Name Samuel- Tesfaye .
ID DRBM/0064/16 Department Department Of Business
Management sec Two
1,Who wrote the article?
The author of the article is Wen Qiu from the School of Chinese Language and Literature at Beijing
Normal University.
2,General Introduction of the article
In the article "Aristotle's Definition of Language" by Wen Qiu from the School of Chinese Language and
Literature at Beijing Normal University, the author delves into Aristotle's perspective on language, aiming
to explore his definition and understanding within the context of his philosophical works. Through a
detailed examination, Wen Qiu intricately dissects Aristotle's theories, unraveling his profound insights
on language encompassing its nature, function, and structure. The article sheds light on Aristotle's
categorization of language types, the interplay between language and thought, and its role in cognition
and communication. By offering a scholarly analysis of Aristotle's linguistic theories, Wen Qiu's work
stands as a significant contribution, unveiling age-old philosophical contemplations that resonated in
contemporary linguistic and philosophical discussions. Qualitative research methods were likely
employed to interpret Aristotle's ideas, providing a nuanced understanding of his conceptual framework.
The article incorporates references to Aristotle's works and scholarly interpretations, enriching the
discourse on linguistic philosophy. Through this exploration, Wen Qiu sheds light on Aristotle's enduring
legacy in the understanding of language, cognition, and communication, echoing the profound impact of
his philosophical contributions in the realm of linguistic studies and beyond, emphasizing Aristotle's
substantial influence on linguistic theories.
3,Summary of the article
In the article, Wen Qiu offers a comparison between Aristotle's perspectives on language and Chomsky's
linguistic theories, highlighting their contrasting views on the origins, nature, and characteristics of
human language. By conducting an in-depth examination of Aristotle's views, the text dissects his
theories on the nature, function, and structure of language, likely exploring his categorization of
language types and the connection between language, thought, and communication. Additionally, the
article delves into Aristotle's thoughts on language, focusing on the distinction between human language
and animal communication, concepts of phonetics and phonology, and their implications for
understanding the essence of language. Overall, Wen Qiu's scholarly work serves as a valuable
exploration of linguistic philosophy, elucidating Aristotle's profound insights on the interplay of language,
cognition, and communication, thereby enriching both linguistic and philosophical scholarship with a
deeper understanding of Aristotle's conceptualization of language.
4,Purpose of Article
The purpose of Wen Qiu's article is to underscore Aristotle's foundational ideas on language and their
lasting influence on linguistics, emphasizing the enduring impact of his theories in the field. The
significance of the article in scholarly circles lies in its comprehensive analysis of Aristotle's linguistic
theories, providing insights into the historical evolution of linguistic thought and showcasing their
continued relevance in current academic discourse. Through this exploration, the article sheds light on
the enduring legacy of Aristotle's contributions to the study of language and their ongoing importance in
shaping linguistic understanding.
5,Why the writer/writers want to write the article?
The writer or writers likely wanted to explore Aristotle's perspectives on language to demonstrate the
historical significance of his contributions and how they have shaped subsequent linguistic theories.
6,Is the article very important? How? / Why not?
The article plays a vital role in highlighting Aristotle's early contributions to language theory, setting the
stage for future linguistic studies. By delving into Aristotle's insights, scholars gain a deeper
understanding of the historical evolution of language theory, appreciating the foundational concepts that
continue to shape contemporary discourse. Its comprehensive analysis of Aristotle's linguistic theories
not only illuminates the historical trajectory of linguistic thought but also underscores the enduring
relevance these theories hold in current academic discussions, emphasizing their enduring impact on the
field of linguistics.
7,What methods did the researcher use? Was it qualitative or quantitative?
Research Methods:
The researcher likely employed qualitative methods to analyze Aristotle's texts, interpret his
philosophical views on language, and contextualize them within the broader scope of linguistic
philosophy and ancient Greek thought. This qualitative approach involves analyzing Aristotle's
writings on language, synthesizing his key ideas, and interpreting historical texts to understand and
appreciate the depth of his contributions to language theory within the context of linguistic
philosophy and ancient Greek thought
8,Is the article has reference? How many reverences?
Yes, it has 19 references ,these references encompass a wide range of works on Aristotle's philosophy,
language theory, logic, and metaphysics, reflecting the enduring influence of Aristotle's ideas across
diverse scholarly domains,
### References:
a. Aristotle, translated by A.L. Peck (1965). Historia Animalium (Volume I). William Heinemann Ltd,
London; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
b. Aristotle, translated by A.L. Peck (1965). Historia Animalium (Volume II). William Heinemann Ltd,
London; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
c. Aristotle, translated by A.L. Peck (1937). Parts of Animals. William Heinemann Ltd, London; Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
d. Aristotle, translated by A.L. Peck (1942). Generation of Animals. William Heinemann Ltd, London;
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
e. Aristotle, translated by Harold P. Cooke (1938). On Interpretation. William Heinemann Ltd, London;
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
f. Aristotle, translated by H. Rackham (1932). Politics. William Heinemann Ltd, London; Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
g. Aristotle, translated by W. Hamilton Fyfe (1927). The Poetics. William Heinemann Ltd, London; Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
h. Aristotle, translated by W. S. Hett (1957). On the Soul. William Heinemann Ltd, London; Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
h. Aristotle, translated by W. S. Hett (1936). Problems (I). William Heinemann Ltd, London; Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
i. David Charles (2000). Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press,
Oxford; New York.
j. Deborah K.W. Modrak (2001). Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge; New York.
k. Hans Arens (1984). Aristotle's Theory of Language and Its Tradition: Texts from 500 to 1750.
Benjamins, Amsterdam.
l. John Corcoran (1974). Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht (Holland).
m. Julie K. Ward (2008). Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
n. L.M. De Rijk (2002). Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology. Volume II, The Metaphysics: Semantics in
Aristotle's Strategy of Argument. Brill, Boston.
o. Marguerite Deslauriers (2007). Aristotle on Definition. Brill, Boston.
p. Miriam Therese Larkin (1971). Language in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Mouton, Hague.
q. Robert Wardy (2000). Aristotle in China: Language, Categories, and Translation. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
r. Scott G. Schreiber (2003). Aristotle on False Reasoning: Language and the World in the Sophistical
Refutations. State University of New York Press, Albany.
9,Conclusion
In conclusion, Wen Qiu's article on Aristotle's Definition of Language provides a valuable exploration of
linguistic philosophy through the lens of one of history's most influential thinkers. By delving into
Aristotle's conceptualization of language, the article deepens our understanding of the interplay
between language, cognition, and communication, making it a pertinent contribution to both linguistic
and philosophical scholarship.
