Code: Bse Limited: Dhaval Narendr A Soni
Code: Bse Limited: Dhaval Narendr A Soni
Sub: Transcript of the Post Results Earnings Call held on November 7, 2023
Pursuant to Regulations 30 and 46(2)(oa) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015, please find attached the Transcript of the Company’s Q2 FY24
post results earnings call held on November 7, 2023.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
For, ZYDUS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED
DHAVAL Digitally
            DHAVAL
                     signed by
DHAVAL N. SONI
COMPANY SECRETARY
Encl.: As above
          “Zydus Lifesciences Limited Q2 FY24
              Post Results Earnings Call”
November 7, 2023
                              1 of 25
Ganesh Nayak:   Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to our post results
                teleconference for the quarter ended September 30th, 2023. On
                today's call, we have with us Dr. Sharvil Patel, Managing Director,
                Mr. Nitin Parekh, Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Arvind Bothra, Senior
                Vice President, Investor Relations and Mr. Alok Garg - Senior Vice
                President from the Managing Director's office.
                With that, let me take you through the financial numbers for the
                quarter gone by. We registered consolidated revenues of Rs. 43.7
                billion, up 9% on a year-on-year basis. EBITDA for the quarter was
                Rs. 11.5 billion, with a growth of 41% on a year-on-year basis.
                Operating profitability remained robust as we registered an
                EBITDA margin of 26.2% during the quarter, which is an
                improvement of 580 basis points on a year-on-year basis. Net
                Profit for the quarter stood at Rs. 8 billion, up 53% year-on-year.
                Our Balance Sheet continued to strengthen with a net cash
                position of Rs. 16.4 billion as at 30th September, 2023 as against
                the net cash of Rs. 5.5 billion as at 31st March, 2023.
                Now, let me take you through the operating highlights for the
                second quarter of FY24 for our key business segments.
Sharvil Patel:   Thank you, Dr. Nayak. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. It is a
                 pleasure to have you all on the call today. We remain focused on
                 building long term growth drivers and augmenting the innovation
                                  3 of 25
efforts in our focused geographies to enhance stakeholder value
over time.
                 4 of 25
             We also received approval from CDCO to initiate Phase I clinical
             trial for our novel PCSK9 inhibitor. The study will evaluate the
             safety and tolerability of this candidate which will be administered
             subcutaneously in healthy human volunteers. Dyslipidaemia
             patients with high LDL cholesterol are at a high risk of
             atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events such as heart attack
             and stroke. This PCSK9 inhibitor will regulate the level of LDL
             receptors which are responsible for the uptake and clearance of
             cholesterol from the blood.
             Thank you and now we can move towards the Q&A session. Over
             to the coordinator for the Q&A.
Kunal:       Hi. Thank you for the opportunity, Sir. So, the first one on this
             Sitagliptin franchise that we are trying to build on 505(b)(2) side.
             How do you see the addressable market? Is there any niche
             segment that we are targeting there? Obviously because the
             innovator has been there for quite some time. And, secondly,
             would it require any incremental front-end investment from us?
             And what would be our pricing strategy there? That would be the
             first question.
                              5 of 25
Sharvil Patel:   So, the Sitagliptin franchise, obviously, is a large, established
                 franchise in the US market. Most of the prescriptions are run
                 through either commercial or Medicare segments and they are
                 mostly filled by the retail segment. So, our strategy will be to go
                 into the retail segment and see how do we get access through
                 different PBM contracts going forward. And, I think, we'll have to
                 slowly work on building the awareness for the product and also
                 find the right ways to create the right contracts and look at taking
                 market share.
Kunal:           Sure, Sir. And in terms of pricing, would we have any idea or we
                 are still in the deciding phase?
Sharvil Patel:   So, this is not a generic substitution. So, pricing is going to be PBM
                 contract. So, it's difficult to give you an idea today till we launch
                 and go through those phases.
Sharvil Patel:   No, our current strategy is that we will go through our, as I said,
                 through contracts and listing and awareness area. So, I don't think
                 we're talking about a front-end team yet.
Kunal:           Okay, perfect. And secondly, Sir, if I look at the other expenses this
                 quarter, they have been quite substantially down on a sequential
                 basis. So, any particular reason for it? How should we think from
                 the future quarter perspective?
Nitin Parekh:    So, other expenses also include R&D expenses as well as expenses
                 related to Zydus Wellness Limited where there is some seasonality
                 involved. Also, certain professional, legal expenses, they are not
                 uniform across all the quarters. So, if you take out the R&D part, I
                 think, 850-900 crore would be the base depending on Zydus
                 Wellness promotion spend.
Kunal: Okay. But R&D has also increased on a sequential basis, right?
Nitin Parekh:    So, R&D should not be viewed on a sequential basis. It should be
                 viewed on annual basis because it all depends on the projects,
                 filing, registration, other expenses. On an annual basis, we have
                 guided for 7-8%. We stick to that guidance.
                                   6 of 25
Kunal:             Okay, perfect. I have more questions, I'll join back the queue.
Sayan Mukherjee:   Okay, sorry. So, yeah, I was asking about the acquisition that you
                   did for the liquid dosage form in UK. So, firstly, if you can take us
                   through medium term outlook for this acquisition. Because the
                   revenue base is quite low at this point and we paid almost £60
                   million. So, if you can give us some color on the pipeline and how
                   should, you know, we think about revenues improving and if you
                   can talk about profitability.
Sharvil Patel:     Yes. So, on the first point on the LiqMeds acquisition. So, this is a
                   specialized delivery business which develops difficult to do liquid
                   products from products that are not available today. So, most of
                   the products are in the nature when you talk about US regulations
                   then, the 505(b)(2) route, many of them, as I said, first to launch
                   or first to file for those markets. They meet an unmet need for
                   people who need to have dose adjustment or have dysphagia. The
                   good part of this business is that they have already had important
                   licensing arrangements with the large specialty companies both in
                   UK as well as US. So, they work with Rosemont in UK. and three
                   big specialty companies in US who specialize in selling these type
                   of products. So, I think, from that point of view, there's already a
                   model which is accepted. They have a good relationship and
                   partnership with the companies. They have a very large pipeline
                   which is partly licensed and still under development, which in
                   future will also be available for launching as well as licensing out.
                   So, we see this business as, obviously, a niche business, a good
                   business which will have a technological differentiation, will be
                   built on the specialty footprint in the US mostly and also in many
                   other markets in terms of creating access for it. And, obviously, it
                                    7 of 25
                   is just the first 12-15 months of launch. So, it's just the beginning
                   of the company in terms of launch. So, the scaling up will happen
                   over the next three years and we expect, because of the nature of
                   this business and which is to do with mostly the manufacturing,
                   development and licensing, it would have a significantly high
                   profitability like specialty companies do.
Nitin Parekh:      So, Saion, also the nature of the business as of now is that
                   currently they don't have their front-end, as Sharvil bhai
                   mentioned about certain customers and contracts. So, the topline
                   is not important. The stream of income is a 3-part, One is
                   whatever manufacturing goods they sell and the profit that they
                   make on that. But large part of income would come in terms of
                   profit sharing as well as certain milestone-based incomes based
                   on sales. So, these are going to come in times to come. So,
                   whatever number of revenue that you are looking at is actually
                   misnomer and that should not be, you know, given so much of
                   importance.
Saion Mukherjee:   Okay-okay. Thanks. And on the landscape for specialty, how are
                   you sort of thinking?
Sharvil Patel:     So, yeah, on that front, as I said, our keen interest is to continue to
                   look at ultra rare diseases and orphan diseases in the US. We have
                   our currently two products Nulibry, which is commercialized, and
                   Zycuvo, which is delayed, but we still believe we have a sufficient
                   room to build this rare disease portfolio. We are looking to do
                   further acquisitions in this ultra rare portfolio and we have some
                   good leads. So, we continue to hope we will be able to exercise
                   more options of acquisition for late-stage products or ready to
                   commercialize products in the US. So, that will be one important
                   aspect of what we will do on the specialty front in the US, on the
                   rare disease front in the US. And that's our current expectation of
                   what we would hope to build out for which is buying niche small
                   assets which are sticky and commercialize them with small
                   commercial infrastructure both in US and also take them to
                   Europe.
Saion Mukherjee:   Okay. And, Dr. Sharvil, do you have like a 3-5year plan on this?
                   How many assets you would typically like to have? You already
                   have a couple of them, which you have acquired, anything that
                   will be from our own pipeline? So, how should we think about and
                   what is the medium-term vision here like when you look at this
                   acquisition how many products? I mean, how should we think
                   about this particular business, let's say from a 5-year perspective?
                                     8 of 25
Sharvil Patel:     Yeah. So, I think, we are looking to at least add 2-3 more products
                  to the portfolio. We have at least two under our own
                  development, which are organic, and we continue to look for two
                  or three more assets on the M&A front as I said which are late
                  stage or near to commercial approval. So that’s what our
                  hypothesis is. I would say, the next 3 years, our target should be
                  that if we can achieve aspirationally 100 million dollars of revenue
                  on that part of the business.
Saion Mukherjee: Ok. thank you and I will join back. Thank you.
Bino:             Hi, good afternoon! Sharvil bhai, is there any IP related issue
                  around this because there is still drug substance patent around
                  the salt which is there?
Sharvil Patel: We don’t have an issue around launch. We are clear for launch.
Bino:             Ok. Second, we had, in the last quarter itself mentioned that
                  Revlimid would come down significantly from Q1 to Q2. So, has it
                  come down or is it kind of insignificant in Q2?
Bino:             Ok. And on Asacol HD, anything, any further colour from the last
                  call? Are you still expecting a competition this year? This financial
                  year?
Sharvil Patel:    Ya, we have built for that, assuming competition. We are not
                  aware of it but we have built for competition.
Sharvil Patel:    Ya, we are evaluating that product. So, it is an important product
                  but I think it is too early for us to make any comments on that yet.
Moderator:        Thank you. The next question is from Surya. Surya, I think you may
                  have to unmute.
Surya:            Sorry, hello? Thanks for the opportunity Sir. I am sorry for this. My
                  first question is on the sequential decline on the US business. You
                                    9 of 25
                 mentioned that there is no Revlimid sales in this quarter. Right
                 Sir?
Surya:           So, practically about Revlimid, you had a kind of a thought process
                 that whatever Revlimid revenue that you will be making, it would
                 be distributed throughout the quarter in the year, evenly
                 distributed.
Sharvil Patel:   We have never said Revlimid will be evenly distributed. We have
                 always said that it is quarter 4 and quarter 1 of the calendar year,
                 financial years.
Surya:           Ok. Since we have completed the first year of Revlimid and it is a
                 volume limited one, now in the first year, what is the kind of
                 volume that we would have achieved? Is it fair to believe that it is
                 more than 6 percent?
Sharvil Patel:   We are not giving volume. It’s a settlement agreement that exists.
                 So, we are not giving that kind of guidelines. As I said, it is a very
                 important aspect of our yearly revenue and with an increase in
                 market share that we will get, we will see an uptake in revenue for
                 Revlimid, at least for the next calendar year.
Surya:           Related question Sir. Although the Revlimid number is not there
                 which was in the previous quarter was almost like 70 million dollar
                 plus or something like that, despite that kind of revenue stream
                 not there which is such a high margin business, your gross margin
                 in this current quarter without Revlimid almost maintained the
                 same number what you had achieved in the previous quarter. So,
                 what is supporting this kind of number and how sustainable the
                 base business is in achieving this kind of gross margin?
Sharvil Patel:   So, as I said, it is a mix of our base business and new product
                 launches and overall product mix, lesser realization from
                 consumer health in this quarter because of their seasonality. I
                 think all of that has led to a decent GC margin but Nitin bhai if you
                 can add something…
                                      10 of 25
Nitin Parekh:    Input cost reduction has also helped especially in Zydus Wellness
                 and they have also taken selling price increase in Zydus Wellness
                 plus the new products that are launched in the quarter in US, they
                 are at better margins. So it’s a business mix and product mix, both
                 helping us, as well as cost reduction.
Surya:           Don’t you think that this Revlimid is such a significantly influential
                 gross margin product? So that means, is it fair to believe that once
                 we again see the Revlimid number which will be again elevated
                 versus last year, then our gross margin profile will really be
                 meaningfully better than the current number, what we are
                 seeing?
Sharvil Patel:   So, if we do not see Asacol competition, then what your
                 hypothesis is right. But we are building for Asacol price erosion.
                 So, then we will have to see how much we can compensate.
Surya:           Ok. Because somewhere I had seen the reporting which was
                 showing that networth is negative yet.
Nitin Parekh:    That we will check the number. Maybe because of carry forward
                 past losses because they are spending and developing the
                 products initially. So, there are spends and income is in the
                 backend in terms of time frame.
Sharvil Patel:   As I said, this company, the business case for today it is
                 development for partners and licensing and they have a cost plus
                 profit share plus milestone based events where they earn margins
                 and these are speciality products so the margins are very high. So,
                 this will be a sufficiently, very high profitable business. It is not a
                 sales, top line business but a very profitable business going
                 forward and it will also help us build our specialty play in the US.
                 Maybe not always directly but through partners also.
Surya:           Ok. So that means, with this integration, this base will not going to
                 work for the customers anymore? It will be captive service kind of
                 thing. That is the right understanding Sir?
                                  11 of 25
Sharvil Patel:   No, no, we are partnering with some of the products. We don’t
                 have the capability to sell ourselves and we are not present
                 everywhere. So, it will be mostly the current business model only
                 and also we will use these products to file in our developing
                 markets and other markets where these are important products
                 also. Those we will do ourselves. But the current projections of
                 revenue that we have made are mostly through licensing which
                 are already contracted out
Surya:           Ok, ok, Ya. Thank you. And just last one question Sir. On the R&D
                 side, whether you have mentioned 100mn dollar kind of a spend
                 that you are targeting for the specialty initiative.
Sharvil Patel:   Somebody had asked a question that mid-term, 3-5 years what do
                 you see, the scale-ups? So, we said, for the rare disease portfolio,
                 our aspiration is that over the next 3 years or 3-5years, we build a
                 100mn dollar revenue.
Surya:           On the R&D side, whatever the spend that we are making, how
                 much of that is for specialty currently and what is the kind of
                 ultimate game plan in terms of investment, creating capacity,
                 capability and what time frame that you are targeting to really
                 build a kind of a sizeable portfolio and a meaningful base over the
                 next 5yrs., let’s say?
Sharvil Patel:   Today, our R&D spend, about 50 to 55 percent of our spend is on
                 generics portfolio which is also differentiated and complex and
                 the remaining 45 percent is what we spend on our NCEs and
                 biologics and vaccines. I would say, over a period of time, the
                 generic portfolio will not grow and the growth will be seen in NCEs
                 and biologics as we add more development programs for global
                 development. So, I would say the mix would change from higher
                 base on the specialty versus the generics on the R&D efforts.
Surya:           Ok. And till the time, our R&D spend will be streamlined like this
                 currently at 7-8 percent?
Sharvil Patel:   Ya, we are seeing around 7-8 percent and overall, over the period
                 of next 3years, we will look at around 8 percent on revenue.
Surya:           Sure. Thank you Sir for answering all my queries. Wish you all the
                 best and Happy Diwali to you.
                                 12 of 25
Moderator:       Thank you. The next question is from Akshat Gupta.
Akshat:          Hello! Yes Sir. I can see that there is reduction in business in US
                 formulations.
Akshat:          After analysing the quarter on quarter numbers, we see that there
                 is a 24 percent decrease in business of US formulations.
Sharvil Patel: Ya, because we don’t have Revlimid sales this quarter.
Sharvil Patel: It’s what we reported. Gross margins are 66+ percent.
Akshat: And the quarter on quarter margins have been reducing Sir.
Sharvil Patel:   That’s because of Revlimid. Revlimid last quarter was there versus
                 this quarter.
Kunal:           Thank you sir for the opportunity again. On the Asacol, while we
                 are building in one competitor, now that our product has become
                 reference product, have we seen anymore para 3 filer for that
                 which would come in future, not just in this year but probably in
                 future?
Sharvil Patel:   There are people who have filed, who continue to work on it. So, I
                 don’t think there is any patent is left but as I said, we have
                 assumed one competitor and potentially another competitor at
                 the end of the next calendar year. So, we have to assume the
                 worst. But so far, we have no idea when we will see competition.
Kunal:           Can you provide update on Saroglitazar trials, for PBC and NASH
                 for the developed markets?
Sharvil Patel:   Ya, so on PBC, for Saroglitazar, we hope to complete all our
                 recruitments this financial year, for the recruitment of the trial.
                 So, we are on track to do that and then, obviously subsequently
                 follow-up and then, filing. For NASH, phase II(b) is still on-going.
                 It’s a longer phase II(b). So that is still sometime away. We still
                 need to recruit 130-150 patients.
                                  13 of 25
Kunal:           Sure. Sir, would there be any change in strategy from NAFLD or
                 NASH perspective given the weight loss drugs gaining momentum
                 because my belief is NAFLD, NASH are directly linked to the higher
                 weights etc?
Sharvil Patel:   So, again, for our current focus on commercialization and plan is
                 for Saroglitazar and PBC and not in NASH. NASH is still long way
                 out for us in terms of developed market strategy. And we have to
                 see how the therapies do get developed. Yes, these products are
                 also important but maybe in the future, there will be a need for
                 not only this much combinations. So, I don’t think a single drug or
                 a single molecule will exist to solve for a particular indication like
                 NASH and NAFLD which is very complicated with multiple issues.
                 So, I would say that there is still enough opportunity for that
                 segment but we are still far away from any commercialization
                 capability for NASH in the medium to long term.
Kunal:           And the 100 mn target that we have given for specialty, would
                 that include PBC approval for Saro?
Sharvil Patel:   No, the 100mn aspiration that we have said for our rare disease
                 business is not to do with Saro.
Sharvil Patel:   Saro is our orphan disease platform which is a different business
                 unit that we are targeting.
Kunal:           Ok, perfect. And sir, given there is, while you have suggested that
                 Q4, Q1 is where Revlimid would be. But would you be comfortable
                 giving us some direction as to where we could see our US revenue
                 for the next couple of quarters. We have said that it will grow but
                 what that growth could look like based on the products that we
                 have in our portfolio?
Sharvil Patel:   As I had said, for this financial year, we do expect a double digit
                 growth for the US. As we have new launches, significantly
                 important new launches as well as limited competition products
                 that we hope to continue, our expectation is to continue to grow
                 the US generics business.
Kunal:           And overall within US, have you seen any improvement in price
                 erosion, the competitive dynamics because the shortage
                 environment continues there?
Sharvil Patel: No, I think it’s similar. I don’t see any drastic change in the market.
Kunal: So, what would be our price erosion for this quarter?
                                  14 of 25
Sharvil Patel:   We don’t give price erosion for the quarter but overall, we are
                 expecting mid-single digit price erosion.
Sharvil Patel:   I think that’s our best estimate and it will all depend on the
                 portfolio. When we see competition on Asacol and others, then
                 obviously depending on that, the erosion will be more but on a
                 normalized basis, we are seeing mid to high single digit depending
                 on the portfolio.
Kunal: Sure, sure, thank you Sir and all the best.
Vishal:          Thanks for the opportunity. Did we get any benefit from PLI
                 incentives during the quarter?
Nitin Parekh:    Yes. In the quarter, we have 40 crore rupees accrued in this
                 quarter for PLI scheme.
Vishal:          Ok. And second on LiqMeds acquisition, can you share how many
                 products have been commercialized so far?
Sharvil Patel:   There are 16 products that are approved in UK. All are not
                 commercialized yet and there are 5 505(b)(2) products approved
                 in the US which are getting commercialized. Some are
                 commercialized and some are to be commercialized and they have
                 multiple products filed and to be filed.
Sharvil Patel:   I don’t think we will be able to give that right now but as I said,
                 currently in the next 3 years planning wise, most of the products
                 are developed or filed. So, the visibility is much clearer for over
                 the next 2-3 years. But the future pipleline, we still need to come
                 back to you. But there is a very large pipeline so the main is, how
                 do we prioritize and file these products?
                                  15 of 25
Vishal:          On the products which are commercialized, these are early stages
                 of launch and so they can ramp-up?
Sharvil Patel:   Yes. These are early stages of launch and these are all specialty
                 products. These are not generic substitution products.
Vishal:          Ok. And just one final, you talked about a launch, around REMS
                 product that you were expected to launch. So, any guidance
                 there? Can we expect this in the next 2 quarters?
Sharvil Patel:   I think we are about to launch or launched one already. The
                 second, we will launch in the last quarter or the first quarter of
                 next year.
Nitin Agarwal:   On the US business, I mean we look at sequential decline, you said
                 that decline is entirely attributed to Revlimid or other parts of the
                 business have also contributed to the decline?
Sharvil Patel:   No, the decline is because of Revlimid. With new products and
                 base business, we actually improved from the base of Revlimid.
Nitin Agarwal:   The question that I am asking is, we are almost on a 70 mn delta
                 on a QoQ basis. So, I am suggesting that Revlimid was higher than
                 70 million dollars in Q2? Is that right inference to make?
Nitin Agarwal:   If you look at, for example last year, we were at about 215 mn
                 dollars of business, obviously Revlimid was not in the base. We
                 have had a reasonable number of new launches coming through
                 the years over the last few quarters. We are still around the same
                 level, 215 becoming 225 in the current quarter. How should one
                 look at this progression of this business, ex of the contribution
                 probably from the likes of Revlimid?
Sharvil Patel:   As I said, overall, we believe that, this year, FY24 we will see a
                 double-digit growth for our US business and that will be our
                 endeavour, with new launches we continue to do that. The only
                 point is, it’s wrong for us to remove Revlimid. Revlimid is not a
                 one year phenomenon. It’s already been there for 2, almost 2
                                  16 of 25
                 years and it will continue at least for the next two years. So, this is
                 really with inclusion of Revlimid, which will continue every year.
Nitin Agarwal:   So, I'm saying about you know, and on the India part of the
                 business, you know, do we have now visibility of maybe, inline
                 market or higher and comfortable market inline to above market
                 growth on a going forward basis from here on?
Sharvil Patel:   Yes, we will grow in-line with market. And we will now I think with
                 the better growth in October for the market, we hope to have
                 better, much better growth in the coming quarter also.
Nitin Agarwal:   Last if you can squeeze in, on Sitagliptin, when are you looking to
                 launch these products?
Nitin Agarwal:   Okay, do you have in your experience, or any sort of past
                 experiences where 505(b)(2) launches like these have happened
                 and companies who've done that have been reasonably successful
                 in there, whatever success they've had in such launches in the
                 past?
Sharvil Patel:   So, it has been, I won't say there have been any meaningful big
                 successes on oral 505(b)(2). So, something new for all of us or the
                 industry also but we are hopeful that we should aspire for 8 to
                 10% market share to begin with.
Bino:            Hi, thanks for the follow up. From your press release, I can see
                 that there are two biotech products in one of which you have
                 completed the trial and one for which you have finished
                 recruitment. So, are these phase three trials?
Sharvil Patel:   Yes, these are phase three trials. One we have finished and filed
                 and one we have just finished recruitment and hope to file in the
                 last quarter.
Bino:            Okay and I assume these are in India and in that case are they
                 more like kind of biosimilars or is it a completely new bio
                 products?
Sharvil Patel:   Yeah. So, these are biosimilars and these are when I said that
                 clinical trials, these were done in India for India market and
                 developing countries.
                                  17 of 25
Binu:            Okay, biosimilars basically. Great, thank you.
Sharvil Patel:   So, we continue to reiterate that we will grow in line with the
                 market. The strategy is going to be driven by our growth booster
                 brands that we have, which will drive large part of the growth for
                 the company and which also include the innovative products like
                 Lipaglyn, Bilypsa, Oxemia, which is desidustat and Ujvira and also
                 adding few more products in the coming year in terms of
                 differentiation, like Dydrogesterone and others. So, those, the
                 innovative products will add a significant uptake to our overall
                 growth story while we continue to maintain and grow on our base
                 business also. I would say, near term, as I already reiterated with
                 the improvement in market in the segment in October and going
                 forward, we would see a better uptake on growth for the India
                 business. And with a larger base being built on these innovative
                 products, we would also see better than market growth over a
                 period of time.
Damyanti:        Okay and in terms of sales team like are you broadly okay with the
                 current team strength or you plan to add on more to improve
                 reach and penetration, etc?
Sharvil Patel: So, in next financial year, we are increasing our footprint.
Sharvil Patel:   But not in a drastic manner but in a measured manner, we would
                 add field force, feet on street in the coming financial year.
Damyanti:        Okay. My second question is on the US business. So, like you have
                 seen good pickup in approvals, launches, etc. So, in your current
                 year’s portfolio, if you can mention like how much sales is
                 contributed by say non-oral solids, some differentiated products,
                 which will be the key drivers going ahead also.
                                   18 of 25
Sharvil Patel:    So, US business of generics is a basket business which has oral
                  solids, topical products, injectables and complex products like
                  suppositories as well as transdermal patches. So, I don't think we
                  have any segment way of doing this business. It's a portfolio
                  business that we build. And that is how the generic market also
                  functions. So, I don't think we can give dosage-wise breakup. But
                  as I said, the business is constituted of all of these dosage forms.
Damyanti:         Okay, and all going ahead also like it depends on the nature of the
                  product, rather than the dosage, which will determine…
Sharvil Patel:    Yeah, there will be always a mix of all of these, which I mentioned
                  to you.
Damyanti: Okay, thank you for your answers. I'll get back in the queue.
Sharvil Patel:    So, I think, first starting with Saroglitazar, I think it is to create a
                  larger access. We have a certain reach and capability and capacity
                  to reach a certain number of patients. And with the indication
                  coming through for NASH and NAFLD for Saro and the only drug to
                  be approved for this, we do see that potentially adding more
                  patients and by creating awareness for more physicians, is a need
                  for us. And from that point of view, we did go through a whole
                  process of identifying the key partners. And so far, we have been
                  able to have two, one for the desidustat and one for Saroglitazar.
                  We hope to add one more partner very soon.
Charul Agarwal:   And what would be the agreement like in terms of profit share or
                  would it be a fixed fee, how would it be like?
Sharvil Patel: It's a typical out licensing agreement like others that exist in India.
Charul Agarwal:   Okay. My next question on opex. You did mention that the cost
                  could moderate over the next quarter, but could you throw more
                  light on the nature of these expenses?
                                   19 of 25
Nitin Parekh:     We only talked about other expenses on a quarterly basis, what is
                  the base? So, we said that excluding R&D spend, the quarterly
                  base will be 850 to 900 crores.
Charul Agarwal: Okay, what were the lower expenses due to QoQ?
Sharvil Patel:    Savings because of higher input costs last year versus this year,
                  and product mix also has helped us.
Nitin Parekh:     So, I think she is asking about other expenses reduction. And as I
                  said other expenses, they are affected by two major factors. One
                  is R&D spend, which is not uniform across the quarters. Other is
                  Zydus wellness related spend, which is seasonality nature. If you
                  remove these two, which are going to be different for different
                  quarters, the normal base will be 850 to 900 crores and that
                  variability is also because of you know, legal and professional
                  spend and other spend, some spend which are related to sales or
                  production, so which again vary from quarter to quarter, but that
                  range, you know, gives you a ballpark number.
Charul Agarwal: Thank you, sir. I’ll get back in the queue.
Tarang Agarwal:   Hi, three questions from me. One, you know, this is with reference
                  to, you know, onboarding Mr. Patel in North America. You know
                  what really drove this decision and you know, considering that
                  you've been in the market for almost two decades now, how are
                  things likely to change with him coming on board?
Sharvil Patel:    So, our US, as I said, we have two important geographies that we
                  have a strong focus on. Now, obviously, over the last 15 years, we
                  have built a good US generics business. But as we move forward,
                  we have an intention to build a rare disease portfolio. We hope to
                  build a Saroglitazar and build an orphan specialty business in the
                  US. We have an animal health business. we have Viona
                  pharmaceuticals. We hope to explore Canada and enter that
                  market. So, looking at all of that, I think there was a need to
                  consolidate how we run the operations in the US. And we have
                  been looking for somebody to come in and look after all as a
                  consolidated North American business. So that was the main
                  reason for us to do that. That we are able to harmonize,
                  consolidate and grow this business. So, Punit brings both the
                  understanding from the customer side, which is important, but
                                   20 of 25
                   also brings in his understanding of specialty business in his earlier
                   efforts that he has put both at CVS and his earlier job. So, I think
                   that was the main reason for us to see that how do we continue to
                   build our generics platform, but also all these other new platforms
                   and consolidate the leadership in the US.
Tarang Agarwal:    Okay, got it. Second, you know, my sense is, there was some
                   Revlimid in the base quarter of the previous financial year. So,
                   would it be safe to presume that the US business must have
                   grown by almost 15 to 18% on a constant currency basis?
Karan Agarwal:     Okay. And last, how many launches could we see in US over the
                   next half year or say next four quarters?
Tarang Agarwal: I mean, next one year from today or next half year till March 2024.
Saion Mukherjee:   Yeah, thanks for the follow up. Just that I wanted to, in the US
                   generics, you mentioned 30 to 40 products. But is it possible to
                   give some granular like what kind of products we should sort of
                   look forward to over the next three years and just one specific
                   one, you got an approval for a transdermal, I think a few months
                   back. Just wanted to confirm whether that's launched or when is it
                   going to be launched?
                                    21 of 25
                   the 8-10 million plus range kind of value. So, it is the good basket
                   of products that are there scheduled for launch and some of them
                   being very important as well.
Saion Mukherjee:   Okay, and any comment you have on the GLP-1 portfolio, which
                   you have filed? Anything you'd like to share, is that an opportunity
                   you see over the next couple of years?
Sharvil Patel:     I would say not in the immediate future. But this is definitely a
                   very important opportunity. And we do believe that we are also
                   amongst the few companies who have a good position on this. So,
                   it will be an exciting launch, obviously beginning with India and
                   emerging markets but then moving into the developed markets,
                   but I don't think it's a short-term opportunity.
Saion Mukherjee:   Okay, and in India when would these opportunities play out for
                   you?
Sharvil Patel:     I think, post patents. I think it's 26 is when the patents go off, I
                   think in India and some other markets. I'll get back to you Saion on
                   that.
Kunal:             Just one clarity sir. I believe that we had another product called
                   generic Trokendi XR as well as a good contributor in quarter one,
                   which would have also come down and would have been... So,
                   then the 70 million declines cannot be given to Revlimid, right?
                   There'll be some Trokendi because it was…
Sharvil Patel:     That was in quarter four bigger because that was the month then
                   quarter one there was competition already.
Kunal: Okay. So, then the Revlimid decline would be less than 70 million?
Nitin Parekh:      So almost. If not 100%, 90% plus, you know, decline is related to
                   Revlimid only.
Surya:             Yeah. Sir, just a query on the Mylabs acquisition. So, what is the
                   thought process there and where it fits to our overall growth
                   strategy?
Sharvil Patel:     So, we haven't acquired any majority stake in Mylabs. We have
                   taken six and a half percent equity stake.
                                    22 of 25
Surya:           Correct. But any thought process going ahead there?
Sharvil Patel:   I think one strong belief as a company and as a product portfolio
                 that we say that beyond being a pharmaceutical company, how do
                 we bring better solutions for patients beyond the pill. One area,
                 which is very interesting for us is at home testing and point of care
                 devices. And I think Mylabs is pioneering in both of these areas
                 and completely homegrown and which also brings efficiencies and
                 cost efficiencies. So, we believe, we will find an important area to
                 work on creating access for these types of PCR point of care
                 devices which can revolutionize the way molecular diagnostics
                 and advanced diagnostics happens for many of, not only the
                 current conditions and issues, but future diseases as well. So that's
                 where our focus is going to be and that is why we have partnered
                 with them to bring these kind of portfolio to the physicians and
                 the patients.
Surya:           Okay. But don't you think that is a kind of relatively generic in
                 terms of the earning potential, in terms of the competitive
                 landscape that is there in the market, and whether it is targeted
                 for the domestic market or you're thinking, taking to the other
                 market?
Sharvil Patel:   No, it's for domestic and it is not at all generic. The large
                 diagnostic testing places are generic in nature. These are
                 molecular diagnostic tests, which are highly specific and sensitive
                 and in real time, and where you can do it at home or point of care
                 at a clinic. So, this has not been done in India yet. So, there's
                 nothing generic about it.
Sharvil Patel:   So, the injectable segment is a very important part of our overall
                 generic strategy. And it will continue to be critical for us to grow in
                 the US. But it is just one part of our overall product mix that we
                 do. So, I would say obviously it is growing and it's small, but the
                 most important part is that we have a franchise that is in
                 injectable, complex orals, suppositories, transdermals, topical. So,
                 the whole franchise is going to be important.
Surya:           Okay, other than the oral solid then including injectables, what is
                 the pipeline it would be looking like for you?
                                  23 of 25
Sharvil Patel:    So, as I said the pipeline constitutes of orals, injectables,
                  inhalation, transdermal, topicals and some suppositories.
Sarvil Patel: We have more than 100 products that we need to file.
Tarang Agarwal:   Hi, just one quick question. How are you looking at the Zydus
                  Wellness business, purely from where it stands today? I mean, on
                  a consolidated entity level, it's a fair, big drag on the return
                  metrics. So, just wanted to get your sense in terms of how are you
                  looking at this business?
Sharvil Patel:    So, I think from our India strategy point of view, Zydus Wellness is
                  a very integral part of our strategy and future profits and growth.
                  And I would say, obviously, in the last two to three quarters, we
                  have had issues on margins because of cost escalation that
                  happened. But I think, as you see in the last quarter that is
                  corrected and the gross margins are back to the original gross
                  margins that it had. So, one part of the problem gets solved in
                  terms of the margin profile, and it's been a tepid quarter because
                  of low demand, as you can see, for most of the FMCG. But going
                  forward, it is a business that will drive double digit revenue
                  growth and with improvement in margins, also profit growth. So,
                  for us it is a very integral part of what we plan to do in terms of
                  the overall India business.
Moderator:        Thank you. I now hand the conference over to Dr. Nayak, for
                  closing remarks.
Ganesh Nayak:     Thank you very much. And we look forward to interacting with
                  you again in the month of February when we declare the next
                  quarter results and wish all of you a very good evening and wish
                  you a very Happy Diwali and a prosperous New Year. Good night.
                                  24 of 25
Moderator:   Thank you on behalf of Zydus Lifesciences Limited that concludes
             this conference. Thank you for joining us and you may now
             disconnect your lines and exit the webinar.
END OF TRANSCRIPT
25 of 25