International Political Economy (HIPC 080) Revision notes on theoretical approaches
1. Realism
• Core Beliefs:
o States are the primary actors.
o The international system is anarchic (no central authority).
o National interest and survival are key.
o Power (especially military) is the main currency.
• Key Thinkers:
o Thucydides, Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes (Classical Realism)
o Hans Morgenthau, Kenneth Waltz (Neorealism/Structural Realism)
• Variants:
o Classical Realism – rooted in human nature (power-seeking).
o Neorealism – focuses on the structure of the international system.
• Criticisms:
o Too pessimistic; neglects cooperation and non-state actors.
o Underestimates the role of international institutions.
2. Liberalism
• Core Beliefs:
o Cooperation among states is possible.
o Emphasizes international institutions, democracy, and economic
interdependence.
o War is not inevitable.
• Key Thinkers:
o Immanuel Kant, Woodrow Wilson, Robert Keohane, Joseph Nye
• Key Concepts:
o Democratic Peace Theory – democracies are less likely to go to war with each
other.
o Complex interdependence – states are connected through multiple channels.
• Criticisms:
o Overly optimistic; assumes rationality and shared interests.
o Struggles to explain conflict between liberal democracies.
3. Constructivism
• Core Beliefs:
o Ideas, norms, and identities shape international relations.
o The international system is socially constructed.
o State interests are not fixed – they evolve through interaction.
• Key Thinkers:
o Alexander Wendt (“Anarchy is what states make of it”)
o Martha Finnemore, Nicholas Onuf
• Criticisms:
o Difficult to test empirically.
o Understates material power and interests.
4. Marxism / Critical Theories
• Core Beliefs:
o Focus on global capitalism and class struggle.
o IR reflects economic inequalities and exploitation.
o Emphasizes the role of imperialism and economic dependency.
• Key Thinkers:
o Karl Marx (influence), Antonio Gramsci, Immanuel Wallerstein (World-Systems
Theory)
• Variants:
o Dependency Theory, Neo-Marxism, World-Systems Theory
• Criticisms:
o Economically deterministic.
o Lacks practical policy application.