Michigan 05
Michigan 05
PREPARATION GUIDE
December 5, 2005
   BUSINESS SCHOOL
   CONSULTING CLUB
                                                                            © 2005 Michigan Consulting Club
Contents
Editor’s note
            Introduction to cases
                       •         Administering cases
                       •         Receiving cases
The cases
                                                                 Editor’s Note
  Dear Michigan Consulting Club Member,
  If you are reading this, then it is likely you are interested in pursuing a consulting career upon graduation from business
  school. In order to increase your familiarity with the consulting interview format, the Michigan Consulting Club has
  established a multilateral training program focusing on the different parts of the recruiting and interviewing process. This
  book focuses on the ‘case-interview’ portion of the consulting interview and is to be used in conjunction with other case-
  oriented club training materials.
  The elements tested in a case interview are core to firms’ hiring decisions. These cases, or mini-business problems, are a
  glimpse into a consultant’s (and often the interviewer’s) life as they are frequently taken from real client experiences.
  Given practice and experience, cases become a natural way of thinking about how you would structure approaches and
  solutions to nearly any type of problem. Along the way, we hope you will find you enjoy solving problems in this manner,
  and would enjoy performing this type of work for a living.
  In order to facilitate your preparation, your fellow club members have recorded their real-life case interview experiences
  and their customized frameworks and solution elements. These cases act as a strong reference point for what to expect
  during a consulting interview, but are in no way all encompassing. Since each case comes down to a conversation
  between the interviewer and the candidate, it is very plausible that one candidate could receive the same case from two
  different interviewers and have two very different conversations about the business problem. In fact, we encourage this.
  Finally, you may have noticed that you are reading this compilation in landscape format. This is intentional. Consultants
  think in terms of PowerPoint slides much more often than essay-style documents. They also constantly work to devise the
  most succinct way to illustrate and frame-out a problem, necessary action steps, and a solution. This said, the ’05-’06
  preparation guide has broken from the tradition of book-based cases by adopting PowerPoint deck-based cases. You will
  find this format dovetails well with how you write your notes in cases, and how you will convey information as a
  consultant.
Good luck, and remember your fellow club members are here to help,
  2005-2006 Board
  Michigan Consulting Club
Contents
Editor’s note
            Introduction to cases
                       •         Administering cases
                       •         Receiving cases
The cases
                                                                 Administering Cases
  Great case experiences are not solely determined by strong candidates cranking out
  amazing issue and financial-based analyses. The interviewer’s interaction with the
  candidate and ability to convey information will very easily change the style of a case.
  Given the interviewer’s position of power in the discussion, there are several things to keep
  in mind prior to, during, and after a case interview.
                                                  With
                                                  With these
                                                       these steps
                                                             steps in
                                                                   in mind,
                                                                      mind, you
                                                                            you should
                                                                                should be
                                                                                        be able
                                                                                            able to
                                                                                                 to
                                                 conduct
                                                 conduct aa concise
                                                            concise and
                                                                     and rewarding
                                                                         rewarding case
                                                                                   case interview.
                                                                                         interview.
2005-2006 MICHIGAN CONSULTING CASE INTERVIEW PREPARATION GUIDE                                                                                                          -4-
                                                                            © 2005 Michigan Consulting Club
Contents
Editor’s note
            Introduction to cases
                       •         Administering cases
                       •         Receiving cases
The cases
                                                                   Receiving Cases
  You will have a lot of instruction about general conduct and how to receive specific types of
  cases during the Consulting Club’s training program, however there are several things to
  always keep in mind to maximize the value of each case you receive.
                                                            Good
                                                            Good luck,
                                                                 luck, and
                                                                       and remember
                                                                           remember to
                                                                                    to have
                                                                                       have fun!
                                                                                            fun!
2005-2006 MICHIGAN CONSULTING CASE INTERVIEW PREPARATION GUIDE                                                                                                         -6-
                                                                            © 2005 Michigan Consulting Club
Contents
Editor’s note
            Introduction to cases
                       •         Administering cases
                       •         Receiving cases
The cases
Contents
Editor’s note
            Introduction to cases
                       •         Administering cases
                       •         Receiving cases
The cases
Format Introduction
  In this case preparation guide you will find four types of slides. The type of each slide
  is noted in the upper left corner.
                                         This is where the initial business problem is posed and the interviewer is provided with any
      Establishing the                   additional information they can provide to the candidate upon request. These slides are to be kept
           Case                          by the interviewer.
                                         This handout will eventually make its way to the candidate’s hands. However, when this handoff
  Candidate Handout /                    occurs is at the discretion of the interviewer. Some interviewers may choose to overwhelm their
     Assignment                          candidate with a large amount of information early on to see them struggle, others may be
                                         reluctant to provide information unless asked specifically. Assignments for the candidate are
                                         exactly that, and should be expressly completed under the eye of the interviewer.
          Additional                     These slides are a continuation of the ‘Establishing the Case’ slides, either adding more
         Questions/                      information to provide the candidate (upon request or due to timing), or taking the case in a new
       Information for                   direction. These slides are to be kept by the interviewer.
          Candidate
                                         These slides suggest where the case could/should go based on the initial case information and
      Sample Solution                    backup data. These frameworks are by no means the only possible solution, but should provide
         Elements                        the interviewer some structure for where the candidate should be heading. These slides are to be
                                         kept by the interviewer, but information can be shared as the interviewer sees fit.
                     As
                     As evidenced
                        evidenced by
                                   by the
                                      the loose
                                           loose framework
                                                 framework inin each
                                                                each case,
                                                                     case, you
                                                                           you are
                                                                               are encouraged
                                                                                   encouraged to
                                                                                              to establish
                                                                                                 establish
                    variants on these cases  for additional practice
                    variants on these cases for additional practice
2005-2006 MICHIGAN CONSULTING CASE INTERVIEW PREPARATION GUIDE                                                                                   - 10 -
Quick
Quick Brainteaser
      Brainteaser Case
                  Case
                                                                                                                        © 2005 Michigan Consulting Club
                                                                      Additional Information to
   Problem Statement Narrative                                                                      Sample Solution Methodology
                                                                       Provide Upon Request
  Please estimate the number                                        • About 10M new cars are        • There are 70M cars on the
  of passenger car tires sold                                         sold each year                  road
  each year in the United                                                                              • 60M old cars
  States.                                                           • Cars last about 7 years          • 10M new cars
                                                                      before needing replacement    • Tires last three years
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
1%: Industry accepted fraud rate 0.001%: Anticipated fraud rate $0.01/year in fraud with pen
  100M cards exist across USA                                                                              If pen costs <$100, then beneficial
                                                                                                           for card companies
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
     Candidate should                          Cost Center        Cost (% rev)         Cost ($)        Savings (% cost)       Savings $             New Cost ($)
         calculate                               Labor               50%                $5M                   5%                  $250K                $4.75M
      implications of                          Equipment             25%               $2.5M                  5%                  $125K               $2.375M
      changing cost                           Administrative         20%                $2M                   1%                   $20K                $1.98M
        structure…                               Profits              5%               $500K                                                       $895K PROFIT
                                                 Current profit        Interest rate           Cost of firm         Expected profit       Undiscounted Break-even
       Then want to                                   $500M                10%                    $5M                     $895K                    5.58 years
     conduct a break-                                                 (CoC – growth)                                                      (stating: over 5 yrs is fine)
      even analysis.                                                                                                                         TOO LONG = NO GO
                                         • No industry experience
  A solid interview will
     address other                       • Cultural issues (small operations purchased by large company)
    potential risks…                     • National entrants overpowering effort
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
     Initial revenue driver                            …Drill to increased    Given contract, client       …And take action to
          questions…                                     competition.        must investigate price…       improve revenues.
 Increased competition?                           Competitors competing      Price elasticity of         In the short run while
 Yes!                                             on price ($30 vs. $50)     demand is 0.5               contracts are tied with
                                                                                                         current channel,
 Substitute products?                             Competitors in different   Customers not very          increasing price to
 Yes!                                             channel                    price sensitive             increase revenues to
                                                                                                         $5.4B from $5B is
 Decline in market                                Client can not change      Increasing price by 20%     recommended
 demand? No, demand is                            channel                    to $60 will reduce          Longer term, the client
 higher than ever with do-                                                   demand to 90M units, etc    should investigate
 it-yourself work (our                                                                                   entering a broader array
 market) increasing                                                          Follow-up question:         of distribution channels
                                                                             Why not increase price      to ensure maximum
 Marketing budget                                                            by 40%? To further          product reach
 reduction? No, been                                                         increase revenues?
 very stable.                                                                                            Further, the client
                                                                             A: Demand may be non-       should explore a
                                                                             linear, and unpredictable
 Decline in distribution                                                                                 premium-value
                                                                             at large price changes
 channels? No- one                                                                                       proposition to compete
 stable contract.                                                                                        in price reduction market
                                                                                                         and retain margins
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
    There
    There are
          are any
              any number
                   number ofof responses
                               responses to
                                         to this
                                            this open-ended
                                                 open-ended case,
                                                            case, therefore
                                                                  therefore the
                                                                            the interviewer
                                                                                 interviewer is
                                                                                              is encouraged
                                                                                                 encouraged to
                                                                                                            to
                 allow
                  allow the
                        the candidate
                            candidate to
                                      to drive
                                         drive the
                                               the case.
                                                   case. Some
                                                         Some common
                                                              common elements
                                                                        elements maymay include:
                                                                                         include:
                                         Supply                                                               Demand
                    The US is essentially subsidizing word drug                                Nutritional planning, exercise, no-smoking, etc. are
                    consumption by paying higher prices. US expenditure             No         much cheaper to promote rather than having to deal
    Higher
                    pays for the majority of R&D and risk-premium costs          proactive     with complications (heart disease, diabetes) down the
     drug
                    for the pharma industry. Possible solutions are to             pre-        line. Possible solution: government (or employer)
   costs in
                    persuade drug companies to charge the same prices            symptom       sponsored programs promoting prevention activities.
     USA
                    everywhere, or threaten re-importation. Discuss long-          care        Discuss healthcare incentive to do this… where is the
                    term implications on R&D and curing diseases.                              financial return?
                    There is a growing trend of wealthy citizens seeking                       If a large number of doctors choose to live in a
                    out specialized care from private centers with                Doctors’     particular area (a large city, for instance), and there are
  Emerging          providers accommodating by opening specialized                             not enough patients to sustain a normal practice, the
                                                                                  ability to
   modular          clinics that only offer high-margin procedures (heart                      doctors could order additional (and possibly
                                                                                   induce
      Care          surgery), but are not burdened by low margin, but                          unnecessary) tests to generate additional revenue.
                    necessary, ER’s, etc. This takes needed funds out of          demand       Possible solution: fees per patient rather than fees per
                    full-service facilities. Discuss regulations or risks.                     service performed. Challenge on practicality
                    Healthcare providers need to make lots of money.                           The US treats every patient in the ER regardless of
                    They have invested in careers, R&D, capital, etc, and         Lack of      insurance. However, it is much more expensive to
                    need a return. This creates a motive of wanting to             health      handle something in the ER rather than when the
    Profit                                                                        care for
    motive          MANAGE disease rather than CURE disease to                                 problem first occurs (regular doctor visits, etc)
                    maximize return. All healthcare players make more              lower       Possible solution: Provide adequate health care for
                    money from a longer-term cash flow than onetime                class       lower class before problems become emergencies.
                    treatment. Discuss socialization vs. current model.                        Possible free-rider and socialization discussions
          Case
          Case
  Your client is a software maker that has one                         • Client goal: grow revenues
  product.
                                                                       • Product: Document authoring software (MS
                                                                         Word, etc)
  The CEO would like to know whether the
  company should offer multiple products instead                       • Possible product segmentation considered:
  of one.                                                                business vs. home products
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
500
                                          400
                                                                                                                       Home
                                                                                                                       Business
                                                                                                                       Combined
                                          300
200
100
                                              0
                                                  0               5       10        15      20          25   30
                                                                                                                  Users (M)
          Questions
          Questions
                                                       Use
                                                       Use this
                                                           this slide
                                                                slide as
                                                                      as ‘interviewer’s
                                                                         ‘interviewer’s guide’
                                                                                        guide’ after
                                                                                               after
                                                              providing
                                                              providing graph
                                                                         graph to
                                                                                to candidate
                                                                                   candidate
   • Is there anything else to think about?                                        • Segmentation shows the revenue max price
                                                                                     is $400 (w/ revenue of $6B) if price
                                                                                     discrimination is impossible
        Elements
        Elements
  • The candidate may discuss elements needed to create             • Little/no ability to create different products for different
    two versions of the product- these may include:                   markets could lead to price-led cross-segment product
      • Programming                                                   cannibalization
      • Testing/ QA
      • Packaging                                                   • Creating switching barriers would allow company to
      • Sales/marketing                                               differentiate between product lines without concern for
      • Distribution                                                  cannibalization
  •Related to the product/market differentiation issue, the         • Rather than separating current product into two separate
  firm could gain incremental revenue by either:                      products-
    • Establishing separate product sales/licensing costs for       • Client could offer a series of complimentary products to
      business/ home users ($200 for 1-3 licenses, and $550           their core product, adding incremental revenue and
      for additional, etc)                                            segmenting their customers based on how many
    • Approaching other vendors for bundling deals to attach          additional features they wanted (i.e.: adding interrelated
      product with other products                                     programs at a price)
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
                                                                   Purchasing/
                                   Demand                                                                         Sales &
                                                                    Materials           Manufacturing                               Customers
                                  Forecasting                                                                   Distribution
                                                                    sourcing
 Indications              Rather old                         Materials come       Old production           3 Distribution      Same customers as
 (only provide            forecasting tool has               from similar         equipment                centers (DCs):      competitors
 to candidate             tended to generate                 vendors as all other                          West, Midwest, East
 upon request)            overly cautious                    manufacturers        Foreman told us in
                                                                                                           US sales only
                          production                                              interview that he
                          numbers, but does                  Materials do not     tends to hedge           Will sell dough for
                          not account for all                spoil, spoilage only against forecasting      any use- regardless
                          spoilage cost                      occurs after         by overproducing-        of sales volume
                                                             product has been     it is a pain to retool
                                                                                                           Some products
                                                             manufactured         the machines all the
                                                                                                           have very low
                                                                                  time
                                                                                                           customer-turn
                                                 Overall
                                                 Overall Recommendation:
                                                         Recommendation: Overproduction
                                                                              Overproduction and
                                                                                               and low
                                                                                                    low volume
                                                                                                        volume SKUs
                                                                                                                 SKUs
                                                  are
                                                  are leading
                                                       leading to
                                                               to spoilage,
                                                                  spoilage, improving
                                                                             improving forecasting
                                                                                        forecasting and
                                                                                                     and equipment
                                                                                                         equipment
                                                   while
                                                   while rationalizing
                                                          rationalizing SKUs
                                                                        SKUs will
                                                                               will dramatically
                                                                                    dramatically improve
                                                                                                  improve situation
                                                                                                          situation
2005-2006 MICHIGAN CONSULTING CASE INTERVIEW PREPARATION GUIDE                                                                                         - 25 -
     Establishing
     Establishing the
                  the
                                                                                                                      © 2005 Michigan Consulting Club
          Case
          Case
          Elements
          Elements
Requisite Math
WTP per acre: $8.00 or $3.2K per average farm per year
  1.    Large: If we price the product at $80k we sell 1000                            1.   Skimming: start by pricing at $80k and then $32k and
        profit $70M                                                                         then $16k;
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
                    High domestic raw material costs raise the question:                       If trucks and buses purchase parts from similar
                    can we do better elsewhere?                                                original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), then
                                                                                 Sourcing      consolidating purchasing operations may add buyer
 Offshore/                                                                                     power and eliminate purchasing duplication
 Near-shore         Sourcing parts globally may reduce raw material costs
                    and increase profitability
                                                                                               Buses and trucks are built on similar platforms. Scale
                                                                                               may exist in R&D for any new products as well as
                                                                                Modularity     stocking duplicative components, when eliminated
                                                                                               would reduce inventory and handling costs
                    This is a dangerous ploy. Leveraging low cost labor
                    and low tax production may lead to increased short
                                                                                               If the bus plant is not operating at full capacity, it may
 Compete on         term sales (and potentially higher profits)                   Act as       take advantage of tax situation and low labor to
   Price            However if a competitor is able to follow, customers         supplier      cheaply supply parts to truck company
                    may see all benefit and there is no going back if it is a
                    mistake
                                                                                               Selling buses to those who purchase trucks and visa
                                                                                Co-leverage    versa adds to the potential client list of both
                                                                                  sales &      companies, potentially allowing for steal-share growth
                    Our low cost of production position may lend to a           distribution   in a stagnant industry
                    favorable position in a complementary industry.
  Seek new          Luxury, and other custom bus production requires
                    high labor element, where we have advantage.                               How many other bus manufacturers can offer bundled
   markets                                                                                     goods to governments and schools requiring trucks as
                    Further, higher margins make for attractive target           Bundling      well? By bundling pricing, the group can become a
                                                                                               central supplier for transportation equipment
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
Interviewer              Separately run between              Scale appears to exist in   Only one division-           Run as separate                     Run as separate
guidance for             divisions, but not very             maintenance, repair and     medical products - uses      organizations between               facilities across country
each area (do not        scalable                            operations purchasing       manufacturing and it is      divisions, selling to the           for each division, all
read verbatim)                                                                           not a core competence,       same clients- large                 running at about 50%
                                                                                         perhaps outsourcing?         benefit in combining                capacity
Possible                 This client exhibits the textbook case for ‘de-silo-ing’ and creating a matrix organization. By operating under consolidated cross-
candidate                division groups, the organization will be able to run with a much more efficient cost structure and leverage its cross-divisional
recommendation           strengths to increase revenues
                            Pharma        Med. Equip      Pharmacy     Drug Vend.                                            Pharma        Med. Equip       Pharmacy       Drug Vend.
                           Distribution   Mfg. & Dist.    Services      Machines                                            Distribution   Mfg. & Dist.     Services        Machines
                            Admin &        Admin &         Admin &      Admin &                               Admin &
                            Overhead       Overhead        Overhead     Overhead                              Overhead
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
  Revenue                                                                                    Revenue
  $100/ton x 1000 tons = $100K                                                               $110/ton x 800 tons = $88K
  Costs                                                                                      Costs
  Fixed: $20K                                                                                Fixed: $20K
  Variable: $70/ton x 1000 tons = $70K                                                       Variable: $70/ton x 800 tons = $56K
  Profits                                                                                    Profits
  $100K - $70K - $20K = $10K profit                                                          $88K - $56K - $20K = $12K profit
          Case
          Case
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
        Elements
        Elements
                                                                      Packers               Processors
                     Hog producers
                                                                 Prepare material        prepare consumer               Retail/ Distribution
                   grow and sell hogs
                                                                  for processing          products (client)
New competitors also suppliers: raising prices to client and lowering prices to retail
                                         • The client may choose to approach packers who have not yet forward-integrated into processing and establish
            Partnering                     exclusive purchasing deals
                                         • SOLUTION: Two major packers have not yet forward integrated, and would likely be very interested in a deal
                                         • By consolidating the sausage manufacturing business, the client would have increased buyer power over suppliers
            Acquiring                      and would be better positioned to combat rising material prices
                                           SOLUTION: If the packers do not lower material prices, they will still steal all price-conscious customers
                                         • Position the client product as a premium brand. A long history of production and ‘secret spices’ may convince
             Branding                      customers that value may not be something you are looking for in a sausage
                                         • SOLUTION: This would effectively segment the market by premium/value- addressing profitability via higher margins
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
                                                                                     Revenue/ Efficacy
       Acquisition / Program Type                                                                                                     Cost Measurement
                                                                                       Measurement
or DVDs, or even cash, after and compare it with another • In-store equipment
Pilot Program
                                                                                                                      Startup Costs
                    a certain dollar value of                                        (this is what they actually                         • Data mining software
                    purchases is reached                                             did), essentially setting an                        • Advertising
                                                                                     experiment and control
                                                                                     population using statistical
    Informational
                                                                                                                    Continuing
                                                                                                                    Operations
                    Provide customers with                                           access to special reduced                        •Other costs:
                                                                      Deals
    Promotional
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
  • On what days are we running these discounts compared to our                         • Service levels on sales days- are customer service representatives
    competitors? Friday vs. Saturday?                                                     readily available?
                                                                                        • Is inventory adjusted in accordance with sale days?
  • What newspapers are we using to deliver the brochures? Which is
                                                                                        • Back-end logistics: are prices updated in-store and in computer
    best for our customers: Times or Post?
                                                                                          systems? (THIS WAS THE PRIMARY ISSUE- systems were not
                                                                                          updated and customers were highly confused by discrepancy)
  • What is the layout of brochures compared to competitors?
                                                                                        • Generating additional revenue from each customer on non-
                                                                                          discounted products?
  • How accessible are the stores compared to our competitors?
  • Use retro-active demand analysis to determine which sales are the                   • The same could be true with salad dressing, dessert toppings, etc.
    most effective for gross revenue purposes
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
     Interviewer possible
                                                        Product mix in stores            Demand forecasting           Back-end logistics
           follow-up
   • What risks do you see                              It appears 80% of stores         • Forecasting which        • Tying forecasting with
     in doing this?                                     are geared toward sales            books may become           book orders could
       • Product Mix: slow                              of products with an                breakouts would allow      reduce ‘multiple small
         sellers are required                           expected profit of                 for massive headway        order’ costs for small
         to get people to                               ($0.50), perhaps                   on competition and big     sellers that become
         purchase                                       reallocating this mix to           profits                    breakouts
         bestsellers                                    be more favorable to
                                                        bestsellers and break-           • Suggested model          • Moving to a tiered
        • Demand                                        out books would                    inputs:                    model, selling small
          forecasting: Getting                          increase profits                     • Media mentions         sellers online or in
          the breakouts                                                                      • Fads                   lower-overhead
          wrong would be                                                                     • Pre-orders             establishments (see
          very costly                                                                        • Tie-ins                risks to left)
                                                                                             • Online sales
        • Logistics:                                                                         • Author’s previous
           - Little downside                                                                   sales
                                                                                             • Subject matter
                                                                                               compared to recent
                                                                                               hits
                                Possible
                                Possible derivative
                                         derivative case:
                                                    case: Conduct
                                                          Conduct analysis
                                                                  analysis from
                                                                           from publisher
                                                                                publisher viewpoint
                                                                                          viewpoint
          Case
          Case
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
                                                                0
                                                                      2005   2006*   2007*   2008*   2009*    2010*
Year (*expected)
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
$25
$20
                                          $15                                                                   Profits
                                                                                                                Cost of Sales
                                          $10
$5
                                           $0
                                                           Online Auction Model     Traditional Auction Model
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
90%
80%
70%
60%
50% Contract
40% Auction
30%
20%
10%
                                             0%
                                                                        Sheep Sales
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
                                                                         Farmers ‘Online’
                                          50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
                                           0%
                                                        2005     2006*     2007*    2008*   2009*    2010*
Year (*expected)
        Elements
        Elements
                                         **Use 2009 numbers to show 5-year ‘maturity’ and steady-state for profitability- this
                                         model assumes a 100% penetration- candidate should deduct that penetration is
        Expected
                                         irrelevant given overall industry profitability**
        Calculation
      (Approximate)                               400M           x     50%       x         30%        x           $10               $6.66M Profit
                                                lbs sheep            auctioned       ‘online farmers’       per 100 lbs sold   =
                                                                                                                                   Less than $10M
  • If this product were already launched, how would you                                 •   Trade magazine advertisements
    choose to market it?                                                                 •   Door to door sales & training representatives
                                                                                         •   Commissioned farmer representatives
                                                                                         •   Relationships with sheep processors ‘pull-driven’
                                                                                         •   Value proposition: cost savings in moving heard to
                                                                                             auction site: producers could pick heard up at farm
          Case
          Case
  The client has hired you to size the market and                                  • 10M suburban households
  recommend if this is a good investment or not.                                   • 1M new suburban households each year
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
                                                                 Client
                                                                 Client Market
                                                                        Market Situation
                                                                               Situation
     Number of homes
                                         10 Million
        in market
        Home growth
                                         1 Million
          last year
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
                                           90%
                                                                                       1% growth
                                           80%
70%
60%
                                           50%
                                                                                       1% growth
                                           40%                                                           >$1M
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
                                                                           Competitive Landscape
                                         100%                      National Player 5           Local Player 5
60%
50%
20%
10%
                                             0%
                                                                 National Market              Local Market
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
                                           0%
                                                       National   National   National    Local      Local
                                                       Player 1   Player 2   Player 3   Player 1   Player 2
        Elements
        Elements
       Market Sizing
     (Annual Revenue)                              $1000 x  1M         + $30/mo     x     12  x      10M      =            $4.6B
                                                  System New Homes       Service        Months Existing Homes          Annual Revenue
                                         70% of alarm buying market is growing at 1% per year, with the overall alarm buying market
                                         growing at or less than population growth
       Market Growth
                                         This makes market growth unattractive
                                         The national market is dominated by one player with several other strong players making entry
                                         very difficult
    Competition Reach
                                         The local market is highly fragmented with apparently 1-2 major players in each market, making
                                         entry in this space equally difficult with local de-facto monopolies
                                         Large national players appear to be operating with rather low EBIT numbers – this may be due to
         Competitive                     spread out infrastructure and inefficient utilization of resources
         Environment                     Smaller local players have stronger EBITs, however this leaves them in a strong position to
                                         compete, and entry will be difficult
                                                Market
                                                Market does
                                                       does not
                                                            not appear
                                                                appear to
                                                                       to be
                                                                          be attractive
                                                                             attractive at
                                                                                        at this
                                                                                           this time
                                                                                                time
          Case
          Case
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
Pricing By Channel
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
     (upon
     (upon request)
           request)
                     Year 1           Year 2          Year 3     Year 4   Year 5   Year 6   Year 7   Year 8   Year 9 Year 10
                       90%              80%             70%       60%      50%      40%      30%      20%     10%      0%
        Elements
        Elements
    of profit differences.                     Summed Baiting Profits     400       445      485       520        550      575      595      610        620            625
                                                Summed Spray Profits      250       340      420       490        550      600      640      670        690            700
• Discounting would virtually eliminate profit difference between products (all spray profit over bait is 5 yrs out)
   Aggregating indications               • Incumbent client can leverage built-in fear for customers (toxicity) of new, cheaper, product
     between systems…
                                         • If there is a low/no startup cost for new product, there is little/no downside risk of entry
                                         Allowing the spray market to cannibalize baiting sales will lead to drawn out per-customer profit, and will increase
    …Allows for a concise                profit-reliance on renewals.
       client-tailored                   Given entrant and startup costs, client should equip fleet for spray application, but should advertise benefits of baiting
     recommendation.                     over spray (time tested, safer for kids & food, etc), along with ability to accommodate both applications such as: ‘Your
                                         full service termite eradication expert since 1925.’
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
                                         • Example: ‘The sales per representative discrepancy appears to have three primary drivers:
  The candidate will be                     • Our reps are tied up with administrative tasks while they could be out selling 25% more
   able to answer the                       • Our quota system rewards our reps to ‘sell what they know’ – not what we want them to sell
   client’s question…                       • Our representatives are very experienced, but technology is changing and they need to be current with their
                                              product knowledge
                                         •Retool processes to increase rep time selling, likely by increasing administrative staff
      …And provide a                     •Implement training program for representatives so they understand both products equally
      pragmatic set of                   •Adjust quota system to align with corporate goals
         solutions.                        • Specifically, determine which product is more profitable, and steer quota toward this product
                                           • Determine a more ‘balanced’ quota system that does not reward reps for concentrating work in one area
          Case
          Case
         to
         to Provide
            Provide
 Concentration                 4 players with equal              10 players with equal    12 players with equal   Highly fragmented
                               share                             share                    share
 Competitive                   Patented technologies             Products are mfg based   Major IT consulting     Geographically based
 Tactic                                                          w/ little intellectual   firms
                                                                 property
                                                                                                                  10%
 Profit Margins                15%                               10%                      20%
 Other                         All products are in               Natural extension of     Track records are highly Requires workers with
                               performance                       current products (ATMs   important                electrician skills
                                                                 & Disk drives)
        Elements
        Elements
                                             Expected Profits/ $
                                             Industry Revenue      Corporate Alignment   Competition   Entry Strategy
               While
               While system
                     system implementation
                             implementation is
                                             is more
                                                more profitable,
                                                      profitable, card
                                                                  card development
                                                                       development isis more
                                                                                        more aligned
                                                                                               aligned with
                                                                                                       with client
                                                                                                            client
                        and
                        and has
                            has less
                                 less competition-
                                      competition- recommend
                                                   recommend acquiring
                                                                acquiring one
                                                                           one of
                                                                               of four
                                                                                  four firms
                                                                                        firms in
                                                                                               in market
                                                                                                  market
          Case
          Case
  Information
   Information to
                to
      Provide
      Provide
      (NOT
       (NOT A
    HANDOUT)
            A
     HANDOUT)
                                               Case 21: Insurance Provider (II of IV)
                                                     The Boston Consulting Group, Round II
       ASSIGNMENT
       ASSIGNMENT
                                          Candidate:
                                          Candidate: Please
                                                     Please complete
                                                            complete and
                                                                     and explain the 22nd
                                                                         explain the   nd column
                                                                                          column
        Elements
        Elements
                                         • Implementing the new structure already used by competitors may cause payouts to drift in
     …and voicing                          unexpected directions (either up or down)
    concerns about                       • Potential for fraud must be addressed prior to full system wide rollout
        risk…                            • Some customers may prefer the ease of a scheduled visit rather than having to undergo footwork
                                           on their own (especially if serious accident)
                                         Survey selection of client base (and potential client base) anonymously to determine acceptance of
     …Leads to a                         model
     client-tailored                     Institute pilot program in a select area to determine effect on payout and client morale- if positive
   recommendation.                       in both regards, rollout system wide
          Case
          Case
        Elements
        Elements
        • Appears mailers are sent indiscriminately, by sending               • Example: door-to-door sales may allow for specific
          targeted mailers to high-potential candidates                         selection of areas & homes rather than indiscriminate
            • This would likely lead to higher conversion ratios                mailing
          Case
          Case
  The company has only one customer and the customer                          Quantity (tons)       100              40           180                 80
                                                                                   Full Cost         $6             $4.7           $8                $4.7
  continuously forces the client to price down. The                                     Price        $7              $5            $7                 $5
  company has one factory outside of Detroit and the
  factory is running at 70% utilization. The company
                                                                              • Small parts are more labor intensive to produce than
  manufactures 42% of the product on that factory and
                                                                                mats
  outsources the remaining 58%.
                                                                              • Mats lend more ‘brand recognition’ to products than
  The CEO would like to improve factory utilization as well
  as improve profitability… could you help develop some                         small parts
  recommendations?                                                            • Parts produced internally have a higher quality than
                                                                                outsourced parts
                                                                              • Outsourced work has lower labor cost than internal
        Elements
        Elements
              Internal Production
                                                                                                 Internal capacity: 140 / 0.7 = 200 tons ; max out internal mats mfg!
                                                            Outsourced Production
Rug (P) Rug (Q) Equip. (P) Equip. (Q) Rug (P) Rug (Q) Equip. (P) Equip. (Q) $1 x 200 + $0.30 x 0 + -$1 x 80 + $0.30 x 120
100 + 12 + -180 + 24 Rug (P) Rug (Q) Equip. (P) Equip. (Q) Rug (P) Rug (Q) Equip. (P) Equip. (Q)
          Case
          Case
      to
      to Provide
         Provide
  •Only provide each item when asked                                       • SKU portfolio did not change
  •Note: Company still growing by adding stores
                                             3Q 2002             3Q 2003   • Pilot had no effect on other operations
     Digital Camera Rev. ($M)                   502               899
          Total Store Rev ($M)                  7.75               12      • Q3 runs June- September
                    # of stores                 199               296
    Digital Camera COGS ($M)                    251               674
                                                                           • Generalist wage changes insignificant
        Elements
        Elements
                                         • Stores increased by ~50%, therefore camera revenue per store increased about 30%
      Analysis of
                                         • However, COGS increased about 170% or 120% after normalizing for store openings
        financial
     performance…                        • This means digital camera profits actually declined during the pilot program, even though
                                           revenues increased dramatically
                                         • It appears specialists were focusing on selling low margin cameras in order to earn revenue-
                                           driven commissions
       …Leads to                         • In terms of revenues, the program was a success, however the client suffered in terms of profits.
   clients’ answers.
                                         • Recommendation: re-run the program after determining a profit-driven commission plan, based
                                           on results, determine rollout possibility for system
          Case
          Case
  The CEO, who is new and is an outsider to the company,                            •   Current pickups or drop-offs/ hr: 2
  has asked you to help prioritize some short term                                  •   Pickups or drop-offs/ hr w/ software: 2.5
  investments, as well as advise on where the company                               •   Hourly rate $100
  should go in the long term.                                                       •   Annual system wide pickups: 4M
                                                                                    •   Drop-offs: 4M
                                                                                    •   Tax rate: 40%
  In terms of the short term investments, the CEO is                                •   No depreciation
  particularly interested in a Route Optimization software
  that has been developed by one of the regional divisions                          • Labor is 1/3 of total costs
  and has significantly improved profitability within that                          • Labor is 50% pickups & 50% deliveries
  division. So, first the CEO wants to know what the
                                                                                    • Ask candidate to outline their idea of the cost buckets
  impact to the firms profitability will be…
                                                                                       • Fuel
                                                                                       • Drivers
                                                                                       • Warehousing
                                                                                       • Trucks, other equipment
     Handout
     Handout
  (upon
  (upon request
         request
      about
       about
     software
     software
                                                                 Case 25: Trucking (II of III)
    function)
     function)                                                      DiamondCluster, Round I
                                                                                                            Region 2:
                      Region 1:
                                                                                                            Pick ups &
                      Pick ups &
                                                                                                            Deliveries
                      Deliveries
A D
                                                                                Long Haul
                       B                                                                                                 E
                                                                 Market A                        Market B
                       C                                                                                                 F
                                                                            Impact of software
                                                                              (local markets)
     Handout
     Handout
  (upon
  (upon request
         request
      about
       about
     software
     software
                                                                 Case 25: Trucking (III of III)
    function)
     function)                                                         DiamondCluster, Round I
      BACKGROUND
      BACKGROUND
    (Upon
     (Upon Request)
           Request)
Processing Cost
                                            Cost
                                            Cost differences
                                                 differences are
                                                             are accepted
                                                                 accepted due
                                                                          due to
                                                                              to differing
                                                                                 differing quality
                                                                                           quality
    (Upon
     (Upon Request)
           Request)
Port Margins
    (Upon
     (Upon Request)
           Request)
    (Upon
     (Upon Request)
           Request)
20 miles
300 miles
          Information
           Information
    If the candidate does not drive to manufacturer                                        Guidance for interviewer and
    transportation costs in 15 min., provide hints…                                     information provided upon request
  • What drives the customer decision in choosing which                         • Manufacturer transportation costs by port:
    port to ship from?
                                                                                                 Hong Kong       Zhanjiang        Shenzhen
  • What costs does a manufacturer incur while shipping a                          Total Cost       $300           $210                $180
    container from his plant to end customers?
                                                                                • Hourly labor cost is the same for all trips
  • How does the manufacturer get the container to port?
                                                                                • There is an administrative border between HK and
  • How about manufacturer transportation costs?                                  mainland China- trucks have to undergo customs
                                                                                  clearances (and endure long waits)
                                                                                    • 50% time waiting, 50% in customs
                                                                                • Long lines in evenings, but no lines during day & night
                                                                                • Customs communications are highly underdeveloped
                                                                                • Need two drivers for HK, mainland drivers not allowed;
                                                                                  also salaries much higher in HK
                                                                                • HK government has a stake in the company and
                                                                                  receives significant tax benefits
          Elements
          Elements
  • Convince HK government to invest in building out the                        • Orchestrate a single customs clearance (at HK border
    customs station at the border to increase throughput                          or at port) rather than a customs border at each
  • Invest in updating customs information and                                  • Establish a separate trucking company to absorb
    communication systems                                                         border cost
                                                                                   • This is a short-term solution
  • Lobby HK government to abolish regulation that
    prohibits Chinese commercial drivers to drive in Hong                       • Incentivize manufacturers to ship during the day or late
    Kong                                                                          at night to avoid evening rush
         Case
         Case (I)
               (I)
         Case
         Case (II)
               (II)
Profit $560 M
        Elements
        Elements
    Ask candidate:                       •Answers (which should be backed up by some rationale) could include:
   can you provide                        • Risk susceptibility
    me a couple of                        • Size (revenues)
   ways to segment                        • Size (employees)
    our small and                         • Industry (service/ production)
    medium sized                          • Lender services
      business                            • Borrower services
     customers?
                                         • Given the potential return and connection to our current offerings, the benefits far
                                           outweigh the risks- looks like a go! (candidate should structure out thoughts)
      So, should we
      move forward
        with this?
          Case
          Case
  Your client is a very small consumer packaging                       • Candidate should be interested in issues such as:
  company. One of their product lines, for which they                     • Capacity of the machine
  have one dedicated machine, is plastic bags for food                    • Demand for each product
  storage. They have 3 sizes of bags – 4” (sandwich bag)                  • Revenue / costs for each product
  8” quart bag and 12” (gallon bag). The bags are all the                 • Production time for each product
  same width – the sizes refer to the length of the bag.
                                                                       • Provide candidate with capacity and demand/ blank-
                                                                         profitability slides if they ask for that type of data
  The client is facing more demand than they think that
                                                                       • Prompt with “So, based on this information, what
  they have capacity to produce. They have called us in to
                                                                         would you recommend the company produces on its
  figure out a 2 key questions:
                                                                         rollers and why?”
                                                                           • Answer should be: 4” and 8” bags w/ 12” bags as
   How can they best utilize their current bag capacity?                     overload
   Should they invest in a new bag machine?                            • PART II: “So, the client has some extra demand they
                                                                         have not met, should they invest in another roller?
                                                                         What information would you like to know?”
  Let’s start with the capacity question. How would you                   • If asked:
  want to start to think about this problem? What                             • Cost: $750K
  information would you want to have?                                         • Payback: 5 years
                                                                              • Demand growing at population growth
                                                                              • Mature market, no dramatic changes
                                                                              • Throughput growing at 2% due to efficiency
(1) If detailed exhibits exist, they will be referenced in this box,
    and included in full on the following slide(s)
2005-2006 MICHIGAN CONSULTING CASE INTERVIEW PREPARATION GUIDE                                                                        - 89 -
      Candidate
      Candidate
                                                                                                                                              © 2005 Michigan Consulting Club
       Handout
       Handout
      Capacity
       Capacity
        (Upon
        (Upon
      Request)
       Request)
                                                   Case 28: Sandwich Bags (II of VII)
                                                The Boston Consulting Group, Sample Case
                                          4” bags
                                                                                                                      Key Capacity Data
                                            Machine
                                                                             1“
                                                                                  ba                  500 “bag-widths” produced per hour
                                                                                     g-w
                                                                                           idt
                                                                                                 h”
               4”             4”          4”            4”       4”         4”
                                                                                                      Runs 20 hours / day
                                             8” bags
                                                                                                      5 days / week
                                            Machine
                                                                            1“
                                                                                 ba                   50 weeks per year
                                                                                    g-w
                                                                                          idt
                                                                                                h”
                       8”                          8”                       8”
                                                                                                      Total of 5000 hours of production per year
                                             12” bags
                                             Machine
                                                                            1“
                                                                                 ba
                                                                                    g-w
                                                                                          idt
                                                                                                h”
                              12”                                     12”
      Handout
      Handout
     Profits
      Profits &
              &
      Demand
      Demand
       (Upon
       (Upon
                                                  Case 28: Sandwich Bags (III of VII)
     Request)
      Request)                                  The Boston Consulting Group, Sample Case
                                                                 Profitability and Demand by Product Type
4” 6 .02 9M
8” 3 .03 3M
12” 2 .04 3M
     Handout
      Handout
       (After
       (After
    completing
    completing
     previous
     previous
                                                  Case 28: Sandwich Bags (IV of VII)
       math)
       math)                                      The Boston Consulting Group, Sample Case
                                                                  Completed Profits & Capacity
         Information
          Information
  • Ask: What would you have to believe to say a new                   • $120K per year from 12” bags
    machine is a good idea? (suggestions)                                 • $600K profits over 5 years
     • Demand would increase faster than 2%
     • A new product could be introduced                               • Need $150K over 5 years for payback
     • Capacity could be rented out                                       • $30K per year
     • Prices will increase                                               • $0.03 per bag at 1M bags
                                                                          • $0.015 per bag at 2M bags
  • A NEW PRODUCT…                                                        • $0.01 per bag at 3M bags
  • Tell candidate: “let’s say the client’s R&D team has just
    come out with a new bag. It is a 2-in-1 bag, one side                 • To candidate: “So, if we could get $0.03 per bag and
    holds your sandwich and the other side holds your                       produce 1M bags we would be happy. Using this
    chips or lettuce to keep things from getting soggy.                     graph (next page), please draw me the curve that
    This bag is a 6” bag. Assume that if we stated to                       represents all of the price/quantity combinations
    produce this bag tomorrow it would be accepted, there                   where we would be willing to make the investment
    would be no lag time for people to catch on to using it.                in the roller.”
  What annual profit per bag would we need to generate in                 • Does this curve have any endpoints for our client?
   order to make the new roller a good purchase…
   Assignment
   Assignment
     Demand
     Demand
      Curve
      Curve                                       Case 28: Sandwich Bags (VI of VII)
                                                The Boston Consulting Group, Sample Case
               profit per
               bag ($)
0.03 x
1 # of bags (M)
        Elements
        Elements
          Case
          Case
  Your client is a gift wrapping paper manufacturer in the                 • Cost comparison provided on candidate handout slide-
  United States. They are considering a proposal to                          do not provide until candidate outlines potential
  outsource their manufacturing to mainland China. You                       differences and asks for specifics between options
  have been called in to assist in the go / no-go decision
  making process. They would like to know your                             • Fixed costs include:
  thoughts and your recommendation…                                           • Plant & machinery      See diagram for costs
                                                                              • Employees              See diagram for costs
                                                                           • Variable costs include:
  ASK CANDIDATE TO BEGIN BY ESTABLISHING COST
                                                                              • Raw paper material    $20 per ream (same for both)
  BUCKETS
                                                                              • Ink                   $100 per ream US
                                                                                                      $50 in China
  AFTER COST BUCKETS ESTABLISHED, ASK HOW THEY                                • Ink is special wrapping paper ink and an
  MAY DIFFER IN CHINA (A: LOWER LABOR COSTS?)                                   unavoidable cost
      Handout
      Handout
     Profits
      Profits &
              &
      Demand
      Demand
       (Upon
       (Upon
                                            Case 29: Gift Wrapping Paper (II of III)
     Request)
      Request)                              The Boston Consulting Group, Round I
+ =
China
+ =
        Elements
        Elements
                                         $100 Parts & Machines                 More equipment may increase repair cost
                                         $50 Labor                             Lower per employee, but hiring/firing costs may increase
  Generate comparable
                                         $20 Paper
      China costs
                                         $50 Ink                               Closer to supplier, still expensive
                                         $150 Shipping                                                                 $370 TOTAL COST
          Case
          Case
  Your client is a leading auto manufacturer in the United                        • This is an ‘understanding the market’ case, not a
  States. There are three primary players in this market.                           profitability case. If prompted, refer to ‘getting an
  Historically, the market leader had 30% share, our client                         understanding for the industry.’ The candidate should
  and the other player both had 20% market share.                                   not want to drive to the profit equation.
                                                                                  • Elasticity of demand: 5
  Over the past 2 years, your client’s share has been
  falling, and it wants to know why.                                              • Consumer preferences are the same and have not
                                                                                    shifted
         Elements
         Elements
                                         • In order to prevent competitors following a price reduction to regain share, there are several
                                           ‘locked’ methods the client can pursue:
       Recommended                           • Discounting higher-margin after-market products or add-on features
         solutions                           • Increase loyalty or trade-in program incentives
                                             • Increase financing incentives ie: ‘90 days same as cash’
                                                  Candidate
                                                  Candidate should
                                                             should discuss
                                                                    discuss benefits
                                                                            benefits and
                                                                                     and risks
                                                                                         risks of
                                                                                               of each-
                                                                                                  each- aa
                                                          final
                                                          final recommendation
                                                                recommendation is
                                                                                is not
                                                                                   not required
                                                                                       required
2005-2006 MICHIGAN CONSULTING CASE INTERVIEW PREPARATION GUIDE                                                                                           - 100 -