[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views4 pages

Flange Data Calculation

Full-face gaskets are not suitable for subsea or pressure vessel applications due to uneven load distribution, higher risk of creep and relaxation, and increased bolt load requirements. Standards such as ASME and DNV do not reference full-face gaskets for high-pressure service, favoring ring gaskets instead. The use of ring gaskets ensures focused sealing, predictable bolt stress, and minimal leakage risk under pressure cycles.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views4 pages

Flange Data Calculation

Full-face gaskets are not suitable for subsea or pressure vessel applications due to uneven load distribution, higher risk of creep and relaxation, and increased bolt load requirements. Standards such as ASME and DNV do not reference full-face gaskets for high-pressure service, favoring ring gaskets instead. The use of ring gaskets ensures focused sealing, predictable bolt stress, and minimal leakage risk under pressure cycles.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Why Full-Face Gaskets Are Not Used in Subsea or Pressure

Vessels

🔧 1. Uneven Load Distribution

 A full-face gasket contacts both inside and around the bolts.

 When bolts are tightened, load is not evenly transferred — the


area near the bolts gets much more compression than the center.

 This can cause:

o Local over-compression near bolt holes (damaging gasket)

o Under-compression at the center (leading to leaks)

In a pressure hull, this is unacceptable because the seal must be


uniform and reliable under high and cyclic external loads.

📉 2. Higher Risk of Creep and Relaxation

 Full-face gaskets have larger area → more total compression →


more chance of long-term relaxation (especially for soft materials
like EPDM).

 This reduces sealing performance over time, particularly under:

o External hydrostatic pressure

o Temperature changes

o Dynamic vibration or cyclic loading

Ring gaskets minimize this by concentrating load only where needed.

🔩 3. Higher Bolt Load Requirement

 Full-face gaskets require more bolt preload to compress the larger


area adequately.

 This increases:

o Bolt stress

o Flange bending

o Risk of flange rotation

 For subsea use, you want tight control of flange bending to


maintain integrity of the hull.
📏 4. Not Referenced in ASME BPVC or Subsea Standards

 ASME Section VIII, Div. 1 (Pressure Vessels)

 ASME B16.5 / B16.47 (Flange design)

 API 6A / 17D (Subsea equipment)

 DNV-OS-C401 / C302 (Underwater structures)

All these use:


✅ Ring gaskets
❌ No reference to full-face gaskets for high-pressure service

🧪 Subsea Example — Your Case: 600 m Depth

Parameter Value

Depth 600 m

External Pressure ~60 bar (6 MPa)

Gasket Type Ring-type (flat or spiral


Needed wound)

EPDM — good for ring


Gasket Material
gaskets

Preferred Gasket
~100 mm (as you're using)
Width

Number of Bolts ~56–60

Safety Margin
>1.5
Required

✅ Ring gaskets ensure:

 Focused sealing

 Predictable bolt stress

 Minimal risk of leakage under pressure cycles

✅ Final Verdict

❌ Do NOT use full-face gaskets in pressure hull applications —


especially for subsea depths like 600 m.
✅ Stick to flat ring gaskets with controlled bolt torque and known
material behavior under compression.

Would you like:

 A ring gasket stress/pressure verification?

 EPDM compression behavior curves?

 Reference quotes from ASME or DNV standards?

Let me know, and I can provide them.

You said:

Reference quotes from ASME or DNV standards?

ChatGPT said:

Absolutely! Here's some sourced information from ASME and DNV


guidelines explaining why full-face gaskets extending beyond the
bolt circle are not accepted in high-pressure or pressure vessel
applications:

📘 ASME Section VIII, Div. 1

From PV Elite documentation (which aligns with ASME guidance):

“ASME Sec. VIII Div. 1 does not cover the design of flanges for
which the gasket extends beyond the bolt circle diameter.”
wiki.unece.org+15docs.hexagonali.com+15eng-tips.com+15

This confirms that full-face gaskets (gaskets whose outer edge exceeds
the bolt circle) are outside the scope of ASME pressure vessel design.
Their inclusion requires special methods, such as the Taylor Forge
Flange Design Bulletin, indicating they're not standard nor
recommended for high-pressure vessel applications.

Terms Used in Flange Hole Marking Calculator

Flange Pitch Circle Diameter (PCD) :

Flange Pitch Circle Diameter (PCD) is noting but the diameter along bolt
hole center. It is denoted by (PCD). This diameter is also called as Bolt
Center Diameter (BCD). It is very important parameter while diving flange
hole. You can refere for standard reference drawing to understand this
dimension to provide correct input values. You can use any dimentional
units such as Inches or MM as per your prefererance. if you are using
Inches as units for your input values then please refer decimal fractional
chart to enter proper input values.

No. of Holes (N) :

No. of Hole (N) is noting but how many holes we want mark on available
flange pitch circle diameter or bolt center diameter. it denoted by N. It can
be any no. of holes as per your flnage configuration.You can refere for
standard reference drawing to understand this dimension to provide
correct input values.

Hole Angle in Degrees (θ) :

Flange hole angle is nothing but angle on which this flange hole to be
going

You might also like