79 CC NI ACT - 25098-2024
Mayank Arora Vs. Praveen Jain -0 ()
09.05.2025
Present: Mohd. Talib Saifi, Ld. Counsel for the complainant
(through VC).
Summons issued to accused received back unserved
with the report ‘insufficient address’.
Perusal of record reveals that there are two additional
address of accused persons which have been filed by the bank
witness.
The summons have not been served on the said
addresses. Issue fresh summons to the accused on the other said
addresses through all permissible modes including electronic
mode on filing of PF/RC/AD/speed post returnable on 25.07.2025.
PF be filed within 15 days from today. Complainant is SURBHI
SHARMA
directed to mention the addresses in the PF form.
Digitally signed
The complainant is at liberty to serve the summons by SURBHI
SHARMA
Date: 2025.05.09
alongwith the copy of complaint to the accused person through 18:02:15 +0530
regd. post / speed post or any other authorized courier service and
place internet tracking postal receipt of the same before this court
by NDOH.
In case of refusal, non-availability or premises of the
accused is found locked, summons be served by way of affixation.
(Surbhi Sharma)
JMFC(NI Act)-02-PHC
NDD-ND-09.05.2025