[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Screening Vs Diagnostic Evaluation F

Uploaded by

er.sakshisinghal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Screening Vs Diagnostic Evaluation F

Uploaded by

er.sakshisinghal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Rehab Buddy Child Development Center & Autism

Research Institute

Screening vs Diagnostic Evaluation (Autism & ADHD)


1) Screening vs Diagnostic Evaluation — what’s the difference?
• Screening = a short questionnaire or checklist given to all children (or at-risk children) to see if early signs
are present.
o Quick, early detection tool
o Not a diagnosis — just flags children who may need further evaluation.
o Example: M-CHAT-R/F for toddlers (16–30 months).
• Diagnostic Evaluation = detailed, multidisciplinary assessment to determine if a child meets criteria
(DSM-5).
o Includes: parent interview, developmental history, clinician observation, and standardized tests.
o Example tools: ADOS-2, ADI-R.

2) Autism — common screening tools

1. M-CHAT-R/F (Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers — Revised, Follow-up)

• Age: 16–30 months (commonly at 18 & 24 month well-visits).


• Format: 20 yes/no parent questions + follow-up interview.
• Use: Decides if referral is needed for evaluation.
• Research: Strong evidence; validated in Indian languages (high sensitivity/specificity)

3) Autism — commonly used diagnostic tools

1. ADOS-2 (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd ed.)


• Structured play/interaction observed by clinician.
• Gold-standard observation tool.
• Valid but performance can vary by language, age, culture.
2. ADI-R (Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised)
• Semi-structured parent interview on early development, communication, social skills, behaviours.
• Complements ADOS-2; aligned with DSM-5.
3. CARS / CARS-2 (Childhood Autism Rating Scale)
• Clinician rating scale from history + observation.
• Provides severity score.
• Validated against ADOS in multiple studies.
4. ISAA (Indian Scale for Assessment of Autism)
• Developed in India; measures autism severity with local context.
• Validated and used in Indian clinics/research.
Key point: No single test “proves” autism. Clinicians combine structured tools + history + observation +
teacher/therapist input.

4) ADHD — screening and diagnostic tools parents may meet

Screening & rating scales (parents + teachers complete):


1. Vanderbilt Scales – widely used; maps directly to DSM; validated in India.
2. Conners’ (Conners 3 / Conners 4) – parent, teacher, self-report; measures inattention,
hyperactivity, oppositional traits.
3. ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV/5) – symptom checklist for DSM criteria.
Diagnostic process (ADHD):
• Based on DSM-5 criteria:
o Symptoms in 2+ settings (e.g., home + school)
o Onset in childhood
o Causing impairment
• Rating scales support clinical interview, but do not replace it.
• Medical review to rule out vision, hearing or other conditions.

5) What a typical assessment visit looks like (parents’ checklist)


1. Screening step (young children): brief parent questionnaire (e.g., M-CHAT-R/F). If positive → referral.

2. Comprehensive evaluation:

o Developmental history (parent interview)

o Structured tools (ADOS-2, ADI-R, Vanderbilt, Conners)

o Clinician observation/play

o Teacher reports

3. Medical review: hearing/vision checks, rule out other conditions, consider comorbidities (e.g., anxiety,
language delay).

4. Multidisciplinary team (ideal): pediatrician/psychiatrist + psychologist + speech therapist + OT.

6) Accuracy, cultural issues & India-specific findings


• Screening/diagnostic tools must be validated for language/culture to avoid false positives/negatives.

• India-specific evidence:

o M-CHAT-R/F Hindi and regional language versions show >90% sensitivity/specificity in some
studies.

o ISAA developed for Indian context; validated and in use.

• Ongoing research aims to improve routine use in primary care and school screening.

© Rehab Buddy Child Development Center & Autism Research Institute


https://www.rehabbuddycdc.com/

https://www.rehabbuddycdc.com/
https://www.rehabbuddycdc.com/https://www.rehabbuddycdc.com/https://www.rehabbuddyc
+91 63505-75296
dc.com/ https://www.rehabbuddycdc.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMclw8iSAZUuYtFimRu1HNg

You might also like