[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views6 pages

APM3715 - Major Tests 1 - 2025 - Scan

Aplied numerical methods question paper for test 1 2025 , it is about root finding methods , and matrices.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views6 pages

APM3715 - Major Tests 1 - 2025 - Scan

Aplied numerical methods question paper for test 1 2025 , it is about root finding methods , and matrices.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

college of

science, engineering
and technology

UNIVERSITY EXAMINATIONS

JUNE

APM3715

Numerical Methods for Civil Engineers

Welcome to the APM3715 — Assessment 3

Date: 9 June 2025


Duration: 2 hours

Examiner name: Mr J. Sibanda


Internal moderator name: Mr M. Makaleng
External moderator name: Mr N.A. Mnisi

This paper consists of 6 pages, including cover pages.

Total marks: 70

Instructions:
THIS IS AN OPEN BOOK TEST
YOUR SCRIPT MUST BE SAVED WITH STUDENT NO, SUBJECT CODE AND UPLOADED
UNDER THE ASSESSMENT 3 TAB ON MYEXAM PLATFORM. EXAMPLE ON HOW TO SAVE
YOUR SCRIPT Student Number_APM3715_MT1
. Include reference to additional information sheets if applicable.
. Include instruction on the platform and specific submission tool.
. Indicate the type of invigilation tool used (This module is IRIS invigilated)
. Include invigilation tools student instructions (IRIS or Invigilator Cell phone Application), if
applicable. (guidelines will be distributed separately)

Additional student instructions


1. Students must upload their answer scripts in a single PDF file (answer scripts must not be
password protected or uploaded as “read only” files)
2. Incorrect file format and uncollated answer scripts will not be considered.
3. NO emailed scripts will be accepted.
4. Students are advised to preview submissions (answer scripts) to ensure legibility and that
the correct answer script file has been uploaded.
5. Incorrect answer scripts and/or submissions made on unofficial examinations platforms
(including the invigilator cell phone application) will not be marked and no opportunity will
be granted for resubmission. Only the last answer file uploaded within the stipulated
submission duration period will be marked.
6. Mark awarded for incomplete submission will be the student’s final mark. No opportunity for
resubmission will be granted.
7. Mark awarded for illegible scanned submission will be the student’s final mark. No
opportunity for resubmission will be granted.
8. Submissions will only be accepted from registered student accounts.
9. Students who have not utilised the proctoring tool will be deemed to have transgressed
Unisa’s examination rules and will have their marks withheld. If a student is found to have
been outside the proctoring tool for a total of 10 minutes during their examination session,
they will be considered to have violated Unisa’s examination rules and their marks will be

Open Rubric
withheld. For examinations which use the IRIS invigilator system, IRIS must be recording
throughout the duration of the examination until the submission of the examinations scripts.
10. Students have 48 hours from the date of their examination to upload their invigilator results
from IRIS. Failure to do so will result in students deemed not to have utilized the proctoring
tools.
1. Students suspected of dishonest conduct during the examinations will be subjected to
disciplinary processes. Students may not communicate with any other person or request
assistance from any other person during their examinations. Plagiarism is a violation of
academic integrity and students who plagiarise, copy from published work or Artificial
Intelligence Software (eg ChatGPT) or online sources (eg course material), will be in
violation of the Policy on Academic Integrity and the Student Disciplinary Code and may be
referred to a disciplinary hearing. Unisa has a zero tolerance for plagiarism and/or any
other forms of academic dishonesty.
12. Listening to audio (music) and making use of audio-to-text software is strictly prohibited
during your examination session unless such usage of the software is related to a student's
assistive device which has been so declared. Failure to do so will be a transgression of
Unisa’s examination rules and the student's marks will be withheld.
13. Students are provided 30 minutes to submit their answer scripts after the official
examination time. Students who experience technical challenges should report the
challenges to the SCSC on 080 000 1870 or their College exam support centres (refer to
the Get help during the examinations by contacting the Student Communication Service
Centre [unisa.ac.za]) within 30 minutes. Queries received after 30 minutes of the official
assessment duration time will not be responded to. Submissions made after the official
assessment time will be rejected according to the examination regulations and will not be
marked.
14. Non-adherence to the processes for uploading assessment responses will not qualify the
student for any special concessions or future assessments.
15. Queries that are beyond Unisa’s control include the following: a. Personal network or
service provider issues
b. Load shedding/limited space on personal computer
c. Crashed computer
d. Non-functioning cameras or web cameras
e. Using work computers that block access to the myExams site (employer firewall
challenges)
f. Unlicensed software (eg license expires during exams)

16. Students suspected of dishonest conduct during the examinations will be subjected to
disciplinary processes. UNISA has a zero tolerance for plagiarism and/or any other forms
of academic dishonesty.
Questions 1
The township of Mamelodi has seen widespread infrastructure issues attributed to
problematic soils, as detailed in a geotechnical investigation by GeoStruct Solutions
(Pty) Ltd. Among the four major problems identified, expansive clays, collapsible
sands, dispersive clays, and erodible topsoils were found. The team observed that
multiple failure modes overlapped across construction zones.

To model and quantify the combined risk of failure at various construction sites, the
engineers decided to represent soil behaviour interactions and their mitigation
responses as a system of linear equations, where each variable represents the relative
severity of each soil behaviour (on a scale from 0 to 10) at a particular location. This
allows planners to estimate the impact of multiple interventions.

GeoStruct collected the following simplified relationships from three sample zones (Z1,
Z2, Z3) based on laboratory tests and field inspections:

o Zone 1 (Z1): The total damage observed (wall cracks + road settlement) is
attributed 50% to expansive clays, 30% to collapsible sands, and 20% to
dispersive clays.
e« Zone 2 (Z2): Foundation damage and gully formation were 20% due to
collapsible sands, 40% dispersive clays, and 40% expansive clays.
« Zone 3 (Z3): A failed dam structure's piping failure was 70% due to dispersive
soils and 30% due to expansive soils.

Let:

« x1: severity index of expansive clay behaviour


« Xx2: severity index of collapsible sands
« xa: severity index of dispersive clays

The recorded failure indicators (normalized damage indices) for the three zones are
8.5, 6.0 and 9.0 in Z1, Z2 and Z3, respectively.
Questions:

1.1 Formulate a system of three linear equations using the above information. Each
equation should represent the weighted contribution of different soil behaviours
to the observed damage in Zones 1-3. (3 marks)

1.2 Solve the resulting system using Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting.
Show all steps, row operations, and pivoting decisions clearly. (10 marks)

1.3 Interpret the computed severity indices x1, x2, x3. What do they suggest about
the most critical soil behaviour that needs attention in Mamelodi? Which
mitigation strategy (from those proposed) should be prioritized? (5 marks)

1.4 Suppose a technician made a rounding error while entering data for Zone 2,
recording the observed failure index as 6.5 instead of 6.0.
* Recalculate the system with this new value. (3 marks)
e Compute the relative change in each severity index compared to the
original. (2 marks)
* Discuss the sensitivity of the solution to input errors. What does this imply
for data reliability in engineering assessments? (5 marks)

Q1 Total: (28 marks)

Question 2
A vertically oriented steel pile is to be driven 15 meters deep into a stratified soil profile
in Mamelodi for a low-rise school foundation. The pile has an outer diameter of 425
mm and must support a compressive axial force of 800 kN. Geotechnical
investigations reveal that the soil resistance comprises both end-bearing resistance at
the pile base, and frictional resistance along the shaft.

Due to complex soil behaviour (including expansive clays and collapsible sands),
engineers observed nonlinear settlement of test piles during static load testing. The
empirical load-settlement relationship is approximated by the nonlinear function:

Q=& -5+3Q-R=0

where Q is the applied load in tons, R is the field-measured bearing capacity and f(Q)
is load imbalance due to soil resistance vs applied load. The root of this function gives
the equilibrium load for given resistance.
21 Explain the physical significance of each term in the function f(Q). What does
it mean for f(Q) = 0? What kind of soil-structure interaction behaviour is
modelled by this equation? (4 marks)

21 Using the Newton-Raphson method, perform three iterations to approximate


the value of Q that balances the system. Start with an initial guess of Qo = 3.5.
Show all steps, including the derivative used and intermediate values.
(6 marks)

21 If the initial guess is changed to Qo = 0.5, discuss (with justification) whether


convergence is expected. What does this tell you about the importance of
choosing a good initial guess in nonlinear geotechnical problems? (4 marks)

Q2 Total: (14 marks)

Question3
A civil engineer is designing a continuous beam that spans three supports (A, B, C)
over two equal spans of 6 meters each. The beam is subjected to uniform distributed
loading of w =10 kN/m over each span. The beam is prismatic (constant El) and is
fixed at both ends (A and C), with a simple support at the middle (B), making it statically
indeterminate.

The moment distribution method (or slope-deflection method) yields a system of


equations of the form:

K-M=F

Where:

K: stiffness matrix (function of support conditions and span lengths)


M: unknown fixed-end moments at nodes A, B, and C

F: equivalent fixed-end moment vector due to external loads

Based on the above beam configuration:

Fixed at Aand C
Pinned at B
Uniform load w =10 kN/m
Equal spans of L= 6 m
Assume constant flexural rigidity EI

Use the slope-deflection method to:

a) Derive expressions for the moments at A, B, and C in terms of rotations and


displacements. (5 marks)
b) Formulate the stiffness matrix K and the load vector F.
(Hint: Use standard slope-deflection formulas for fixed—fixed and fixed—pinned
members.) (3 marks)

3.2 Once your system is formulated in the form K-M = F, apply LU decomposition
manually to solve for the unknown moments. Show all intermediate matrices L
and U, and all steps in forward/backward substitution. (7 marks)

3.3 Implement the same system in R, using 1u() from the Matrix package (or
equivalent). Compare your manually obtained moments with the computed
ones. You are allowed to use Octave if you wish. (5 marks)

3.4 Discuss the following:

Why LU decomposition is preferred in repeated load cases (e.g., dynamic


loads). (4 marks)
How the stiffness matrix structure might change if one support becomes aroller
or if the loading becomes point-based. (4 marks)

Q3 Total: (28 marks)

TOTAL MARKS [70]


© UNISA 2025

You might also like