[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views12 pages

Chap 4 Microprocessor Vs Microcontroller

The document outlines the considerations for selecting between ASIC and PAL technologies, emphasizing factors like cost, development time, and reliability. It also compares microcontrollers and microprocessors, highlighting their integrated functions and performance requirements. Key recommendations include assessing performance needs, peripheral functions, memory requirements, power consumption, and available tool support for development.

Uploaded by

abiralchrestha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views12 pages

Chap 4 Microprocessor Vs Microcontroller

The document outlines the considerations for selecting between ASIC and PAL technologies, emphasizing factors like cost, development time, and reliability. It also compares microcontrollers and microprocessors, highlighting their integrated functions and performance requirements. Key recommendations include assessing performance needs, peripheral functions, memory requirements, power consumption, and available tool support for development.

Uploaded by

abiralchrestha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

System Concern Requirements

Functions Response Time


Data Rate
I/O drive (A, V)
Reliability – MTBF
Regulations FCC, Military Specifications

Environment Volume,
Weight
Vibration
Shock
Operation Bandwidth
Resolution
Speed
Accuracy
Power Consumption
Noise
▪ ASIC solve a signal-or-data processing problem optimally in terms of "high
throughput" and "Low power", but has quite large cost compared to simple PAL
device

▪ PAL chips are cost effective, and can be assembled to solve the signal-or-data
processing problem, but has high computational overhead (time), and power.
Assembling requires some times before the product can be fully developed?

▪ What do you recommend?

▪ Ask the right questions.


▪ Does the development time merit using the ASIC in your product?

▪ Will you be able to amortize its cost over the production run?

▪ Will a circuit using many chips of PAL really be cost effective than a single ASIC microcontroller,
which takes less time to implement program?

▪ PAL assembling can reduce reliability of overall system. Is it acceptable?

▪ What is driving factor?

▪ Cost?

▪ Development Ease?

▪ Time to Market?
▪ Right Choice in selection of technology will:

▪ Reduce part count

▪ Reduce Board Space

▪ Reduce Power Consumptions

▪ Reduce Cost

▪ Decrease time to market

▪ Increase Reliability
▪ Microcontroller vs Microprocessor ▪ Microcontroller vs Microprocessor
▪ Microcontroller includes integrated I/O functions (basic
▪ Microprocessor doesn't have integrated memory
I/O) into a single chip
▪ No basic I/O on chip structure
▪ Reduces the part count of the system and increases
reliability ▪ Memory size handling depends on addressing
▪ Most microcontroller have integrated memory on chip lines and for scalability complex interfacing
(e.g. 64K RAM, 2K ROM)
needed
▪ Integrated memory (but with fixed size)
▪ Are general purpose
▪ Microcontrollers are application specific, and can
handle less variety of events (less general) ▪ Has ability to handle variety of events (increased

capacity for dealing with complex problem)

For selecting one, Determine Key Driving Factor!


▪ There is a microprocessor and microcontroller. Which do you recommend?

▪ Know your system

▪ Determine Performance Requirement

▪ Find the number of peripheral functions needed

▪ Find memory space requirement

▪ What are available tool support for design, development and testing?

▪ Ask, "Do you already have expertise/experience, software and development tools
for particular processor/components you selected?
▪ Determine Performance Requirement

▪ Performance is related to architecture of processor and its processing capacity in bits (4,
8, 16, 32)

▪ Factors to determine performance are:

▪ Throughput

▪ Resolution and Dynamic range

▪ Address range/space and available memory

▪ Language choice: code size, speed of compilation and actual execution

▪ Predominant type of calculation : Integer or floating?


▪ Numbers of peripheral function

▪ How many do you need?

▪ What are the needed functions?

▪ Is there any such functions available on-board (on-chip) with processor

▪ e.g. Math Coprocessor, Graphic Accelerators, Interrupt Handler, Data Transfer and

Communication (DMA, Small Computer System Interface, Serial I/O), Timers, ADCs,
DACs, Power drivers, Watchdog Timers
▪ Memory Estimation

▪ Amount of memory needed for design can be estimated by

▪ Data Array size

▪ Stack size

▪ Temporary and permanent variables required and needed /captured memory space by them

▪ I/O buffer size

▪ Addition of above estimated values can give minimum required memory size for the
design

▪ A suitable memory margin must be selected for future scalability and improvements
▪ Power Consumption Consideration

▪ Increased consumption of power means

▪ Complex and large cooling system

▪ Increased battery size, or short battery life

▪ Power consumption by different processors vary,

▪ Appropriate processor selection can develop power efficient system design


▪ Tool Support

▪ Ask:

▪ What experience do you have, and what tools are available to support your development?

▪ Do hardware emulators exist that will help you to debug both circuit and code?

▪ What software tools are available to support development on the selected processor?

▪ Does vendor of these tools provide good support?

▪ Does vendors have good reputation?

You might also like