22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

1. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, cloud computing has transformed the way applications are developed,
deployed, and managed. Among the latest innovations in this domain, Serverless
Architecture has emerged as a powerful paradigm that abstracts away the complexities
of infrastructure management. Contrary to the name, "serverless" does not mean the
absence of servers; rather, it signifies that developers no longer need to provision,
maintain, or scale servers manually. Instead, the cloud service provider automatically
manages all infrastructure-related tasks, allowing developers to focus solely on writing
code and delivering business value.

Serverless computing operates on the principle of Function-as-a-Service (FaaS), where

small units of code (functions) are executed in response to specific events or triggers.
This event-driven model ensures that resources are used only when needed, leading to
efficient utilization and cost savings. Developers simply upload their code, and the
platform ensures execution, scalability, monitoring, and fault tolerance without requiring
manual intervention.

The key advantage of serverless architecture lies in its scalability, flexibility, and cost-
effectiveness. Applications automatically scale up or down based on demand, and
organizations only pay for actual execution time instead of maintaining idle
infrastructure. Moreover, serverless platforms accelerate development cycles by reducing
operational overhead, making them ideal for building microservices, APIs, real-time
applications, and Internet of Things (IoT) backends.

Popular cloud providers such as Amazon Web Services (AWS Lambda), Microsoft
Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions offer robust serverless solutions that are
increasingly being adopted across industries. As businesses strive to innovate faster and
reduce costs, serverless computing has become a significant step toward agile, modern
software development practices.

In essence, serverless architecture represents a shift from infrastructure-centric models to

code-centric models, enabling developers to innovate rapidly while leaving infrastructure
concerns to the cloud provider. Its growing adoption highlights its role as a cornerstone of
future cloud-native applications.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 1

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

2. LITERATURE SURVEY

Research Studies on Serverless Computing

Serverless computing has become a rapidly growing area of research in both academia and
industry. Studies highlight that serverless, particularly Function-as-a-Service (FaaS), enables
event-driven execution and eliminates infrastructure management. Spillner (2017) examined
how serverless supports modular software design, while Baldini et al. (2017) provided a
detailed survey of serverless platforms such as AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google
Cloud Functions, emphasizing challenges like state management and cold starts. Lloyd et al.
(2018) studied cost implications, showing that serverless is ideal for bursty workloads but not
efficient for long-running tasks.

Comparison with Traditional and Cloud-Native Models

Traditional server-based computing required organizations to manage dedicated

infrastructure, resulting in high operational costs and limited flexibility. With virtualization
and containers, resource utilization improved, but infrastructure management still required
expertise. Serverless computing represents the next step in cloud-native evolution by
providing complete abstraction of infrastructure. Unlike traditional systems, serverless scales
automatically and charges based on execution time rather than server uptime. Compared to
containers, serverless reduces management overhead but trades off with issues like cold start
latency and execution time limits.

Notable Academic and Industry Contributions

Jonas et al. (2019) emphasized that serverless simplifies distributed programming but
requires new debugging and monitoring techniques. Castro et al. (2019) highlighted security
concerns such as multi-tenancy risks and the need for stronger isolation. From an industry
perspective, providers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google have developed powerful serverless
services widely adopted across domains including IoT, AI/ML, and real-time applications.
Enterprises such as Netflix and Coca-Cola have reported significant cost savings and agility
improvements by adopting serverless solutions in production.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 2

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

3. EXISTING SYSTEM

Traditional Server-Based Model

In the early stages of computing, applications were deployed on dedicated physical servers.
Organizations had to purchase hardware, install operating systems, configure environments,
and manage updates. This model required high capital investment and constant monitoring.
Scaling was difficult since servers were provisioned for peak loads, leaving resources
underutilized during normal operations. Maintenance, fault tolerance, and disaster recovery
further increased operational complexity.

Virtual Machines and Containers

Virtualization allowed multiple virtual machines (VMs) to run on the same physical
hardware, improving resource utilization and providing isolation between applications.
However, VMs introduced overhead, requiring gigabytes of memory and complex
management.

Later, containers such as Docker offered lightweight, portable environments that packaged
applications with their dependencies. Containers provided faster startup times and greater
efficiency compared to VMs. With orchestration tools like Kubernetes, deployment and
scaling became more automated, but infrastructure management and expertise were still
required.

Limitations of Pre-Serverless Approaches

Despite these advances, several challenges remained:

 Infrastructure Management: Teams had to manage provisioning, scaling, and

patching.
 Overprovisioning: Resources were often allocated for peak usage, leading to idle
costs.
 Scalability Issues: Scaling VMs and containers required careful planning and
monitoring.
 Operational Effort: Developers spent more time maintaining infrastructure than
focusing on application logic.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 3

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

4. NEED FOR SERVERLESS ARCHITECTURE

Issues with Traditional Infrastructure Management

Traditional infrastructure models require organizations to manage servers, operating systems,

networking, and scaling manually. This involves constant monitoring, patching, and capacity
planning, which increases operational overhead. Developers often spend more time managing
infrastructure than building applications, slowing down innovation.

Rising Demand for Scalability and Cost Optimization

Modern applications face unpredictable workloads, from sudden traffic surges in e-commerce
to real-time processing in IoT systems. Traditional servers and even container-based systems
often require overprovisioning, leading to idle resources and higher costs. At the same time,
businesses need solutions that scale up automatically during peak demand and scale down
during low usage to optimize spending.

Why Organizations are Moving Toward Serverless

Serverless computing directly addresses these challenges by abstracting infrastructure

management. Developers focus only on writing code, while the cloud provider automatically
handles provisioning, scaling, and availability. The pay-per-use model ensures that
organizations pay only for actual execution time, avoiding wasted resources. Serverless also
accelerates time-to-market by reducing deployment complexities and enabling faster
prototyping.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 4

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINA
SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

5. ARCHITECTURE AND WORKING OF SERVERLESS

SYSTEMS

Serverless architecture is built on the principle of event

event-driven
driven execution, where applications
are decomposed into smaller, independent services. Instead of managing servers, developers
write functions that execute in response to specific triggers. The cloud provider takes care of
resource provisioning, execution, scaling, and availability. This makes the architecture
lightweight, flexible, and cost--effective.

Function-as-a-Service
Service (FaaS)

The core component of serverless architecture is Function-as-a-Service

Service (FaaS).
(FaaS) In this
model, developers write functions that perform small, independent tasks. These functions are
stateless and are executed only when trigge
triggered
red by an event such as an HTTP request, a
database update, or a file upload. Once the execution is complete, resources are released
automatically.
Examples: AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions
Functions.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 5

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINA
SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

Backend-as-a-Service
Service (BaaS)

Serverless also leverages Backend

Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS), where third-party
party services provide
backend functionalities such as authentication, database management, storage, and
messaging. Instead of building these components from scratch, developers integrate m
managed
services like Firebase, AWS Cognito, or DynamoDB
DynamoDB.. This reduces development time and
complexity, allowing teams to focus on application logic.

Event-Driven
Driven Execution Model

The heart of serverless lies in its event-driven model.. Functions are triggered
trigge by predefined
events — for example:

 A new user registration triggers an authentication function.

 Uploading an image triggers a function to resize or analyze it.
 A sensor update in IoT triggers a data logging function.

This ensures that resources are used only when required, providing elastic scalability without
manual intervention.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 6

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

Workflow of a Serverless Application

1. Event Source – An event such as an API request, file upload, or database update
occurs.
2. Trigger – The event invokes a serverless function configured to handle it.
3. Execution Environment – The cloud provider allocates compute resources, executes
the function, and scales as needed.
4. Integration – The function interacts with other services like databases, storage, or
APIs.
5. Termination – Once execution is complete, resources are released, and billing stops.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 7

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

6. KEY COMPONENTS

A serverless system relies on several core components that enable its event-driven, scalable,
and efficient operation. These components work together to ensure that functions run only
when triggered, resources are automatically managed, and applications integrate smoothly
with cloud services.

Event Sources and Triggers

Serverless applications are primarily event-driven. An event source is any activity or change
in the system that triggers a function. Events can originate from multiple sources such as
HTTP requests via an API gateway, file uploads in cloud storage, database changes, or IoT
sensor updates. Triggers link these events to specific functions, ensuring the right action
executes automatically without manual intervention.

Function Execution Environment

When an event occurs, the cloud provider sets up an isolated execution environment to run
the function. This environment is stateless and temporary, meaning it exists only during the
function’s execution. It provides the necessary runtime (Node.js, Python, Java, etc.) along
with required resources. The execution environment can scale up instantly by running
multiple instances of the function to handle increased demand.

Cloud Service Integration (Databases, APIs, Storage)

Serverless functions rarely operate in isolation; they typically interact with other cloud-
managed services. Common integrations include:

 Databases: Functions read and write data from managed services such as
DynamoDB, Firebase, or Cosmos DB.
 APIs: Functions are often exposed through API gateways, enabling external
applications or users to invoke them securely.
 Storage: Cloud storage services (e.g., AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage) act as event
sources, where actions like uploading a file can trigger processing functions.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 8

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

7. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF

SERVERLESS ARCHITECTURE

Serverless computing has gained widespread adoption because it simplifies application

deployment while reducing costs and improving scalability. Some of the key advantages are:

No Server Management

One of the biggest benefits is that developers do not need to worry about provisioning,
configuring, or maintaining servers. The cloud provider handles infrastructure, patching, and
monitoring, allowing teams to focus entirely on writing and improving application logic.

Automatic Scaling

Serverless platforms scale applications automatically based on demand. Whether there are a
few requests or millions, the system provisions resources dynamically. This elasticity ensures
consistent performance without requiring manual intervention or complex load-balancing
setups.

Pay-Per-Use Cost Model

Unlike traditional systems where servers must be running continuously, serverless charges
only for actual execution time and resources consumed. This pay-as-you-go pricing reduces
waste by eliminating costs for idle infrastructure, making it highly cost-efficient, especially
for workloads with unpredictable traffic.

Faster Time-to-Market

By abstracting infrastructure management, serverless enables developers to quickly build,

test, and deploy applications. Using integrated cloud services (e.g., authentication, storage,
APIs), development cycles are accelerated. This agility allows organizations to innovate
faster and respond quickly to business or customer needs.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 9

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

8. APPLICATIONS OF SERVERLESS COMPUTING

Serverless architecture is widely used across different domains because of its flexibility,
cost efficiency, and automatic scalability. Some common applications include:

Real-Time File and Image Processing

Serverless functions can process files and images immediately after they are uploaded.
For example, when a user uploads an image to cloud storage, a function can automatically
resize, compress, or scan the image without manual intervention.

APIs and Microservices

Serverless platforms are ideal for building lightweight APIs and microservices. Each
API endpoint can be implemented as a separate function, which simplifies development
and allows applications to scale independently based on demand.

IoT Backends

IoT devices generate large volumes of data that need to be processed in real time.
Serverless systems provide backends that can handle sensor updates, data storage, and
analysis without requiring dedicated infrastructure, making them suitable for smart
homes, healthcare, and industrial IoT.

Chatbots and Voice Assistants

Serverless functions are frequently used in conversational applications such as chatbots

and voice assistants. Functions can be triggered by user queries, process the input, and
return responses quickly. Integration with cloud services like natural language processing
(NLP) enhances these applications further.

Event-Driven Data Processing

Serverless is highly effective for tasks triggered by data changes, such as database
updates or streaming data. For example, when new records are added to a database, a
serverless function can validate, transform, or move the data automatically.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 10

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

9. SERVICE PROVIDERS AND SECURITY IN

SERVERLESS COMPUTING

Service Providers in Serverless Computing

Several cloud platforms provide serverless services, each with its own features and
advantages. The most popular providers are Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure,
Google Cloud Platform, and IBM Cloud.

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda, introduced in 2014, is the most widely used serverless platform. It supports
multiple languages such as Python, Node.js, Java, and C#. Lambda integrates with other
AWS services like S3, DynamoDB, and API Gateway, making it highly suitable for large-
scale applications. Its reliability, scalability, and strong ecosystem are key reasons for its
dominance in the market.

Microsoft Azure Functions

Azure Functions is Microsoft’s serverless offering. It integrates closely with other Azure
services and supports a wide variety of programming languages. A unique feature is its
Durable Functions, which allow developers to write stateful workflows in a serverless
environment. Azure Functions is often preferred by organizations already using Microsoft
tools and enterprise solutions.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions is a lightweight, event-driven platform that connects with services
like Google Cloud Pub/Sub, Firestore, and Cloud Storage. It is known for simplicity and
seamless integration with Google’s data and AI services, making it particularly useful for
event-stream processing and AI/ML-powered applications.

IBM Cloud Functions (OpenWhisk)

IBM Cloud Functions is based on the open-source Apache OpenWhisk project. It supports
multiple languages and offers flexibility for developers who want to avoid vendor lock-in by

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 11

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

working with open-source frameworks. It is a good option for businesses looking for
customizable and hybrid cloud solutions.

Comparative Analysis

 AWS Lambda: Best for ecosystem and enterprise adoption, but more prone to vendor
lock-in.
 Azure Functions: Strong enterprise integration, especially for Microsoft-based
environments.
 Google Cloud Functions: Simpler, with strong AI/ML integration, but less mature
ecosystem.
 IBM Cloud Functions: Open-source and flexible, but with a smaller market share.

Security in Serverless Computing

Shared Responsibility Model

In serverless computing, security responsibilities are divided between the cloud provider and
the customer. The provider manages the infrastructure, runtime, and scaling, while the
customer is responsible for securing application code, access controls, and data handling.

Security Risks and Challenges

 Multi-Tenancy Risks: Shared resources may expose functions to vulnerabilities.

 Insecure Dependencies: Reliance on third-party libraries can introduce security
flaws.
 Event Injection Attacks: Malicious inputs may trigger unintended function
execution.
 Monitoring Limitations: Short-lived, distributed functions make it difficult to trace
and detect attacks.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 12

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

10. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SERVERLESS

COMPUTING

Data Privacy and Ownership

Serverless platforms process large volumes of sensitive data on third-party cloud

environments. Questions arise regarding data ownership, as the information resides on
infrastructure managed by cloud providers. Developers and organizations have an ethical
responsibility to ensure compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA, and
to guarantee that user data is not misused or exposed without consent.

Transparency and Accountability

In serverless systems, cloud providers manage most of the infrastructure, which reduces
visibility into how applications run at the backend. In case of failures, outages, or security
breaches, accountability may become unclear. Ethically, organizations should disclose
potential risks to clients and maintain transparency about how their applications handle and
store user data.

Vendor Lock-In Concerns

Heavy reliance on a single cloud provider creates vendor lock-in, restricting flexibility and
long-term independence. From an ethical standpoint, developers should consider designing
portable solutions and informing stakeholders about the risks of dependency on a single
vendor.

Fair Resource Usage

Since serverless platforms are multi-tenant environments, improper or malicious use of

functions (e.g., excessive resource consumption, cryptomining, or deploying malicious code)
can impact other tenants. Ethical practices involve designing efficient code, avoiding abuse of
shared infrastructure, and ensuring fair usage of resources.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 13

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Cloud data centers consume significant amounts of energy. Organizations have an ethical
responsibility to choose providers that prioritize renewable energy and sustainable operations.
Promoting energy-efficient serverless applications contributes to global efforts in reducing
the carbon footprint of IT systems.

Bias in AI/ML Applications

Many serverless workloads integrate with AI and ML services. If biased datasets or

algorithms are deployed, serverless applications may unintentionally propagate
discrimination or unfair decisions. Ethically, developers must ensure fairness, accountability,
and transparency in AI/ML-powered serverless systems.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 14

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

11. CONCLUSION
Serverless architecture represents a major shift in cloud computing by removing the burden
of infrastructure management and allowing developers to concentrate solely on application
logic. It offers benefits such as automatic scaling, reduced operational costs, faster
development cycles, and improved resource utilization, making it attractive for organizations
of all sizes. Applications can seamlessly handle varying workloads without manual
intervention, enabling teams to innovate and deliver products more efficiently.

However, serverless is not without its challenges. Issues such as cold start latency, vendor
lock-in, and security concerns remain critical considerations for developers and businesses.
Despite these limitations, the serverless paradigm continues to mature with improvements in
frameworks, tools, and best practices that address many of these concerns.

As the technology evolves, serverless is becoming a key enabler of modern cloud-native

applications. Its integration with AI, machine learning (ML), IoT, and enterprise-scale
systems demonstrates its versatility and potential. With its pay-per-use pricing model and
growing ecosystem, serverless empowers organizations to build scalable, event-driven, and
resilient applications. With continued innovation by cloud providers, it is poised to become
an integral part of the future of computing—offering developers a simplified and agile
environment for building next-generation solutions.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 15

22MCA43: TECHNICAL SEMINAR Serverless Architecture

12. REFERENCES
1. Spillner, C. (2017). Serverless Computing and Function-as-a-Service (FaaS):
Overview and Research Directions.
2. Baldini, I., et al. (2017). Serverless Computing: Current Trends and Open Problems.
Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Serverless Computing.
3. Lloyd, W., et al. (2018). Serverless Computing: Economic and Architectural Impact.
IEEE Cloud Computing.
4. Jonas, E., et al. (2019). Cloud Programming Simplified: A Berkeley View on
Serverless Computing.
5. Castro, P., et al. (2019). Security Challenges in Serverless Architectures. IEEE
Internet Computing.
6. AWS Lambda Documentation – Amazon Web Services.
7. Microsoft Azure Functions Documentation – Microsoft.
8. Google Cloud Functions Documentation – Google.
9. IBM Cloud Functions (OpenWhisk) Documentation – IBM.

Department of CSE(MCA), VTU’s CPGS, Kalaburagi Page 16