See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/338983628

Sports Science Data Protocol

Article · December 2019

CITATION READS

1 2,412

2 authors, including:

Lorena Martin
University of Southern California
1 PUBLICATION 1 CITATION

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Lorena Martin on 02 February 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 ISSN 2379-6391

SPORTS AND EXERCISE MEDICINE

Open Journal PUBLISHERS

Research Protocol
Sports Science Data Protocol
Lorena Martin, PhD*

Former Lakers Director of Sports Performance Analytics, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
Corresponding author
*

Lorena Martin, PhD

Former Lakers Director of Sports Performance Analytics and Seattle Mariners Director of High Performance, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA;
E-mail: HealthandSportsAnalytics@gmail.com

Article information
Received: October 25th, 2019; Revised: December 2nd, 2019; Accepted: December 13th, 2019; Published: December 13th, 2019

Cite this article

Martin L. Sports science data protocol. Sport Exerc Med Open J. 2019; 5(2): 36-41. doi: 10.17140/SEMOJ-5-174

ABSTRACT
Purpose
At the most elite level, even an increase of 1% improvement can make the difference between winning and losing. Sports scientists
can help athletes gain insights that can be the differentiating factor. The purpose of this protocol is to delineate the process from
the identification of key performance indicators to the presentation of the findings for sports scientists. It is designed to provide
chronological steps in efforts to mitigate barriers of collecting data and tracking players as well as to help gain athlete buy-in to
sports science by helping them maximize their performance.
Study Design
The competitive nature of professional sports leads to players, their agents, and teams to seek the expertise in sports performance
areas such as those from athletic trainers, strength and conditioning coaches, physical therapists, nutritionists, and sports psycholo-
gists. However, much of the knowledge provided by these entities typically remain in silos. Thus, the whole picture of the athlete’s
performance enhancement mechanism is not elucidated. This is where the significance of a sports scientist ensues, with the ability
to integrate the data from each of the sports performance areas with the objective of obtaining a complete and comprehensive
picture of the athlete.
Data Collection
This area of collecting data and monitoring athletes is becoming mainstream. As such professional sports leagues have started
to implement privacy rules and regulations on the protection of athlete biometric data. It is important to be aware of the rules
related to wearable technology and athlete biometric data as well as how to go about the process of collecting data from profes-
sional athletes. That is why it is important that care be taken and a protocol be followed to ensure the integrity of data collection
in the field of sports science.
Data Processing and Analyses
Data mining is the extraction of data for the purpose of discovering meaningful patterns, normalization, and the choosing of
statistical models that can help in making data driven decisions. The interpretation and presentation of the data can have a large
impact on the decisions. As such, a protocol should be adhered to.
Conclusion
The following protocol will serve as a guide on how to collect data efficiently and successfully.
Keywords
Sports science; Data protocol; Sports performance; Sports scientists; Load; Professional athletes; Sports teams.

INTRODUCTION the role of the sports scientist comes in, as they can be the con-
necting link between these distinctive areas of expertise, as their

P rofessional athletes are always seeking to gain a competitive

edge. A slight improvement in any aspect of sports perfor-
mance can lead to a significant difference in performance out-
proficiency should be to have a general understanding of all the ar-
eas and understand which outcome or dependent variables should
be quantified to provide a meaningful metric that is relevant to
comes.1 It has been well-documented in the literature that different the athlete’s performance.4 Moreover, the sports scientist should
areas of sports performance such as athletic training, physical ther- be directly in communication with the professional athletes and
apy, strength and conditioning, nutrition, and sports psychology the sports performance experts from different areas as shown in
function independent of one another without sharing resources Figure 1.
and information within professional organizations.2,3 This is where
cc
Copyright 2019 by Martin L. This is an open-access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which
allows to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and reproduce in any medium or format, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited.
Research Protocol | Volume 5 | Number 2| 36
 PUBLISHERS
Sport Exerc Med Open J. 2019; 5(2): 36-41. doi: 10.17140/SEMOJ-5-174

performance? What meaningful implication will this data have?

How to go about collecting data? What data is valuable and simple
Figure 1. Sports Scientist Role Diagram to measure? How to go about choosing a technology to measure
the variables? How long will it take to collect this data? How to go
about requesting consent from the athlete? Where is the data going
to be stored? Who will have access to the data? Is the data stored in
a secure location?10

IDENTIFICATION OF DATA-KEY PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

After answering these questions, the focus should shift to the KPIs
and the type of load to be quantified. The terms load and training
load (TL) are typically applied interchangeably and sub-classified as
either internal load or external load. Internal load represents psy-
chological variables such as confidence and anxiety and physiologi-
cal KPIs such as heart rate variability, lactate threshold, glucose and
B. Role is a placeholder for any sports performance expert such as strength coach,
athletic trainer, physical therapist, nutritionist, or sports psychologist to exemplify insulin levels, etc.11 External load is characterized by physical, bio-
the direct line of communication with A. Player and C. Sports Scientist. mechanical, behavioral and environmental KPIs. It is important to
distinguish between internal load and external load and how they
In many instances, due to teams being short-staffed or should be quantified. For instance, many of the KPIs of external
the lack of the role of a sports scientist, teams assign one of the loads such as power output, acceleration, and speed are derived
aforementioned sports performance area experts to try and carry from wearable technology such as accelerometers, gyroscopes,
out the duties of a sports scientist.5 Ideally, there should be a sports magnetometers, and global positioning systems (GPS). Whereas,
scientist staff with expertise to have the ability to be innovative, KPIs of internal loads such as lactate threshold and rate of per-
ask pertinent research questions, and identify key performance in- ceived exertion (RPE) are obtained through either biomarker as-
dicators (KPIs) or metrics that can help maximize athletic perfor- sessments or self-reported questionnaires.12
mance.6 The role of the sports scientist comprises of knowledge
on how to collect, analyze, interpret, present, and secure the data.7 The practical implication of measuring TL is to help the
Furthermore, sports scientists in professional sports teams should sports scientist and training staff better help the athlete by estab-
have the ability to produce distinct reports to players, coaches, and lishing appropriate TL thresholds.13 This will also allow the sports
front office management (general manager, assistant general man- scientist to gain insights into strengths and weaknesses of the ath-
ager, analytics staff).8 lete in efforts to reduce the risk of injury, examine what works for
the athlete, and help them to continue to improve their perfor-
The sports scientist’s first initiative should be to ask ques- mance.
tions,9 for instance: What are the KPIs that would help the athlete’s

Table 1. A Measurement Model for Sports

Physiological Physical Psychological Behavioral Environmental
Blood pressure Agility Anxiety Nutrition Built environment
Social support groups
Glucose and insulin Anaerobic power Competitiveness Sleep
(Coaches, Parents, Peers)
Heart rate variability Balance Confidence Substance use Socioeconomic status
Lactate threshold Body composition Depression

Methylome Cardiorespiratory endurance Impulsiveness

Previous injuries Coordination ability Intellect of sport

Respiratory rate Flexibility Motivation

Resting heart rate Muscular endurance Narcissism

Telomere length Muscular power Perfectionism

Vision Muscular strength Resiliency

VO2max Reaction time Self-efficacy

Sport-specific skills Self-esteem

Vigor
6
Source: Martin L

37 Martin L Research Protocol | Volume 5 | Number 2|

 PUBLISHERS
Sport Exerc Med Open J. 2019; 5(2): 36-41. doi: 10.17140/SEMOJ-5-174

Based on the sport, position, and player body composi- reliability typically assessed through the standard error of measure-
tion some variables and KPIs may be more relevant than others. ment (SEM). Other methods include the limit of agreement and
See the table below for a list of variables and KPIs related to sports Bland Altman plots.
performance (Table 1).
It is strongly recommended that the sports scientists col-
It is essential that an adequate background literature lecting data, establish both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability.11
search that includes becoming knowledgeable in the sport of inter- Caution is recommended when choosing reliability assessments, as
est and the metrics to be quantified be performed. This process in- there are several iterations of ICCs (Table 2) based on the number
cludes searching through journals, books, as well as inquiring about of raters or sports scientists as well as the number of athletes that
previous projects that may have been conducted by the team, or- will be assessed and whether absolute or relative reliability will be
ganization, or league.14 This will help in the development of a well- examined.
defined purpose for the KPIs that will be measured, along with the
hypotheses, the purpose of collecting the data on these KPIs and Table 2. Definition of ICCs and Computation Equations
how the findings will be translatable to the athlete’s performance Computation
Designation Model Definition
and overall team’s success.10 Formula
ICC (1, 1) One-way σS2 ∕ σS2 + σ2e MSB-MSW/MSB+
CHOOSING THE WEARABLE/TECHNOLOGY AND random-effect (k-1)MSW

VALIDATION ICC (1, k) σS2 ∕ σS2 + σ2e ∕k MSB-MSW/MSB

ICC (2, 1) Two-way σS2 ∕ σS2+σT2 +σ2e MSB-MSE/MSB+(k-1)

After choosing the KPIs of interest, the sports scientist should random-effect MSE+k(MST-MSE)/n
choose the appropriate measurement, assessments, and form of ICC (2, k) σS2 ∕ σS2+ MSB-MSE/MSB+
(MST-MSE)/n
evaluation. Therefore, it is fundamental for sports scientists to be (σT2+σ2e)/k
acquainted with and able to distinguish between measurement, as- ICC (3, 1) Two-way σS2 ∕ σS2+σ2e MSB-MSE/MSB+
sessment, and evaluation. Sports scientists should know that mea- mixed-effect (k-1)MSE

surement is the assignment of numbers to quantify a characteristic ICC (3, k) σS2 ∕σS2+σ2e∕k MSB-MSE/MSB
being assessed, while assessment or test is a tool to make the par- Adapted from Li et al. 20

ticular measurement, and evaluation is the judgment on the quality

of the assessment of the measurement.10 Furthermore, it is a given
The applied recommendations include practicing setting
that sports scientists know how to validate an instrument of mea-
up the technology to gather data on yourself, peers and other vol-
surement as well as establish reliability. Validity is the term used to
unteers. The purpose of this practice is three-fold, 1) to become
describe whether the technology or instrument measures what it
efficient and confident in implementing the technology, 2) estab-
is set out to measure.11 In the pro sports industry, there are many
lish intra- and inter-rater reliability and 3) be aware of any barriers
products of wearable technology being marketed to the training
or hardware difficulties that may come up with the equipment or
staff.15 It is critical for the sports scientist to assess whether the
instrument that will be used to collect the data.
technology is valid and measures what it is purported to measure
or not.16 As such, it is important to be able to evaluate how valid
It is important to make it an easy and successful trial the
these technologies and instruments are by validating the technol-
first time around otherwise it may be difficult to obtain player buy-
ogy or instrument against a gold-standard, thus establishing crite-
in. Therefore, it is recommended that the wearable or player track-
rion validity. Once the instrument or technology has been chosen
ing device be initially implemented on professional athletes that
and validated, the focus should shift from the instrument or tech-
buy-in and are likely to be compliant. The reality is that with high
nology to the data output. It is ideal to obtain the raw data files
profile athletes one needs to be cautious as there may not be a sec-
as it can also help the sports scientist understand the underlying
algorithm of the formulated commercialized metrics being offered ond opportunity. Therefore, it is important to be confident and ef-
by the equipment manufacturers. ficient when approaching them. If the professional team or league
has a B team, a second division, a minor league, or a G league (the
ESTABLISHING INTRA-RATER AND INTER-RATER
NBA’s official minor league), this may be an ideal starting place to
see what technology the athletes gravitate towards and which end
RELIABILITY TESTING
up being impractical.21 It would be ideal to have this scenario as a
pilot trial. If that is not an option or there is a strong appeal from
After choosing and validating a technology or instrument, it is
the majors or 1st division teams, then be particular as to which
important to conduct reliability assessments.17 Reliability is the
technologies to present, while avoiding overwhelming the players.22
consistency and reproducibility of the measurement.18 The most
commonly agreed-upon types of reliability that should be assessed
PRESENTATION TO THE PLAYERS
include absolute and relative reliability.19 A simple way to distin-
guish between the two is to think about whether the assessment
A major barrier for collecting data can be a lack of buy-in from the
is cross-sectional, which would pertain to relative reliability typi-
athletes. In order to obtain player buy-in, the following are recom-
cally assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), or if it
mended: give a general presentation to the group of players, have
is a longitudinal assessment which would be indicative of absolute
a one on one meeting with each player if possible, and provide the

Research Protocol | Volume 5 | Number 2| Martin L 38

 PUBLISHERS
Sport Exerc Med Open J. 2019; 5(2): 36-41. doi: 10.17140/SEMOJ-5-174

rationale for collecting the athlete’s data. Remember professional ing players healthy and maximizing their performance.22
athletes are inundated daily with media, autograph requests, and
their own training and performance. Typically, it is rare to find a DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSES
professional athlete to volunteer to be assessed, although there are
a few exceptions. Many are skeptical because they don’t know what Ideally there should already be a platform in place that has an ap-
is being collected, why, or how their data is going to be used.23 plication programming interfaces (APIs) integration for the tech-
Therefore, these concerns need to be addressed upfront. nologies that will be collecting data and servers that can hold the
data securely.26 A repository of excel built-in from the organization
To address their concerns, it is recommended that the or a commercially available database platform or athlete manage-
sports scientists be familiar with the respective team’s, league’s, or ment system should also be up and running. For example, cur-
organization’s rules and regulations on player health and perfor- rently, many of the professional leagues subscribe to an athlete
mance data. As each league and each organization may differ on management system platform that provides trends and aestheti-
who owns the data, how it will be used and who will have access to cally pleasing dashboards.26 The next step is to make sure to have
the data.22 For instance, if the coaches and front office are going to access to the raw data form and work off a copy of the original
have access to the data, be transparent with the athlete as they have data, and aggregate to a large database. In simple terms combine
a right to know. Ideally, it would be optimal if the team, league, or the datasets from different technologies to a master dataset. This
organization has granted permission to allow the player to choose phase involves data cleaning, processing, and the handling of miss-
whom he wants to show the data to. ing data. Running the statistical analyses will depend on the type
of variables collected and the questions of interest, whether com-
Explain what will be collected and how it will relate to parisons of the athlete to their prior performance or comparisons
their performance. Emphasize that the main purpose of collecting to other players will be performed.27 Statistical modeling is a lot
and analyzing data is to prevent injuries and maximize sports per- more complex and is not the focus of this paper, for detailed de-
formance. Be honest about how the data is going to be used and scriptions of types of analyses recommended based on variables
who will have access. This leads us to the next section. to be collected and research questions, refer to Sports Performance
Measurement and Analytics.6
INFORMED CONSENT FORM
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
Informed consent forms are basically a contract between the play-
er and the sports scientists detailing how the data will be collected, Data visualization is one of the most important aspects of this
what type of data will be collected, what is the intended use of the process. If the data is not presented in a simple, palatable man-
data, and who will have access to the data. It is a written statement ner then the message and content will be automatically discarded.
granting permission to the sports scientist to obtain the player’s Although it is critical to collect meaningful metrics that are rel-
data for the specified purposes on a voluntary basis.23 If the team, evant to the athlete’s performance, it is just as important to know
league or organization supply a form, implement the form pro- the audience.28 The presentation of the data should be consistent,
vided, otherwise, draft up a consent form that provides at least easy to understand and structured slightly different for each of
the following: rationale for collecting data, assessments that will be the following; players, coaches, and front office management.8 For
conducted along with a short description of each and how the out- example, some may prefer a more detailed report, while others may
comes translate to performance. Also, on the informed consent, be expecting a simple chart or graph.
there should be a space for the athlete’s printed name, signature,
date, and sports scientist’s initials that is providing the informed DATA SAFEKEEPING
consent. There should also be an area that describes who the ath-
lete is willing to grant access to the data.24 Of course, check that Ensuring that the athlete’s data is secure is fundamental to this
this informed consent is compliant with the professional league’s, protocol. Part of the security and confidentiality is included in the
team’s or sports organization’s policy. legislation of The Health Insurance Portability and Accountabil-
ity Act of 1996 (HIPAA).22 It requires health care providers and
COLLECTION OF DATA organizations to protect the confidentiality of protected health
information (PHI), which can also include some if not all of the
If all the prior steps have been completed, this part becomes sim- athlete biometric data. In addition, it covers how the data is han-
ple. Set up a date and time that works well for the players and dled, transferred and shared.29 Furthermore, this phase typically
coaches.25 Make sure that the technology or equipment that is go- involves being knowledgeable about the respective league, team,
ing to be implemented has been tested and retested. Refine the or organization’s rules and regulations as well as collective bargain-
processes as necessary. Try and keep everything similar, from the ing agreements (CBAs) on player health data.22 Depending on the
sports scientist’s demeanor during the data collection process to league, for example, the NBA’s CBA has a provision on wearable
the time of data collection, and situation in regard to whether the data compared to other leagues that do not. Finally, the last step
data collection will take place during practice or games.10 Finally, is to confirm that the data is stored in a safe and secure location.30
keep in mind the end goal of data collection, which is to help make
data-driven decisions that will increase the probability of maintain-

39 Martin L Research Protocol | Volume 5 | Number 2|

 PUBLISHERS
Sport Exerc Med Open J. 2019; 5(2): 36-41. doi: 10.17140/SEMOJ-5-174

CONCLUSION high performance coaches access the knowledge of sport sci-

entists?. Int J Sports Sci Coaching. 2008; 3(3): 319-334. doi:
The sports science data protocol is aimed at guiding the sports 10.1260/174795408786238470
scientists through a logical progression of steps towards collect-
ing data from professional athletes in a team, league, or organiza- 5. Miles KH, Clark B, Fowler PM, Miller J, Pumpa KL. Sleep prac-
tional setting (Figure 2). The formulation of this protocol is based tices implemented by team sport coaches and sports science sup-
on a combination of experiences working for different profes- port staff: A potential avenue to improve athlete sleep?. J Sci Med
sional sports organizations, input from professional athletes, train- Sport. 2019; 22(7): 748-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.01.008
ing staff, coaches, and evidence-based research. The goal was to
combine purposeful research with the applicability in professional 6. Martin L. Sports Performance Measurement and Analytics: The Science
sports settings. In theory, there would be larger sample sizes, ath- of Assessing Performance, Predicting Future Outcomes, Interpreting Statisti-
letes would grant their permission to have sports scientists col- cal Models, and Evaluating the Market Value of Athletes. New Jersey,
lect their health and performance data, privacy would not be an USA: FT Press; 2016.
issue, and the players would be completely compliant. This serves
as a guide to understanding barriers to the collection of data from 7. Robertson S, Bartlett JD, Gastin PB. Red, amber, or green? Ath-
professional athletes as well as to be able to successfully overcome lete monitoring in team sport: the need for decision-support sys-
such obstacles. Overall, the end goal is to reduce the risk of injury tems. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017; 12(Suppl 2): S273-S279. doi:
and maximizing sports performance through the process delineat- 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0541
ed in the sports science data protocol.
8. Sands W. Communicating with coaches: Envisioning data. In: Applied
Proceedings: Acrobatics. Perth, WA, USA: School of Biomedical and
Figure 2. Sports Science Data Protocol Steps
Sports Science; 2005: 11-20.

9. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Selected issues in the design and analysis

of sport performance research. J Sports Sci. 2001; 19(10): 811-827.
doi: 10.1080/026404101317015447

10. Morrow JR. Measurement and Evaluation in Human Performance, 5th

ed. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics; 2015.

11. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM. Test validation in sport physiol-

ogy: lessons learned from clinimetrics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform.
2009; 4(2): 269-277. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.4.2.269

12. Saw AE, Main LC, Gastin PB. Monitoring athletes through self-
report: factors influencing implementation. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;
14(1): 137-146.

13. Burgess DJ. The research doesn’t always apply: Practical so-
lutions to evidence-based training-load monitoring in elite team
sports. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017; 12(s2): S2136-S2141. doi:
REFERENCES 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0608

1. Nevill A, Atkinson G, Hughes M. Twenty-five years of sport 14. Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and
performance research in the Journal of Sports Sciences. J Sports Sci. science. Sports Med. 2000; 30(1): 1-15. doi: 10.2165/00007256-
2008; 26(4): 413-426. doi: 10.1080/02640410701714589 200030010-00001

2. Barnes M, Cousens L, MacLean J. From silos to synergies: A 15. Düking P, Hotho A, Holmberg HC, Fuss FK, Sperlich B. Com-
network perspective of the Canadian sport system. International parison of non-invasive individual monitoring of the training and
Journal of Sport Management and Marketing. 2007; 2(5-6): 555-571. doi: health of athletes with commercially available wearable technolo-
10.1504/IJSMM.2007.013967 gies. Front Physiol. 2016; 7: 71. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00071

3. McDuff DR, Garvin M. Working with sports organiza- 16. Johnston RJ, Watsford ML, Kelly SJ, Pine MJ, Spurrs RW. Va-
tions and teams. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2006; 28(6): 595-605. doi: lidity and interunit reliability of 10 Hz and 15 Hz GPS units for as-
10.1080/09540261.2016.1212820 sessing athlete movement demands. J Strength Cond Res. 2014; 28(6):
1649-1655. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000323
4. Reade I, Rodgers W, Hall N. Knowledge transfer: How do

Research Protocol | Volume 5 | Number 2| Martin L 40

 PUBLISHERS
Sport Exerc Med Open J. 2019; 5(2): 36-41. doi: 10.17140/SEMOJ-5-174

17. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intra- 24. Lowens B, Motti VG, Caine K. Wearable privacy: Skeletons in
class correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996; 1: 30-46. doi: the data closet. Paper presente at: 2017 IEEE International Conference
10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30 on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI); 2017; Park City, UT, USA; doi:
10.1109/ICHI.2017.29
18. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing
rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 420-428. doi: 10.1037//0033- 25. Akenhead R, Nassis GP. Training load and player monitoring
2909.86.2.420 in high-level football: Current practice and perceptions. Int J Sports
Physiol Perform. 2016; 11(5): 587-593. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0331
19. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing mea-
surement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medi- 26. Thornton HR, Delaney JA, Duthie GM, Dascombe BJ. Devel-
cine. Sports Med. 1998; 26(4): 217-238. doi: 10.2165/00007256- oping athlete monitoring systems in team sports: Data analysis and
199826040-00002 visualization. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019; 14(6): 698-705. doi:
10.1123/ijspp.2018-0169
20. Li L, Zeng L, Lin ZJ, Cazzell M, Liu H. Tutorial on use of
intraclass correlation coefficients for assessing intertest reliability 27. Stein M, Janetzko H, Seebacher D, et al. How to make sense of
and its application in functional near-infrared spectroscopy–based team sport data: From acquisition to data modeling and research
brain imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2015; 20(5): 050801. doi: 10.1117/1. aspects. Data. 2017; 2(1): 2.
JBO.20.5.050801
28. De Beéck TO. Data science approaches for the analysis and
21. Zych N. Collection and ownership of minor league athlete ac- interpretation of training load data of athletes. 2019.
tivity biometric data by major league baseball franchises. DePaul J.
Sports L. 2018; 14: 129. 29. Karlsson D, Timpka T, Jacobsson J, et al. Electronic data cap-
ture on athletes’ pre-participation health and in-competition injury
22. Osborne B. Legal and ethical implications of athletes’ biomet- and illness at major sports championships: An extended usability
ric data collection in professional sport. Marq. Sports L. Rev. 2017; study in athletics. Health Informatics Journal. 2018; 24(2): 136-145.
28: 37. doi: 10.1177/1460458216661861

23. Gale K. The sports industry’s new power play: Athlete biomet- 30. Durkin TM. Health data privacy and security in the age of
ric data domination. Who owns it and what may be done with it. wearable tech: Privacy and security concerns for the NFLPA and
Ariz. St. U. Sports & Ent. LJ. 2016; 6: 7. WHOOP. J. High Tech. L. 2018; 19: 279.

Submit your article to this journal | https://openventio.org/submit-manuscript/

41 Martin L Research Protocol | Volume 5 | Number 2|

View publication stats