Specify the feedback analysis process:
The feedbacks are analyzed based on a set of questionnaires defined by the Institute. All
theory courses/Laboratories/Projects are evaluated based on a set of 15 questionnaires. Each
of these questionnaires is graded on a scale of One to Four by the students.
Scale of feedback system is as follows:
Feedback Attributes with Level Obtained 4-point scale with the following scale points
1-Unsatisfactory(U), 2-Satisfactory(S), 3-Good(G), 4-Excellent€
An Average Level Feedback Obtained from the feedbacks given is calculated as
Average Level Feedback Obtained = (E x 4+G x 3+S x 2+U x 1) / 15
Where,
E is count of the Excellent values in feedback answer
G is count of the good values in feedback answer
S is count of the Satisfactory values in feedback answer
U is count of the Unsatisfactory values in feedback answer
Sample Report and Calculations
Competency Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Total
Objectives & explanation of the course
was clear 0 1 0 0 3
Syllabus was covered at an appropriate
time as per the schedule given in the
1 0 0 0 4
calendar
Interactive teaching practice. 0 1 0 0 3
The staff member responds to the
questions raised by students and gives
0 1 0 0 3
clear explanations.
The staff member was willing to help
the students when they had problems
0 1 0 0 3
in learning.
Evaluation of the tests and
0 1 0 0 3
assignments.
Unbiased and fairness in treatment
0 1 0 0 3
to students
Utilizing the class hour only for
teaching and not irrelevant 0 1 0 0 3
talk
Collected sufficient standard
0 1 0 0 3
textbooks
The staff member’s voice is
0 1 0 0 3
audible and clear
Punctuality and promptness in
0 1 0 0 3
conducting classes
Communication skills in class 0 1 0 0 3
I have understood the correlation
between Course Outcomes (CO) &
Programme Outcomes (PO) and
1 0 0 0 4
Course Outcome (CO) &
Programme Specific Outcomes
(PSO)
I have learned to apply the
knowledge I have gained from 0 1 0 0 3
course outcome
I have developed a deeper
understanding of how the subject
0 1 0 0 3
relates to my chosen programme
of study
Total 2 13 0 0 47
Calculations: E = 4, G = 7, S = 3, U = 1, TOTAL = 15 (1 Full Response Considered)
Average Level Feedback Obtained = (2 x 4+13 x 3+3 x 0+1 x 0) / 15
Average Level Feedback Obtained = 3.13
Sample Feedback Report:
Basis of reward / corrective measures if any
Reward: Feedback is one of the components of faculty evaluation in PBAS (Performance
based Appraisal System). Good feedback for the faculty will fetch good annual appraisal,
which will have a direct bearing on his/her annual increment.
Corrective measures: If a faculty gets feedback less than 2.5/3, then he/she will be
counselled
/ inquired by a committee to ascertain the root cause of the performance. He/she will be
encouraged to attend faculty development programs, and will also be advised to take some
training sessions if required. The committee gives suggestions, counselling, and support to
the concerned faculty for teaching-learning performance improvement. /*As per norms of
the institute, a teacher obtaining low feedback for 6 times will have to forego the increment
and 12 times will face the action for retire compulsorily.*/
Number of corrective actions taken
Number of Faculty Members with
Academic
Semester Feedback < 2.5 /3 who were counselled
Year
Feedback-1 Feedback-2 Feedback-3
ODD SEM NIL NIL NIL
2022-23 EVEN SEM NIL NIL NIL
ODD SEM 1 NIL NIL
2023-24 EVEN SEM 1 NIL NIL
ODD SEM 1 NIL NIL
2024-25 EVEN SEM 1 NIL NIL
