1
Application of Epidemiology
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name
Instructor’s Name
Due Date
2
Prevalent Infectious and Chronic Diseases
Virginia has a complicated pattern of infectious and chronic illnesses due to its
diversified population and terrain. From cosmopolitan Richmond and Virginia Beach to rural
Appalachian communities, Virginians face various health issues determined by socioeconomic
position, healthcare access, environmental exposures, and culture. Cardiovascular disease,
cancer, and respiratory disorders like COPD are major public health issues. While vaccination
and public health programs have controlled infectious illnesses, occasional influenza outbreaks,
and COVID-19 continue to pose concerns. HIV and hepatitis have also persisted, especially in
places with inadequate healthcare access or socioeconomic factors, including poverty and drug
misuse.
Comparing sickness occurrence in Virginia and Minnesota reveals similarities and
differences. Virginia and Minnesota both have cardiovascular disease and cancer, but most
populations with preventive treatment and healthy behavior have lower cardiovascular disease
morbidity and mortality (Ndejjo et al., 2021). Minnesota's high median income and solid care
infrastructure contrast with Virginia's urban-rural mix, which might compromise care. Minnesota
had fewer vaccine-preventable infectious disease cases than Virginia, probably due to
vaccination adoption and differences in the public health budget and infrastructure. Both states
have similar and different illness rates according to socioeconomic characteristics, care values,
and environment, such as urban-rural air quality.
The causes of illness prevalence in both states are complicated. High blood pressure,
obesity, and inactivity contribute to Virginia's top killer, cardiovascular disease. Minnesota has
benefited from diet and exercise programs to reduce heart disease risk (Minnesota Department of
Health, 2021). Preventive treatment and early illness identification are priorities in Minnesota
3
public health (Benavidez et al., 2024). Comparisons show that healthcare policy, community
actions, and environment shape regional health profiles. Both states show that public health
measures must incorporate regional demography and availability and emphasize global illness
etiology variables.
Application of the Epidemiological Model
A complete epidemiology model may optimize Virginia's long-standing cardiovascular
disease prevention efforts. Heart failure, arrhythmias, and coronary heart disease cause major
morbidity and death in Virginia and other states, including Minnesota (Roth et al., 2020).
Through healthy behavior, prompt medical treatment, therapy compliance, socioeconomic status,
education, and access to care, behavior, environment, and genetics affect CVD. Interrelated
causes of cardiovascular disease are explained by the CVD model. CVD is a valuable model
since it explains several contributing variables and a single cause and outcome. They are
surrounded by behavioral and biological factors such excessive blood fat, high blood pressure,
cigarette usage, lack of exercise, and poor diets (Azadaki et al., 2024). Social variables including
income, education, community personality, and healthy food availability surround them. This
model includes genetic vulnerability and psychological stress, CVD risk factors. Due to its web-
like nature, even small changes in one variable may have wide-ranging effects. More community
security and leisure places may boost activity, lower blood pressure and obesity, and reduce heart
disease risk. Using the Web of Causation model, the scenario identifies many activities. Public
initiatives must address behavior, social issues, hypertension, and cholesterol. Community
interventions may promote healthy eating, food environment improvement, and smoking
cessation (Bezzina et al., 2023). The concept helps create multi-faceted strategies to reduce
illness incidence and promote public health by addressing multiple cardiovascular disease risk
4
factors. Upstream social and environmental variables and downstream clinic risk factors need
therapy. Minimizing cardiovascular disease in society and individuals requires balance.
Levels of Prevention
Community health practice relies on prevention to reduce illness burden and promote
health. Three preventive strategies are main, secondary, and tertiary. Primary prevention changes
risk and protective factors to prevent disease. Community-based health education, proper
nutrition, and exercise may prevent cardiovascular disease. These techniques target fundamental
causes, including sedentary behavior and bad diets, which lead to obesity and hypertension, to
prevent cardiovascular events. Public health initiatives that promote a balanced diet, frequent
exercise, and tobacco abstinence have reduced heart disease in populations who follow these
guidelines.
Early identification and treatment reduce disease development in secondary prevention.
Routine examinations for blood pressure, cholesterol, and other risk factors for cardiovascular
disease are secondary preventive methods. Early hypertension identification allows prompt
medical care, reducing the risk of more serious cardiovascular events (Shimanda et al., 2024).
Free or low-cost health screenings at community centers, companies, and schools have identified
at-risk people. Early lifestyle adjustment or pharmaceutical therapy may slow cardiovascular
disease development and prevent consequences. Since many people with cardiovascular disease
are asymptomatic in the early stages, early intervention may save their lives.
Tertiary prevention manages existing illnesses to lessen disability, deterioration, and
quality of life. Tertiary prevention for cardiovascular disease comprises cardiac rehabilitation,
medical care, and lifestyle changes for long-term health (Winnige et al., 2021). Complete cardiac
rehabilitation programs include supervised exercise, dietary counseling, and stress management.
5
These programs promote physical exercise, medication adherence, and psychological well-being
to assist patients recover from acute cardiac events and lower the risk of recurrent occurrences.
Tertiary preventive techniques improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare expenditures
associated with recurring hospitalizations by addressing the complex requirements of heart
disease patients.
Reflection
Advanced practice nurses must monitor preventative initiatives to provide high-quality,
patient-centered care. They may follow patient outcomes and evaluate preventative programs
using electronic health records, community health assessments, and quality improvement
activities. Follow-up visits, health testing, and patient reporting inform preventive measures.
Collaboration with community organizations, public health agencies, and experts improves
preventative plan assessment and improvement. Preventive techniques ensure community needs
and current research informs initiatives.
My practice will implement preventive interventions via primary, secondary, and tertiary
interventions. Patients will participate in health education and outreach activities and get direct
treatment. I want to work with community organizations and public health authorities to create
healthy settings and reduce cardiovascular disease risk. I will advocate and attend diet, exercise,
and stress management classes and get frequent health checks. Early detection and surveillance
of cardiovascular disease risk factors will enhance preventative treatments. I think this approach
will improve my community's health, reduce cardiovascular disease, and have long-term effects.
After the assignment, I valued a multifaceted model for illness causes and therapy like
cardiovascular disease. I found that treatments must address individual, societal, and
environmental illness causes using a web of causality approach. A whole-person approach
6
fosters a complex, multifaceted paradigm for illness causes and treatments. After analyzing
preventative levels, I value integrating primary, secondary, and tertiary disease control methods.
Successful public health initiatives use all three preventative levels, which play distinct but
complementary roles in a continuum of care.
In conclusion, Virginia and Minnesota's public health contexts share concerns and
regional heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease prevalence. The Web of Causation model shows
the complicated interaction between disease-causing causes therefore individual and
environmental aspects must be considered. Healthcare practitioners may prevent, identify, and
treat cardiovascular disease using primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Advanced practice
nurses monitor, evaluate, and modify these preventative methods to make them successful and
responsive to different patient populations. This study has taught me epidemiologic models and
preventative methods, which I can use daily to improve health and public health.
7
References
Azdaki, N., Salmani, F., Kazemi, T., Partovi, N., Bizhaem, S. K., Moghadam, M. N., Moniri, Y.,
Zarepur, E., Mohammadifard, N., Alikhasi, H., Nouri, F., Sarrafzadegan, N., Moezi, S.
A., & Khazdair, M. R. (2024). Which risk factor best predicts coronary artery disease
using the artificial neural network method? BMC Medical Informatics and Decision
Making, 24(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02442-1
Benavidez, G. A., Zahnd, W. E., Hung, P., & Eberth, J. M. (2024). Chronic disease prevalence in
the US: Sociodemographic and geographic variations by zip code tabulation area.
Preventing Chronic Disease, 21(21). https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.230267
Bezzina, A., Clarke, E. D., Ashton, L., Watson, T., & James, C. L. (2023). Workplace health
promotion programs targeting smoking, nutrition, physical activity, and obesity in men:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Health Education
& Behavior, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981231208396
Ndejjo, R., Hassen, H. Y., Wanyenze, R. K., Musoke, D., Nuwaha, F., Abrams, S., Bastiaens, H.,
& Musinguzi, G. (2021). Community-Based interventions for cardiovascular disease
prevention in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Public Health
Reviews, 42(1604018). https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1604018
Roth, G. A., Mensah, G. A., Johnson, C. O., Addolorato, G., Ammirati, E., Baddour, L. M.,
Barengo, N. C., Beaton, A. Z., Benjamin, E. J., Benziger, C. P., Bonny, A., Brauer, M.,
Brodmann, M., Cahill, T. J., Carapetis, J., Catapano, A. L., Chugh, S. S., Cooper, L. T.,
Coresh, J., & Criqui, M. (2020). Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk
factors, 1990-2019: Update from the GBD 2019 study. Journal of the American College
of Cardiology, 76(25), 2982–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010
8
Shimanda, P. P., Shumba, T. W., Brunström, M., Iipinge, S. N., Söderberg, S., Lindholm, L., &
Fredrik Norström. (2024). Preventive Interventions to Reduce the Burden of Rheumatic
Heart Disease in Populations at Risk: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American
Heart Association, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.123.032442
Winnige, P., Vysoky, R., Dosbaba, F., & Batalik, L. (2021). Cardiac rehabilitation and its
essential role in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. World Journal of
Clinical Cases, 9(8), 1761–1784. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i8.1761