Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude 33: Hand-Out 17
Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude 33: Hand-Out 17
Abortion is the ending of pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the uterus.
The abortion debate asks whether it can be morally right to terminate a pregnancy before normal childbirth.
Ethical issues involved in abortion are:
i. A fetus is a member of the biological species homo sapiens. To destroy a human being deliberately
is unethical (it's murder).
ii. Right to live a dignified life for children born with disorders
iii. Life and death are in the hands of god. Humans should not interfere in them. (religious ethics)
iv. Right of the unborn fetus to take birth is denied.
v. Right of bodily autonomy of women – Immanuel Kant has said that autonomy is the root of human
dignity and the sources of all morality. Pregnant women must have the right to undergo abortion if
there is serious threat to her health.
vi. If governments choose to make abortion illegal then sufficient support must come from the side of
the government in upbringing of the child, if parents have limited resource. Otherwise government
takes decision and burden is shifted in parents.
vii. Professional ethics of medical practitioners comes into question when proper guidelines are not
followed for abortion.
viii. Right to self-determination in case of pregnancy caused by rape.
Recently Ireland voted overwhelmingly in favor of repealing a provision that gave an unborn foetus an
equal right to life as the mother, thus legalizing abortion.
The booming clinical trial industry in developing countries like India is raising concerns about proper ethics
review of practices and procedures performed on living organisms. Some issues are:
iii. Antyodaya (unto the last): Gandhiji’s principle of “Sarvodaya through Antyodaya”, (“welfare of all
through the welfare of the last person”) is not followed. There are many “Orphan drugs” which no
pharmaceutical company is ready to make because of low profitability.
iv. Autonomy: of subjects is severely compromised especially when all the information regarding possible
side effects is not provided to them.
v. Profitability in the name of social service: Many drug companies operate in developing countries to
provide medical aid. Hover many a times real motive is to do drug trial at no cost.
vi. Professional ethics: of entire medical community is questioned due to some black sheeps of the
community. Like in 341 cases of clinical trials resulting in death were reported in 2015, out of which
only four cases were compensated.
Guiding principles
iv. Immanuel Kant’s philosophy - “So act as to treat humanity, whether in their own person or in that of any
other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only”.
v. Clinical trial of new drugs should be done with complete transparency and poor must not be deceived.
vi. Gandhiji’s Talisman – drug trial and medical procedures must give primacy to the needs of poor.
Situation for “orphan drugs” must not arise.
vii. Professional ethics - Knowledge without Character and Commerce (Business) without Morality (Ethics)
are sins as per Gandhiji.
Most importantly, strong law is required to check malpractices. For example, according to the new
guidelines, a manufacturer, before requesting an individual to participate in clinical trial of a new drug, must
inform the individual of any reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts, as well as of the possible benefits.
i. Right to clean environment: is a fundamental right guaranteed to the citizens by the constitution of
India.
ii. Justice: burning up crackers creates more problems for lower rung of the society.
iii. Common good: Clean environment is a common good for all living beings. It has social, economic and
also spiritual benefits. But it depletes due to pollution caused by fire crackers.
iv. Right over duty: Right to celebrate festival is often given more importance than duty towards co-
citizens who may be in need of peaceful and silent environment due to ill health or otherwise.
v. Utilitarian perspective: in short term, burning crackers may give happiness to some but in long term, it
will be harmful for all.
However, it is also true that banning crackers is not a long tern solution to this problem. Prohibition can lead
to conflict and public unrest in long term. Thus endogenous changes must be targeted for sustainable
solution to this problem. Some steps that can be taken in this regard are:
• Persuasion: bringing about attitude change in people towards clean and green environment. This can be
done through:
1) ‘Give it up’ campaign like the one for LPG cylinders can be effective. Schools can be used in this
regard.
2) Satellite image and data on pollution over the city must be disseminated to citizens to bring
attitudinal change.
3) Burning crackers must be related to health of children. It will impact emotional component of
parents
4) Harmful effects by the chemicals in the firecrackers must be advertised to influence behavioral
attitude.
• Emotional intelligence – can be utilized in helping citizens understand the burden of air-borne diseases
and harm to the agricultural output of poor farmers.
• Multipronged strategy: efforts have to be made in controlling all sources of pollution like construction
dust, vehicular pollution, waste burning, generators and crop residue burning in the Indo-Gangetic
plains.
Gandhiji has that “Religion without Sacrifice” is a sin. Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda and
other philosophers and scholars have pointed out the importance of religion being scientific and humane.
Following these principles, we can come to a solution of the menace of pollution by fire crackers.
According to the British House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics, euthanasia is a deliberate
intervention undertaken with the intention of ending of life to relieve from intractable suffering.
• Article 21 – Right to Life and Right to Death – sanctity of human life is at stake
• Justice – injustice with the patient if his/her consent is not secured
• Against the Hippocratic oath – it will be against the oath of doctors that ‘I will give no deadly medicine
to anyone nor suggest any counsel’
• Misuse of Euthanasia – if legalize it may be a threat to the old-age population, coma patients, disables,
etc.
• It is against attributes of empathy, love and compassion towards vulnerable people.
• It creates crisis of credibility in the minds of people regarding state to provide them better medical
facilities and securing their lives.
• It might boost morale of otherwise mentally alert people to opt for euthanasia who are under debt,
family pressure, betrayed in love, isolated from society e.g. HIV patients, GAY couples etc.
• Religious opponents of euthanasia believe that life is given by God, and only God should decide when to
end it.
• Its abdication of responsibility of state which is constitutionally and legally bound to protect people.
• It reminds of eugenic history of Nazi Germany, where unwanted people were terminated.
Stand of government
There is no statutory or constitutional law in the country to regulate euthanasia. Supreme Court Judgment
has legalized passive euthanasia in Aruna Shanbaug Case. Certain guidelines have been laid by SC in this
regard:
✓ A decision has to be taken to discontinue life support either by the parents or the spouse or other close
relatives, or in the absence of any of them, such a decision can be taken even by a person or a body of
✓ Even if a decision is taken by the near relatives or doctors or next friend to withdraw life support, such a
decision requires presence of two witness and countersigned by first class judicial magistrate. To be
approved by medical board set up by hospital.
As per my analysis, arguments are very strong against active euthanasia, but for passive euthanasia the view
is favorable. However, there is a need for a fool-proof system which can regulate passive euthanasia more
effectively:
• Separate legislation for passive euthanasia should be enacted so that the ambiguity in taken decision
would be less.
• Case by case matter must be taken. Thus keeping process dynamic and with the thorough reporting of
the particular case by the authorized panel, we can prevent the abuse of the patient.
• Expert doctors for suggesting and carrying out this process should be consulted.
• Counseling sessions for vulnerable population.
It is said that “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire”. We should try to save the life of people rather
than devising means to take it away. The argument that 'we are of no use to the society, and are only wasting
valuable resources' is brutal utilitarian view, which must be used only as a last resort.
IPR is a method through which the property rights of a specified product is given to the holder for specified
period though patent, trademark, copyrights etc. It values the talent of a person or a group and prevents their
IPR from violating. However, there are some ethical issues involved in such rights:
• Individual rights vs. social interest: J. S. Mills has said that individual liberty should be given, but in
case of conflict, social interest shall prevail.
• IPRs often go against the ethical principle of utilitarianism which suggests maximum good for
maximum number of people.
• Right to cheap and affordable health system: generic medicines vs. patent medicines. IPR gives
monopoly to a single organization for producing and controlling prices of the patent medicines.
However, the unaffordable prices of medicines violate the rights of poor lead to injustice for them.
• Right to Education: Patent content are prevented from photocopies. However, for the few pages of
content, students have to buy a full book instead of photocopying it. But in Delhi university photocopy
IPR is important in the today’s world of trade. Open violation can demotivate the producers to put time and
money in research and development. It’s a kind of injustice for an inventor who put all effort in creating a
masterpiece and then others enjoy the benefits by copying the technology. Thus a balance is needed to be
maintained in the process of granting IPRs to individuals and organizations.
The recent rise in popularity of gambling poses many social and ethical issues.
• Gambling is addictive in nature just like alcoholism and drug addiction. Legalizing betting can tempt the
poor into frittering away their savings.
• Gambling syndicates often use methods of manipulation rather than persuading people to put their
money in gambling.
• It leads to injustice for the families of people who are addicted to gambling. Burden falls upon women
and children and their basic rights like dignified life, food, health and education are violated.
• Gambling in Mahabharata led to the war of Kurukshetra which led to the destruction of Kuru Empire.
• Gambling is a precursor of many crimes like stealing and physical assaults and habit of alcoholism.
• Wealth without work is one of the seven deadly sins as given by Gandhi ji.
However, recent Law commission report has called for legalization of gambling in sports as putting a
complete ban can lead to a hike in 'black money generation and circulation." It’s also against right to self-
determination. It can increase state’s revenue which can be used for welfare activities. Proper regulation can
also generate FDI and employment in tourism and hospitality industry.
Section 377 criminalizes sexual activities which are “against the order of nature". This provision is often
used against people from LGBT community and has many ethical issues associated with it.
• It leads to injustice for LGBT people as the burden of social taboos falls upon them.
• It goes against the right of self-determination, bodily integrity, equality and right to privacy.
• It goes against John Rawl’s liberty principle of justice which call for maximum freedom for people
provided it is compatible with the freedom of others.
• It also go against Gandhi’s Talisman as LGBT community is often the most deprived section of society.
• Such activities have been there since ancient times and had been reported in many cultures across the
world.
Dominant view today is that LGBT behavior is inborn and a person cannot be punished for what he is and
what nature has made him. There is nothing wrong in it if the relations are consensual and in line with
general rules.
Sting journalism in past has brought out cases of ministers demanding money for granting mining clearance
in Chhattisgarh to cricketers admitting to match fixing in IPL. However, the very nature of inducement and
secrecy involved in sting journalism poses many ethical questions:
Ministry of information and broadcasting along with media persons need to come up with guidelines to be
followed so that in sting journalism democratic accountability along with social responsibility can be
ensured
Sec-497 IPC deals with the offence of adultery, which refers to an act of sexual intercourse between a
married person and someone who is not that person's spouse.
• This Section does not allow a woman to pull the strings of law if her husband involved in adultery with
another woman. Thus, it leads to gender discriminative in its present form.
• It gives a blank cheque to the wife to indulge in as many sexual relationships as she likes. Here woman
will not be held liable for any punishment. Thus, only male counterpart will be guilty even if the
relationship is lured by the woman.
• Moreover, it makes the woman as just a property of a husband instead of his soul-mate. Thus he right to
dignity is being compromised.
• In-justice to women if her husband is in relation with some un-married woman.
• Most importantly, it is the law of British rulers in India and at present Britain has decriminalized the
adultery.
Thus, instead of decriminalizing adultery, it should be made gender neutral. Punishment should be given to
both. Also, with Right to Equality under Article 14 of the Constitution, this section should permit both wife
and husband to file a case against the offence of adultery.
Surrogacy is Assisted Reproductive Technology, whereby a woman agrees to become pregnant and give
birth to a child for another person who is or will become the parent of the child.
The ethical aspect of surrogacy can be judged by the manner in which the process of surrogacy is
conducted.
It can bring happiness in the life of couple who don’t have children. Surrogate mothers, who are generally
poor, get good medical attention, nutrition and financial help from the commissioning parents. If we apply
utilitarian principle of J.S. Mill, then surrogacy, if conducted with integrity, can be considered ethical.
However there have been cases of misuse of technology, lack of bioethics, and violation of rights of
surrogate mothers.
Technology is always value neutral. Same goes for surrogacy. It must be used taking care of rights and
justice for all stakeholders.
11. Ethical issues in the practice of Female Genital Mutilation in Dawoodi Bohra community
The practice of female genital cutting has been condemned as a violation of the rights of women and girls.
Female genital cutting affects women's enjoyment of their lives and reproductive health in a manner that
denies liberty and security to women, and subjects them, usually at a young age, to physical violence and
serious health problems. Some other issues are:
• This practice arises from the stereotypical perception that women are the principal guardians of a
community's sexual morality.
• This practice violates the principle of Beneficence, as it is by all means a maleficent practice.
• It violates the principle of justice, as it is not just to have women enjoying their marital and sexual
lives and others suffer from theirs.
• Autonomy of girls and informed consent versus Rights of community to practice their religious and
cultural practices.
The Supreme Court has also expressed concern over this practice, saying it compromises and violates the
bodily integrity and privacy of a woman in the name of religion.
The coronavirus pandemic is the greatest challenge mankind has faced since World War II. The pandemic is
much more than a health crisis, as it has socio-economic and ethical dimensions also.
• Duty of people to take care of their family members versus their own well-being.
• Right to health and dignified life of poor people who can’t afford medical treatment.
• Stereotypes and prejudice against each other on basis of caste, region or religion. For example, members
of Tablighi Jamaat were held responsible to spread the virus in many Indian states.
For professionals:
• They are in ethical turmoil as people are losing jobs and income. Whether they should retain their
workers or they should lay off their workforce to sustain the business.
• Many businesses have adopted wrong means like hoarding and black marketing to earn higher profits by
taking advantage of vulnerable people.
For Governments:
• Means versus Ends debate is there. They must control corona pandemic but through what means. Can
they use violence to do it?
• Duty of government to do Justice with the poor people who suffer either due to lockdown or due to
corona virus.
• Economy of the state versus Life of the people: If lockdown is extended for a longer time, then it may
lead to irreparable damage to economy. Suicide cases can increase because of this. Government must
not only ensure life but a good life for the citizens.
Morality and substance of ethics in people is tested during tough times only. This pandemic has the potential
to create devastating socio-cultural, economic and political effects that will leave deep and longstanding
scars. Its impact can be minimized by following the path of Dharma.
The National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building (‘NPCSCB’) – “Mission Karmayogi” has
been launched in September 2020 with the objective of enhancing governance through Civil Service
Capacity Building.
Aim: According to the government, ‘Mission Karmayogi’ envisages to prepare Indian civil servants for the
future by making them more creative, constructive, imaginative, innovative, proactive, professional,
progressive, energetic, enabling, transparent and technology-enabled.
• Apart from domain knowledge training, the scheme will focus on functional and behavioral
competencies also.
Institutional framework
For implementation and monitoring of the programme, following institutional framework has been
approved:
• Prime Minister’s Public Human Resource Council (PMHRC): A Council under the chairmanship of
Prime Minister is conceived to be the apex body for driving and providing strategic direction to civil
service reforms and capacity building.
• Cabinet Secretariat Coordination Unit: It will monitor the implementation of NPCSCB, align
stakeholders and provide mechanism for overseeing capacity building plans.
• Capacity Building Commission– It will be set up for functional supervision of training institutions and
facilitate in preparation of annual capacity building plans.
• Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV, an autonomous company) – It will own and operate all the digital assets
created for NPCSCB on behalf of the Government of India.
• Programme Management Unit (PMU) - It will provide Program Management and Support services to
the Department.
• The capacity building programme will be delivered through an Integrated Government Online Training
or iGOT-Karmayogi digital platform, with content drawn from global best practices rooted in Indian
national ethos.
• Officers will be evaluated on the basis of the courses they take throughout their career to enhance their
skill.
• An online database will be maintained on what courses they have completed, how did they fare, what
areas does their expertise lie in, etc.
• In case of any future vacancy or if an appointing authority is considering an officer, they can simply see
what kind of training the officer has been getting.
However, the difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones. There is a tendency in
the Bureaucracy to resist the change which challenges their status quo. Thus, a behavioral change in the
bureaucracy is required. Moreover, these online courses must not become another opportunity for the
officers to go for the sabbatical leaves. It must be ensured that they are actually attending the courses and
participating in it so that the purpose doesn't get defeated. Clearly, the reform process is not going to be easy
but this is a good move in the direction.
Note: This piece of information is based on article “Responsible AI — the need for ethical guard rails” which was published in
The Hindu on 17/03/2021.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a wide-ranging branch of computer science concerned with building smart
machines capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence. In simple words, It is the
endeavor to replicate or simulate human intelligence in machines.
The expansive goal of artificial intelligence has given rise to many questions and debates. Like, what if
robots take over policing? What if nanny-bots look after our children and elderly? What if they became
more intelligent than us?
AI has already entered in our life in a subtle way like It is embedded in the recommendations we get on our
favourite streaming or shopping site; in GPS
mapping technology; in the predictive text that completes our sentences
when we try to send an email or complete a web search.
In the case of Covid-19, AI has been used in thermal imaging in airports and elsewhere. In medicine it can
help recognize infection from computerized tomography lung scans. It has also been used to provide data to
track the spread of the disease.
A study published in Nature reviewing the impact of AI on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
finds that AI may act as an enabler on 134 — or 79% — of all SDG targets.
However, just as AI has the potential to improve billions of lives, it can also replicate and exacerbate
existing problems, and create new ones. The study in Nature also finds that AI can actively hinder 59— or
35% — of SDG targets.
1. Environmental degradation: AI requires massive computational capacity, which means more power-
hungry data centres — and a big carbon footprint.
4. Humanity at risk: With great power comes great responsibility. What if artificial intelligence itself
turned against humans? Imagine an AI system that is asked to eradicate cancer in the world. After a lot of
6. Data Privacy Concerns: AI also presents serious data privacy concerns. The algorithm’s never-ending
quest for data has led to our digital footprints being harvested and sold without our knowledge or informed
consent. The case of Cambridge Analytica is an example, in which such algorithms and big data were used
to alter voting decisions of people in India.
7. Copying Human Prejudice and Stereotypes: The fact is, just as AI has the potential
to improve billions of lives, it can also replicate and exacerbate existing problems, and create new ones.
Consider, for instance, the documented examples of AI facial
recognition and surveillance technology discriminating against people of colour and minorities. Or how an
AI-enhanced recruitment engine, based on existing workforce profiles, taught itself that male candidates
were preferable to female.
8. Addiction: Addiction and dependence on technology can alter human relations and society. People may
start living in a virtual world and relation may get weaken. Cases are there where people have committed
crime to ensure regular access to technology.
Whole of Society Approach: Many countries, including India are striving to strike the right balance
between AI promotion and AI governance — both for the greater public good.
NITI Aayog’s ‘Responsible AI for All’ strategy, recognizes that our digital future cannot be optimized for
good without multi-stakeholder governance structures that ensure the dividends are fair, inclusive, and just.
In this scenario, a “whole of society” approach to AI governance will enable us to develop broad-based
ethical principles, cultures, and codes of conduct. So that societal trust can be developed for AI to flourish
and bring about the extraordinary breakthroughs it promises.
Whole of World Approach: Given the global reach of AI, such a “whole of society” approach must rest on
a “whole of world” approach. The UN Secretary-General’s Roadmap on Digital Cooperation is a good
starting point.
Conclusion
Just as electricity allowed us to tame time, enabling us to radically alter virtually every aspect of existence,
AI can leapfrog us toward eradicating hunger, poverty and disease — opening up new and hitherto
unimaginable pathways for climate change mitigation, education and scientific discovery.
However, without ethical guard rails, AI will widen social and economic schisms, amplifying any innate
biases at an irreversible scale and rate and lead to discriminatory outcomes.
15. Moonlighting
Moonlighting is a recent buzzword that has garnered a lot of attention. It is currently one of the biggest
concerns of the IT industry and major tech companies, including Infosys, WIPRO, TCS, and among others,
are all opposing this practice. In contrast, recently, Swiggy announced an “industry first" policy that allowed
moonlighting for its employees.
Meaning: Moonlighting is a practice where employees secretly take up a second job or other work
assignments along with their fulltime job. Also known as side gigs, the secondary job is taken without
employers' knowledge and is usually the side jobs taken at night or on the weekends.
Wipro CEO Rishad Premji was the first to coin the term moonlighting as claimed that this practice is
“cheating and unacceptable.” Following this, the company sacked 300 employees for moonlighting.
• Legal but may not be Ethical: There is no overarching law which prohibits a person from doing multiple
jobs. However, a person with a similar nature of jobs may spark ethical issues.
• Confidentiality issues especially in the IT sector where the same software can be used to serve different
clients.
• If employees are working long hours, the second job may cause the employee to become distracted,
unproductive, and neglect job responsibilities because of physical fatigue.
• Employees may use company resources for their second job, which increases operating expenses.
• Poor diet, lack of sleep and exercise can impact employee health.
• It can lead to conflicts of interest, absenteeism, or poor attentiveness.
Points in favour
Employer’s side: Moonlighting could be considered cheating if an employee’s contract calls for non-
compete and single employment, which is the situation with the majority of conventional employment
contracts.
Many companies deploy tools and techniques to detect and prevent risks associated with moonlighting such
as data leakage and daylighting (working on another job during the working hours of the primary job).
Employee’s side: Moonlighting should be a choice unless it affects the efficiency and integrity of
employees’ primary work duty.
Before looking for side jobs or starting a business, it is crucial for employees to carefully check their
employment contract with their principal job to ensure compliance with any moonlighting policies.
Rationale • As per Tamil Nadu government, when • As per SC, humans have free will, but bulls are
humans ran marathons, why could not forced into running.
bulls be part of a sport?
Constitutional • The ban has affected the fundamental • As per Article 48 (DPSP), the Constitution
right to religion enshrined under Article requires the State to “take steps for preserving
25 of the Indian Constitution. and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the
slaughter, of cows and calves in other milch and
draught cattle.”
• As per Article 51A, the Constitution places a
duty on every citizen to “protect and improve the
natural environment including forests, lakes,
rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for
living creatures.”
The dialogue format allows ChatGPT to not only compose essays and answer follow-up questions, but also
admit to its mistakes and challenge incorrect premises.
However, it also has several limitations including limited understanding of context and background
information, difficulty in understanding sarcasm and irony, lack of common sense and general knowledge,
and limited ability to understand and respond to complex questions. Additionally, ethical considerations
such as bias in training data, misuse and abuse of the technology, impact on job displacement and loss of
human interaction, privacy, and security must also be considered.
Solution
• It can assist with writing and generating text, but any content produced by ChatGPT shall be the
responsibility of the person or entity using the model. So, if there’s a question on integrity, ChatGPT
may not be liable for breach of integrity.
• It will also be important for organizations developing language models and governments to provide
guidelines, regulations, and best practices to mitigate associated risks and to ensure the responsible use
of the technology. Continuous research, monitoring, evaluation and reformation would be required.
• Data used by Chat GPT shall be more exhaustive, diverse, and inclusive. Multiple languages and
dialects shall be included. Sarvodaya approach shall be followed. This will help to protect the rights and
interests of all stakeholders, including developers, users, and the public.
Arguments against it
• Many religions oppose homosexuality and view same-sex marriage as a violation of their moral code.
• Some argue that children raised by same-sex couples may be at a disadvantage due to the lack of a
traditional family structure.
• Marriage has traditionally been between a man and a woman in many religions. The Special Marriage
Act, 1954 was created to overcome the limitations of religious personal laws, not to create a new
institution of marriage.
• Right to privacy exists for LGBTQIA+ people, but it cannot be extended to marriage, which has a
necessary public element.
• ‘Legitimate’ Interest of State: The state has a legitimate interest in regulating marriage and personal
relationships, as seen in laws regarding age of consent, prohibited degrees of marriage, and divorce. The
right to marry is not absolute and subject to state laws.
• Gendered terms: Argument that gendered terms like 'mother' and 'father', 'husband' and 'wife' would be
problematic in same-sex marriages.
In my opinion, the concept of marriage has changed over the last 100 years. Earlier we had child marriages,
temporary marriages, a person could marry any number of times - that also changed.
Dominant view today is that LGBT behavior is inborn and a person cannot be punished for what he is and
what nature has made him. There is nothing wrong with it if the relations are consensual and in line with
general rules.
Thus, the SC shall give a constitutional declaration in favour of LGBTQIA+ community and the
government shall be directed to frame laws in this regard after through deliberations with all the
stakeholders.
In between, awareness must be created to promote equality and acceptance of all sexual orientations and
expand public opinion about the LGBTQIA+ community. Thus, it is important for society to continue to
have open and respectful discussions about these issues to promote understanding and tolerance for all
individuals and their choices.
Case studies
1. Mahesh is a senior teacher in a government school and now after rendering 20 years of service, he
has got the opportunity to be the principal of one of the best government schools in the state. He is
known for his administrative skills as well and has handled all his students in a very efficient manner
during all his postings.
A case has come up where a teacher has beaten up a child named Rajan, after he was caught
misbehaving in the class. Rajan is a regular offender and is known for his wicked acts and
disrespectful attitude towards other students and his teachers. He is often found involved in fights and
arguments. However, this time, Rajan was caught red handed and his class teacher lost his cool. The
teacher beat Rajan with a wooden stick which leads to bruises on his body and face. He also went
unconscious for few minutes.
Answer: Most children of the present generation are grown while listening to the stories of how their
parents used to get beaten up by their teachers. Corporal punishment (CP) thus seems to be a part of Indian
education system since ages. But the result has never been great.
In fact, today corporal punishment is considered as the shortest, most impatient, flawed way of teaching or
making a child understand something.
a) Why CP is still considered a right method to maintain discipline:
• It’s considered as a part of cultural legacy. Teachers believe they have the right to beat up the children as
they will.
• Revenge seeking behaviour among the adults. They will beat because they got beaten.
• Hierarchical nature of society where the only way of maintaining relations is to dominate others.
• Lack of awareness or interest among teachers to explore options other than violence and abuse.
• Short term attitude and tendency to get immediate results.
• Teachers commit violence against children when swayed by emotion. Say, when they feel frustrated at
being unable to manage the classroom.
• Other factors such as low pay scales, a skewed student-teacher ratio and poorly resourced schools
contribute to emotional build-ups.
• Lack of skills, training, facilities and infrastructure for teachers to develop innovative ways to maintain
discipline.
• Punishing one child has a demonstration effect on the whole classroom.
• Caste system which often lead to mental harassment by making casteist remarks.
Q2. You have been recently appointed as the Secretary to the Tourism Department of a Himalayan
state in northern part of India. Your state is a major tourist attraction for most people across India. It
is largely because of the Char Dham Yatra which takes place every year during summers. The Char
Dham is a set of four pilgrimage sites in this state and it is believed that visiting these sites helps
people to achieve their moksha.
However, too much and unplanned pilgrimage has led to problems like crowd management and
disturbance in the sensitive ecology of the region. Last year a city called Rampur, which fall in the
way of the yatra, faced landslides. Deep cracks were formed in the foundation of houses and roads in
Rampur. Some cracks have also appeared on a road which falls on the route of the Char Dham Yatra.
Rampur has now been declared a landslide-subsidence zone and many families living in uninhabitable
houses in the sinking town have been evacuated to temporary relief centres. Rampur is also of great
strategic importance to the Indian armed forces and is home to one of the Army's most important
cantonments.
Based on this situation, your department has decided to put some mandatory regulations like online
registration and a cap of 10,000 pilgrims per day on the number of pilgrims visiting the Himalayan
temples. Even locals will have to do online registration, which would create a practical difficulty.
However, soon the protest against this decision has started. The whole economy of the state depends
on tourism and such a daily cap on pilgrims will harm the interest of the locals. An organization of
Char Dham priests also met the chief minister of the state and ask him to take this decision back.
Their logic is that the majority of the pilgrims are poor, elderly and illiterate and won’t be able to
register for the yatra. This will create chaos when the people would be sent back. Agitations will start
soon if the decisions are not taken back. The CM has asked you to look into the matter in detail and
resolve it in an amicable manner.
(a) Identify the different options available to you in attending to this situation.
(b) Critically evaluate each of the options listed by you.
Answer: Balancing economy with environmental conservation and religious sentiments has always been a
tough task for Civil Servants. It can only be dealt with well-informed, sustainable and inclusive decision
making.
An explosive cocktail of climate change, excessive tourism and aggressive road and dam building in the
geologically unstable region is a prefect recipe for a man-made disaster.
Ethical issues involved in the case:
• Means versus Ends.
• Short term benefit versus long term harm.
• Anthropocentrism versus Ecocentrism
• Right to dignified life of the people of Rampur versus Right to practice one’s region of the pilgrims.
• Economy versus Ecology
a) Options available for me in this situation Stakeholders
1. Accept the demands of priest and remove the regulations.
2. Stay firm on government’s decision and enforce the regulations. • Me and tourism
3. Try to satisfy the locals by increasing the daily cap of pilgrims and also department
make facility for permission on arrival. • Local people
4. Making an informed decision based on ground studies, public • Pilgrims
participation and the advice of the experts. • Chief Minister
• Flora and fauna
Critical evaluation of the options:
of the state
1. Accept the demands • Traders along
the route
Merits
• Temple priests
• Economy of the state will thrive. • Travel and tour
• Maximum people will get the chance to fulfil their religious aspirations. operators
• Increased revenue and popularity for the state government.
Demerits
• It can lead to a man-made disaster if a land slide takes place in Rampur. Life of locals as well as
pilgrims would be in danger.
• Crises of conscience for me if some tragedy happens.
• In long-term, ecological balance of the region will suffer.
• Permanent damage may lead to complete shutdown of the pilgrimage.
3. In the last 5-6 years, many public servants in India have started using social media for airing their
views and maintaining their personal as well as public relations. Social networking sites have emerged
as a new line of interaction between different entities of governance like government, citizens, private
sector, and civil society. But it seems that social media is not only enhancing but also hampering the
functioning of the government.
Recently, a senior IAS officer from Telangana, tweeted from her personal account in support of a riot
victim and questioned the Gujarat government’s decision of releasing 11 men convicted on charges of
gang-raping during the 2002 Gujarat riots.
This has led to a debate about whether the officer breached the Civil Service (Conduct) Rules of 1964
and revived the debate about civil servants’ right to express their personal views on matters of law
and governance.
In another case, a public spat on social media between the two officers of Karnataka cadre shocked
the bureaucratic circle of the state. Both officers accused each other of corruption charges and shared
photographs of each other on social media. This brought a lot of embarrassment for the state and
finally both were transferred without posting. Thus, use of social media by public servants is a
controversial issue which needs a lot of deliberation. In this context: (250 words, 20 marks)
a) Explain the positive as well as negative implications of using social networking sites on governance
process in India?
b) Explain if it is right on the part of civil servants to discuss the policies and decisions of government
or other officers on social networking sites?
ETHICS BY ATUL GARG 27
c) What can be done to make optimum utilization of this new tool of communication?
Answer: Social media, where information is shared across different platforms freely and extensively, has
emerged as a new power tool of transparency, accountability, participation and inclusiveness.
It has a huge potential to convert representative democracy into participative democracy. However, just like
all technologies, indiscriminate use of social media can also lead to a new set of problems in governance
process.
a) Following are the positive and negative aspects of using social media:
b) It is a matter of deliberation whether civil servants can discuss policies and decisions on social media or
not.
• The citizens of this country have the • When you work for the government, you are
fundamental right of free speech guaranteed bound by certain disciplinary laws like not
by the Constitution, subject to reasonable joining any political party or speaking freely
restrictions. on government policies and decisions.
The Kerala High Court in one of its judgements said that one cannot be prevented from expressing his views
merely because he is an employee. In a democratic society, every institution is governed by democratic
norms.
Like what was done by senior IAS officer from Telangana to support the riot victim was in line with
constitutional morality and was for public interest. But what happened in Karnataka case was unfortunate
and it was against the decorum of civil services. Thus, rules needs to be changed as per changing times.
Civil services activism is the need of the day.
c) Social networking sites are revolutionary means of communication. Therefore, it must be embraced rather
than one being skeptical about it. However civil services values must be preserved while using this double
edge sword. Following steps can be taken:
• Social networking communication policy can be adopted with a strong set of ethics. A code of
ethics/conduct can be developed in this regard.
• Organizations can create official pages on social networking sites. This will avoid chaos and random
information sharing.
• Officials of certain critical bodies like Armed forces, Parliament, Supreme Court etc. can be debarred
from using social networking site for official purpose just like they are not allowed to go on strike.
• Cyber security preparedness and developing means to stop the spread of fake information by the
collaboration of government and service providers.
• Training officers regarding the use of social media.
Now is time to ‘un-gag’ civil servants, but with some reasonable restrictions. The secrecy clause shall be
replaced by the transparency clause.
ETHICS BY ATUL GARG 29
*****
***********************************xxxxx**********************************
Most popular books for Civil Services GS Paper-IV: Ethics Integrity & Aptitude
Both the books are available on Amazon and Flipkart.