Format No : UAPL/WH-QA/F12
SUPPLIER AUDIT REPORT Rev No : 02
Rev Date : 25.01.2023
A. GENERAL POINTS
1. Auditee Company & its Address
2. Supplier Code No. -
3. Telephone No: 4. Fax No. 5.
6. Date of Previous visit: 7. Date of visit :
8. Proprietor's / Director's Name Phone(Res)
1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
6. 6.
9. Auditors 10. Auditees
11.
No. of items being made for UAPL :
12. Over all turnover (Last FY) 13. Utilization of capacity for UAPL in
14. Man Power : Technical : Non technical :
15. Major Customers ( Other than UAPL)
Collaboration Detail (if Applicable) Not available
16.
Certification Detail
SUPPLIER AUDIT REPORT
1. Last audit open points
2. Customer complaint & BIS issues status last 6 month
Format No : UAPL/IQC/F08
SUPPLIER AUDIT REPORT Rev No : 2
Rev Date : 25.01.2023
1 Product - ROHS/REACH
2 Process - ISO
3 PDI - UAPL
4 Packing - UAPL
GUIDELINE FOR SCORING SrNo Marks Observation Score Remark
A EOHS
Environmental factor such as contaminant,
A.1 temperature, humidity, illuminance which needs 1 3
special care is controlled within sufficient range?
Does 5S(Arrangement, Tidies, Cleaning,
A.2 Cleanliness, habituation) well maintain in the 2 3
factory?
Does the supplier have regular management review
A.3 3 3
meetings
A.4 hazardous scrap disposal parties available ? 4 3
A.5 scrap disposal SOP Evident ? 5 3
A.6 Safety equipment ( PPE) ? 6 3
Have there been any major health & safety
A.7 7 3
recordables within the last five years
B INCOMING MATERIAL CONTROL
B.1 Do facilities/resources for 1 3
Is the supplier experienced with the material
B.2 2 3
grade/type?
B.3 Inspection/ testing exist in 3 3
B.4 plant 4 3
B.5 Incoming Inspection criteria 5 3
B.6 NC part management 6 3
C IN Process Quality control
C.1 Are there control plan on shop floor/ 1 3
C.2 control plan parameters identified in 2 3
Have we previously done business with this supplier
C.3 3 3
or manufacturing facility
C.4 w.i /process plan/process sheet 4 3
C.5 FPA record sheet maintained 5 3
Does the supplier have an effective internal audit -
C.6 6 3
management review process
C.7 Identification & traceability for In- 7 3
Does the supplier company with acceptable MSA
C.8 8 3
practices
C.9 process plants 9 3
Check the rejections are kept in Red Bin and
C.10 10 3
matching with Daily Defect Record Sheet
C.11 Whether rework parts record maintained ? 11 3
Does the supplier have experience manufacturing
C.12 12 3
this or similar product(s)
C.13 Is in process Inspection carried out 13 3
C.14 product+process 14 3
Whether patrolling inspection is carried out as per
C.15 15 3
the frequency defined in Control Plan
Does the part require special handling or shipping
C.16 16 3
care
Is there skill Matrix available? Is assessment
C.17 17 3
frequency defined & assessed accordingly
Does the supplier have a traceability process for
C.18 18 3
parts currently product
C.19 Final Inspection
Check for Defective sample available at work station
C.20 1 3
covers all the defects as per the Work instruction
Does the supplier have experience with the required
C.21 2 3
tolerance range
Are the inspection areas well lit and are visual aids
C.22 3 3
present
Does the supplier track internal PPM's If so, list the
C.23 4 3
average for the past year.
C.24 What is the facilities current external PPM 5 3
C.25 Is non conforming material controlled 6 3
C.26 (traceability Identification disposal 7 3
Does the supplier have an effective corrective action
C.27 8 3
process
Did or will the supplier accept our quality
C.28 9 3
requirements? Current SRM
D.1 (PDIR) is prepared 10 3
D.2 PDI station available 11 3
If a special process service provider, is the supplier
D.3 compliant with applicable AIAG special process 12 3
assessments (I.e.; CQI-9)
D.4 Packaging 0
D.5 Packaging monitoring 1 3
D.6 Does the supplier export product? If yes, to where. 2 3
Does the supplier have internal packaging design
D.7 3 3
capabilities
E CONTROL OF MEASUREMENT &
E.1 TESTING EQUIPMENT 1 3
E.2 Is there a system of periodic inspection/ 2 3
E.3 calibration of gauges/instruments 3 3
E.4 equipment's 4 3
F PREVENTIVE MAINTEMANCE
F.1 Is there any plan for preventive 1 3
F.2 Maintenance of machine? 2 3
Are predictive tools used for preventive
F.3 3 3
maintenance
F.4 Tool history card available 4 3
Does the supplier have in-house tooling/pattern
F.5 5 3
making capability
G RESPONSIVENSS/SERVICE
G.1 Response to Costumer complaints 1 3
Does the supplier have a process for predictive
G.2 2 3
maintenance
Does the supplier have all the necessary machinery,
G.3 3 3
tooling and equipment for product realization
What is the supplier's on-time delivery percentage
G.4 for production and service parts for the past two 4 3
years
G.5 Response to other technical 3
G.6 requirement 1 3
Does the supplier have CAD/DAE resources on
G.7 2 3
site? What program / number of licenses
Is benchmarking effectively used to develop new
G.8 3 3
products and processes
H CAPACITY
H.1 Spare Capacity 1 3
H.2 Capacity Expansion Plan 1 3
Total : 195 Total : 0
Good
Ratings & Evaluation Criteria :
1 - No system
2 - System available not followed & System partial
followed
3 - System available & fully followed
* If points 0 & 1 need action plan
Rating guidelines :
Poor <50% Require Re audit with in month
Satisfactory >51% & <70% Require improvement in specified field
Good >71% & <80% To be approve for registration vendor
Excellence >81% & <99% Excellence
NOTE Vendor audit marks coming below 70 will fall in criteria of re auditing again in three months.
Signature :
VENDOR REPRESENTATIVES UNI-TECH AUTOMATION PVT LTD
