[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views4 pages

CAPA by Using 8D Methodology1

The 8D report from Shineyu Engineering Technologies details issues with the Plunger Housing part supplied to L And T Construction, including improper dimensions and inspection failures. The root causes identified include lack of operator training, improper inspections, and inadequate process validation. Corrective actions have been planned and implemented to address these issues and prevent future occurrences.

Uploaded by

quality.shineyu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views4 pages

CAPA by Using 8D Methodology1

The 8D report from Shineyu Engineering Technologies details issues with the Plunger Housing part supplied to L And T Construction, including improper dimensions and inspection failures. The root causes identified include lack of operator training, improper inspections, and inadequate process validation. Corrective actions have been planned and implemented to address these issues and prevent future occurrences.

Uploaded by

quality.shineyu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

SHINEYU ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

TITLE: 8D REPORT Internnnal CAPA


PART NUMBER:
PART NAME: Plunger Housing
CUSTOMER : L And T Construction Thro Vijay speroidals
D1: PROBLEM TEAM :
Sl no Name Designation
1 SIDDHRAJU Production
2 Shivarudra production
3 Madhusudhan QAD
4 Shivanand Line Inspection and setup aproval
D2: PROBLEM DISCRIPTION:
1. Drill holes Dia 10.5, 11, Pitch Distance Miss maches From reff Dia 30 H7
2. No Repetability Foud in All Developed componants.
3. ImProper Line inspection and Without Setup Aproval.
4. Improper Final Inspection.

D3: INTERIM CONTAINMENT ACTION:


Sl no Part checks at Date
1 Customer END 7/21/2025
2
3
4
5
D4: ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS:
MAN METHOD MATERIAL
Lack of Operator
✘ ✘ Process not Validated Material Testing not done
Training
Operator Eye sight not
Process parameters not adhered Material mix up
tested

Setting piece mixup Inadequate packing Defective Raw material

✘ Operator Skipped the ✘ New Revision not followed ✘ Line inspection not done
Operations Wrong offset
✘ Operator's lack of ✘ Process Sheet/ Work Instruction not
Others
involvement available
✘ Operation not identified in the process

Others
flow
✘ Operator Skipped the
Machine wrong selection
Offset

Not Stored Properly

Shelf life not Monitored

DOC REF: ADC/G8D/F/01 ISSUE NO DATE: 04, 01/04/2022 REV NO DATE: 00, 01/04/2022

Others

IDENTIFIED ROOT
Operators lack of involvement , Quality Stage inspection Lack Found
CAUSE:
D5 & D6: CORRECTIVE ACTION & IMPLEMENTED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:
Sl no Major causes identified Action taken / Plan
1 How did the defect happen in the Process ?
Operators lack of involvement Must and should Monitoring of Setup aproval , offset meth
Stage inspection Lack Found Fixture settings

2 How did the defect not noticed during the inspection?


3. ImProper Line inspection and Without Setup Aproval. Proper Inspection
4. Improper Final Inspection.

D7: PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS (System Related Changes):


1. Quality Documents Changed:

2. Corrective Action Planned in Similar Parts (Horizontal Deployment): YES PLANNED

D8: TEAM RECOGNITION:


Production/Quality dept

Monitoring the Effectiveness of Corrective Action after the Implementation :


TO BE FILLED BY CUSTOMER / SUPPLIER : Inhouse SETPL
SL NO MONTH/LOT QUANTITY SUPPLIED DATE

DOC REF: ADC/G8D/F/01 ISSUE NO DATE: 04, 01/04/2022 REV NO DATE: 00, 01/04/2022
Docu Date : QMS/01/04/2024
NG TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD REV : 00/QMS

nnnal CAPA Date : 29/07/2025

8D REF NUMBER: 2025/26/001


DATE OPENED:
DATE CLOSED:

Designation Sign
Production
production
QAD
Inspection and setup aproval
A) Quantity Supplied in the lot:
92 nos
B) Rejected / Reworked / Salvage:
Rejected 23 nos
C) Order status : Cancel
Expected Nos 4000

OK Not OK Status
Not OK Order cancled From customer

MATERIAL MACHINE/ TOOLING MEASUREMENT/ INSPECTION

Testing not done Lack of tooling Maintenance Inspection check sheet not available

Qualifying gauge / Instrument not


l mix up Tool worn out
available

ve Raw material Lack of M/c Maintemance Gauge/Instrument worn out

pection not done Others Limit Samples not Available

Inspection method different

Calibration not done


First piece/Last piece approval not done

Wrong instrument selection

✘ Inspection skiped

DOC REF: ADC/G8D/F/01 ISSUE NO DATE: 04, 01/04/2022 REV NO DATE: 00, 01/04/2022
✘ Not aware of Acceptance criteria

✘ Others

Lack Found

S:
Action taken / Plan Responsibility Target Date Completed Date

hould Monitoring of Setup aproval , offset methods , Siddaraju , Immdetely Immdetely


ngs Shivarudra
Shivanand
Madhusudan

ection Shivanand Immdetely Immdetely


Madhusudan

Status Document No & Date of Revision

Reported By
ept QAD

QTY REJECTED/REWORKED Defect PPM GOOD/BAD

DOC REF: ADC/G8D/F/01 ISSUE NO DATE: 04, 01/04/2022 REV NO DATE: 00, 01/04/2022

You might also like