Classical Mythology 12th Edition
Classical Mythology 12th Edition
Download Now
Preface
Mark P. O. Morford
University of Virginia, Emeritus
Robert J. Lenardon
The Ohio State University, Emeritus
Michael Sham
Siena College
IT IS NOW OVER FIFTY years since the manuscript of Classical Mythology was submitted
to the publishers. The original authors have now revised the book through eleven more
editions while keeping their research in the field current.
Our work is conceived as a comprehensive source where one may go to explore in depth the
nature of the Greek and Roman deities and the heroes and heroines of saga; in a few words,
here is a fundamental text for the serious study of the subject of classical mythology. Yet we
also have intended to provide a fertile source where one may nourish a sympathetic
understanding of the great mythological heritage bestowed by classical antiquity. We also
consider the great influence of classical mythology on diverse artistic forms (painting,
sculpture, literature, music, opera, dance, theater, and cinema) to be a most enjoyable and
rewarding subject, too important to be ignored. The later influence of classical mythology on
the arts was originally the subject of Part Four (Chapters 27 and 28), entitled “The Survival of
Classical Mythology.” This part was removed from the eleventh and subsequent editions, but is
still available online in what will hopefully be a more useful format. The subject, however, of
the influence of classical mythology permeates all aspects of our presentation throughout. The
tenacious persistence of Greek and Roman mythology undeniably remains vital and pervasive
in our contemporary world. Greek and Roman myths, of indelible beauty and with great power
to inspire, present a particularly fertile and inexhaustible venue for the appreciation of the
cultural, intellectual, and artistic history of Western civilization.
Originally, Professor Morford and Professor Lenardon each undertook the major
responsibility for certain sections—Professor Lenardon wrote Part One (Chapters 1–16) and
Chapter 28 in Part Four (now online), and Professor Morford wrote Parts Two and Three
(Chapters 17–26) and Chapter 27 (now online). We have continued to use this approach,
although in subsequent revisions all three authors contributed freely throughout the book.
Translations
Successive revisions have been extensive and far-reaching, in grateful response to the many
sensitive and appreciative critics over these many years. They have consistently encouraged us
to remain firm in our conviction that the literary tradition of Greek and Roman mythology
must always remain primary, but they have also confirmed our need and desire to incorporate,
insofar as possible, additional comparative and interpretative approaches and more far-
reaching evidence from other sources such as archaeology.
Translations of the ancient authors remain extensive, and none has been deleted from this
edition. The majority of them throughout the book (except Chapter 26) are by Professor
Lenardon, including all thirty-three of the Homeric Hymns; all the important passages in
Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days; and excerpts (many of them substantial) from
Homer, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, Herodotus, Plato, and, in Latin, Ovid and Vergil.
These texts are interspersed with interpretative commentary and analysis to elucidate their
mythological and literary significance and afford insightful and challenging avenues of
interpretation.
Shorter excerpts from many other authors are included, such as the lyric poets, the pre-
Socratic philosophers, Pindar, and Lucian; and the Latin authors Statius, Manilius, and
Seneca.
Spelling
Consistency in spelling has proven impossible to attain. In general, we have adopted Latinized
forms (Cronus for Kronos) or spellings generally accepted in English-speaking countries
(Heracles, not Herakles). Since non-Latinized spelling of Greek names has become
fashionable, we include an appendix listing Greek spellings of important names with their
Latinized and English equivalents, which will serve as a paradigm of the principles of
transliteration.
Art and Audio Program
Every aspect of Classical Mythology’s design and richly rewarding art program has been given
great care and attention as we have prepared the twelfth edition.
The illustrations have been an integral part of the work since its inception. Professor Morford
was responsible for their selection and for the captions in the first eight editions; for the ninth
edition, the first to appear in full color, the opinions of the many colleagues and reviewers also
informed our selections. From the ninth to the eleventh editions all three authors took part in
the selection of illustrations, a process that often required painful decisions about what to
leave out, but one that has also led generally to a consensus about what to include. Professor
Morford and Professor Sham divided the responsibility for writing the captions. Professor
Sham has been responsible for images and captions new to the twelfth edition.
The visual program is further enriched by the “Myth & Culture” features, all of which were
composed by Professor Sham. In twelve illustrated essays throughout the text, this feature
allows a close and careful comparative study of the ways in which mythical figures and
episodes have been depicted by different artists in a variety of media.
Audio Recordings
Users of Classical Mythology consistently praise the book for the quality of the translations of
ancient works, all of which were done by the authors. Readers can enjoy listening to many of
these translations as streaming audio files in either the enhanced e-book or in Oxford
Learning Link: www.oup.com/he/morford12e. The translations that are available in an
audio format are indicated in the margin by an icon.
Please visit www.oup.com/he/morford12e for a demo of the audio recordings and Closer
Look image analyses.
New to the Twelfth Edition
New Artwork
The text’s rich visual program has been enhanced with a number of new illustrations,
each of which includes an informative caption.
Chapter 25, “Greek Mythology in the Roman World,” offers revised coverage of Ovid’s
Metamorphoses.
Updated Bibliographies
Throughout the text, the end-of-chapter bibliographies have been edited and updated
with new material.
Improved Organization
Every chapter has been edited for greater clarity and accuracy.
The twelfth edition of Classical Mythology offers a complete suite of classroom resources for
both instructors and students, available at Oxford Learning Link (OLL):
www.oup.com/he/morford12e. For instructors, these resources include an instructor’s manual
with chapter outlines, commentaries, translations, and test questions, as well as a
computerized test bank and PowerPoint slides. A course cartridge can also be integrated into
learning management systems such as Canvas or Blackboard.
For students, resources include commentaries, learning objectives, and chapter activities. In
addition, the OLL contains Now Playing: Learning Classical Mythology through Film.
Designed specifically to accompany Classical Mythology and prepared by Professor Sham, this
supplement illustrates how classical myths have inspired new adaptations in film, dance, and
music, with descriptions from over thirty films and television episodes. Each entry provides a
preview of each work, designed to inform an appreciation of the material, an extended
treatment of individual scenes, and questions for discussion or written homework
assignments. The OLL also includes two bonus chapters (Chapter 27, “Classical Mythology in
Literature,” and Chapter 28, “Classical Mythology in Music, Dance, and Film”).
Acknowledgments
We have received help and encouragement from many colleagues, students, and friends over
the years and generous support from numerous people involved in the editorial development,
production, and publication of the twelve editions of this book. To all who have contributed so
much, we are deeply grateful.
In particular, for this edition we are thankful to Barbara Polowy, director of the Hillyer Art
Library at Smith College, and to the following reviewers for criticism and specific suggestions:
This new edition would not have been possible without the enthusiastic and vigorous support
of Charles Cavaliere, executive editor; Sukwinder Kaur, editorial assistant; Sheryl Adams,
senior marketing manager; and Michele Laseau, art director.
Charles Alton McCloud, through the many editions of the book, generously shared his
expertise in music, dance, and theater. His passing in 2014 is still deeply felt.
Mark P. O. Morford
Robert J. Lenardon
Michael Sham
Maps, Figures, and Myth &
Culture
Mark P. O. Morford
University of Virginia, Emeritus
Robert J. Lenardon
The Ohio State University, Emeritus
Michael Sham
Siena College
MAPS
FIGURES
7. Images of Apollo
Mark P. O. Morford
University of Virginia, Emeritus
Robert J. Lenardon
The Ohio State University, Emeritus
Michael Sham
Siena College
Closer Look
The “Closer Look” image analyses offer the opportunity to examine in detail paintings, frescos,
sculpture, mosaics, photographs, and other fine art that represent important episodes from
classical myth. Each “Closer Look” includes detailed commentary and guiding questions.
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Pandora
Chapter 5
The Forge of Vulcan
Chapter 7
Galatea
Chapter 8
Las Hilanderas
Pallas Athena
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
The Indian Triumph of Dionysus
Chapter 15
The Underworld
Chapter 16
Chapter 17
The Rape of Europa
Chapter 18
Orestes at Delphi
Chapter 19
Chapter 20
Chapter 21
Danaë and the Brazen Tower
Medusa
Chapter 22
Chapter 23
Chapter 25
Chapter 26
AUDIO RECORDINGS
Audio
Users of Classical Mythology consistently praise the book for the quality of the translations of
ancient works, all of which were done by the authors. Readers can enjoy listening to many of
these translations as streaming audio files in the enhanced e-book or on the book’s Learning
Link: www.oup.com/he/morford12e. Those translations that are available in an audio
format are indicated in the margin by an audio icon.
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
The Flood
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Arachne’s Transformation
Chapter 9
Pygmalion
Aphrodite and Adonis
Aristophanes’ Speech
Chapter 10
Actaeon
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
The Homeric Hymn to Hermes
The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: The Reconciliation between Hermes and Apollo
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Plato’s Myth of Er 1
Plato’s Myth of Er 2
Aeneas and the Sibyl
Tartarus
Elysium
Chapter 16
Orpheus Descends to the Underworld
Chapter 17
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
The Judgment of Paris
Chapter 20
Chapter 21
Chapter 22
Heracles’ Life
Heracles’ Labors
Chapter 23
Chapter 24
Mark P. O. Morford
University of Virginia, Emeritus
Robert J. Lenardon
The Ohio State University, Emeritus
Michael Sham
Siena College
MARK MORFORD was Professor Emeritus of Classics at the University of Virginia, where
he joined the faculty in 1984 after teaching at The Ohio State University for twenty-one years
and serving as chairman of the Department of Classics. He also served as Kennedy Professor of
Renaissance Studies at Smith College, where he held a research appointment in the Mortimer
Rare Book Room of the Neilson Library. As vice president for education of the American
Philological Association, he actively promoted the cooperation of teachers and scholars in
schools and universities. Throughout his fifty years of teaching he was devoted to bringing
together teachers of classical subjects and teachers in other disciplines. He has published
books on the Roman poets Persius and Lucan and the Renaissance scholar Justus Lipsius
(Stoics and Neostoics: Lipsius and the Circle of Rubens), as well as many articles on Greek
and Roman literature and Renaissance scholarship and art. His book The Roman
Philosophers was published in 2002, and at his passing he was working on a new book, The
Ancient Romans.
ROBERT LENARDON was Professor Emeritus of Classics at The Ohio State University,
where he was on the faculty for twenty-five years and served as director of graduate studies in
classics. He taught at several other universities, including the University of Cincinnati,
Columbia University, and the University of British Columbia. He was a visiting fellow at
Corpus Christi College, Cambridge University, and has written articles on Greek history and
classics and a biography, The Saga of Themistocles. He served as book review editor of the
Classical Journal and presented radio programs about mythology in music, a subject dear to
his heart. The afterlife of classical subjects and themes in literature, music, film, and dance
was a favorite area of teaching and research. For the fall semester of 2001, he was appointed
Visiting Distinguished Scholar in Residence at the University of Louisville, Kentucky. His
translations from the Greek Anthology have been set to music by Gerald Busby, in a work
entitled Songs from Ancient Greek, for tenor and piano (premiere, Carnegie Hall, 2005). At
his passing he had just completed writing a history, Hubris: The Persian Wars against the
Greeks.
MICHAEL SHAM is Professor of Classics at Siena College, where for nearly thirty years he
has developed a small but vigorous program. He has served as chair of the Department of
Modern Languages and Classics at Siena College. Throughout his teaching career he has been
dedicated to bringing the value of a classical education to a wider audience. He has worked to
bring together scholars, writers, and artists across traditional academic disciplines to explore
the continually renewed vitality of the classical tradition. He has written and spoken on a wide
range of scholarly interests, including the influence of Ovid’s Metamorphoses on
contemporary American poets and the adaptation and production of Greek tragedy for the
contemporary stage. He has himself written an adaption of Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis to
some acclaim. He was a contributing author to A Companion to Classical Mythology
(Longman, 1997). He is responsible for the companion website, the Instructor’s Manual for
Classical Mythology, and the Now Playing supplement. He is currently working on a book
about the influence of the Iliad and the Odyssey on contemporary culture.
PART ON E
TH E M YTH S OF
C R EATION : TH E GOD S
Mark P. O. Morford
University of Virginia, Emeritus
Robert J. Lenardon
The Ohio State University, Emeritus
Michael Sham
Siena College
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, Jupiter and Thetis View larger image
1
Interpretation and Definition of
Classical Mythology
Mark P. O. Morford
University of Virginia, Emeritus
Robert J. Lenardon
The Ohio State University, Emeritus
Michael Sham
Siena College
PHAE D RU S : Tell me, Socrates, was it not somewhere around here by the stream of Ilissus that
Boreas is said to have carried off Oreithyia?
S O C RATE S : That’s the story.
PHAE D RU S : It was around here, wasn’t it? At any rate, the stream is beautiful, pure and clear, and
perfect for young girls to play along.
S O C RATE S : No, it was down farther…. There is an altar there to Boreas, I think.
PHAE D RU S : I didn’t know that. But tell me, Socrates, by Zeus, do you believe this story is true?
—PLATO, Phaedrus 229b
Preparation for Sacrifice View larger image
The word myth comes from the Greek word mythos, which means “word,” “speech,” “tale,” or
“story,” and that is essentially what a myth is: a story. Some would limit this broad definition
by insisting that the story must have proved itself worthy of becoming traditional.1 A myth
may be a story that is narrated orally, but usually it is eventually given written form. A myth
also may be told by means of no words at all, for example, through painting, sculpture, music,
dance, and mime, or by a combination of various media, as in the case of drama, song, opera,
or the movies.
Many specialists in the field of mythology, however, are not satisfied with such broad
interpretations of the term myth. They attempt to distinguish “true myth” (or “myth proper”)
from other varieties and seek to draw distinctions in terminology between myth and other
words often used synonymously, such as legend, saga, folk tale, and fairy tale.2
Download the chapter’s NOTE-TAKING GUIDE and follow along while reading.
True Myth or Myth Proper and Saga or Legend
As opposed to an all-encompassing definition for the general term myth, true myth or myth
proper is used for stories primarily concerned with the gods and humankind’s relations with
them. Saga or legend (and we use the words interchangeably) has a perceptible relationship
to history; however fanciful and imaginative, it has its roots in historical fact.3 These two
categories underlie the basic division of the first two parts of this book into “The Myths of
Creation: The Gods” and “The Greek Sagas.”
Folk Tales and Fairy Tales
In addition to these two categories there are folk tales, which are often stories of adventure,
sometimes peopled with fantastic beings and enlivened by ingenious strategies on the part of
the hero or heroine, who will triumph in the end; their goal is primarily, but not necessarily
solely, to entertain. Many of the characters and motifs in folk tales are familiar to us all. They
are found in both oral and written literature throughout the world, from ancient times to the
present, and inevitably will be a source of inspiration for the future, for example, the
monstrous giant, the wicked sorceress, the distraught maiden in peril and the special powers
of her savior, the wicked sisters, mistaken identity, the imposition of labors, the solving of
riddles, the fulfillment of romantic love, and on and on. Among the many folk tales in this
book, the tale of Cupid and Psyche (see p. 212) offers a particularly splendid example. It begins
with “once upon a time” and ends with “happily ever after.”
Fairy tales may be classified as particular kinds of folk tales, defined as “short, imaginative,
traditional tales with a high moral and magical content”; a study by Graham Anderson
identifying fairy tales in the ancient world is most enlightening.4 It is impossible to distinguish
rigidly between a folk tale and a fairy tale, although perhaps a fairy tale is often created
especially for the young.
The Problems Imposed by Rigid Definitions
Rarely, if ever, do we find a pristine, uncontaminated example of any one of these forms. Yet,
the traditional categories of myth, saga, and folk tale are useful guides for any attempt to
impose some order upon the multitudinous variety of classical tales.5 How loose these
categories are can be seen, for example, in the legends of Odysseus or of the Argonauts, which
contain elements of history (saga) but are full of stories that may be designated as myths and
folk tales. The criteria for definition merge and the lines of demarcation blur.
Myth and Truth
Since, as we have seen, the Greek word for myth means “word,” “speech,” or “story,” for a critic
like Aristotle it became the designation for the plot of a play; thus, it is easy to understand how
a popular view would equate myth with fiction. In everyday speech, the most common
association of the words myth and mythical is with what is incredible and fantastic. How often
do we hear the expression “It’s a myth” uttered in derogatory contrast with such laudable
concepts as reality, truth, science, and the facts?
Therefore, important distinctions may be drawn between stories that are perceived as true and
those that are not.6 The contrast between myth and reality has been a major philosophical
concern since the time of the early Greek philosophers. Myth is a many-faceted personal and
cultural phenomenon created to provide a reality and a unity to what is transitory and
fragmented in the world that we experience—the philosophical vision of the afterlife in Plato
and any religious conception of a god are mythic, not scientific, concepts. Myth provides us
with absolutes in the place of ephemeral values and with a comforting perception of the world
that is necessary to make the insecurity and terror of existence bearable.7
It is disturbing to realize that our faith in absolutes and factual truth can be easily shattered.
“Facts” change in all the sciences; textbooks in chemistry, physics, and medicine are sadly (or
happily, for progress) soon out of date. It is embarrassingly banal but fundamentally
important to reiterate the platitude that myth, like art, is truth on a quite different plane from
that of prosaic and transitory factual knowledge. Yet, myth and factual truth need not be
mutually exclusive, as some so emphatically insist. A story embodying eternal values may
contain what was imagined, at any one period, to be scientifically correct in every factual
detail; and the accuracy of that information may be a vital component of its mythical raison
d’être. Indeed, on one hand, one can create a myth out of a factual story, as a great historian
must do: any interpretation of the facts, no matter how credible, will inevitably be a mythic
invention. On the other hand, a different kind of artist may create a nonhistorical myth for the
ages, and whether or not it is factually accurate may be quite beside the point. A case for
discussion is presented by the excerpts from the historical myth of Herodotus, which is
translated in Chapter 6.
Myth in a sense is the highest reality, and the thoughtless dismissal of myth as untruth, fiction,
or a lie is the most barren and misleading definition of all. The dancer and choreographer
Martha Graham, sublimely aware of the timeless “blood memory” that binds our human race
and that is continually evoked by the archetypal transformations of mythic art, offers a
beautifully concise summation: as opposed to the discoveries of science that “will in time
change and perhaps grow obsolete … art is eternal, for it reveals the inner landscape, which is
the soul of man.”8
Myth and Religion
As we stated earlier, true myth (as distinguished from saga and folk tale) is primarily
concerned with the gods, religion, and the supernatural. Most Greek and Roman stories reflect
this universal preoccupation with creation, the nature of god and humankind, the afterlife, and
other spiritual concerns.
Thus, mythology and religion are inextricably entwined. One tale or another may have been
believed at some time by certain people not only factually but also spiritually; specific creation
stories and mythical conceptions of deity may still be considered true today and provide the
dogma for devout religious belief in a contemporary society. In fact, any collection of material
for the comparative study of world mythologies will be dominated by the study of texts that
are, by nature, religious. Greek and Roman religious ceremonies and cults were given
authority by myths that inspired belief and therefore afford a recurrent theme in the chapters
to follow. Among the examples are the worship of Zeus at Olympia, Athena in Athens, and
Demeter at Eleusis, as well as the celebration of other mystery religions throughout the
ancient world. The ritualist interpretation of the origins of mythology is discussed later in this
chapter. Greek religion is discussed in Chapter 6.
Mircea Eliade
Mircea Eliade, one of the most prolific twentieth-century writers on myth, lays great emphasis
on the mystical in his conception of myth: he sees myth as a tale satisfying the yearning of
human beings for a fundamental orientation rooted in the religious aura of a sacred
timelessness. This yearning is fully satisfied only by stories narrating the events surrounding
the beginnings and origins of things. Eliade believes that God, once in a holy era, created the
world, and this initial cosmogony becomes the origin myth, the model for creations of every
kind and stories about them. He conceives, for example, of a ritual or rite having been
performed in a sacred place in this sacred timelessness quite beyond the ordinary or profane
space in which we live. His concept develops a difficult, complex mysticism. Like a religious
sacrament, myth provides in the imagination a spiritual release from historical time. This is
the nature of true myths, which are fundamentally paradigms and explanations and most
important to the individual and society.9 This definition, which embraces the explanatory
nature of mythology, brings us to another universal theory.
Myth and Etiology
Some maintain that myth should be interpreted narrowly as an explication of the origin of
some fact or custom. Hence, the theory is called etiological, from the Greek word for cause
(aitia). In this view, the mythmaker is a kind of primitive scientist, using myths to explain
facts that cannot otherwise be explained within the limits of society’s knowledge at the time.
Again, this theory is adequate for some myths, for example, for those that account for the
origin of certain rituals or cosmology; but interpreted literally and narrowly, it does not allow
for the imaginative or metaphysical aspects of mythological thought.
Yet, if one does not interpret etiological (“the assignment of causes or origins”) too literally
and narrowly but defines it by the adjective explanatory, interpreted in its most general sense,
one perhaps may find at last the most applicable of all the monolithic theories. Myths usually
try to explain matters physical, emotional, and spiritual not only literally and realistically but
also figuratively and metaphorically. Myths attempt to explain the origin of our physical
world: the earth and the heavens, the sun, the moon, and the stars; where human beings came
from and the dichotomy between body and soul; the source of beauty and goodness, and of evil
and sin; the nature and meaning of love; and so on. It is difficult to tell a story that does not
reveal, and at the same time somehow explain, something; and the imaginative answer usually
is in some sense or other scientific or theological. The major problem with this universal
etiological approach is that it does nothing to identify a myth specifically and to distinguish it
clearly from any other form of expression, whether scientific, religious, or artistic—that is, too
many essentially different kinds of story may be basically etiological.
Rationalism versus Metaphor, Allegory, and
Symbolism
The desire to rationalize classical mythology arose far back in classical antiquity and is
especially associated with the name of Euhemerus (ca. 300 b.c.), who claimed that the gods
were men deified for their great deeds (see Chapter 27 on the companion website). The
supreme god Zeus, for example, was once a mortal king in Crete who deposed his father,
Cronus. At the opposite extreme from euhemerism is the metaphorical interpretation of
stories. Antirationalists, who favor metaphorical interpretations, believe that traditional tales
hide profound meanings. At its best, the metaphorical approach sees myth as allegory
(allegory is to be defined as sustained metaphor), where the details of the story are but
symbols of universal truths. At its worst, the allegorical approach is a barren exercise in
cryptology: to explain the myth of Ixion and the centaurs in terms of clouds and weather
phenomena is hardly enlightening and not at all ennobling. (For Ixion and the Centaurs, see
pp. 118 and 372.)
Allegorical Nature Myths: Max Müller
An influential nineteenth-century theory was that of Max Müller: myths are nature myths, he
said, all referring to meteorological and cosmological phenomena. This is, of course, an
extreme development of the allegorical approach, and it is hard to see how or why all myths
can be explained as allegories of, for example, day replacing night or winter succeeding
summer. True, some myths are nature myths, and certain gods, for example, Zeus, represent
or control the sky and other parts of the natural order; yet, it is just as true that a great many
more myths have no such relationship to nature.10
Myth and Psychology: Freud and Jung
Sigmund Freud
The metaphorical approach took many forms in the twentieth century through the theories of
the psychologists and psychoanalysts, most especially those of Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung.
We need to present at least some of their basic concepts, which have become essential for any
understanding of mythic creativity. Freud’s views were not completely new, of course (the
concept of “determinism,” for example, “one of the glories of Freudian theory,” is to be found
in Aristotle),11 but his formulation and analysis of the inner world of humankind bear the
irrevocable stamp of genius.
Among Freud’s many important contemporaries and successors, Jung (deeply indebted to the
master but a renegade) must be singled out because of the particular relevance of his theories
to a fuller appreciation of the deep-rooted recurring patterns of mythology. Among Freud’s
greatest contributions are his emphasis on sexuality (and in particular infantile sexuality), his
theory of the unconscious, his interpretation of dreams, and his identification of the Oedipus
complex (although the term complex belongs to Jung). Freud has this to say about the story
of King Oedipus:
His fate moves us only because it might have been our own, because the oracle laid upon us before
our birth the very curse which rested upon him. It may be that we are all destined to direct our
first sexual impulses toward our mothers, and our first impulses of hatred and resistance toward
our fathers; our dreams convince us that we were. King Oedipus, who slew his father Laius and
wedded his mother Jocasta, is nothing more or less than a wish-fulfillment—the fulfillment of the
wish of our childhood. But we, more fortunate than he, in so far as we have not become
psychoneurotics, have since our childhood succeeded in withdrawing our sexual impulses from
our mothers, and in forgetting the jealousy of our fathers…. As the poet brings the guilt of
Oedipus to light by his investigation, he forces us to become aware of our own inner selves, in
which the same impulses are still extant, even though they are suppressed.12
This Oedipal incest complex is here expressed, in the masculine form, in terms of a man’s
behavior in relationship to his mother, but it also could be expressed in terms of the