[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views26 pages

Hindu Code Bill

Volume 2 Issue 7 of the International Journal for Legal Research & Analysis discusses the Hindu Code Bill, which aims to modernize laws related to marriage, divorce, and inheritance for Hindus and related religions in India. The document includes contributions from various legal scholars and emphasizes the bill's significance for women's rights and social justice, while also addressing criticisms regarding its application across different religious communities. The journal seeks to provide a platform for legal discourse and welcomes original contributions in the field of law.

Uploaded by

purplecrayon007
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views26 pages

Hindu Code Bill

Volume 2 Issue 7 of the International Journal for Legal Research & Analysis discusses the Hindu Code Bill, which aims to modernize laws related to marriage, divorce, and inheritance for Hindus and related religions in India. The document includes contributions from various legal scholars and emphasizes the bill's significance for women's rights and social justice, while also addressing criticisms regarding its application across different religious communities. The journal seeks to provide a platform for legal discourse and welcomes original contributions in the field of law.

Uploaded by

purplecrayon007
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

www.ijlra.

com
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024 ISSN: 2582-6433

DISCLAIMER

No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form by any means
without prior written permission of Managing Editor of IJLRA. The views
expressed in this publication are purely personal opinions ofthe authors and do not
reflect the views of the Editorial Team of IJLRA.

Though every effort has been made to ensure that the information in Volume 2
Issue 7 is accurate and appropriately cited/referenced, neither the Editorial Boardnor
IJLRA shall be held liable or responsible in any manner whatsever for any
consequences for any action taken by anyone on the basis of information in the
Journal.

Copyright © International Journal for Legal Research & Analysis

1
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024

EDITORIAL TEAM

EDITORS

Megha Middha
Megha Middha, Assistant Professor of Law in Mody University of Science and
Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar

Megha Middha, is working as an Assistant Professor of Law in Mody University


of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar (Rajasthan). She has an
experience in the teaching of almost 3 years. She has completed her graduation in
BBA LL.B (H) from Amity University, Rajasthan (Gold Medalist) and did her post-
graduation (LL.M in Business Laws) from NLSIU, Bengaluru. Currently, she is
enrolled in a Ph.D. course in the Department of Law at Mohanlal Sukhadia
University, Udaipur (Rajasthan). She wishes to excel in academics and research
and contribute as much as she can to society. Through her interactions with the
students, she tries to inculcate a sense of deep thinking power in her students and
enlighten and guide them to the fact how they can bring a change to the society

Dr. Samrat Datta


Dr. Samrat Datta Seedling School of Law and Governance, Jaipur
National University, Jaipur. Dr. Samrat Datta is currently associated
with Seedling School of Law and Governance, Jaipur National
University, Jaipur. Dr. Datta has completed his graduation i.e.,
B.A.LL.B. from Law College Dehradun, Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna
Garhwal University, Srinagar, Uttarakhand. He is an alumnus of KIIT
University, Bhubaneswar where he pursued his post-graduation
(LL.M.) in Criminal Law and subsequently completed his Ph.D. in
Police Law and Information Technology from the Pacific Academy of
Higher Education and Research University, Udaipur in 2020. His area
of interest and research is Criminal and Police Law. Dr. Datta has a
teaching experience of 7 years in various law schools across North
India and has held administrative positions like Academic Coordinator,
Centre Superintendent for Examinations, Deputy Controller of
Examinations, Member of the Proctorial Board

Page | 2
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024

Dr. Namita Jain


Head & Associate Professor

School of Law, JECRC University, Jaipur Ph.D. (Commercial Law) LL.M., UGC -NET
Post Graduation Diploma in Taxation law and Practice, Bachelor of Commerce.

Teaching Experience: 12 years, AWARDS AND RECOGNITION of Dr. Namita Jain are
- ICF Global Excellence Award 2020 in the category of educationalist by I Can
Foundation, India.India Women Empowerment Award in the category of “Emerging
Excellence in Academics by Prime Time & Utkrisht Bharat Foundation, New
Delhi.(2020). Conferred in FL Book of Top 21 Record Holders in the category of
education by Fashion Lifestyle Magazine, New Delhi. (2020).Certificate of Appreciation
for organizing and managing the Professional Development Training Program on IPR
in Collaboration with Trade Innovations Services, Jaipur on March 14th, 2019

Mrs.S.Kalpana
Assistant professor of Law

Mrs.S.Kalpana, presently Assistant professor of Law, VelTech Rangarajan Dr.


Sagunthala R & D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi.Formerly
Assistant professor of Law,Vels University in the year 2019 to 2020, Worked as
Guest Faculty, Chennai Dr.Ambedkar Law College, Pudupakkam. Published
one book. Published 8Articles in various reputed Law Journals. Conducted
1Moot court competition and participated in nearly 80 National and
International seminars and webinars conducted on various subjects of Law. Did
ML in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Administration.10 paper
presentations in various National and International seminars. Attended more
than 10 FDP programs. Ph.D. in Law pursuing.

Avinash Kumar
Avinash Kumar has completed his Ph.D. in International Investment Law from
the Dept. of Law & Governance, Central University of South Bihar. His
research work is on “International Investment Agreement and State's right to
regulate Foreign Investment." He qualified UGC-NET and has been selected
for the prestigious ICSSR Doctoral Fellowship.He is an alumnus of the Faculty
of Law, University of Delhi. Formerly he has been elected as Students Union
President of Law Centre-1, University of Delhi.Moreover, he completed his
LL.M. from the University of Delhi (2014-16), dissertation on "Cross-border
Merger & Acquisition"; LL.B. from the University of Delhi (2011-14), and B.A.
(Hons.) from Maharaja Agrasen College, University of Delhi. He has also
obtained P.G. Diploma in IPR from the Indian Society of International Law,
New Delhi.He has qualified UGC – NET examination and has been awarded
ICSSR – Doctoral Fellowship. He has published six-plus articles and presented
9 plus papers in national and international seminars/conferences. He
participated in several workshops on research methodology and teaching and
learning.

Page | 3
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024

ABOUT US

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH & ANLAYSIS


ISSN
2582-6433 is an Online Journal is Monthly, Peer Review, Academic Journal,
Published online, that seeks to provide an interactive platform for the publication
of Short Articles, Long Articles, Book Review, Case Comments, Research
Papers, Essay in the field of Law & Multidisciplinary issue. Our aim is to
upgrade the level of interaction and discourse about contemporary issues of law.
We are eager to become a highly cited academic publication, through quality
contributions from students, academics, professionals from the industry, the bar
and the bench. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH &
ANALYSIS ISSN 2582-6433 welcomes contributions from all legal branches,
as long as the work is original, unpublished and is in consonance with the
submission guidelines.

Page | 4
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024

“CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE


INTRODUCTION AND EFFECTS OF HINDU
CODE BILL IN INDIA”
AUTHORED BY - SARTHAK BOBADE

ABSTRACT
The Hindu Code Bill, which during the recent Indian election became a controversial issue
between Prime Minister Nehru and certain conservative Hindu elements, still awaits passage by
the Indian Parliament. The object of the bill, which has been years in preparation, is to unify,
codify, and modernize the laws governing marriage, divorce, inheritance, property rights, and
allied topics for Hindus, who form the great majority of the population of the Indian Republic.
The word "Hindu" is of foreign origin and inexact in its meaning. The proposed bill applies to
adherents of the Hindu faith and also to Sikhs, Jains, Lingayats, and Buddhists, all religions allied
historically to Hinduism. It applies, in fact, to all citizens of India except Muslims, Parsis,
Christians, and Jews.

The keen interests of Hindus, and particularly of Hindu women, in the proposed Hindu Code
Bill, which touches so closely their personal affairs, is paralleled by the close attention which
outside observers are devoting to this experiment in codification. Students of jurisprudence have
seen resemblances to the famous codification of French law in the early nineteenth century, and
to Egypt's recent codification of Islamic law. It is fairly certain that India's new code, if and when
it is finally passed, will be a modern interpretation of classical Indian religious law and local
custom, with strong traces of English common law.

The Hindu Code Bill has been criticized, even by progressives who otherwise favor it, on the
ground that the same laws should apply to all citizens regardless of religion. In reply, it is said
that since much of the traditional customary law has a religious basis, the same code cannot be
imposed on all sects without violating the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.
Actually, many communities which have adopted some other religion still follow the old Hindu
laws and customs in non-religious matters, so that the practical difficulties of applying a uniform
code have perhaps been exaggerate.
Page | 5
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
In this research paper, we‟ll discuss all easy aspects of the Hindu Code Bill from its formation
and enacting to its impacts on the society as well.

LITERATURE REVIEW
1. "Hindu Code Bill: A Study in Social Engineering" by Granville Austin "Hindu Code
Bill: A Study in Social Engineering" by Granville Austin is a research paper that provides
a detailed historical analysis of the Hindu Code Bill and its impact on Indian society. The
paper discusses the political and social context in which the Bill was introduced, the
debates surrounding it, and the various provisions of the Bill. The author argues that the
Bill was a significant step towards the modernization of Hindu law and the empowerment
of women in India.
The paper argues that the Hindu Code Bill was a landmark piece of legislation that
contributed to the modernization of Hindu law and the empowerment of women in India.
The Bill, while not perfect, represented a significant step towards greater social justice
and equality in Indian society.

2. "The Hindu Code Bill: A Feminist Perspective" by Leela Dube


"The Hindu Code Bill: A Feminist Perspective" by Leela Dube is a research paper that
provides a feminist perspective on the Hindu Code Bill, which was a series of laws passed
in India in the 1950s that aimed to reform and codify Hindu personal law. The paper
argues that while the Hindu Code Bill was a significant step towards gender equality, it
did not go far enough in addressing the structural inequalities that women faced in Indian
society.

The paper argues that while the Hindu Code Bill was an important piece of legislation
that contributed to the empowerment of women in India, it did not go far enough in
addressing the structural inequalities that women faced in Indian society. The author calls
for a continued feminist engagement with the law, and for further reforms that address
the root causes of gender inequality in India.

3. "The Hindu Code Bill: A Critical Assessment" by Upendra Baxi"


The Hindu Code Bill: A Critical Assessment" by Upendra Baxi is a research paper that
critically evaluates the Hindu Code Bill, which was a series of laws passed in India in the

Page | 6
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
1950s that aimed to reform and codify Hindu personal law. The paper argues that while
the Bill represented a significant step towards modernization and gender justice, it also
had certain limitations and shortcomings that needed to be addressed.

The paper argues that while the Hindu Code Bill was a significant step towards
modernization and gender justice, it also had certain limitations and shortcomings that
needed to be addressed. The author calls for a continued engagement with the law, and
for further reforms that address the root causes of gender inequality in India, such as caste
and class barriers.

BACKGROUND OF THE HINDU CODE BILL


In the Vedic age, women participated in religious rites and could officiate as priests. It was
customary in ancient times for writers, painters and sculptors to remain anonymous and to ascribe
their work to mythical personages; thus, though the names of a few women artists are known,
there are indications to suggest that their numbers were in fact much larger. Women
mathematicians, philosophers and civil administrators are among the nation's illustrious
ancestors whose names are household words and are recited in drama and song throughout the
villages of India. It is a generally accepted fact that women once participated in public life and
enjoyed a position of social equality with men. Their spiritual disfranchisement came at the time
of Manu, the law-giver who placed a taboo upon the participation of women in the Upanayan (or
sacred thread) ceremony. Since religion was the basis of society, this prohibition had a
tremendous effect upon the status of women in other respects as well, and from that time onwards
they gradually lost their position in society. Because property and inheritance rights were bound
up with religion, women's prerogatives suffered in this field also. The daughter was the first
sufferer, her right of inheritance to her father's property being abolished. As women's position in
society worsened, the process found reflection in the laws.

Under British law, women were not allowed to own property until the 19th century, when the
Married Women's Property Act was passed, although women never lost their right to do so under
Hindu law. The concept of stridhan or women's property, although increasingly limited over the
centuries, never completely disappeared. With the advent of British rule, certain property rights
of women were further restricted when backward pandhs and priests provided interpreters and
translators for British magistrates. At the same time, the term "widow's property" was born, which
Page | 7
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
allowed a woman to keep the property inherited from her husband during her lifetime, but not to
give it away. The marriage law also gradually deviated from the previous equal treatment of men
and women. Hindu law allowed polygamy only in cases where the woman proved sterile; that
exception later was interpreted to include women who did not have the disease of the husband.
Over time, child marriage became common, widows were forbidden to remarry, the dowry system
spread, and as a result the marriage law lost any semblance of equal rights.

Some argue that Hindu marriage was a sacrament and therefore divorce or dissolution of
marriage was unknown in Hindu law. However, a well-known text of the ancient lawgiver
Narada clearly states that divorce must be allowed under certain conditions. In other words, Hindu
law has varied at different times due to the multiplicity of interpretations given to it, so that
reformers on the one hand and staunch conservatives on the other can refer to opposing texts, as
they often do. support their specific arguments. Furthermore, Hindu law varied not only over time
but also between different classes and regions. It is not uniform across India. There are mainly
two legal orders, Dayabhaga and Mitakshara, and even these have their own subdivisions. Along
with these is the matriarchal system which flourished in the pre-agricultural era and still continues
in Malabar and certain other parts of the country. In the legal systems of Aliyasantana and
Marumakkattayam, which are essentially matriarchal, women have not only equal but more
complete rights than men. There is also a difference between the Brahmanical Hindu marriage
law that governs the so-called upper classes of society, and the marriage laws followed by the
lower classes, where customary divorce is recognized and always has been, and where the laws
in question are more. equality to women. The custom of dowry, which still prevails among the
upper and middle classes, obliging the bride to inherit the marriage, is completely reversed in the
lower classes, where the bridegroom must pay a dowry to receive his bride. There are even
differences in the laws governing the higher classes. Thus in Bombay, under the Mayuk school
of law, the daughter's right of inheritance remains intact, while in Bengal the widow's right to her
husband's property was limited only after the beginning of British rule.

Custom, even more than law, harmed the cause of women. Customs changes are happening very
fast in India these days. Early marriage was banned by the Child Marriage Restriction Act of
1929. The purdah system, which was all the rage in Muslim times and denies women
opportunities for social interaction, was abandoned by Hindus and is largely dying out among
Muslims as well. The Hindu joint family system once provided social security for the elderly, the

Page | 8
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
disabled and the sick. Later, it became a serious obstacle to the advancement of women, because
it tied them to domestic responsibilities and denied them the opportunity to freely participate in
the social life of the community. This system is also fast disappearing due to current social and
economic forces. The first progress was seen in the middle of the 19th century, with the
appearance of the great pioneer and social reformer Raja Ram Mohan Roy, who almost single-
handedly championed the issue of women's rights and social reform. At that time, sati was
practiced in some parts of the country (a widow burned on her husband's burial site). Sati was
brought to India through Scythian influence and was initially confined to the Rajputs, the famous
warrior class of Rajasthan, but later spread more widely. Thanks to the efforts of Raja Ram
Mohan Roy, who fought against great odds, a law was passed prohibiting this custom. Pandit
Ishwar Chandar Vidyasagar was another important reformer who argued that ancient Hindu
scriptures accepted widow remarriage and whose efforts led to the passing of the Widow
Remarriage Act in the late 19th century. At the turn of the century, progressive Hindu groups
such as the Brahmo Samaj and the Arya Samaj, whose reforms were endorsed in the Vedas and
Upanishads, broke many backward customs by helping their female members enjoy education.
and opportunities for self-expression helped them take their place among the world's most
progressive women. The liberating influence of the great Tagore family, which produced several
pioneering female reformers, was gradually felt throughout the country. Later came figures like
Hari Singh Gour, Dr. Deshmukh and Rai Haribilas Sarda who were responsible for passing bills
in the central parliament which removed some of the grosser injustices. However, serious
obstacles remained as the British government followed a policy of non-interference in the
religious and social affairs of the colonists and was therefore unwilling to take reform initiatives.

The most momentous change in the position of women in India was due to the efforts of Mahatma
Gandhi, who, in launching his campaign of non- violent non-cooperation in the struggle for
Indian freedom, ignored both law and custom by specifically calling upon women to participate.
They left the seclusion of their homes and, courting imprisonment came forward to help in every
emergency that faced the country. No legislation could have been more sweeping or more
effective than the Mahatma's call, which leveled the barriers of established custom almost
overnight. Thus, the non-cooperation movement for national independence brought the
emancipation of women in its wake. Thenceforth women in ever larger numbers became
increasingly active not only in the freedom movement but also in various fields of social service.

Page | 9
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024

ROLE OF DR. BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR IN THE MAKING

“No law passed by the Indian Legislature in the past or likely to be passed in the
future can be compared to it (Hindu Code) in point of its significance. To leave
inequality between class and class, between sex and sex which is the soul of Hindu
society, untouched and to go on passing legislation relating to economic problems
is to make a farce of our Constitution and to build a palace on a dung heap. This is
the significance I attached to the Hindu Code.”
—Dr. Ambedkar on ‘Hindu Code’

After India's independence in 1947, the


postcolonial government led by Prime
Minister Jawaharlal Nehru completed the
codification and reform of Hindu personal
law, a process started by the British.
According to the British policy of non-
interference, reform of personal law should have arisen from a demand from the Hindu
community. This was not the case, as there was significant opposition from various leading Hindu
politicians, organizations and devotees who saw themselves unjustly singled out as the sole
religious community whose laws were to be reformed. However, the Nehru administration saw
such codification as necessary in order to unify the Hindu community, which ideally would be a
first step towards unifying the nation. They succeeded in passing four Hindu code bills in 1955–
56: the Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act,
and Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act. These continue to be controversial to the
present day among women's, religious, and nationalist groups.

Page | 10
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
Dr. Ambedkar, however, was in a position to make a
strong impact on the making of the Constitution after he
was appointed president of the “Drafting Committee”.
While This Committee, was not responsible for drafting
the primary texts, had the essential function to get these
into shape on the basis of articles proposed by other, issue-
based, Committees, before submitting them to the
Constituent Assembly. The Assembly made several
readings and, each time, Drafting Committee members
and most often its chairman, Dr. Ambedkar guided and
channelized the discussion. In addition, he was one of the
few members of the Constituent Assembly who belonged,
besides the Drafting Committee, at the same time,
to more than one of the 15 Committees including the Minorities Committee where safeguards for
the Dalitswere discussed.

In the Constituent Assembly, Dr. Ambedkar defended thevalues and political models in which he
had been immersed since his youth when he studied in the United States and England. This
brought him closer to Nehru but led him to adopt Gandhian positions. Like Nehru, Ambedkar
believed in parliamentary democracy. He also faced criticism from the left who wanted to classify
the Republic of India as "socialist" from the first article of the constitution. According to him,
this would contribute to "simply destroying democracy", because the task of the government,
appointed by the people, was to choose the best form of social organization, as he explained on
19th November 1948. Another sign of his commitment to the values of liberal democracy was
when he proposed to change the strict separation of executive and judicial powers. Some
representatives opposed this in the name of state power, arguing that too strict legal control would
undermine it. Nehru participated in this discussion, although his responsibilities as Prime Minister
did not allow him much time as he wanted to support Dr. Ambedkar's revision. It was accepted
and became Article 50 of the Directive Principles. Later, Ambedkar advocated the establishment
of a British legal system. According to him, the division of power would in no way weaken the
country. Dr. Ambedkar, on the contrary, advocated a strong center on the grounds that excessive
federalism would prevent uniform application of the Constitution throughout India. For example,
he argued that the immunity clause would not be applied uniformly if states had too much

Page | 11
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
autonomy. This possibility of centralization naturally offended Gandhi's supporters, who always
seemed very interested in decentralizing power down to the village level. In a sense, Ambedkar
posthumously avenged the Mahatma in the Constituent Assembly because he managed to sideline
or at least weaken the influence of the more radical Gandhians on Panchayati Raj, cow protection,
etc. While none of the articles in that text abolished castes, discrimination based on creed, race,
caste, sex and place of birth was prohibited because equality was paramount, which was to
become Article 15 of the 1950 constitution. It also prohibited all restrictions based on the same
criteria on shops, restaurants, hotels, public places for leisure, wells, streets and other public
places receiving financial support from the state. In particular, Article 17 has lost immunity. Hard
labor and all other forms of begging (forms of slavery, the first victims of which were Dalits)
were prohibited under Article 23.

But Dr. Ambedkar failed to make an impact in one of his main areas, which is personal. laws are
a key area of social reform. During the debates in the Constituent Assembly, he showed his
willingness to reform Indian society by advocating the adoption of a Western civil code. He then
confronted those representatives who wanted to preserve personal laws, especially Muslim
representatives who seemed very worried about the fate of Sharia law. As a result, Dr. Ambedkar
got nothing but an article in the Directive Principles which says, "The State shall endeavor to
secure to the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India." After the
promulgation of the Constitution, Dr. Ambedkar supported the reform of Hindu personal law. He
wanted to implement in a revised form the Hindu Code Bill which the British gradually
developed. With over a century of legislation from the abolition of Sati (1829) to the Hindu
Women's Property Act (1937), they decided in the 1940s to consolidate the reformed Hindu
Personal Law into a single code. Among its most important provisions was the fact that daughters
received a share of the inheritance with sons after the death of their parents, widows received
absolute property, monogamy was the rule of law, and divorce was allowed under certain
conditions. The code was introduced in the parliament in April 19 7, but the political conditions
of independence and partition prevented that body from discussing the text. In 19 8, Nehru
entrusted the drafting of a new code to a sub-committee of the General Assembly and appointed
Dr. Ambedkar as its head. In the latter are written such important principles as the equality of
men and women in matters of property and adoption, the granting of legal status only to
monogamous marriage, the elimination of the "caste conflict of civil marriage" and the need for
concrete justification. application for divorce, a procedure that until now was too common incases

Page | 12
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
where her husband refused her. The questioning of practices governing Hindu privacy created a
deep feeling not only among the traditional parties of the Hindu Mahasabha, but also among
Congress leaders, including Rajendra Prasad, who as President of the Constituent Assembly
became the first President of the United States. Republic of India Many other Congress leaders,
including party president Pattabhi Sita Ramayyan, opposed the bill, after all, it could not have
been passed before 1951-52. general election to alienate local conservative landowners.
Jawaharlal Nehru subscribed to this code where he saw Dr. Ambedkar as one of the cornerstones
of the modernization of India. He even announced that his government would resign if the bill
was not passed. Dr. Ambedkar pressed him to present it to the Parliament as soon as possible.
The prime minister asked for his patience and divided the code into four subgroups to dissolve
the opposition before presenting it to the Assembly on 17 September 1951. The ensuing debate
confirmed the hostility of the more traditional congressmen at the time. Finally, These laws are
as fallows.

Laws related to Dowry, Marriage and divorce Caste Disabilities Removal which
later on became the Caste Disabilities Removal Act, 1850
1. CONVERTS MARRIAGE ACT, 1866,
2. The special Marriage Act, 1872,
3. The child marriage Restraint Act 1929 (Known as sharda Act)
4. Hindu Marriage Act 1945
5. Hindu Marriage (Removal of Disabilities) Act 1946
6. Hindu Marriage Act 1955
7. The Indian divorce Act 1955
8. The Hindu widows : Remarriage Act 1856
9. Dowry prohibition Act 1961
10. Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006

Laws related to right to property Act


1. The Hindu Inheritance (Removal of Disabilities) Act, 1928,
2. The Hindu Law of inheritance (Amendment) Act, 1929,
3. The Hindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930,
4. the Hindu Women's Rights to property Act, 1937,
5. Hindu Women's Right to Separate Maintenance and Residence Act, 1946,
Page | 13
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
6. Hindu Marriage (Removal of Disabilities) Act 1946.
7. The Hindu women Married women‟s right to separate Residence and maintenance Act
1946
8. Hindu adoption and maintenance Act 1956
9. Hindu succession Act 1956

Laws Related to protection of rights of working women


1. Factories Act 1948
2. Minimum Wages Act 1948
3. Hindu minors and guardianship Act 1956
4. The maternity benefit Act 1961
5. Equal remuneration Act 1976
6. The Factories amendment Act 1976

Hindu women's Right to property Act, 1937 was passed with a view to granting property rights
to women but its repercussion on the joint family was overlooked. Hindu Society although, has
advanced much beyond what it was during the period of Commentaries and Digests, yet, the
development of law was thwarted. Hindu law became static and did not conform to the changed
context of Hindu society. The progressive section of Hindu society always clamoured for reforms.
In 1941 a Hindu Law committee was constituted which in its, report recommended that Hindu
Law should be codified in gradual stages beginning with the law of intestate succession and
marriage. The Government ultimately decided to split up the code and pass it in installments.The
passage During Constituent Assembly Debates Dr. Gour strongly pleaded for the uniform Civil
Code for the whole county in order to ameliorate the poor condition of women of every
community. He wanted to provide with equal rights and status to every woman, Hindu or Muslim.
Article 44 of the Constitution provides for uniforms civil code for the citizens. The State shall
endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India. But till
today a uniform civil code could not be made. The Supreme court on May 10, 1996, in its
judgment asked the prime minister to take "fresh look" at Article 44 of the constitution. The court
said that is was imperative both for protection of the oppressed and promotion of national unity
and solidarity. Mr. Justice R.M.Sahai said in his judgement that "the Successive Governments till
date have been wholly re-miss in their duty of implementing the constitutional mandate under
Article 44 of the constitution and why it so. Only political leadersof this Nation knows better

Page | 14
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
than a Aam Adami or abala nari support to understand it.

This Article examines the debate about women‟s rights and family law reform in interwar and
early independent India. Focusing on the Hindu Code bill, an attempt to reform and codified in
the family law that began in 1941 and culminated in 1956, It argues that these reforms sought to
alter the way in which male authority was exercised within the Hindu family but also to
consolidate the power of North Indian Hindu men over other regional Hindu and Non Hindu
communities. Managed through alliance between colonial rulers and local men of influence,
British governance in India helped to ensure and even sharpen the hierarchical structure of
patriarchal authority in India. Constitutional reform and changes in the political, economy of
colonial rule after world war I began to place this hierarchical structure of power under pressure
and created growing interest amongst Indian legislature and colonial officials in its reforms.
Though couched in the language of women‟s rights reform of personal law was drivan by a desire
to reconfigure the balance of power within both the Hindu family and the Indian state.

On September 22, 1951, Jawaharlal Nehru, fearing a caste Hindu backlash, dropped the Hindu
Code Bill. Thus was lost a golden opportunity to remove all the constraints imposed on Hindu
women by the patriarchal brahminical social order based on the dictates of Manu. As is
commonly known, women in Hindu society have historically been denied political social and
economic rights. Brahminical texts denied women education. Sati, child marriage, widow
ostracization were cunningly used to deny women their rights to property.

As free India's first Law Minster, Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar recognized that it was his duty to free
women from the clutches of Manu's laws. He drafted and introduced the Hindu Code Bill on 24
February 1949. Through this Bill, Dr.Ambedkar wanted to put an end to a variety of marriage
systems prevailing in India and legalise only monogamous marriage. But most importantly, the
Bill sought to confer on women the right to property. It also sought to give equality to men and
women in all legal matters. But caste Hindu "leaders" and "intellectuals", not prepared to respect
women as equals, opposed this Bill calling it an attack on their religion. Socalled liberal Congress
leaders such as Rajendra Prasad. Govind Vallabh Pant and Madan Mohan Malviya & other
leaders opposed the Bill. Sarojini Naidu threatened to go on a hunger strike if the Bill was not
dropped. Dr. Ambedkar was heavily criticized for standing in favour of women's rights The
orthodox elements together with "moderate" Congress leaders whipped up communal passion in
the country by raising the cry of "Hinduism in Danger" in the hands of an "untouchable". A
Page | 15
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
spineless Nehru yielded to pressure and decided to drop the Bill. Dr.Ambedkar strongly backed
the Bill and called on the liberal intelligentsia and the media to come forward in support of the
Bill, but most failed to respond to his call unable to see beyond their caste prejudices. Hurt by the
lack of commitment to positive change and Nehru's backtrack Dr.B.R.Ambedkar resigned from
the Union Cabinet.

However, in his struggle for combating graded inequality Dr. Ambedkar opted a strategy to
remain the part of process in reformation rather than agitating or complaining from outside.
Probably, the „Hindu Code Bill‟ was last an attempt of Dr. Ambedkar to reform graded inequality
of Hinduism from within. Since from the beginning of his political career, Dr. Ambedkar was
criticizing Hinduism for inbuilt inequality, but tried to bring reformation. There occurred the
incidences where his movement had reached at crossroad and in clear conflict with two Congress
leaders. First at Poona-pact with Mahatma Gandhi which ended with Consensus compromise‟,
and second at „Hindu Code Bill‟ with Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru which ended with„ fractured
faith‟ of Dr. Ambedkar. Further the current article attempts to provide a historical perspective to
the evolution of Hindu law. It annotates the dynamic interaction among a wide variety of social
forces that created the historical context to the Hindu Code Bill controversy. It shows that the
Hindu Code Bill was shaped by a constellation of forces such as growth of the women‟s
movement, necessities of the nationalist struggle, and the need for legal reforms in the first half
of the twentieth century. The chapter records the efforts of the women‟s movement in India, the
attainment of women‟s franchise, and the influence exerted by the intensification of theIndian
national movement that forced women to come out of their domestic confines and joined their
male compatriots. Thus internal inconsistencies within the legal system coupled with external
realities necessitated modification of the laws relating to women since the 1920s.

Discussing about the specific stages of evolution of the Hindu Code Bill and provides the base
for understanding the ideological underpinnings of the discourse over the Hindu Code Bill during
1941 to 1946. The chapter traces the process of codification of Hindu laws since the 1920s,
immediately after the Montague Chelmsford reforms. It discusses the debate over Hindu
legislative reforms in the 1920s and 1930s and also the growing social discontent over the Hindu
Women‟s Right to Property Act of 1937 that led to the constitution of the Hindu Law Committee
in 1941. The chapter also discusses the recommendations of the first Hindu Law Committee, the
reconstitution of the Committee in 1944 with the mandate to frame a Bill to codify Hindu law.

Page | 16
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
Also, the contribution of the Hindu Code Bill in the construction of the modern Indian nation.
Contrary to the existing perception that the Hindu Code Bill in its diluted form failed to create a
significant impact on modern Indian society, the analysis tries to capture the lasting imprints of
the Hindu Code Bill on the modern Indian mind. With the help of theoretical tools and empirical
analysis, the section locates the significance of the Hindu Code Bill controversy in independent
India. It attempts to demonstrate that not only did the Hindu Code Bill provide the benchmark
for the second wave of feminist activism in India in the 1970s and 1980s, it also shaped much of
the subsequent legal debates surrounding the proper implementation of Hindu laws. The chapter
argues that even in its truncated form, the passage of the Hindu Code Bill was important in
shaping the gender consciousness in independent India and thereby influencing the process of
law formation over the longer term.

ROLE AS A SOCIAL REFORM


The need for a general reform of the whole of the personal law of the Hindus has been
increasingly apparent to lawyers through- out India as the flood of judicial decisions, the increase
in the number of high courts, and the appearance of more and more legal reports has added to the
confusion produced by the spectacle of modern lawyers, English and Indian, trying to delve into
the minds of the ancient lawgivers and reading into ancient texts meanings which may have been
far from the authors' minds. The courts, which might have tried to exercise their influence to
achieve greater unity in the land, took an almost dilettante delight in finding new aspects to the
law in individual cases and creating new diversity till, in the words of an English commentator,
Hindu case law was 'a luxuriant jungle in which it is impossible to see the wood for the trees'. It
seemed at times as if the law was developing along lines which were in accord neither with the
spirit of the ancient writers of the smritis and srutis nor with the needs of modern times. Writers
of the standing of Sir Hari Singh Gour and Sir Dinshah Mulla tried to reduce Hindu Law to written
works that had the clarity of a code, but they could not be completely successful as there was so
much in the system that needed to be reformed. A chaotic state of affairs has resulted. A Hindu
could have as many wives as he chose. A Muslim could have up to four. A Hindu had no divorce.
A Muslim could divorce at will. But in some parts of the country Hindus enjoyed some form of
customary divorce either at will, or on payment of a fine or under some other conditions. Among
the people of Malabar and the Canaries country there were loose forms of marriage which in
effect permitted a woman a good deal of freedom, and the form of succession was matriarchal,
as distinct from the patriarchal system generally prevalent among Hindus, In part of India a son's
Page | 17
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
rights in the estate of a Hindu father only materialized on the father's death; in the rest of the
country it vested in the son from his birth so that he became a joint owner in the family estate.
Some Muslims followed the Hindu law of joint family and succession to property. Others
followed their own system. Religious marriages between Hindus of different castes were not
possible. Even where a Hindu husband had no intention of taking a second wife, a Hindu marriage
was not register able and had not the same value in the law courts as the exclusive monogamous
union of a Christian husband and wife. Thus a Hindu might abandon his Hindu wife, to whom he
had been married with full religious ceremony, and contract a civil marriage with another woman.
In the eyes of the law the civil marriage would be quite valid, and, furthermore, it would bar him
from further marriages so long as it lasted. The call for reforms was inevitable with the seeping
into India of new ideas as a result of contact with other countries and the coming of Western
education. The Hindu might still cherish his inheritance in a sentimental way, but he could not
but recognize the limitations of an old social code in life in a new era. From distant London judges
of the Privy Council might declare that 'no variations or uncertainties should be introduced into
the established and widely recognized laws which governan ancient Eastern civilization'. Yet the
very decision in which Lord Sumner made this profound statement of respect for the past was
the cause of a demand for change on the part of Hindus which led to the Gains of Learning
Act. Nothing could better illustrate the desire of progressive Hindus for change and the inability
of judges of the Privy Council to sense the mood of a new age in India, despite the occasional
presence on their bench of Indian judges.

Thus while some further delay in the enactment of the Code will help to close the gap which may
be left between public opinion and the views of the more enlightened leadership, it is imperative
that once the electioneering atmosphere has been dispelled the legislature should get to work on
the enactment and the scores of amendments to it so as to bring forward the day when the Hindus
will have a uniform common law. A new code will give the Hindu community, and Hindu
marriage in particular, improved standing in the world generally. It will be of value even beyond
the limits of India, for it will give the courts of Pakistan, Ceylon, Malaya, and other countries
with large Hindu communities a lead on which to act in the handling of that community where
they might otherwise have hesitated to introduce changes that would have exposed them, in the
case of Pakistan at any rate, to the charge of intolerance. Most important of all, the Code will be
the best proof of India's intention to implement promises of equality contained in her Constitution
and to give women rights which might well have come before the grant of the franchise.

Page | 18
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024

IMPACT OF THE BILL ON INDIAN WOMENS


The path of reformers to whom we owe whatever little civilisation there is, has always been long
and hard. The Hindu Code, when it came soon after Independence, was a historic milestone in
women's movement in India. But it was possible for Jawaharlal Nehru to put it on the Statute
Book, despite his most eminent critics, because a cli- mate of opinion had been created in the
first and second half of the 19th century by men like Rammohun Roy, Ishwarchandra Vidyasagar
in Bengal and Ranade and Telang in what was then the Presidency of Bombay. They had
struggled tenaciously against orthodoxy, bigotry and evil customs and made Nehru's task easier.
The Hindu Code transformed, at least theoretically, women's lives by providing with two very
important rights to them - right to divorce and property right. These went a long way towards
empowering them and giving them a new status in society. According to Hindu - and Christian -
tradition, marriage was a sacrament. It was permanent union between the husband and wife who
were exhorted to strive their utmost to make it a success. How- ever, often marriages did not
succeed and unhappy and incompatible marriages became nothing but fetters for the couples
concerned. By the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, the right of divorce was for the first time granted
to women on certain specific grounds. So, in a male-dominated society as it was in India, women
were free to relieve themselves of unhappy married lives and to choose lives of their own.
Moreover, the second part of the Hindu Code, that is the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, made a
Hindu woman owner of all property, acquired from a male Hindu dying intestate. This gave her
economic independence necessary to lead a life of her own choice. The Hindu Code, therefore,
was a significant contribution to the attainment of freedom by Indian women. The extent to
which the Hindu Code transformed the lives of Hindu women can be analysed by an attempt to
assess their position before the passing of the Code and after. It is not very easy to evaluate the
condition of the Hindu women in India during the second half of the 19th century. The life of an
average Hindu woman was very difficult and pitiable owing to the existing social customs and
practices of time. It is now a matter of common knowledge that during the Vedic period, Indian
women enjoyed a great deal of freedom. In the pursuit of knowledge and virtue, in the
performance of rituals, in the composition of hymns and in other activities - temporal or spiritual
- - women were considered to be equals of men. Famous women like Gargi and Maitrayee were
prized possessions of ancient Indian society. The Hindu women displayed outstanding
capabilities as administrators and warriors. Apart from Meerabai who distinguished herself as the
poet queen of the fifteenth century, the warrior queens Ahalya Bai and Rani Laxmi Bai of Jhansi,
became immortal for displaying rare courage and determination in the field of battle. Rani
Page | 19
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
Bhawani of Natore in Bengal exhibited rare ability in managing her estates. Hati Vidyalankar, a
Bengali resident of Varanasi, and Shyammohini Devi of Bengal were two eminent Sanskrit
scholars.

Inferior Status
The condition of Indian women in general and of Hindu women in particular, began to deteriorate
after the coming of the Muslims in India. This was largely due to a natural social response to the
challenge posed by the disturbed condition following foreign invasions of the country as well as
internecine conflicts. Some undesirable social customs consequently crept intothe society which
gradually reduced the Indian women to a state of perpetual bond- age. When raids and warfare
became a common occurrence in India, the fear of insecurity of unmarried young women was
perhaps largely responsible for the emergence of the system of early marriage. This most
probably led to the emergence of the cruel dowry system which prevailed in India for centuries
and persists even today. The fear of insecurity was to a great extent responsible for the growth
and continuance of the system of Sati. The emergence of Purdah system and seclusion of women
was a by-product of such fear. With no organized system of education to sustain her, a female
child, often married even before she had learnt the alphabets, remained unlettered and absolutely
dependent upon men economically and otherwise. Gradually, the belief grew in Indian society
that women were destined to have a status inferior to men. At the beginning of the 19th century,
the position of Indian women had reached the "lowest depth of degradation". Any discussion of
the condition of women during the second half of the 19th century must analyse the social
customs with the accompanying evils, which prevailed in the society. Family was the most
important centre in the life of an Indian. The traditional pattern of family was the joint family
which included father, mother, grandfather, grand- mother, brothers, sisters and also other
relatives. The Western concept of nuclear family consisting of husband, wife and children only
had not emerged then. Marriage was a social institution and the union of a couple was regarded
as a social alliance between the two families of the bride and the bridegroom. Making one's family
happy was one's sole aim of life. Personal happiness and gratification were given the least priority.
The chief objects of Hindu marriage were Dharma (religious duty), Proja (progeny) and Rati
(conjugal love). Child marriage was a bane of the Hindu society. The girls were often given in
marriage at the age of ten or even below. More tragic than the child brides was the lot of up- per
caste Hindu widows in the society. Often looked upon as a drudge in the family, a widow
invariably led a miser- able life. The condition of a child widow was still worse. Women in Hindu

Page | 20
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
society had no right to succession to property. That made them dependent on men. A Hindu
widow, therefore, inherited nothing on either side. She was only entitled to stay and live in her
husband's family till death. She had no right beyond maintenance to keep her body and soul
together.

Filling Gaps
Despite these efforts, lot of gaps remained in the legislation intended to improve the position of
women in society. Though they cannot be discussed here for want of space, they are significant
in the sense that they led to the framing and passing of the Hindu Code of 1956. The Hindu Code
aimed largely at filling up these gaps. It had two parts - the first part dealing with marriage was
passed in 1955 and the second part dealing with property was passed in 1956. The right of divorce
was eventually granted to women by the Hindu Marriage Act of May 18, 1955. This is the first
part of the Hindu Code which provided for divorce, the principal grounds for which were: (1)
Living in adultery; (2) ceasing to be a Hindu by conversion; (3) renouncing the world by entering
a religious or- der; (4) incurable insanity for three years; (5) virulent and incurable leprosy for
three years; (6) not having been heard of for seven years; (7) not having resumed cohabitation for
two years after the passing of a decree for judicial separation; (8) failing to comply for two years
with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights; (9) the husband having married again and the
second wife still being alive; (10) the husband was guilty of rape, sodomy or bestiality. Divorce
by mutual consent was provided for in section 28. No hasty divorce could be obtained on this
ground. Every petition was to be preceded by living separately for a period of at least two years.
The Hindu Marriage Act also granted two other matrimonial remedies. These were the restitution
of conjugal rights and judicial separation. A decree for restitution, where one party had deserted
the other, could be granted where the grounds relied upon by the respondent were found to be
unsatisfactory. However, the court's order for restitution of conjugal rights is often violated,
because a mere order of the court is not expected to change the mind of a spouse who has severed
all connection with the other. A significant benefit acquired by women from theHindu Code was
that monogamy was strictly emphasised. This relieved the Hindu women from the pang of
suffering the existence of a co-wife. The Hindu Succession Act of 1956, the second part of the
Hindu Code, provided a share to a female even in respect of property owned by a joint Hindu
family of the Mitakshara type. The Act provided a proper solution to strong divergent views
regarding Hindu women's position in the order of succession without disrupting the Mitakshara
coparcenary. The Act adopted the Dayabhaga system under which property was to beheld by the

Page | 21
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
wife and children as personal property with an absolute right to dispose it. Under the old law, a
discrimination was made among female heirs on grounds such as whether a particular female was
rich or poor, whether she was with issue or without issue. All these discriminating points were
now abolished by this Act. It converted the women's limited estate into an absolute estate; and
secondly, it abolished the right of the reversioners to claim the property after the widow. The
Hindu Code further gave women their due importance by two other significant provisions - the
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Bill as well as the part deal- ing with adoption. Under the
former, the custody of a child under the age of three was to be normally with the mother, though
the natural guardian was to be the father and after him the mother. The mother was not deprived
of her right of guardianship by her remarriage and the widowed mother might also appoint a
guardian by will so long as her husband had not already appointed a testamentary guardian for
the same minor child. Similarly, according to the adoption part of the Hindu Code Bill, the father,
who under the shastric rules could give his son in adoption without his wife's consent, was
forbidden to do so as long as she was alive and was com- petent to give consent, that is to say,
was sane and was above 18 years of age. No other qualification for the mother was required.
Further, the mother alone could give the boy in adoption if the father was dead or had renounced
the world by becoming a hermit or ascetic or had ceased to be a Hindu or was not capable of
giving con- sent.

Benefits Summarised
So the mothers received their proper places in the Hindu Code. In fact, the benefits derived by
the Hindu Women from the Code may be summarised as follows:
(1) No girl below the age of fifteen could be married;
(2) Monogamy was strictly to be followed;
(3) Marriage was no longer sacrosanct and divorce could be obtained under certain specific
grounds;
(4) Sons and daughters were given equal footing in the matter of inheriting the parent's
property;
(5) Women derived the right to succession and their property were to be life estates and they
were given the full authority to dispose them of in the manner they liked;
(6) The mothers received the full custody of their children less than three years of age;
(7) Children could not be given in adoption without the mother's consent if she was in a
position to do so.

Page | 22
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
The Hindu Code, therefore, intended to provide a break- through in the life of Hindu women by
setting them free from the shackles of unhappy marriages and by providing them with rights of
inheritance. This was supposed to infuse a sense of confidence in women and to empower them
to fight independently and boldly against the injustices committed against them. Regrettably,
however, the dream of the legislators of giving Hindu women a position of equality in society
was belied. For the law did not work well in actual practice. Because, a society cannot, after all,
be reformed by legislation alone. This has to be done by an accompanying transformation of ideas
and out- look of the society at large. First of all, divorce was looked upon as a stigma in Indian
society. Divorcee girls, there- fore, found it extremely difficult to resettle in life by get- ting
married for the second time. Secondly, children were the worst sufferers of the consequences of
divorce. So few women could gather courage to walk out of their husbands' homes and continued
to suffer silently the evils of unhappy marriages. Further, majority of women had no refuge to
take shelter after leaving their husbands' homes, because of refusal by their parents to help them
out in their distress. Many of them lacked education and thereby failed to re-establish themselves
by securing a job. Very difficult job markets enhanced their miseries sharply. Social institutes for
rehabilitating displaced women, therefore, became an urgent necessity.

CONCLUSION
The application of the Hindu Code Bills have been controversial in determining who is to be
called a Hindu and who is entitled to be exempted from certain rules of Hindu law.

They are also still contentious among many communities, including women's, nationalist and
religious groups. At the time of their creation, many portrayed them as a serious deviation from
Hindu legal precedent. Feminists, such as Nivedita Menon, argue that since the personal laws
cover matters of marriage, inheritance and guardianship of children, and since all personal laws
discriminate against women, the tension within the laws is a contradiction between the rights of
women as individual citizens and those of religious communities as collective units of the
democracy. In her 1998 article "State, Gender, Community: Citizenship in Contemporary India",
she calls for more support and initiation for reform within all personal laws and more legislation
in areas that are not covered by secular or personal laws, such as domestic violence. She also
argues for a gender-equal framework of rights that covers the "public" domain of work (maternity
benefits, equal wages) and is available to all Indian citizens, thus avoiding a direct confrontation
with communities and communal politics.
Page | 23
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024

REFERENCES
1. "Hindu Code Bill: A Study in Social Engineering" by Granville Austin:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43953216?seq=1
2. "The Hindu Code Bill: A Feminist Perspective" by Leela Dube:
https://www.epw.in/system/files/pdf/1960_12/49/the_hindu_code_bill_a_feminist_persp
e ctive.pdf
3. "The Hindu Code Bill: A Critical Assessment" by Upendra Baxi:
https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195655247.001.0001
/ acprof-9780195655247-chapter-3
4. Banningan, John A. “The Hindu Code Bill.” Far Eastern Survey, vol. 21, no. 17, 1952,
pp. 173–76. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3024109. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.
5. Ray, Renuka. “The Background of the Hindu Code Bill.” Pacific Affairs, vol. 25, no. 3,
1952, pp. 268–77. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2752804. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.
6. Rajagopaul, G. R. “THE STORY OF THE HINDU CODE.” Journal of the Indian Law
Institute, vol. 17, no. 4, 1975, pp. 537–58. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43953841.
Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.
7. Kishwar, Madhu. “Codified Hindu Law: Myth and Reality.” Economic and Political
Weekly, vol. 29, no. 33, 1994, pp. 2145–61. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4401625. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.
8. Sinha, Chitra. “Images of Motherhood: The Hindu Code Bill Discourse.” Economic and
Political Weekly, vol. 42, no. 43, 2007, pp. 49–57. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40276597. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.
9. B. E. H. F. “Social Reform in India: The Hindu Code Bill.” The World Today, vol. 8, no.
3, 1952, pp. 123–32. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40392503. Accessed 30 Jan.
2023.
10. BASU, MONMAYEE. “Impact of Hindu Code on Indian Women.” World Affairs: The
Journal of International Issues, vol. 5, no. 1, 1996, pp. 46–62. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/45064379. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.
11. Newbigin, Eleanor (2008-01) The Hindu Code Bill and the making of the modern Indian
state
12. Chitra Sinha (2012) The Hindu Code Bill in Independent India Print ISBN-13:
9780198078944 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2012
13. Doctor Hari Singh Gour And Codification Of Hindu Law
Page | 24
www.ijlra.com
ISSN: 2582-6433
Volume 2 Issue 7| Jan 2024
http://indiankanoon.org/docfragment/25526/?big=2&formInput=womens%20sortby:%2
0 leastrecent
14. Sultanpur, Manikamma. (2021). Dr. B.R Ambedkar Contribution to the Hindu Code Bill.
4. 46-61.
15. DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR WRITINGS AND SPEECHES Vol. 14, Edited by
Vasant Moon
16. Reba Som, „Jawaharlal Nehru and the Hindu Code: A Victory of Symbol over
Substance‟, (1994) 8 Modern Asian Studies 165-194
17. P. K. Menon, „Hindu Jurisprudence‟, (1975) 9 The International Lawyer 209
18. Paras Diwan, „The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955‟, (1957) 6 The International &
Comparative L.Q. 263-272
19. HERRENSCHMIDT, OLIVIER. “The Indians‟ Impossible Civil Code.” European
Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv Für
Soziologie, vol. 50, no. 2, 2009, pp. 309–47. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/23999094. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023.
20. Nivedita Menon. "State, Gender, Community: Citizenship in Contemporary India"
[subscription needed]. Economic and Political Weekly. 31 January 1998. Volume 33,
issue 5
21. Mansfield, John H.; Robert D. Baird (1993). "The Personal Laws or a Uniform Civil
Code?" Religion and Law in Independent India
22. https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/nehru-and-the-hindu-code-bill/221000
23. https://www.shivajicollege.ac.in/sPanel/uploads/econtent/946813c7c01e8f733eb46d53e
9 cf9f25.pdf
24. https://scroll.in/article/875157/cartoons-on-ambedkars-contribution-to-hindu-code-bill-
twitter-user-resurrects-forgotten-history
25. Majumdar, Rochona. “History of Women‟s Rights: A Non-Historicist Reading.”
Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 38, no. 22, 2003, pp. 2130–34. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4413620. Accessed 30 Jan. 2023

Page | 25

You might also like