Studies show that criminals get a low level of education.

Some people believe that

the best way to reduce crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job
after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a 1heated debate about whether educating offenders during imprisonment is

the best method of reducing the future 2crime rate. While it is an effective solution, it
is far from being the best method and there are many better ways to reduce crime.

On the one hand, education for prisoners may contribute to the reduction of crime.
The primary reason is that such a form of education could provide offenders with the
essential working skills when they return to the community. With improved job
prospects, prisoners may therefore earn a living after leaving prison and are less likely
to 3commit a crime again. Another significant reason is that education could foster a
sense of value and self-worth in offenders. As a consequence, they may demonstrate
more empathy towards others in the wider community, and become 4law-abiding
citizens after their prison years.

On the other hand, educating 5offenders is not the best solution to reduce crime. This
is because it is offered only to those who have 6broken the law and therefore has far
less preventive value, compared to other solutions. For example, imposing severe
punishments, such as longer 7imprisonment for criminals, could deter criminal acts by
other members of the public who have 8conscious evil intent. There are also other
educational methods that may have a stronger and more long-lasting impact on the
reduction of crime. An excellent example of this is crime education at school, which
helps equip students with the necessary knowledge about crime and crime prevention.

To conclude, I firmly believe that although educating prisoners is an effective way to

reduce crime, it is not the best solution, as there are more preventive and sustainable

measures.

- first-time offender: kẻ phạm tội lần đầu

- conscious evil intent: ý đồ xấu xa
- commit a crime: hành động phạm tội
- She was sentenced to five years' imprisonment: Cô ấy bị tuyên phạt 5 năm tù
+ Cấu trúc chủ động: sentence sb to ... : tuyên phạt ai đó
+ Lưu ý: five years' imprisonment, không phải five year imprisonment
short-term imprisonment: Hình phạt tù ngắn ngày
found guilty of murder: bị kết tội (tuyên án về tội) giết người
- Cấu trúc chủ động: find sb guilty of ...: (tòa án kết tội (tuyên án) ai đó về
tội...)
- heavy punishment: hình phạt nặng
- be put behind bars: bị bỏ tù
- Cấu trúc chủ động: put sb behind bars
- A violation of law: phạm pháp
- subordinate /səˈbɔː.dɪ.nət/: có vị trí thấp hơn hoặc kém quan trọng hơn
+ a subordinate role
+ subordinate status
+ The individual's needs are subordinate to those of the group.
 FURTHER PRACTICE
- to be charged with doing something" có nghĩa là "bị buộc tội làm gì đó".
- Toughest criminals" có nghĩa là những tên tội phạm cứng đầu/nguy hiểm nhất
- To impose a fine on someone" có nghĩa là "áp đặt một khoản tiền phạt lên ai
đó".
-

- Combatting crime is a great concern in many parts of the world. (Chống

tội phạm là một mối quan tâm lớn ở nhiều nơi trên thế giới.)
- For centuries, prisons have been used as a way of both punishing criminals
and keeping them away from law-abiding citizens. (Trong nhiều thế kỷ, nhà
tù đã được sử dụng như một cách vừa để trừng phạt tội phạm, vừa để giữ họ
tránh xa những công dân tuân thủ pháp luật.)
- Imprisonment, without a doubt, can deter people from committing
offences. (Sự bỏ tù, không còn nghi ngờ gì, có thể răn đe mọi người khỏi việc
phạm tội.)
- The fear of losing one’s freedom stops people from thinking about and
carrying out crimes. (Nỗi sợ mất tự do ngăn cản mọi người suy nghĩ và thực
hiện các hành vi tội phạm.)
- Many law-abiding citizens believe those who break the law should be
punished harshly. (Nhiều công dân tuân thủ pháp luật tin rằng những kẻ vi
phạm pháp luật nên bị trừng phạt nghiêm khắc.)
- Prisons should be reserved only for violent offenders, while the majority of
petty criminals should be dealt with through education and training. (Nhà
 tù chỉ nên được dành riêng cho những tội phạm bạo lực, trong khi phần lớn tội
phạm vặt nên được giải quyết thông qua giáo dục và đào tạo.)

1. Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to
prevent it.

→ There is a considerable debate about whether crime can be effectively

prevented or if it is an inevitable aspect of society.

2. Studies show that criminals get a low level of education. Some people believe that
the best way to reduce crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job
after leaving prison.

→ Whether providing education for prisoners is the most effective method to

reduce crime is a matter of ongoing discussion.

3. Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believe that
having more police on the streets is the best way to reduce and combat crime.

→ It is a commonly held belief that increasing the presence of police on the

streets is the best way to combat crime.

4. Many people believe that the government should control the amount of violence in
films and televisions in order to decrease the violent crimes in society.

→ Whether the government should control violent content in the media to reduce
crime rates is a topic of heated debate.

5. Some people think that the media should not report details of crimes to the public.

→ The question of whether the media should be restricted from reporting details
of crimes has sparked considerable controversy.
 FURTHER PRACTICE

Whether + S + V1 + V2 + ….”.
It is believed by some people that obesity cannot be reduced by reducing calorie
intake.(Một số người tin rằng bệnh béo phì không thể được giảm bớt bằng cách giảm
lượng calo nạp vào.)

There is a common belief that technology will soon replace teachers in the
classroom.

(Có một niềm tin phổ biến rằng công nghệ sẽ sớm thay thế giáo viên trong lớp học.)

→ It is claimed that animals should not be exploited by people and that they have
the same rights as humans.(Người ta cho rằng động vật không nên bị con người khai
thác và chúng cũng có những quyền tương tự như con người.)

→ Whether smoking should be banned in public places or not is still a matter of

controversy in today’s society.(Liệu việc hút thuốc có nên bị cấm ở những nơi công
cộng hay không vẫn là một vấn đề gây tranh cãi trong xã hội ngày nay.)

→ There has been a heated discussion about whether students should go to

university or get a job.(Đã có một cuộc thảo luận sôi nổi về việc liệu sinh viên nên
học đại học hay đi làm.)

→ Many adults argue that computer games have negative impacts on children.
(Nhiều người lớn cho rằng trò chơi máy tính có những tác động tiêu cực đến trẻ em.)
Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on
campus. What are the positive and negative aspects of this development?
First of all, when taking part in an e-learning class/platform on the Internet,
students can choose to study a wide range of elective subjects.For instance, those who
live in remote areas nowadays can enroll in online training programmes from their
hometown, instead of investing a great deal of their time and money for reallocating to
the neighborhood of campus.To begin with, spending an excessive amount of time on
distance learning could negatively impact the students’ well-being.Due to the lack of
interaction between other peers and professors, some have suffered serious mental
health issues such as anxiety and depression. This has resulted in inconsistent
academic performance in some students.
Furthermore, participants in online courses tend to procrastinate their learning
progress and poorly allot an appropriate amount of time to complete assignments. This
is partly because this form of studying requires tremendous self-discipline, as well as
organization and time management, which are the skills that most students still
struggle with.
Full suggested answer:
On the one hand, there are some advantages of online learning compared to
traditional classes. First of all, when taking part in an e-learning class/platform on the
Internet, students can choose to study a wide range of elective subjects. For example,
students whose major is Computer Science can still access an economic online course,
or take a crash course in project management at ease. Learning subjects from another
major could substantially help them accumulate knowledge outside their expertise,
therefore enhancing their wisdom. Secondly, online programmes have enabled people
to gain access to education with lower costs regardless of their social background or
geographical location. For instance, those who live in remote areas nowadays can
enroll in online training programmes from their hometown, instead of investing a
great deal of their time and money for reallocating to the neighborhood of campus.
On the other hand, there are some existing drawbacks regarding the increasing
popularity of online learning. To begin with, spending an excessive amount of time on
distance learning could negatively impact the students’ well-being. One of the
examples could be the prolonged social distancing during the global pandemic
COVID-19 has led many students to attend online classes. Due to the lack of
interaction between other peers and professors, some have suffered serious mental
health issues such as anxiety and depression. This has resulted in inconsistent
academic performance in some students. Furthermore, participants in online courses
tend to procrastinate their learning progress and poorly allot an appropriate amount of
time to complete assignments. This is partly because this form of studying requires
tremendous self-discipline, as well as organization and time management, which are
the skills that most students still struggle with.
Write about the following topic:

In order to solve the problems of cities related to pollution and traffic, some

people say that the government should offer free public transportation. Do you

think the advantages of this will outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own

knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Câu trả lời của bạn

Urban areas across the globe are grappling with ever-worsening traffic congestion and
air pollution. As a potential solution to these pressing issues, some have proposed that
governments should make all public transportation entirely free of charge. While this
policy certainly comes with significant financial challenges, I personally believe that
its advantages for the environment, traffic flow, and social equity would ultimately
outweigh the drawbacks.
One of the most compelling arguments in favour of free public transport is its
potential to significantly reduce the number of private cars on our roads. For many
people, the decision to drive is often one of convenience and habit, even for short
journeys. If the alternative, such as a bus or train, were completely free, it would
present a powerful financial incentive to leave the car at home. This shift would
directly lead to less traffic, meaning quicker and less stressful commutes for everyone.
Furthermore, a reduction in private vehicles would result in a substantial decrease in
air pollution. In many large cities, the constant fumes from cars are a major
contributor to poor air quality and public health problems. Making public transport
free could be a straightforward step towards cleaner, healthier urban environments.
Another key benefit is the promotion of social fairness. Transportation costs can be a
significant barrier for individuals with low incomes, students, and the elderly, limiting
their access to jobs, education, and essential services. A fare-free system would
remove this barrier, fostering greater mobility and opportunity for all citizens,
regardless of their financial situation. This would not only improve individual lives
but also contribute to a more integrated and equitable society.
Of course, the primary disadvantage of this proposal is the immense financial burden
it would place on the government. Operating and maintaining a public transport
network is incredibly expensive, and without ticket revenue, these costs would have to
be covered entirely by public funds, likely leading to higher taxes. There is also the
risk that a free service could become overcrowded, potentially leading to a decline in
comfort and service quality, which might discourage some people from using it.
However, I feel these challenges, while serious, can be managed. The high upfront
cost could be viewed as a long-term investment. The economic benefits from reduced
traffic congestion—such as less time wasted in traffic and more efficient delivery of
goods—along with lower healthcare costs due to cleaner air, could offset the initial
expenditure. The problem of overcrowding could also be addressed by strategically
reinvesting funds into expanding the network and increasing the frequency of services
during peak hours.
In conclusion, while the idea of providing free public transportation is ambitious and
presents considerable financial hurdles, its potential benefits are transformative. By
easing traffic, cleaning the air, and creating a more accessible city for everyone, the
advantages of such a policy, in my opinion, far surpass the disadvantages. It is a bold
step, but one that could be crucial for creating the sustainable and liveable cities of the
future.
"The question of whether the internet fosters greater connection or deepens social
isolation is a subject of ongoing discussion. While there is merit to the view that this
technology is a double-edged sword, I firmly believe that its effects are ultimately
determined by the individual's approach to its use."

C. It is true that there are many messaging and video conferencing softwares that can
eliminate the geographical constraints that used to prevent people from establishing
new relationships across the globe, or keeping in touch with relatives living in distant
parts of the world.

In the contemporary era, the internet has fundamentally reshaped the landscape of
human interaction, with a growing number of individuals turning to digital platforms
to form connections. While many champion this trend as a force for bringing people
together, others contend that it paradoxically fosters social isolation. This essay will
examine both perspectives before concluding that the internet, despite its benefits,
poses a greater risk of alienating individuals if not used mindfully.

On the one hand, there are compelling reasons to believe that the internet has
significantly enhanced social connectivity. Firstly, it effectively overcomes
geographical barriers, allowing people to maintain strong bonds with family and
friends regardless of physical distance. For instance, a student studying abroad can
have daily video calls with their family, sharing experiences in real-time and
mitigating feelings of homesickness. Secondly, the online world facilitates the
formation of niche communities based on shared interests. An individual with a
passion for a specific hobby, such as chess or classic literature, might feel alone in
their immediate vicinity but can easily find and connect with thousands of like-minded
peers globally. Finally, the internet has created unprecedented opportunities for
establishing entirely new relationships, from professional networking on platforms
like LinkedIn to finding life partners through dating applications, many of which
successfully transition into meaningful, real-world connections.

On the other hand, the argument that the internet exacerbates loneliness and isolation
is equally persuasive. A primary concern is the often superficial nature of online
relationships. A person may accumulate thousands of "friends" or "followers" on
social media, but these connections frequently lack the depth and genuine support
characteristic of real-life friendships. Furthermore, virtual communication can replace
vital face-to-face interaction. It is not uncommon to witness a group of friends or
even a family sitting together in silence, each engrossed in their own screen, thereby
being physically present but mentally distant. This trend erodes the quality of in-
person socialising. Perhaps the most detrimental impact is the negative psychological
effect stemming from constant online engagement. The curated, often idealized
portrayals of others' lives can lead to social comparison, breeding feelings of
inadequacy, anxiety, and the "fear of missing out" (FOMO), which ultimately
deepens an individual's sense of isolation.

In conclusion, while the internet offers powerful tools for transcending distance and
forging new communities, I am of the opinion that its potential to create shallow
relationships and negatively impact mental well-being presents a more significant
threat. The convenience of digital interaction, if unchecked, can lead to a world where
people are more connected yet feel more alone than ever. Therefore, it is crucial for
individuals to strike a healthy balance between their online and offline social lives to
truly benefit from modern technology without succumbing to its isolating effects.
Đoạn 1: Whether students should have the freedom to select their desired major to
study at the university or not is still a matter of debate. While I can understand the
argument of some people that their choice of subjects should be restricted within
certain areas, it is my opinion that everyone should be able to pursue the course by
their preference.

Đoạn 2: People have different viewpoints on the question of how to make our
transportation activities safer. From my perspective, although imposing heavy
punishments on those who violate regulations on the roads seems practical, other
measures could be used to promote better driving habits.

Đoạn 3: There have been heated discussions over whether introducing children to
several essential skills or a variety of subjects at schools is more beneficial to their
development. While some may believe that teaching skills are more important, I take
the view that subjects should be an indispensable part of any young schooler's
timetable.

Đề bài 1
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to solely focus on the
subjects that they find most useful, 1I strongly believe that everyone should have the
right to pursue their study in any field. It 2is recommended that orientation sessions
should be organized to assist students during their major selection could match their
preference and workforce’s demand.
Đề bài 2:
3In conclusion, while punishing drivers who commit driving offences can be seen as
an effective solution to prevent accidents, I am convinced that other road safety
measures should also be introduced. 4It is suggested that both policies should be
combined to reduce dangerous driving acts.
Đề bài 3:
5In conclusion, while accumulating soft skills is important for a child’s development, I
contend that a wide diversity of school subjects can help lay a firmer foundation for
students' future. It is recommended that children should be encouraged to participate
in extracurricular activities to enrich themselves with other life skills.
Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global
scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss
both sides and give your opinion.

Point 1: Environmental problems should be solved on a global scale

- Some countries need international assistance due to the lack of resources such as
finance or technology

- National experts lack the knowledge to properly tackle the problems

Point 2: Environmental problems should be dealt nationally

- Different nations have different environmental issues

- It is more practical to tackle environmental problems by local incentives and laws

than dealing it globally

In recent years, there is a debate about whether environmental issues should

be addressed on a global scale or dealt with nationally. While some argue that a
global approach is necessary, I believe that a national focus is more reasonable.
Those who prefer to solve environmental problems on a global scale claim that
certain countries lack the necessary resources, such as financial or technological
means, to effectively tackle these challenges. In such cases, global cooperation and
assistance can provide the required resources to do it more efficiently. Furthermore,
the supporters on this side argue that national experts can sometimes lack the
knowledge needed to tackle environmental problems properly. Therefore, it is
necessary to call for an international effort for these issues essential.
On the other hand, I believe that each nation faces different environmental
challenges. Therefore, it may be better to allow each nation to come up with specific
solutions suitable for themselves. For example, factors such as geographical
location, climate, and industrial activities contribute to a variety of environmental
concerns, making it difficult for every country to have the same solution to dealing
with these problems. By focusing on local incentives and laws, governments can
encourage businesses to be more environmentally friendly and individuals to follow a
greener lifestyle.
In conclusion, while a global effort can help all countries, I still contend that
dealing with this challenge at a national level allows each of them to come up with
solutions suitable for each country. By working together at both levels, a significant
improvement in the environment can be expected.
AI 👍
The escalating crisis of environmental degradation has sparked a worldwide
debate on the most effective level at which to address these issues. While some
advocate for internationally coordinated efforts, others maintain that national-level
actions are more practical and effective. This essay will discuss both perspectives
before concluding that a combination of both global and national strategies is
ultimately necessary.
On the one hand, there is a strong argument that environmental problems,
many of which are transnational in nature, must be solved on a global scale. A
primary reason for this is that many nations, particularly those in the developing
world, lack the necessary resources to combat these challenges alone. They may
not have the financial capacity to invest in green technologies or the funds to
manage large-scale conservation projects. Therefore, international assistance and
financial aid from wealthier nations are indispensable. Furthermore, some countries
may not possess the specialized expertise required to tackle complex issues like
desertification or oceanic pollution. Global cooperation allows for the sharing of
knowledge and technology, enabling experts from different parts of the world to work
together to find the most viable solutions.
On the other hand, many argue that it is better to deal with environmental
issues nationally. The central pillar of this viewpoint is that environmental challenges
are not uniform across the globe; different nations face different problems. For
instance, a country like Brazil might prioritize fighting deforestation, while a low-lying
island nation such as the Maldives is more concerned with rising sea levels. A
national government is best positioned to identify, prioritize, and legislate for its
unique circumstances. Moreover, it is often more practical to tackle these problems
through local incentives and laws rather than attempting to enforce broad, and often
non-binding, global agreements. National policies, such as carbon taxes or plastic
bag bans, can be tailored to the local culture and economy and can be enforced
directly through the country's legal system, making them far more effective in driving
tangible change.
In conclusion, while both national and global approaches have their merits,
they address different facets of a complex problem. National strategies are crucial for
implementing specific, tailored solutions that reflect local priorities, whereas a global
framework is essential for tackling cross-border issues and supporting countries that
lack resources or expertise. In my opinion, the most effective path forward is not a
choice between these two scales but an integration of both. National governments
must take responsibility for their own environmental policies, but these actions
should be supported and guided by international agreements, shared technology,
and a collective global will to protect our shared planet.
IELTS WRITING TASK 2:

Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in
teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports is
better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both view and give your opinion

Firstly, enthusiasts of individual sports would enjoy a more flexible timetable without
relying on other players, which is particularly favorable for people who have a hectic
schedule. This is totally opposite for a football player who has to spend time waiting
until all of his teammates gather on the pitch. Secondly, individual sports create an
environment where the players have to motivate themselves in order to reach their
goals without being dependent on others. By this way, the player can feel a sense of
purpose in their recreation, which could lead to a sense of personal fulfillment in the
long run.

The debate over whether it is more advantageous to engage in team sports or

individual sports is a long-standing one. A prevailing belief is that collaborative sports
like football offer superior benefits, while others advocate for the merits of solo
activities such as swimming or tennis. This essay will discuss both perspectives
before arguing that participating in team sports ultimately provides a more
comprehensive range of life skills.

On the one hand, participating in team-based sports fosters crucial interpersonal and
collaborative skills that are vital in many aspects of adult life. When playing sports
like basketball or volleyball, individuals must learn to communicate effectively, trust
their teammates, and work in unison towards a common objective. This environment
teaches the importance of sacrificing personal glory for the good of the group, a
lesson that is directly transferable to professional settings, where teamwork is often
essential for the success of projects. Furthermore, the shared experience of training,
winning, and losing together builds strong social bonds and a sense of camaraderie.
This can lead to lasting friendships and a robust support network, which are
fundamental to mental and emotional well-being.

On the other hand, individual sports offer a different, yet equally valuable, set of
benefits, primarily centered on self-discipline and personal accountability. In sports
like athletics or tennis, the outcome rests solely on the individual's shoulders. There
is no one else to blame for a failure or to rely on for victory. This reality cultivates an
exceptional level of self-reliance, mental fortitude, and a powerful work ethic, as the
athlete must be intrinsically motivated to train and improve. Moreover, individual
sports are an excellent platform for developing focus and concentration. An athlete
must manage their own pressure, set personal goals, and constantly strive to
surpass their previous achievements, fostering a resilient and independent
character.

In conclusion, while both forms of athletic activity offer significant advantages—with

individual sports championing self-discipline and team sports promoting collaboration
—I am of the opinion that the benefits gleaned from team sports are more holistic
and socially applicable. The ability to cooperate, communicate, and function as part
of a collective unit are indispensable skills in our increasingly interconnected world.
Therefore, the lessons in teamwork and shared responsibility learned on the sports
field provide a more essential foundation for future success in both personal and
professional life.
Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each
other, while others think that people have become more independent.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The contemporary world presents a fascinating paradox regarding human

connection. A prevailing debate exists as to whether the advancements of modern
society have fostered greater interdependence or, conversely, have enabled people
to become more self-sufficient. This essay will explore both perspectives, ultimately
arguing that despite a growing sense of individual autonomy, the fundamental
structures of modern life have made us more deeply and broadly dependent on one
another than at any point in history.

On the one hand, there is a compelling case to be made for the rise of individual
independence. The primary driver of this trend is the digital revolution, which has
democratised access to information and skills. Previously, acquiring knowledge
required formal education or apprenticeship, creating dependence on institutions and
experts. Today, an individual can learn a new language through an app, master a
complex skill via online tutorials, or even manage their finances and investments
without consulting a professional adviser. Furthermore, the modern economy, with
the rise of remote work and the gig economy, has liberated many from the
constraints of a single employer and a physical office. This financial and professional
autonomy fosters a powerful sense of self-reliance, as people are increasingly able
to shape their own careers and lifestyles.

However, this perception of autonomy arguably masks a deeper and more intricate
reality of global interdependence. Our daily existence is sustained by complex
systems of specialised labour and global supply chains that we rarely see. The
smartphone in one's pocket, for example, is the product of an intricate web of
cooperation involving designers, miners, factory workers, and logistics professionals
from dozens of countries. This contrasts sharply with past eras where communities
were more locally self-sufficient. Moreover, our independence is critically reliant on
vast, shared infrastructure. The ability to work from home is entirely dependent on
the internet, which in turn relies on a power grid and countless technicians to
maintain it. This reliance is most evident when these systems fail, instantly revealing
our collective vulnerability. Therefore, our modern lifestyle is fundamentally enabled
by a collective effort on a scale never seen before.

In conclusion, while the digital age has undeniably equipped individuals with tools for
greater self-sufficiency in their daily tasks and careers, this exists within a framework
of unprecedented global reliance. In my opinion, the latter is the more significant
force. The independence we experience is often a direct consequence of a highly
efficient system of interdependence working silently in the background. Ultimately,
we have traded local, visible forms of dependence for a global, often invisible,
network of reliance, making us more connected to, and dependent on, one another
than ever before.