Process & Capacity Analysis
Process & Capacity Analysis
A B Raju, CEO
www.biztrans.in
Processes and Operations
Internal and
external customers
Inputs
• Workers Processes and
• Managers operations
• Equipment Outputs
• Facilities 1 3 • Services
• Materials 5 • Goods
• Services
• Land 2 4
• Energy
Information on
performance
Process Analysis
www.biztrans.in
Slot machine in a Casino
This slot machine has a payback of 95% and has a cycle time of 15 seconds
(a player can feed one one rupee coin at the interval of 15 seconds). If you
go with Rs.100 to this slot machine how long can you play?
www.biztrans.in
Slot machine
You can feed 240 coins at the rate of one per 15 seconds in an hour.
The pay out is 95%- so you would get back Rs.228 in an hour thus the slot
machine keeping Rs.12/hour of your playing on an average.
www.biztrans.in
Types of Processes
The other categorization is – single stage (milk pouch packing or our slot
machine) and multi stage (chocolate making to airplane manufacturing)
www.biztrans.in
Types of processes
www.biztrans.in
Processes at
manufacturing
High
organizations
Customization
Low
Low High
Volume
Processes at
manufacturing
High
organizations
Project process
• Selecting location for new plant
Customization
in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s business
processes
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Customization
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
Customization
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
• Machining precision
metal tubes
• Internal consulting team
Customization
at manufacturing firm
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
• Machining precision
metal tubes
Batch process
• Internal consulting team
Customization
at manufacturing
• Forging process to make firm fittings for pressure
vessels access
• Producing a batch of textbooks at R. R.
Donnelley’s plant
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
• Machining precision
metal tubes
• Internal consulting team
Customization
at manufacturing firm
Batch process
• Forging process to make fittings
for pressure vessels access
• Producing a batch of textbooks at
R. R. Donnelley’s plant
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
• Machining precision
metal tubes
• Internal consulting team
Customization
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
• Machining precision
metal tubes
• Internal consulting team
Customization
at manufacturing firm
Batch process
• Forging process to make fittings
for pressure vessels access
• Producing a batch of textbooks at
R. R. Donnelley’s plant
Line process
• Auto assembly
• King Soopers
bread line
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
• Machining precision
metal tubes
• Internal consulting team
Customization
Continuous process
at manufacturing firm
• Oil refiningBatch
process
process
• Borden’s pasta making
• Forging process to make fit-tings
for pressure vessels access
process • Producing a batch of textbooks at
R. R. Donnelley’s plant
Line process
• Auto assembly
• King Soopers
bread line
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
Processes at
manufacturing
High • Selecting location for
new plant in Europe
• Installing ERP for a
manufacturing firm’s
business processes organizations
Job process
• Machining precision
metal tubes
• Internal consulting team
Customization
at manufacturing firm
Batch process
• Forging process to make fittings
for pressure vessels access
• Producing a batch of textbooks at
R. R. Donnelley’s plant
Line process
• Auto assembly
• King Soopers
bread line
Continuous process
• Oil refining process
• Borden’s pasta
making process
Low
Low High
Volume
Project process
High
Processes at
• Real estate process for leasing
and constructing facilities for
large insurance company
service providers
• Student team’s field project
Job process
• Customer service process
at financial services firm
Customization
Batch process
• Order fulfillment process of
importer/distributor
• Placing purchase orders at public
relations agency
Line process
• Cafeteria line
• Teller line at bank
Continuous process
• Power generation plant
• Providing telephone line
access
Low
Low High
Volume
Low volume, make-
to-order process Project process
Volume and Process
Decisions for
• Selecting location for new
Less vertical plant in Europe
integration • Installing ERP for a
Manufacturing
manufacturing firm’s
More resource business processes
flexibility
Process design choices
More customer Job process
involvement • Machining precision metal
tubes
Less capital • Internal consulting team at
intensity/ manufacturing firm
automation
Batch process
• Forging process to make fittings
High volume, make- for pressure vessels access
• Producing a batch of textbooks at
to-stock process R. R. Donnelley’s plant
More vertical
Line process
integration • Auto assembly
Less resource • King Soopers bread
line
flexibility
Less customer Continuous process
involvement • Oil refining process
More capital
• Borden’s pasta making
process
intensity/
automation
Low High
Volume
Low volume,
customized-service
process
Less vertical
integration Project process Volume and Process
Decisions for Services
• Real estate process for leasing
More resource and constructing facilities for
flexibility large insurance company
More customer • Student team’s field project
Process design choices
involvement
Less capital Job process
• Customer service process at
intensity/ financial services firm
automation • General medical practice
High volume,
Batch process
standardized-service • Order fulfillment process of
importer/distributor
process • Placing purchase orders at public
More vertical relations agency
integration
Line process
Less resource • Cafeteria line
flexibility • Teller line at bank
Less customer
Continuous process
involvement • Power generation plant
More capital • Providing telephone line
access
intensity/
automation
Low High
Volume
In Processes
www.biztrans.in
Process Performance Measurement
• Activity times: how long does the worker spend on the task?
• Capacity = 1/activity time: how many units can the worker make per unit of time If
there are m workers at the activity: Capacity = m/activity time.
• Flow Time: The amount of time it takes a flow unit to go through the process.
NYPD procedures for getting a new tire
on a police car:
Officer fills out Tire Replacement Request (TRR) form
www.biztrans.in
www.biztrans.in
Banking: 126 bank study (1996)
Opening a checking acct with a $500 cashier’s check and
no prior banking relationship
www.biztrans.in
Kristen’s Cookies
Kristen’s Cookies
Line Balancing
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B Insert impeller shaft 30 A
C Attach axle 50 A
D Attach agitator 40 B
E Attach drive wheel 6 B
F Attach free wheel 25 C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H Attach controls 20 D, E
I Mount nameplate 18 F, G
Total 244
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B Insert impeller shaft 30 A
C Attach axle 50 A
D Attach agitator 40 B
E Attach drive wheel 6 B
F Attach free wheel 25 C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H Attach controls 20 D, E
I Mount nameplate 18 F, G
Total 244
A
40
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B Insert impeller shaft 30 A
C Attach axle 50 A
D Attach agitator 40 B
E
F
Attach drive wheel
Attach free wheel
6
25
B B
C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
Total 244
A
40
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B Insert impeller shaft 30 A
C Attach axle 50 A
D Attach agitator 40 B
E
F
Attach drive wheel
Attach free wheel
6
25
B B
C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
Total 244
A
40 C
50
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B
C
Insert impeller shaft
Attach axle
30
50
A
A
D
D Attach agitator 40 B
E Attach drive wheel 6 B B 40
F Attach free wheel 25 C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
Total 244
A
40 C
50
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B
C
Insert impeller shaft
Attach axle
30
50
A
A
D
D Attach agitator 40 B
E Attach drive wheel 6 B B 40
F Attach free wheel 25 C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
E
Total
A
244
6
40 C
50
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B
C
Insert impeller shaft
Attach axle
30
50
A
A
D
D Attach agitator 40 B
E Attach drive wheel 6 B B 40
F Attach free wheel 25 C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
E
Total
A
244
6
F
40 C 25
50
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B
C
Insert impeller shaft
Attach axle
30
50
A
A
D
D Attach agitator 40 B
E Attach drive wheel 6 B B 40
F Attach free wheel 25 C
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
E
Total
A
244
6
F
40 C 25
50
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B Insert impeller shaft 30 A D
C
D
Attach axle
Attach agitator
50
40
A
B
H
E Attach drive wheel 6 B B 40
F Attach free wheel 25 C 20
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
E
Total
A
244
6
F
40 C 25
50
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
Work Time Immediate
Element Description (sec) Predecessor(s)
A Bolt leg frame to hopper 40 None
B Insert impeller shaft 30 A D
C
D
Attach axle
Attach agitator
50
40
A
B
H
E Attach drive wheel 6 B B 40
F Attach free wheel 25 C 20
G Mount lower post 15 C
H
I
Attach controls
Mount nameplate
20
18
30 D, E
F, G
E
Total
A
244
6
F
40 C 25
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
D
H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F
40 C 25
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
D
H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F Desired output rate = 2400/week
40 C Plant operates 40 hours/week
25
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
D
H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F Desired output rate = 2400/week
40 C Plant operates 40 hours/week
25
50 r = 2400/40 = 60 Iunits/hour
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
D
H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F Desired output rate = 2400/week
40 C Plant operates 40 hours/week
25
50 r = 2400/40 = I60 units/hour
18
c = 1/60 = 1 minute/unit
G = 60 seconds/unit
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
D
H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F Desired output rate = 2400/week
40 C Plant operates 40 hours/week
25
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
D
H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F Desired output rate = 2400/week
40 C Plant operates 40 hours/week
25
50 TM = 244 seconds/60
I seconds
= 4.067 or 5 stations
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
D
H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F Desired output rate = 2400/week
40 C Plant operates 40 hours/week
25
50 TM = 244 seconds/60
I seconds
= 4.067 or 5 stations
18
G
Efficiency = [244\5(60)]100 = 81.3%
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
F Desired output rate = 2400/week
40 C Plant operates 40 hours/week
25
50 TM = 244 seconds/60
I seconds
= 4.067 or 5 stations
18
G
Efficiency = [244\5(60)]100 = 81.3%
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
Cumm Idle
F Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
Cumm Idle
F Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
30 E
A 6
Cumm Idle
F Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
Cumm Idle
F Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
Cumm Idle
F Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
Cumm Idle
F Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
S2 F
Cumm Idle
Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
S2 F
Cumm Idle
Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
S3 B,F,G B 30 30
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
S2 F
Cumm Idle
Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
S3 B,F,G B 30 30
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
S2 F
Cumm Idle
Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
S3 B,F,G B 30 30
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
S2 F
Cumm Idle
Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
S3 B,F,G B 30 30
E,F,G 18
F 55 5
G
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
A 6
S2 F
Cumm Idle
Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
S3 B,F,G B 30 30
E,F,G 18
F 55 5
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
S3 6
A S2 Cumm Idle
F Station Candidate Choice Time Time
40 C 25 S1 A A 40 20
50 S2 B,C C
I 50 10
S3 B,F,G B 30 30
E,F,G 18
F 55 5
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
S3 6
A S2 F
40 C 25
50 I
18
G
www.biztrans.in
Line Balancing Big Broadcaster
c = 60 seconds/unit
TM = 5 stations D
Efficiency = 81.3% H
B 40
20
S1 30 E
S3 6
A S4
S2 F S5
40 C 25
50 I
18
G
15
www.biztrans.in
Making hot dogs
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moM1s3cltTc)
Find the capacity of each process step, which is the maximum flow rate
(R) through that process step.
Express each process step’s capacity in the same units.
• You can choose any time length you want (for example: dogs / min, dogs /
day, lbs / second), but you must be consistent.
• We’ll choose dogs / min.
Grind:
22,000 dogs
• Each grinder = = 4,400 dogs / min.
5 min
• 2 grinders×4,400 dogs / min = 8,800 dogs / min.
Mix:
22,000 dogs
• Each mixer = = 1,100 dogs / min.
1
3 hour 60 min / hour
• 6 mixers×1,100 dogs / min = 6,600 dogs / min.
Capacity calculations – stuff, cook, peel, inspect
Stuff:
• 3 stuffers×2,300 dogs / min = 6,900 dogs / min.
Inspection.
•
Here are the rates: Grind trimmings, 8800 dogs per minute. Mix ingredients, 6600 dogs per
minute. Stuffing, 6900 dogs per minute. Cook and flavor, 5000 dogs per minute. Peeler, 5600
dogs per minute. Inspection 6120 dogs per minute. The bottleneck is cook and flavor, which
has the slowest rate of 5000 dogs per minute.
Capacity of the entire process 2
Result of step 3
Implied utilization
Result of step 1
The resource with the highest implied utilization is the bottleneck.
Note: You can also find the bottleneck based on calculating capacity for
each step and then dividing the demand at this resource by the capacity.
Process analysis with different types of flow units
• Staffing and processing time data (given to us) and capacity calculations:
Calculations:
Capacity per worker (c = 1/b) 0.05 0.07 0.13 0.50
(app/min)
Task's capacity (app/min) (d = a × 0.10 0.20 0.25 0.50
c)
Task's capacity (app/hour) (d × 60) 6 12 15 30
Evaluating implied utilization
Contact Contact Benchmark Decision
faculty employers grades letter
Data: 3 3 0 3
Consulting demand 0 11 0 11
(app/hour)
Staff demand (app/hour) 0 0 4 4
Internship demand
(app/hour)
Calculations
Total Demand (app/hour) (a) 3 14 4 18
Task's capacity (app/hour) (b) 6 12 15 30
Implied Utilization (a/b) 50% 117% 27% 60%
Calculations
Total Demand (min/hour) (d = a × b) 60 210 32 36
Task's capacity (e = c × 60) 120 180 120 60
(min/hour)
Implied Utilization (d/e) 50% 117% 27% 60%
• Defining the flow unit as “one minute of work” yields the same implied
utilizations as defining the flow unit as “one application.”
• In other words, the implied utilization does not depend on how the
flow unit is defined as long as all demands and capacities are defined
with the same flow unit.
Milling machine at Nova Cruz
• A milling machine is needed to make one steer support and two ribs
per Xootr.
• The setup time is the time needed to get ready for production during
which no production actually occurs.
• What is the capacity of the milling machine?
12 units
Capacity 3 units/minute.
4 minutes
• How long does it take to produce a batch of items?
• So the capacity of a process with setup times that produces in batches is:
Batch size
Capacity
Setup time Batch size Processing time
What are the batches for Nova Cruz?
Suppose Nova Cruz uses the following production cycle: 100 steer
supports, 200 ribs, 100 steer supports, 200 ribs, etc.
Within each rib batch, the same number of ribs are produced.
Each rib batch includes the same amount of time:
• This implies that certain events, like the start of rib production, occur at regular intervals.
Within each rib batch interval, the “setup time” is all time in which ribs are not
produced:
• Can include setting up to start rib production.
• Can include idle time (in which workers/machines are doing nothing).
• Can include time producing other things.
Analysis of rib batches 1
Setup Processing
time (min) time (min)
Steer 60 1
support
Rib 60 0.5
Batch size = 200 because 200 ribs are produced per rib batch.
Setup time = time per rib batch in which ribs are not being produced.
• = Rib setup time + Steer support setup time + Steer support production time
• = 60 min + 60 min + 1×100.
• = 220 min.
With this schedule the milling machine can produce 0.625 ribs per min:
Setup Processing
time (min) time (min)
Steer 60 1
support
Rib 60 0.5
Batch size = 100 because 100 steer supports are produced per steer support
batch.
Setup time = time per steer batch in which steers are not being produced:
• = Steer support setup time + Rib setup time + Rib production time.
• = 60 min + 60 min + 0.5×200.
• = 220 min.
The milling machine can produce 0.3125 steer supports per min:
Define a “batch” to be a “component set” (that is, 1 steer support and 2 ribs).
• This makes sense because each Xootr needs 1 support and 2 ribs.
Batch size
Capacity
Setup time Batch size Processing time
100
120 100 2
0.3125
• The milling machine can produce 0.3125 component sets per minute.
• We’ll use this definition of a batch in the remainder of our discussion.
Capacity increases as the batch size
increases
Batch size
Capacity
Setup time Batch size Processing time
• If the batch size is 12, the Milling Machine is the bottleneck (0.0833
units/min).
• If the batch size is 300, Assembly is the bottleneck (⅓ units/min).
• What is the smallest batch size such that the Milling Machine does not
constrain the process flow?
Choosing the batch size to meet a target
capacity 1
• Rearrange it to yield an equation for the batch size that yields the
target capacity:
Capacity Setup time
Batch size
1 Capacity Processing time
• Hence with a batch size of 120 units or more, the milling machine’s
capacity will be at least ⅓ units / min, equal to assembly’s capacity.
Batch size, idle time, utilization and inventory
Suppose the batch size is 80 component sets (and they are supply
constrained):
• Milling is the bottleneck – it needs 280 minutes to produce this batch.
• Assembly needs 80×3 = 240 minutes to produce this batch (they must idle for 40
min with each batch, or else they will produce too much).
240
Assembly’s utilization = 85.7%.
280
160
Milling’s utilization = 57%.
280
“Large” batch – assembly is fully utilized
Suppose the batch size is 200 component sets (and they are supply
constrained):
• Assembly is the bottleneck, it takes 3×200 = 600 min to produce 200 units.
600
Utilization for assembly = 100%.
600
400
Utilization for milling is 67%.
600
The “just right” batch size
Suppose now the batch size is 120 component sets (and they are supply
constrained):
• Assembly takes 3×120 = 360 min to produce 120 units.
360
Utilization for assembly = 100%.
360
240
Utilization for milling is 67%.
360
• Milling’s utilization cannot be higher!
• If it were, milling’s actual production would exceed 67%×½ units/min = ⅓
units/min …
• … and then parts inventory would continue to grow without limit…
• … which is clearly not desirable.
Inventory dynamics
• Suppose the batch size is 200 component sets and the flow rate is ⅓
units/min.
Adding capacity to the bottleneck will increase the capacity of the total
process, but may cause the bottleneck to move to another
task/resource.
Line balancing (that is, reallocating tasks from the bottleneck to another
resource) can improve the capacity of the total process without adding
resources.
Integrating work improves line balancing.
Implied utilization of a resource can be evaluated even if there are
different types of flow units.