I.
Introduction: Early Theories on Birth Order
• Overview of Late 20th-Century Literature
– Numerous books in Europe and the USA explored how birth order influences
personality.
– The popular viewpoint proposed that siblings could exert as much, or more,
influence on a child’s development than parents.
• Stereotypical Descriptions
– First-borns: Naturally inclined to be leaders.
– Middle-borns: Seen as family diplomats.
– Youngest children: Often regarded as charming yet lazy and rebellious.
II. Changing Perspectives and Criticism of Early Views
• Popularity and Practical Use
– Early ideas gained public traction and were even used by companies in
employee placement based on birth order.
• Oversimplification Issues
– The initial theories were later criticized as too general and not sufficiently
supported by evidence.
– Modern research calls for more nuanced approaches to understanding sibling
behavior and personality.
III. Research Findings on First-Born Influence
• Canadian Study Insights
– The study suggests that the first-born sets a behavioral pattern for younger
siblings.
– A well-behaved first-born boosts parental confidence and shapes positive
expectations for later children.
• Negative Consequences
– Conversely, if the first-born is difficult, parents may feel inadequate and lower
their efforts with subsequent children, potentially perpetuating challenging behaviors.
IV. The Role of Parental Treatment and Sibling Dynamics
• Clarifying the Impact on the Youngest
– Research by Clara Solway indicates that the behavior of last-born children
(e.g., being independent and rebellious) is more linked to parental treatment than to
sibling relationships.
• Self-Fulfilling Stereotypes
– Parents familiar with birth order stereotypes may unconsciously encourage
specific behaviors in their youngest children.
V. Effects on Self-Image and Adult Life
• Edward Croft’s Observations
– Early experiences with sibling dynamics shape a child’s self-image and beliefs
about their own abilities.
– Perceived favoritism among siblings can lead to lasting feelings of inferiority.
• Long-Term Outcomes
– Children who constantly strive to please may lose sight of their own needs,
potentially resulting in directionlessness in adulthood.
VI. Influence of Family Size on Development
• Family Size vs. Birth Order
– Michael DeHora’s research emphasizes that family size may have a greater
impact on personal development than birth order alone.
– In larger families, older siblings often assume caregiving roles, developing
strong communication skills and self-confidence.
– However, excessive responsibility can also increase anxiety if the pressure is
too high.
VII. Language Development and Birth Order
• Traditional Views
– Earlier research suggested that first-born children learn new words faster due to
receiving more parental attention.
• New Evidence
– A Norwegian study over fifteen years reveals that younger siblings eventually
catch up, largely because older siblings often take on the role of teacher and model
language.
VIII. Conclusion: A Multifaceted Influence on Personality
• Complexity of Factors
– The essay concludes that while birth order has some influence on personality,
its effects are intertwined with parental behavior, family size, and sibling interactions.
– Early theories were overly simplistic, and ongoing research seeks to understand
the more complex dynamics that shape a child’s personality.