[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views5 pages

Chapter 8 Notes

The document discusses the various functions and types of assessment in music education, including diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments. It emphasizes the importance of effective communication and the relationship between assessment, measurement, and evaluation, as well as the need for reliability and validity in assessments. Additionally, it explores different assessment approaches, including the use of scoring rubrics, portfolios, and standardized testing, highlighting their roles in enhancing student learning and teacher evaluation.

Uploaded by

Maia Anna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views5 pages

Chapter 8 Notes

The document discusses the various functions and types of assessment in music education, including diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments. It emphasizes the importance of effective communication and the relationship between assessment, measurement, and evaluation, as well as the need for reliability and validity in assessments. Additionally, it explores different assessment approaches, including the use of scoring rubrics, portfolios, and standardized testing, highlighting their roles in enhancing student learning and teacher evaluation.

Uploaded by

Maia Anna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Maia Anna Chapter 9 Notes 03/11/25

Notes
The functions of assessment in music education
-​ Diagnostic assessment allows teachers to determine a starting point for teaching and
learning
-​ Formative assessment provides feedback to students and teachers during instruction
-​ The assigning of an index or description of a students level of attainment upon the
completion of an assignment or unit or semester is considered to be summative
assessment
-​ Feedback that describes the strengths and this is our performance or paper, such as
comments written in the margins of a paper, is more likely to help students develop an
understanding of the processes that lead to good work
-​ To maximize music education, Effective communication about diagnostic, formative,
and summative assessment is imperative
Assessment versus measurement versus evaluation
-​ Assessment is most often used to all activities and processes that result in generating an
understanding of student learning, both informal and formal
-​ Measurement, which may be considered a subset of assessment, narrowly refers to the
assignment of numbers to qualities
-​ Evaluation includes judgment. Evaluation as being the combination of assessment and
judgment
Objective versus subjective
-​ Objective measures are those that strive to eliminate houses that may be part of the
measurement tool
-​ Different scores for the same essay suggest that the teachers were being subjective
-​ Subjective assessment might not be equitable
-​ Approach to assessment that would emphasize context, individualism, and a reduction
of the power dynamic between teachers and students
Reliability
-​ Reliability is really an end of how much error is part of the measuring process
-​ Multiple measurements is a strategy for eliminating inconsistencies that creep into the
measurement process
-​ Hearing students perform the same work several times over a few weeks should likely
improve the accuracy of teachers assessment of students performance
-​ Test-retest reliability is concerned about the consistency or stability of measures
overtime
Validity
-​ Validity answers the question, does an assessment measure what it claims to measure?
-​ Content validity may be the most important. It examines whether an assessment covers
a particular area of content it is designed to measure
-​ Criterion related validity examines the relationship between a test other typically
established measures of the same characteristic or quality
-​ Construct validity examines how well assessment fits with a psychological or social
construct or theory
Relationship between curriculum, instruction, and assessment
-​ Assessment criteria are arguably the most communication of an individual teachers
philosophy of learning
-​ Traditional approaches to classroom assessment as fitting well with a behavioristic
model of instruction: tightly sequenced, hierarchal, proceeds in small eteps, employs
external positive reinforcement, and is driven by explicitly stated behavioral objectives
-​ Constructivist instructional strategies demand brought a range of assessment tools that
go beyond objective tests.
Traditional measures of the outcomes of musical instruction
-​ Cognitive outcomes include recalling of information, applying knowledge to new
situations, analyzing, and evaluating materials and information based on specific
criteria
-​ Major criticism of traditional objective achievement test is that they may focus on
lower level learning such as the simple recall of facts
-​ Traditional performance assessments focus on strategies to improve both the reliability
and the validity of the judges ratings
Approaches to assessing outcomes of music instruction
-​ We should not stop instruction to assess, instead the assessment process should be a
natural part of instruction
-​ Alternative assessments and music should include authentic tasks for students to
demonstrate their understandings and skills
-​ An important aspect of reconceptualizing assessment is that students are well
informedAbout the tasks they are undertaking and about the criteria that will be used to
evaluate the task
Scoring rubrics
-​ By providing evaluate of criteria, students become more independent learners
-​ Scoring Rubik's also help help students understand the target, standard, or goal that
they're striving for
-​ Effective rubrics should use rich descriptive language to specify quality levels of each
criterion
-​ Teachers often say that pure evaluations must be manage carefully, so that constructive
recommendations are generated
Reconceptualizing assessment assignments
-​ A musically literate student should be able to play, listen critically, improvise,
compose, Essentially skills and understandings that are part of a comprehensive music
educational experience
Portfolios
-​ Portfolios can be used to help students keep track of student learning
-​ A music process portfolio is likely to include evidence of authentic music performance
-​ There are several ways to include evidence of perception and reflection, such as written
reflections on rehearsals or tapes of rehearsals
Journals
-​ Journals can be places where he reflect about their working music, their ideas for
composing, or they can be tied to evaluating performances, rehearsals, or lessons
-​ Teacher should consider the degree to which these personal reflections should be a part
of an evaluation system
Model cornerstone assessments
-​ MCA Provide a series of tasks that illustrate classroom learning in the three areas of
performing, creating, and responding to music
-​ Focus on classroom student learning specifically in relation relation to the 2014 music
standards
-​ Include self and peer reflection and assessment activities, which further illustrates the
educative nature of these assessments
Standardized testing in music
-​ A standardized test is one that is typically developed by development company with
both content and testing experts
-​ If an app two test result indicates that a young student has a high aptitude for a
particular field such as music, it would be expected that the student would perform well
a music classes in the future
-​ Standardized achievement tests are used to measure what the students have learned in a
particular discipline
State and national assessments of achievement music Education
-​ The national assessment of educational progress that was first administered in the
1970s included music as a subject starting in the academic year 1971-1972
-​ The 2016 NAEP assessment measured responding and creating with multiple-choice,
short constructed response, and extended constructed response items
-​ Many states develop their own achievement for music, partly in response to the teacher
accountability pressures
Teachers and their music programs
-​ The evaluation of teachers and should include evidence of student learning
-​ Since education is organized locally, it is useful to examine the effectiveness of
instructional programs at the local level
-​ Opportunity to learn standards for music education provides benchmarks curriculum
scheduling, staffing, materials and equipment, and facilities for an effective music
program
-​ Thorough evaluation of a music program should include exam students work produced
at all levels of instruction, in a wide range of music classes

Summary
I’ve had a decent amount of opportunities to learn about assessment in my MUED foundations
and methods classes, however it’s always been kind of a scary thing for me to think about.
Growing up in a school orchestra, the assessment material was always a playing test,
performance, or practice log of some sort. In my private teaching, I set dates a couple weeks in
advance when my students will play through their entire solo and do some sight reading, where
I would then give them feedback after they had finished.

I haven’t used any rubrics or score sheets in my private teaching, I haven’t seen much of a
need for it. I always communicate with my students and their parents (if applicable) as to how
they are doing, what they are doing well and/or struggling with. When I am teaching in a
school I will likely employ a scoring rubric, as I feel it is an effective way to go about
assessment in the music classroo.

You might also like