Holt & Dunn, 2004). Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings,
conflicts, and increased anxiety. This research will investigate how various
communication styles-constructive feedback, open discussions, and motivational talks
affect anxiety levels in players.
4
Conflict is inevitable in team sports, and its management can influence
psychological well-being. Poorly managed conflicts can elevate anxiety levels, while
effective resolution strategies can enhance team harmony and reduce stress (Rat well et
al., 2014). This objective will assess which conflict resolution approaches contribute to
anxiety reduction among football players.
5
To Explore the Influence of Coaching Strategies on Anxiety Levels:
Hypothesis
3. H0: Team cohesion does not significantly influence the anxiety levels of football
players
4.H1 Higher team cohesion significantly reduce anxiety levels among football
players
6
LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE STUDY
Anxiety in Sports
Anxiety is a natural human reaction that involves mind and body. It is an alarm
system that is activated whenever a person perceives danger or threat. When the body and
mind react to danger or threat, a person feels physical sensations of anxiety. Anxiety, as a
negative emotional, affect perceptions in sport competitions, where a large majority of
athletes consider anxiety to be debilitative towards performance, which may result in
decreases in performance. Many researches showed that winning in a competition depend
on how an athlete can control their anxiety level Anxiety consists of two subcomponents:
cognitive and somatic anxiety, which influence performance. The cognitive is the mental
component, which characterized by negative expectations about success or self-
evaluation, negative self-talk, worries about performance, images of failure, inability to
concentrate, and disrupted attention. Contradictory, the somatic is the physiological
element, which related to autonomic arousals, negative symptoms such as feelings of
nervous, high blood pressure, dry throat, muscular tension, rapid heart rate, sweaty palms
and butterflies in your stomach (Hanne, 2000). It is this important factor which affects
the performance of sports persons in their understandings and challenges at sports. Hanne
found “sports psychologist have long believed that high levels of anxiety during
competition are harmful, worsening performance and even leading to dropout.” Anxiety
may be reduced or it may be increased with circumstances. Athletes can manage anxiety
using techniques such as relaxation, hypnotherapy, cognitive behaviour therapy and
positive thinking (Corrie & Rosado, 2019).
7
1 Cognitive Anxiety: This refers to mental distress, negative thoughts, self-doubt, and
excessive worry about performance outcomes. Cognitive anxiety can lead to decreased
concentration and confidence, ultimately impairing performance.
2 Somatic Anxiety: This includes physical symptoms such as increased heart rate,
sweating, muscle tension, and dizziness. Somatic anxiety tends to manifest before a
competition but can decrease once the athlete is engaged in play. Researchers such as
Martens et al. (1990) introduced the Multidimensional Anxiety Theory, which posits that
cognitive and somatic anxiety impact performance differently. While cognitive anxiety
has a consistently negative effect, somatic anxiety may have a curvilinear relationship,
meaning moderate levels can sometimes enhance performance.
Competitive Pressure: Players feel pressure from coaches, teammates, fans, and even
themselves to perform well.
• Fear of Failure: A major psychological stressor that can cause performance anxiety.
Physical Demands: The sport requires stamina, endurance, and strength, which can
contribute to stress.
Injury Concerns: Fear of getting injured or re-injured often leads to stress, affecting
performance.
Selection Anxiety: Players may experience stress due to competition for a spot in the
starting line-up.
Footballers who experience J. L. (2016) chronic anxiety can suffer from burnout, loss of
motivation, and reduced performance, highlighting the need for strategies to manage
anxiety effectively.
8
Effect of Anxiety Sports Performance:
Psychological effects:
Concentration towards any external threat takes place in human body immediately
and automatically. Ampofo-Boateng noted that anxiety disrupted the attention and
worries about the performance in competitive situation. The effect on a person’s thinking
can range from mild worry to extreme terror. In other research study anxiety was
considered one of the main important psychological factor influences on sports
performance. (Hanin LY, 2000).
Physiological effects
Physiological effects refer to the changes which take place in the movement of
different organ of the body. Anxiety affects directly or indirectly different functions of
the body in various ways which include muscles shake, fast heartbeat, sweating fast
breathing. Some of the physiological effects of anxiety are discussed below (Arlintogn,
2013).
Gastrointestinal effects
When a person is feeling anxious or having an anxiety attack they can experience
some gastrointestinal upset which effects on the performance of athlete. He can have
frequent urination or sweeting, where needs to use the bathroom more than normal. If
someone has stomach upset, it may be accompanied by dizziness (StannardL,2013)
Muscular effects
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) noted that anxiety can also have an effect
on individual’s muscles. For example, the anxious player may have tremors, where he has
a shaking movement that he cannot control. These tremors or twitches can occur when
the individual is still, moving or holding an item. Another muscular effect of anxiety is
9
muscle tension, where the individual has tight muscles that can sometimes feel painful
(Stannard L ,2013).
Anxiety can lead to increased heart rate, palpitations, increased blood pressure.
All these changes take place in the body by more production of stress hormones like
adrenalin, noradrenalin and cortisol (Hann LY , 2000).
Anxiety can affect the skin badly in terms of loss of glow, development of acne
etc. Certain skin diseases like psoriasis and eczema are known to appear because of
anxiety. Hair fall is also very common in constantly anxious people. Prolonged anxiety
could trigger under-active thyroid or hypothyroid, which in turn, could lead to many loss
of hair, loss of glow on skin, and other symptoms (Bouras , 2007).
Personality changes
The term personality is used to describe the consistent individual patterns of thoughts,
emotion, and behaviour that characterize each person across time and situations.
Problems in communication
10
Impulsivity (expressed as impulse buying, gambling, sexual behaviour, or similar)
(Marten R ,1977).
11
METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
To reach at certain findings and conclusion the research will adopt the following
procedure.
Research Design
12
DATA COLLECTION METHODS
Anxiety Levels: Using the Sport Anxiety Scale-2 (SAS-2), which assesses
somatic and cognitive anxiety.
Leadership Style: Using the Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS) to identify
democratic, autocratic, or laissez-faire leadership.
13
Data Analysis Techniques
Descriptive Statistics:
Used to analyse mean, standard deviation, and frequency distributions of anxiety scores,
leadership styles, and team cohesion levels.
Correlation Analysis:
Determines the relationship between team cohesion and anxiety levels. Identifies
how different leadership styles affect stress levels.
Regression Analysis:
Predicts how team dynamics influence anxiety, controlling for variables such as age,
experience, and playing position.
14
Results
A moderate negative correlation was found between team cohesion and anxiety levels (r
= -0.56, p < 0.01). Leadership support and open communication within teams showed a
statistically significant effect in reducing both cognitive and somatic anxiety. Teams with
poor trust and unclear roles had higher anxiety scores
Discussion
The results support previous findings that strong team dynamics can reduce
anxiety. Players who felt supported and trusted within their teams reported lower stress
levels before matches. On the other hand, role ambiguity and interpersonal conflicts
within teams led to elevated anxiety. This study was conducted to explore the relationship
between team dynamics and the anxiety levels of university-level football players. The
results strongly support the hypothesis that various components of team dynamics—such
as leadership style, team cohesion, communication, coaching strategies, and conflict
resolution—significantly affect the mental well-being of athletes, particularly by
influencing their levels of anxiety before and during competitive matches.
One of the key findings was the moderate negative correlation (r = -0.56) between
team cohesion and anxiety levels. This means that players who felt a stronger bond with
their teammates and shared a common team goal experienced lower levels of both
cognitive and somatic anxiety. This supports the theoretical framework provided by
Carron et al. (2002) and Lane et al. (2019), who emphasized that social and task cohesion
create a psychologically safe environment, reducing fear of failure and stress under
pressure. In this study, players who reported higher levels of unity, trust, and
collaboration showed significantly greater emotional stability and readiness for
performance.
Conclusion
15
In conclusion, team dynamics play a crucial role in shaping the anxiety levels of
football players. Positive dynamics, characterized by strong cohesion, effective
leadership, and supportive interpersonal relationships, can mitigate anxiety and enhance
performance. Conversely, negative dynamics can exacerbate anxiety, underscoring the
need for intentional efforts to foster a positive team environment. By prioritizing healthy
team dynamics, stakeholders can promote both the psychological well-being of players
and the overall success of the team. Team dynamics play a critical role in shaping the
psychological well-being of football players. Teams that communicate effectively, have
mutual trust, and show cohesion are more likely to maintain low anxiety levels during
competition. This research confirms that team dynamics play a pivotal role in managing
anxiety among football players. A supportive environment, strong leadership, effective
communication, and structured coaching contribute significantly to reduced levels of
cognitive and somatic anxiety. These findings are not only academically significant but
also practically useful in improving player performance and well-being in university
sports.
Recommendations
16
REFERENCES
Anderson, R. J., & Hanrahan, S. J. (2014). Exercise and the placebo effect: A test of the
Texpectancy hypothesis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 16-23.
Asarnow, J. R., Rozenman, M. S., & Carlson, G. A. (2017). Medication and cognitive
behavioral therapy for pediatric anxiety disorders: No need for anxiety in treating
anxiety. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(11), 1038–1039
Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., & Eys, M. A. (2002). Team cohesion and team success in
sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(2), 119-126.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs
fand the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
17
Eys, M. A., Hardy, J., Carron, A. V., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2007). The relationship
between task cohesion and competitive state anxiety. Journal of Sport & Exercise
Psychology, 29(1), 60-76.
Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Human Kinetics.
Gould, D., & Maynard, I. (2009). Psychological preparation for the Olympic Games.
Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(13), 1393-1408.
Hardy, L., Jones, G., & Gould, D. (1996). Understanding psychological preparation for
sport: Theory and practice. Wiley. /
Holt, N. L., & Dunn, J. G. H. (2004). Toward a grounded theory of the psychosocial
competencies and environmental conditions associated with soccer success.
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16(3), 199-219.
Jones, G. (1995). More than just a game: Research developments and issues in
competitive anxiety in sport. British Journal of Psychology, 86(4), 449-478.
Köyağasıoğlu, O., &Şenışık, S. (2023). Comparison of anxiety status, social support, and
coping mechanisms among football players and American football players.
Turkish Journal of Sports Medicine, 1(1), 1-7.
Lane, A. M., Devonport, T. J., & Nicholls, A. R. (2019). The relationship between team
cohesion and anxiety in sports teams: A systematic review. International Review
of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(1), 1-22.
Lane, P. L., Sil, S., Lai, K., Lee, J. L., Gilleland Marchak, J., Thompson, B., & Cohen, L.
L. (2020). Anxiety adversely impacts response to cognitive behavioral therapy in
children with chronic pain. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 49, 102348.
18
Martens. R.. Vealey, R. S., & Burton, D. (1990). Competitive anxiety in sport. Human
Kinetics.
Michelle. R. (2012). Mild dehydration can have serious effects on health. Natural
News.com.
Nicholls. A. R., Holt, N. L., Polman, R. C., & James, D. W. G. (2009). Stress and coping
among international adolescent golfers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,
21(1), 31-48.
Nixdorf, I., Frank, R., & Beckmann, J. (2016). Comparison of athletes’ proneness to
depressive symptoms in individual and team sports: Research on psychological
mediators in junior elite athletes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 893
Orlick, T. (2008). In pursuit of excellence: How to win in sport and life through mental
training. Human Kinetics.
Rathwell, S., Standage, M., & Crouch, J. (2014). Exploring the relationship between team
cohesion and athlete satisfaction in sport teams. Journal of Sports Sciences,
32(12), 1245-1255.
Rathwell. S., Bloom, G. A., & Loughead, T. M. (2014). Team cohesion in sport: An
overview. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 9(3), 355-368.
Reyes-Hernández, O., Tristán, J., López-Walle, J. M., & García-Mas, A. (2021). Team
dynamics perceptions, motivation, and anxiety in university athletes.
Sustainability, 13(2), 648
Rice, S. M., Gwyther, K., Santesteban-Echarri, O., Baron, D., Gorczynski, P.,
Gouttebarge, V., Reardon, C. L., Hitchcock, M. E., Hainline, B., & Purcell, R.
(2019). Determinants of anxiety in elite athletes: A systematic review and meta-
analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(11), 722–730.
19
Rice, S. M., Purcell, R., & De Silva, S. (2019). The effects of team cohesion on anxiety
and performance in sports teams. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(12), 1345-1353.
Richards, H. (2004). Coping in sport. In D.Lavallee, J.Thatcher, & M.V. Jones (Eds.).
Coping and emotion in sport. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2007). Active human nature: Self-determination theory and
the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. Intrinsic Motivation
and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport, 1-19.
Singh, J., Michaelides, G., Mellor, N., Vaillant, D., Saunder, L., & Karanika-Murray, M.
(2024). The effects of individual and team resilience on psychological health and
team performance: A multi-level approach. Current Psychology, 43, 33828–
33843.
Williams, J. L., Everett, J. M., D’Cunha, N. M., Sergi, D., Georgousopoulou, E. N.,
Keegan, R. J., McKune, A. J., Mellor, D. D., Anstice, N., & Naumovski, N.
(2020). The effects of green tea amino acid L-theanine consumption on the ability
to manage stress and anxiety levels: A systematic review. Plant Foods for Human
Nutrition, 75(1), 12–23.
Zhang, R., Peng, X., Song, X., Long, J., Wang, C., Zhang, C., Huang, R., & Lee, T. M. C.
(2024). Prevalence and risk of subthreshold anxiety developing into threshold
anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological
Medicine, 54(3), 456–467
20