[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

Diff in Diff Report

Uploaded by

duyanh1.nguyen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

Diff in Diff Report

Uploaded by

duyanh1.nguyen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

The Impact of Policy X: A Difference-in-Differences

Approach

Introduction
This research examines the effect of Policy X on Outcome Y using a Difference-in-Differences
(DiD) approach. The treatment group consists of … while the control group is composed of …

Study: Something
Data Description
Table PLACEHOLDER presents summary statistics for key variables before and after Policy X.

Pre-Treatment Post-Treatment Pre-Control Post-Control


Variable Mean Mean Mean Mean
Outcome Y 10.5 12.1 10.8 11.0
Covariate A 5.2 5.1 5.3 5.2

Table PLACEHOLDER: Summary Statistics

Empirical Strategy
We estimate the following Difference-in-Differences regression model:

𝑌𝑖𝑡 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 Post𝑡 + 𝛽2 Treatment𝑖 + 𝛽3 (Post𝑡 × Treatment𝑖 ) + 𝑋𝑖𝑡 𝛾 + 𝜀𝑖𝑡
where 𝑌𝑖𝑡 is the outcome for unit 𝑖 at time 𝑡, Post𝑡 is an indicator for post-treatment period,
Treatment𝑖 is an indicator for treatment group, and 𝑋𝑖𝑡 includes control variables.
We justify the use of covariates PLACEHOLDER based on logic (as follows) or domain-
specific precedent (references).

Results
Table PLACEHOLDER presents the results of our Difference-in-Differences estimation.

1
(1) Baseline (2) Controls (3) Robust
Post × Treatment 2.1*** 1.8** 1.9**
(0.5) (0.6) (0.6)
Controls No Yes Yes
Observations 2000 2000 2000
R-squared 0.15 0.18 0.19

Table PLACEHOLDER: Difference-in-Differences Regression Results

Parallel Trends Assumption


The key identifying assumption in a DiD framework is the parallel trends assumption. Figure
PLACEHOLDER plots the trends in Outcome Y for both groups before and after the policy.
[FIGURE HERE]
Our theory of change (described) also grounds our assumption that trends would develope simi-
larly absent treatment.

Robustness Checks
To test the robustness of our results, we did some things:

1. Alternative Control Groups: Using a different set of control observations.


2. Placebo Tests: Estimating DiD on a pre-policy period.
3. Event Study Approach: Estimating treatment effects over multiple time periods.

Discussion
Our findings suggest that Policy X influenced Outcome Y (in some way). The results are robust
to (whatever robustness checks).

You might also like