BANKING LAW AND PRACTICE Course Material-3
BANKING LAW AND PRACTICE Course Material-3
Course Material
Prepared 2022
Acknowledgement:
OVERVIEW
OBJECTIVES
COURSE CONTENT
1. Course Syllabus
Course Overview:
HISTORY OF BANKING
Bank of England was set up in 1694 which was later on followed by other Central
banks of different countries. Mulaisho (1994, p.48). In Zambia, the financial system in the
mid-1960s was dominated by foreign commercial banks mainly serving the credit needs of
foreign and expatriate businesses. Mulaisho (1994, p.48). The general thrust of financial
policies after 1968 was to enable government to exert greater control over the financial
system and to ensure that credit allocation was more supportive of the government’s overall
economic strategy. Mulaisho (1994, p.48). Financial policies consisted of three main
strands: nationalization of foreign financial institutions, establishment of government
owned banks and development finance institutions, and administrative controls over
interest rates and, to a limited extent, loan allocation.
The central bank (Bank of Zambia) has by law the general functions of:
- Maintenance of price and financial system stability through the formulation and
implementation of appropriate monetary and supervisory policies;
- Issuing of bank licences, supervising and regulating the activities of banks and
financial institutions to promote safe, sound and efficient payment mechanisms;
- Issuing of notes and coins;
- Acting as banker and fiscal agent to the Government;
- Supporting the efficient operation of the exchange system; and
- Acting as advisor to the Government on economic and monetary management.
The central bank also provides current accounts for commercial banks for
settlement of commercial banks’ transaction and it participates in the Zambia Clearing
House.
Several banks and non-bank financial institutions were set up by the government to
serve various purposes. The Indo-Zambia Bank was established in 1984 as a joint venture
between the government and three state owned Indian banks, and in 1987 the Zambia
Export and Import Bank was founded to supply trade finance. Development finance
institutions were set up to provide concessional and/or long term finance to priority sectors
with funds mobilized from the government or external sources. These included the Zambia
Agricultural Development Bank and Agricultural Finance Company, which were
amalgamated to form the Lima Bank in 1987, and the Development Bank of Zambia.
According Chiumya (2004, p.9), in the period between 1970 and the early 1990s,
the banking sector consisted of four distinct groups – old foreign banks, state banks, new
foreign banks and the local banks. Chiumya (2004, p.9). Three of the major banks which
were foreign, Barclays Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and Grindlays Bank (now Stanbic
Bank) were concerned with serving the interests of foreign corporate entities. (Chiumya,
2004, p.9). In order to meet the needs of the local population and redress this imbalance,
the government established a number of banks such as the National Savings and Credit
Bank (Natsave), Zambia National Commercial Bank (now ZANACO), Lima Bank and
Cooperative Bank. Chiumya (2004, p.9).
ZANACO was established by the government in 1969. Its objectives included the
provision of credit to Zambians and the extension of bank branches into the rural areas
(Musokotwane, p 12). The government however soon realised that ZANACO would be
unable to expand rapidly enough to meet the expectations placed on it, and in 1971
announced plans to nationalise all the foreign financial institutions, including the
commercial banks (Harvey 1991: 262).
2. Course Module
NOTE: The notes below are not meant to be exhaustive of the topic under discussion.
Students are expected to create comprehensive notes using the text(s) provided and other
resources.
2.1.5 Mulaisho, Dominic, 1994, ’The role of the central bank in economic
liberalisation’ in Nathan Chilepa Deassis and Stuart Makanka Yikona (eds),
The Quest for an Enabling Environment for Development in Zambia, Ndola:
Mission Press, pp 42-58
2.16 C. Chiumya, (2004). Banking Sector Reforms and Financial Regulation: Its
Effects on Access to Financial Services Low Income Households in Zambia
(Paper presented to the 3rd International Conference on Pro-Poor Regulation
and Competition in South Africa).
SUMMARY
According to Mwenda (2010, p.11), the essential norms for effective banking
supervision have become the most significant global standard for prudential regulation and
supervision. The vast majority of the countries have approved the core principles and have
declared their intention to implement them. Mwenda (2010, p.11). Generally, banking
reforms can have an impact on the efficacy of the legal framework for banking supervision.
(Mwenda, 2010, p.11).
The central bank, like the rest of the economy, adapts to changes in the market
environment. Mwenda (2010, p.11). In the case of the Bank of Zambia, prior to 1991, the
Bank had numerous roles, including the promotion of economic growth through the
provision of credit to critical sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, mining, etc, as
well as issuance of export guarantees to exporters. Mwenda (2010, p.11). As expected, the
multiplicity of functions led to conflict of interest. Mwenda (2010, p.11). For instance, on
one hand, the Bank was expected to control the growth of money supply while, on the other
hand, it was required to inject money into the system through the provision of credit to the
selected sectors. Mwenda (2010, p.11). The introduction of economic reforms by the
Government beginning the end of 1991 therefore brought about enormous challenges for
the Bank of Zambia. Mwenda (2010, p.11).
According to Mwenda (2010, p.11), to meet the new challenges, the Bank’s
operations needed to be more focused. Mwenda (2010, p.11). In this respect, the Bank of
Zambia Act was amended in 1996 to reflect the changed nature of the operating
environment. Mwenda (2010, p.11). By amending the Act, the Bank’s primary role was
solely “to formulate and implement monetary and supervisory policies that will ensure the
maintenance of price and financial system stability”. Mwenda (2010, p.11). This was
deliberate, as experience world-over has shown that you can only achieve sustained and
high economic growth in an economic environment characterized by low and stable
inflation. Mwenda (2010, p.11). Thus, by working to ensure price stability as well as
maintenance of a safe, sound and efficient financial sector, the Bank is contributing to the
achievement of sustainable economic growth and, ultimately, poverty reduction. Mwenda
(2010, p.11). In a nutshell, following the amendment of the Bank of Zambia Act in 1996,
the Bank’s main responsibilities comprise price and financial system stability. Mwenda
(2010, p.11). The Bank ensures financial system stability by licensing, supervising and
regulating the activities of banks and non-bank financial institutions so as to promote the
safe, sound and efficient operations and development of the financial sector. (Mwenda,
2010, p.11).
colonial period and the early years of independence was not adequate to effectively regulate
the banking system, especially as the latter evolved during the 1980s. Brownbridge (1996,
p. 17). There were serious deficiencies in both the banking legislation and the supervisory
capacities in the BOZ. (Brownbridge,1996, p. 17).
Brownbridge (1996, p. 17), prior to the economic reforms of the 1990s, the BOZ’s
main role was in ensuring compliance with government imposed allocative regulations.
Prudential regulation was not a priority, and bank inspections concentrated on checking
that banks complied with foreign exchange and interest rate controls as well as statutory
liquidity requirements (Bank of Zambia 1994). Brownbridge (1996, p. 17). The BOZ also
acquired an equity stake in ZANACO, which clearly would have compromised its role as
the bank regulator had the latter been taken more seriously. Brownbridge (1996, p. 17). To
some extent the lack of emphasis accorded to prudential regulation was justifiable: until
BCCZ and Meridien were set up in the early 1980s, the banks operating in Zambia were
either owned by well-established foreign banks or the government, and thus reasonably
secure in terms of the safety of deposits. Brownbridge (1996, p. 17). It was also the case
that the controlled economy provided a relatively safe environment for bank lending.
(Brownbridge, 1996, p. 17).
The fact that reforms to the prudential system were delayed until 1994 has almost
certainly cost the taxpayers heavily as a result of the Meridien collapse and may result in
further costs if many more of the local banks fail. Brownbridge (1996, p. 17). The potential
fragility among the local banks is at least partly attributable to the fact that the revisions to
the banking legislation were not enacted until three years after a more liberal attitude to
bank licensing was adopted. Brownbridge (1996, p. 17). Substantial new entry into the
banking industry was allowed before adequate prudential legislation and supervisory
capacities had been put in place. (Brownbridge, 1996, p. 17).
Between 1965 and 1994 the legislative framework governing the banking industry
was contained in the Banking Act and Bank of Zambia Act. Brownbridge (1996, p. 17).
Various aspects of these Acts impeded effective prudential regulation. (Brownbridge,1996,
p. 17).
First, the authority to license banks, and to withdraw licenses, lay not with the BOZ
but with the Registrar of Banks appointed by the Ministry of Finance (MOF). Brownbridge
(1996, p. 17). Second, the Banking Act did not provide the BOZ with the authority to issue
or update regulations pertaining to prudential requirements. (Brownbridge,1996, p. 17).
Third, the Banking Act was unclear as to what was required of directors and managers of
banks applying for licenses in terms of qualifications, experience, etc., and on what grounds
applications could be rejected. Brownbridge (1996, p. 17). The deficiencies in the licensing
regulations allowed banks lacking strong capital and managerial resources to be set in the
late 1980s and early 1990s. (Brownbridge, 1996, p. 17).
According to Brownbridge (1996, p. 18), the Banking Act did set out capital
adequacy standards relating capital and reserves to liabilities minus liquid assets, and
specified that minimum transfers should be made from profits into a reserve fund.
Brownbridge (1996, p. 18). But the capital adequacy provisions were largely meaningless
in the absence of appropriate regulations regarding provisioning for doubtful debts and
non-accrual of unpaid interest. Brownbridge (1996, p. 18). Hence a bank which was
technically insolvent could appear well capitalized. Brownbridge (1996, p. 18). Important
omissions in the Banking Act were the lack of any references to insider lending and loan
concentration. Brownbridge (1996, p. 18). Moreover, building societies, the Post Office
Savings Bank and any other financial institution established by a written law of Zambia
were explicitly excluded from the Banking Act. (Brownbridge, 1996, p. 18).
Brownbridge (1996, p. 18). The banking legislation was revised with the enactment
of the Banking and Financial Services Act (BFSA) in 1994 which was repealed and
replaced by the Banking and Financial Services Act No.7 of 2017. Brownbridge (1996, p.
18). The BFSA gives the BOZ more legal independence from the MOF: The Registrar is
placed under BOZ control although the MOF must be consulted on licensing and other
matters. Brownbridge (1996, p. 18). It is more flexible than the previous Banking Act with
the BOZ (or the MOF on the recommendation of the BOZ) having the authority to issue
prudential guidelines and regulations (e.g. in regard to capital adequacy) and to demand
regular data from financial institutions relating to prudential matters. Brownbridge (1996,
p. 18). The BFSA is also far more comprehensive in terms of both the type of financial
institutions covered and the requirements demanded of these financial institutions and their
directors. Brownbridge (1996, p. 18).
Mwenda (2010, p.54). The informal sector in Zambia, as in many other developing
countries, remains the most dynamic in terms of employment generation. Mwenda (2010,
p.54). Policies to support this sector, are being put in place and the Government of Zambia
perceives the role of microfinance to be crucial in this regard. (Mwenda, 2010, p.54).
These MFIs were established to fill the gap that had been created with respect to
the provision of financial services to low income households and the poor. Mwenda (2010,
p.54). This development led to calls by politicians, regulators and MFIs – through the
Association for Microfinance Institutions of Zambia (AMIZ) – for the microfinance sector
to be regulated and supervised as part of the financial sector. Mwenda (2010, p.54).
The Banking and Financial Services Act (BFSA), 2017, gives the Bank of Zambia
the authority to license, regulate and supervise banks and other financial institutions
registered under the referred Act. The objective of the Bank of Zambia in this regard is to
ensure and promote a safe and sound financial system.
The appropriate forms, which can be collected from the Bank of Zambia or
downloaded from the Bank of Zambia website, must be completed and submitted by the
applicant to the Registrar at the Bank of Zambia:
(iii) Source of the initial capital to be invested and that of any future funding shall
be disclosed to the Bank of Zambia
(iv) A business plan with financial projections and forecasts for a minimum of three
years from commencement date. This should include an income statement, balance sheet,
cash flow statement and a copy of the accounting policies to be adopted by the proposed
(vi) Any other documents in support of the application, as may be requested by the
Bank of Zambia.
Upon approval of the application and payment of the annual licence fee, the
Registrar shall issue the applicant with a microfinance institution licence to conduct
microfinance business.
SUMMARY
This chapter examines the legal framework for banking supervision and regulation
in Zambia. Reference will be made only to the national legal framework because not only
are there no international treaties on bank supervision but the guidelines and principles
developed by Basle Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) for the supervision of the
conduct of banks sets out requirements that limit their risk-taking. Mwenda (200). These
guidelines and standards will normally cover such areas as risk management, corporate
governance, know your customer (KYC), and anti-money laundering. Mwenda (200). The
BCBS provides an international forum for regular cooperation on banking supervisory
matter. Its objective is to enhance an understanding of key supervisory issues and improve
the quality of banking supervision worldwide. Mwenda (200).
These principles have become the most important global standards for prudential
regulation and supervision and the vast majority of countries have endorsed them by
declaring their intention to implement them. Mwenda (200). However, it is not yet clear as
to whether these principles have become customary international law. Mwenda (200).
Therefore, it can be concluded that the Basle Core Principles constitute soft law as of now,
in that they are globally the main guidelines for central bank supervision of the commercial
banks. Mwenda (200).
Banking instability can have serious adverse effects on a nation’s economy because
it can impair payment mechanism, reduce the nation’s savings rate, diminish the financial
intermediation process, and inflict serious harm on small savers. Chiumya (2004). To
prevent these adverse effects, efforts have been made by government to introduce
legislation on depositor’s protection. (Chiumya, 2004).
The regulatory framework of the banking sector has since 2000 strengthened
through the revision of the banking legislation such the Banking and Financial Services
Act No. 7 of 2017 which was primarily intended to strengthen BOZ regulatory and
supervisory powers in light of the best practices and international standards for prudential
LS Banking Law and Practice 12 of 69
The Copperbelt University
regulation and supervision. (Chiumya, 2004). This has been coupled with the formulation
of regulation against money laundering, corporate governance guidelines and minimum
capital adequate, among others. (Chiumya, 2004).
It must be noted that the greatest problem faced in regulation is not supervision but
enforcement. Supervision has to do with complying with the provisions of the enabling
legislation, whereas enforcement involves the actual implementation of those provisions.
Mwenda (2000). The Banking Act of 1965 which was later repealed by the Banking
Act of 1972, was the first Act that regulated the conduct of banking business in Zambia.
Mwenda (2000). This Act was tailored to address the needs of the banking environment of
a newly independent state of Zambia had just gained independence in 1964. Mwenda
(2000). It was formulated specifically to regulate commercial banks and so as to be in line
with the Zambian economy. Among other things to enable government to compel
commercial banks to be locally incorporated in order to bring in large amounts of equity
capital and commercial banks were mandated under this Act to appoint Zambians as half
the number of directors in those banks. Phiri (2004, p.11). This was intended to help
government to place its citizen in leading roles in as far as national development was
concerned. Phiri (2004, p.11).
Phiri (2004, p.11). The Banking and Financial Services Act of 1994 repealed the
Banking Act of 1972 owing to the change of economic policy of liberalization which was
adopted by the new government. Phiri (2004, p.11). The change in government from a one
party state to a multi-party state led by the MMD resulted in radical reform from a state
controlled economy to a free market or liberlised economy. Phiri (2004, p.11). Therefore,
financial sector reforms were not only inevitable but expected and this was evident in
reforms to prudential regulation and supervision of banking and financial institutions
through the enactment of a new banking law in 1994. Phiri (2004, p.11).
The objectives of the Banking and Financial Services Act 1994 was repealed by the
Banking and Financial Services Act No. 7 of 2017 whose aims are to provide for the
regulation of the conduct of banking and financial services, safeguard the interests of
investors and customers of banks and financial institutions and to provide for matters
connected with or incidental to the foregoing. Phiri (2004, p.11). In this vein, the Act
endeavours not only to create both legal and institutional safeguards for depositors’ monies
but also to promote a safe, sound and efficient financial system. Phiri (2004, p.11).
The power to licence, supervise and regulate financial service providers in Zambia
is defined under two sets of legislation, namely:
(i) The Bank of Zambia Act, Chapter 360 of the Laws of Zambia; and
(ii)The Banking and Financial Services Act (BFSA), Chapter 387 of the Laws of
Zambia. These two sets of legislation outline the functions, responsibilities and mandate of
the Bank of Zambia.
In terms of Section 4(1) of the Bank of Zambia (BOZ) Act, the primary objective
of the Bank of Zambia is to "formulate and implement monetary policy and supervisory
policies that will ensure the maintenance of price and financial system stability so as to
promote balanced macro-economic development". To support this function, the Bank is
given the responsibility, among others, to "licence, supervise and regulate the activities of
banks and financial institutions so as to promote the safe, sound and efficient operations
and development of the financial system."
The Banking and Financial Services Act 2017 supports the BOZ Act by amplifying
the legal and regulatory framework of licensing, supervising and regulating financial
service providers in Zambia.
2.1.4 Grounds upon which the Registrar may refuse to grant a licence
In deciding whether or not to grant a banking licence, and in deciding what conditions
should be attached to such a licence, Mwenda (2010, p.42) the Registrar of Banks and
Financial Institutions can have regard to the capital adequacy of the applicant; the financial
condition, resources and history of the applicant and the applicant’s associates and
affiliates; the character and experience of the directors and major shareholders and of
persons proposing to be concerned in the management of the business to be undertaken
under the authority of the licence; the convenience and needs of the community intended
to be served by that business; and the prospects for profitable operation of that business.
Mwenda (2010, p.42).
In addition to the foregoing: section 10(1) of the Banking and Financial Services
Act 2017 provides that the Bank shall reject an application for a licence where—
(a) an applicant does not meet the requirements of this Act;
(b) a licence previously held by an applicant has been cancelled by the Bank;
(c) an applicant submits false information in relation to the application; or
(d) the name that a financial service provider is proposing to be registered is—
(i) identical with that of another financial service provider; or
(ii) resembles the name of another financial service provider and is likely to deceive
the public
Pursuant to section 17 the Banking and Financial Services Act 2017, a licence granted
to an applicant remains in force until it is revoked by the Registrar of Banks and Financial
Institutions.
An applicant for a banking licence whose application has been refused by the Registrar
of Banks and Financial Institutions or the Bank of Zambia has the right to make his or her
case in writing to the said Registrar or the Bank of Zambia to reconsider the decision over
the granting of a licence. Mwenda (2010, p.43). This procedure applies, mutatis mutandis,
to appeals against decisions of the Registrar or the Bank of Zambia regarding the
revocation of licences. Mwenda (2010, p.43). If, after receipt of any representations from
the applicant or person affected by its decision, the Registrar or the Bank of Zambia
reaffirms its decision, the applicant or other person (hereinafter called the ‘appellant’) may,
within seven days of receipt of the notice reaffirming the decision, notify the minister that
he or she desires to appeal against the decision. (Mwenda, 2010, p.43).
Section 34 (1) of the Banking and Financial Services Act 2017 provides that a
person shall not be elected or appointed as a director, chief executive officer or chief
financial officer of a financial service provider without the prior written approval of the
Bank.
Section 34 (2) states that despite anything to the contrary in the Companies Act,
2017, or any other written law, a person is not qualified for election or appointment as a
director or senior officer if that person—
(a) is not a fit and proper person to hold the relevant office in accordance with this Act;
(b) is below the age of twenty-one years;
(c) has been adjudged bankrupt by a competent court or has made an arrangement or
composition with that person’s creditors, in Zambia or elsewhere;
(d) has been convicted of an offence involving fraud or dishonesty;
(e) has a mental disability that makes the person incapable of performing the functions
of the office;
Mwenda (2010, p.54), where a bank refuses to comply with an order of the Bank
of Zambia, or refuses to permit an examination to be made, or has otherwise obstructed
such an examination, the Bank of Zambia can take disciplinary action. Equally, the Bank
of Zambia may take disciplinary action where it is of the opinion that an authorized
examination shows:
(a) that the bank concerned conducts its business in an unlawful manner or engages in
a course of conduct that is unsafe and unsound; Mwenda (2010, p.54) or
(b) that for any reason (other than insolvency) the bank is unable or likely to become
unable to continue its operations in the ordinary course. Mwenda (2010, p.54).
The PIA has regulatory and supervisory functions over insurance and reinsurance
companies and intermediaries, claims agents, assessors, loss adjusters, pension schemes,
fund managers, administrators and custodians. Even though the BoZ and the PIA are
corporate bodies that have regulatory functions, the authority to issue regulations
ultimately relies on the MOFNP, according to the laws that set up both agencies.
Historically, supervision of the financial business tended to follow sector lines, that
is, each financial sector had its own supervisory authority. Vagneur (2004, p.21). This is
what is known as the fragmented or sector-specific regulatory model of supervision. It is
one in which financial institutions are organized around, and supervised by specialist
agencies. Vagneur (2004). Thus bank supervision is by a bank regulator, securities markets
have their own supervisor and the insurance sector is overseen by an insurance specialist
agency. Vagneur (2004). This trend of having specialist agencies for each sector of the
financial market has not changed in most countries, Zambia inclusive. Vagneur (2004).
Accordingly, in countries which have adopted this model of supervision, there are
substantial body of laws and regulations governing a specific sector of the financial market.
Vagneur (2004). The purpose of these laws and regulations is to provide macroeconomic
stability and to protect individual depositors and investors of the financial markets.
Vagneur (2004).
Indeed, Zambia is one such country that has adopted the fragmented or sector-
specific regulatory model of supervision as there are three institutions that regulate the
financial sector in Zambia. Vagneur (2004). These are Bank of Zambia, Securities and
Exchange Commission and Pensions and Insurance Authority. Vagneur (2004). Under this
model, BOZ is responsible for the supervision of banks, non-bank financial institutions
(NBFIs) and micro finance institutions. Vagneur (2004). Further, BOZ is charged with
responsibility of formulating and executing monetary and supervisory policies with the
ultimate objective of achieving price and financial system stability. Vagneur (2004). Apart
from serving as a banker for all commercial banks, BOZ is an adviser to the Government.
The Bank of Zambia currently derives its mandate from the Bank of Zambia Act 1996
Chapter 360 of the Laws of Zambia and the Banking and Financial Services as amended
Act No.7 of 2017. Vagneur (2004).
The SEC is the authority responsible for the supervision and the development of
the capital market. It is also responsible for licensing, regulation and supervision of its
participants, namely securities exchanges, securities brokers and dealers, investment
advisors, and collective investment schemes.
This chapter shall the salient provisions of the Securities Act No. 41 of 2016 which
Act repealed and replaced the Securities Act Cap 354 of 1993. It became necessary to do
this owing to changes in the financial sector that needed the regulatory framework to align
with current needs and challenges of the market. The new Act makes provision for an
enhanced regulatory framework which will help with efficient and effective supervision
and enforcement of the market. Its constitutive Act charges it with the responsibility of
among other functions, regulating, supervising and developing the securities industry in
Zambia. Vagneur (2004).
The regulatory powers of the Commission require that: any person dealing or
advising on securities must be licensed by the Commission; that any securities market must
be licensed as a securities exchange by SEC; that all securities of a public company which
are publicly traded must be registered by SEC and; that collective investment schemes must
be authorized by the Commission. Vagneur (2004). It must be noted that the Zambian
securities market has been designed as a ‘unified market’ where trading is conducted
through the stock exchange, this entails that securities of public companies that are not
listed are, nevertheless, quoted and traded on a second tier market within Lusaka Stock
Exchange (LUSE). Vagneur (2004).
LUSE is essentially a market place where share and bonds can be bought and sold.
It is made up of stock-broking corporate members, who conduct trade on behalf of their
customers. Vagneur (2004). It is incorporated as non-profit limited liability company, and
the main instruments traded on the Zambian securities markets are equities, government
bonds and corporate bonds. Vagneur (2004). Notably, five banks are registered by SEC as
dealers on LUSE, and these are Banc ABC Zambia Limited, Stanbic Bank Zambia Limited,
Standard Chartered Bank Zambia Plc, Citibank Zambia Limited and ZANACO. Vagneur
(2004).
The cited provision clearly shows that the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) has power to authorise the establishment of collective investment schemes and to
regulate the conduct of business of collective investment schemes in Zambia as provided
for in the Act. Thus, any banking institution intending to set up a collective investment
scheme in Zambia must first seek the authorization of the SEC. Mwenda has pointed out
that the complications of this are that, whereas banks remain under the prudential
supervision of the Bank of Zambia, collective investment schemes set up by banks fall
under the supervision of the SEC.
2.3.2 Registration
In order to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission the following
steps should be followed:
The first step would be for the company to convert to a public company and then
to file in a registration statement, accompanied with an application letter, sent through a
Designated Advisor (DA). The following documents need to be submitted along with the
foregoing:
• Certificate of incorporation
• Share certificate
• Board resolutions authorizing allotment and issue of shares
• Board resolution authorizing issue of the shares
• Audited Financial statements for the last three years or a shorter period
The role of SEC is to monitor if the proper procedure as laid down in the Rules
(Offer Timetable) is followed and also to ensure that all relevant disclosures which are
necessary for a shareholder to make a well informed decision on the merits and demerits
of the offer are included in the offer document. The information must also be made
available to shareholders early to give them sufficient time to make a proper decision.
There are two types of takeover offers namely, voluntary and mandatory. A
voluntary takeover offer may be made by any person to the shareholders of the company. A
mandatory offer is required to be made by any person who acquires more than 35% of the
voting rights of a company or by any person or persons who holds between 35% and 50%
of the voting rights of a company and acquires more than 5% of the rights of the company
in any twelve-month period. The principle here is that if the major shareholder who is in
control of the company changes then other shareholders should be given the option of
existing at a fair price.
The fees payable for authorization of takeover and merger transactions are contained
in Statutory Instrument No. 82 of 2013.
The PIA has regulatory and supervisory functions over insurance and reinsurance
companies and intermediaries, claims agents, assessors, loss adjusters, pension schemes,
fund managers, administrators and custodians. Even though the BoZ and the PIA are
corporate bodies that have regulatory functions, the authority to issue regulations
ultimately relies on the MOFNP, according to the laws that set up both agencies.
The Pensions and Insurance Authority (PIA) is the regulator of the pensions and
insurance industry in Zambia. It was established in 2015 through an amendment of the
Pensions Scheme Regulatory Act of 1997. The Pension and Insurance Authority (PIA) is
LS Banking Law and Practice 19 of 69
The Copperbelt University
independent regulator established by the Pensions and Insurance Act No. 27 of 2005 to
supervise the operations of insurance and pension schemes. As at 29 th March 2010, PIA
had licensed 231 insurance entities and among these four banks are registered as insurance
agencies. These are Barclays Bank Zambia Plc, Standard Chartered Bank Zambia Plc,
Stanbic Bank Zambia Limited and Finance Bank Zambia Limited.
For a long time, the only regulation related to insurance was the Insurance Act
1997, which lumped all forms of insurance, from health and life insurance to general and
motor-vehicle insurance under one umbrella. The following observations are also worth
noting.
The Insurance Act is the overall regulating act for the insurance industry. It details
the licensing, approved operating standards, personnel requirements, capital requirements
and reporting and compliance expected of insurance carriers and brokers. These
requirements are relatively steep for fintechs, especially start-ups with low financial
resources. For example, an insurance carrier must be able to demonstrate a minimum
capital requirement of ZMW10 million ($454,545)11 and the appointed chief executive
officer must have served in the insurance industry for no less than 10 years.
The Pension Scheme Regulation Act is the official act regulating the pensions
industry. Similar to the Insurance Act, it is currently skewed towards larger traditional
pension funds, setting steep requirements for capital adequacy and personnel. The Pension
Scheme Regulation Amendment establishes the PIA as a regulatory body to license,
regulate and supervise market operators in the pensions and insurance industry.
• The PIA Act of 1997 covers all forms of insurance, including life insurance. This
makes capital requirements (ZMW10 million ($454,545))10 for being an insurance carrier
quite steep given the capital necessary for life cover. The NFIS provides a basis, however,
for revising the act, given that it calls for the development of micro-pension and micro
insurance regulations.
• The pensions industry also carries steep capital adequacy requirements to protect
customer funds and guarantee solvency, limiting the ability of start-ups to compete against
established pension fund providers.
There are three other non-specialized government authorities with regulatory and
supervisory powers in the financial sector, namely:
i) the Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MOFNP);
ii) the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA); and
iii) the CCPC. The MOFNP is the authority in charge of licensing, regulating and
supervising moneylenders. In addition, it appoints the boards of directors of the state-
owned savings and credit bank. The MOA is in charge of registering all types of
cooperatives as well as providing them with assistance and advisory services, promoting
the development of the sector, and issuing specific rules.
The CCPA of 2010 transformed the Zambia Competition Commission into the
CCPC, a body under the Ministry of Commerce Trade and Industry in charge of promoting
competition and protecting consumers against unfair trading practices in the entire
economy. The CCPC may recommend the Ministry the issuance of regulations under the
CCPA, as well as appoint inspectors to ensure compliance with the CCPA. The CCPC has
the responsibility for general consumer protection in Zambia, including in relation to
financial products and services.
Zambia is one of the countries with highest levels of financial exclusion, which
seems to be associated with high costs of financial products and low consumer confidence
in formal financial providers. According to the 2009 FinScope survey, only around 23% of
adult population are served by a formal financial institution and 37% use some form of
formal or informal financial product. Some respondents mentioned that financial products
were too expensive to acquire (e.g. charges, premiums or required minimum balances were
too high), while others did not know much about financial products or did not trust financial
providers.
The existing legal framework for financial consumer protection is insufficient and
burdened with overlapping jurisdictions. The sector specific laws have limited provisions
related to consumer protection and contain a number of deficiencies (e.g. regarding
disclosure, business practices, etc.). Credit reporting is regulated by non-binding guidelines
issued by the BoZ, and statutory data protection provisions are limited. In addition, there
are overlaps between sector specific laws and the Competition and Consumer Protection
Act (CCPA). For example, both the CCPA and the Banking and Financial Services Act
(BFSA) contain provisions relating to competition in the banking sector, while the former
also includes consumer protection provisions applicable to customers of financial
institutions.
Carmicheal et al. (2004, p.27). It is now important to consider the pros and cons of
the fragmented model of supervision. Carmicheal et al. (2004, p.27). One of the advantages
of distinguishing three broad types of financial business namely, banking, insurance and
securities trading is to enable the objectives of supervision, that is effectiveness and
efficiency of regulation to be fully met by specialist regulators as they are only concerned
with individual entities in a group. Carmicheal et al. (2004, p.27). Effectiveness relates to
whether the objectives are met, while efficiency relates to whether they are met in an
efficient way and without imposing unnecessary costs on customers and regulated firms
Carmicheal et al. (2004, p.27).
Another advantage of this model, and the reason why several countries have not
vested the powers of supervision in a single unified agency is to guard against a unified
regulator and supervisor agency that would become an extremely powerful institution and
thus begin to have political influence. Carmicheal et al. (2004, p.27).
The fragmented model has two main disadvantages. One is that the fragmented
structure creates the problems of competitive inequality, inconsistencies, duplication and
gaps that arise because similar products offered by, for example banks and insurance
companies are regulated differently because they are supplied by different types of
financial firms. Carmicheal et al. (2004, p.27). Another disadvantage is that multiple
agencies supervising different financial sectors impair the overall effectiveness of the
financial firms as they engage in regulatory arbitrage. Abrams and Taylor (2000) described
the problem of regulatory arbitrage in the following terms: “Regulatory arbitrage can
involve the placement of a particular financial service or product in a given financial
conglomerate where the supervisory costs are lowest or where supervisory oversight is
least, thus leading to firms designing new financial institutions to minimize or avoid
supervisory oversight.
Horn (2002, p.163). The relationship between a banker and his customer depends
upon the nature of service provided by a banker. Horn (2002, p.163). Accepting deposits
and lending and/or investing are the core banking businesses of a bank. In addition to its
primary functions, it deals with various customers by providing other services like safe
custody services, safe deposit lockers, and assisting the clients by collecting their cheques
and other instruments as an agent and trustees for them. Horn (2002, p.163). So, based on
the above a banker customer relationship can be classified as under:
a) Debtor/Creditor
b) Creditor/Debtor
c) Bailee/Bailer
d) Lesser/Lessee
e) Agent/Principal
From the above, it can be seen that different types of relationship exist between a banker
and customer. (Horn, 2002, p.163).
However, Arora (1997, p.15). At common law, there have been several attempts to
define the terms ‘bank’ and ‘banking business.’ The courts have been preoccupied with
treating a bank as a bank institution that undertake the business of banking. Arora (1997,
p.15). Then, then, how do we define ‘banking business’? The courts have not given an
adequate definition of the term ‘bank’, while they have succeeded in spelling out some of
the characteristics which must be fulfilled for an institution to be treated as carrying on the
business of banking. Arora (1997, p.15).
The following are the basic characteristics to capture the essential features of Banking:
(i) Dealing in money: The banks accept deposits from the public and advance the same
as loans to the needy people. The deposits may be of different types - current, fixed,
savings, etc. accounts. The deposits are accepted on various terms and conditions.
(ii) Deposits must be withdrawable: The deposits (other than fixed deposits) made by
the public can be withdrawable by cheques, draft or otherwise, i.e., the bank issue and pay
cheques. The deposits are usually withdrawable on demand.
(iii) Dealing with credit: The banks are the institutions that can create credit i.e.,
creation of additional money for lending. Thus, “creation of credit” is the unique feature of
banking.
(iv) Commercial in nature: Since all the banking functions are carried on with the aim
of making profit, it is regarded as a commercial institution.
(v) Nature of agent: Besides the basic function of accepting deposits and lending
money as loans, bank possesses the character of an agent because of its various agency
services.
Gupta. (2014). The term ‘customer’ of a bank is not defined by law. The Banking
and Financial Service Act No. 7 of 2017 does not expressly define who a customer is.
Ordinarily, a person who has an account in a bank is considered is customer. Gupta. (2014).
Banking experts and the legal judgments in the past, however, used to qualify this statement
by laying emphasis on the period for which such account had actually been maintained
with the bank. (Gupta, 2014).
In Sir John Paget’s view “to constitute a customer there must be some recognizable
course or habit of dealing in the nature of regular banking business.” This definition of a
customer of a bank lays emphasis on the duration of the dealings between the banker and
the customer and is, therefore, called the ‘duration theory’. According to this viewpoint a
person does not become a customer of the banker on the opening of an account; he must
have been accustomed to deal with the banker before he is designated as a customer. The
above-mentioned emphasis on the duration of the bank account is now discarded.
According to Dr. Hart, “a customer is one who has an account with a banker or for whom
a banker habitually undertakes to act as such.”
A person becomes a customer of a bank when an account is opened for him and at
the same time a contract is formed. In the English case of Commissioners of Taxation v
English, Scottish and Australian Bank Limited [1920] AC 683 where the appellate court
was of the o pinion that:
“The word customer ‘signifies a relationship in which duration is not of the essence.
A person whose money has been accepted by the bank on the footing that they undertake
to honor cheques up to the amount standing to his credit is … a customer of the bank in the
sense of the statute, irrespective of whether his connection is of short or long standing.”
– a person or entity that maintains an account and/or has a business relationship with
the bank; – one on whose behalf the account is maintained (i.e. the beneficial owner);
– any person or entity connected with a financial transaction which can pose significant
reputational or other risks to the bank, say, a wire transfer or issue of a high value demand
draft as a single transaction.
It has been judicially held that a person may become a customer by entering into a
contract with the bank by way of opening some sort of account. (See Tax Commissioner
v. English, Scottish and Australian Bank [1920] AC 683. See also, W. S. Weerasooria,
Law Relating to Banking And Inter-Related Services, Colombo). A person may also
become a customer by entering into relations or negotiations with the bank, which are to
be considered part of the contract ultimately concluded by opening an account. Thus, in
Woods v. Martins Bank Ltd [1959] 1 QB 55, the bank-customer relationship was held to
have commenced from the time the bank accepted the plaintiff’s instructions though at that
time there was no account, but only the likelihood that an account would be opened, shortly
afterwards.
In the case of Foley v. Hill (1848) 2 HL Cas 28, it was held that the relationship
of bank and customer is one of contract. According to Paget, this relationship consists of a
“general contract”, together with “special contracts”. The former “is basic to all
transactions” and whereas the latter “could arise only as they are brought into being in
relation to specific transactions or banking services”. Hapgood, (2007, p. 145). The
distinction between general contract on the one hand, and special contracts on the other,
becomes useful when determining the duties and obligations of the bank from the
standpoint of the customer. Hapgood, (2007, p. 145). Unless contractually bound, banks
are generally free to decide whether they will provide particular services to their customers
or not. Cranston, (2002, p. 130). A bank is obliged to perform the ordinary services of
banking arising out of the “general contract” sometimes, even without the request of the
customer.
In the case of Joachimson v. Swiss Bank Corp. [1921] 3 KB 110 at 117, it was
held that in most of the circumstances, the relationship of banker and customer would
depend “entirely or mainly upon implied contract”. Implied terms would be important and
necessary for the bank-customer contracts due to couple of reasons.
Hapgood, (2007, p. 145). The general contracts between banks and their customers
would hardly incorporate all the terms in writing, whereas special contracts may commonly
incorporate printed terms and conditions of the bank. Hapgood, (2007, p. 145). It is unlikely
that customers would agree to all the terms when entering into a general contract with their
banks, such as opening an account. Hapgood, (2007, p. 145). Moreover, it would be
impracticable to reduce all the terms agreed between the bank and the customer to writing.
Above all, there may be implied terms in the bank-customer contracts, which are peculiar
to the banking practice, so that they cannot be displaced without affecting business
efficacy. Hapgood, (2007, p. 145).
On the opening of an account the banker assumes the position of a debtor. Hapgood,
(2007, p. 145). The bank is not a depository or trustee of the customer’s money because
the money over to the banker becomes a debt due from him to the customer. Hapgood,
(2007, p. 145). A banker does not accept the depositors’ money on such condition.
Hapgood, (2007, p. 145). The money deposited by the customer with the banker is, in legal
terms, lent by the customer to the banker, who makes use of the same according to his
discretion. The creditor has the right to demand back his money from the banker, and the
banker is under and obligation to repay the debt as and when he is required to do so. But it
is not necessary that the repayment is made in terms of the same currency notes and coins.
The payment, of course, must be made in terms of legal tender currency of the country.
Hapgood, (2007, p. 145).
In Foley v Hill (1848) 2 HLC 28, 9 ER 1002, it was held that a banker is not a
trustee of the customer. The relationship between them is that of a debtor and creditor.
Money deposited by a customer becomes the banker’s but creates an obligation on the
banker to repay an equivalent sum at any agreed interest rate to the customer. Thus a
customer’s claim against his banker for the loss of monies that had been drawn in his favour
out of a joint account with another customer that had subsequently been closed. (Note that
holding that the bank was a trustee would deny the banker ability to use the sums deposited
for lending to other parties. A trustee is not allowed to make profits out of the trust property
as all benefits must belong to the beneficiaries. This would make banking an unfruitful
undertaking).
Merriam Webster Dictionary, defines bailment, bailor, and bailee. A bailment is the
delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose upon a contract. As per the
contract, the goods should when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or disposed of
as per the directions of the person delivering the goods. The person delivering the goods is
called the bailer and the person to whom the goods are delivered is called the bailee.
Banks secure their loans and advances by obtaining tangible securities. In certain
cases, banks hold the physical possession of secured goods (pledge) – cash credit against
inventories; valuables – gold jewels (gold loans); bonds and shares (loans against shares
and financial instruments) In such loans and advances, the collateral securities are held by
banks and the relationship between banks and customers are that of bailee (bank) and
bailer. (borrowing customer).
Banks lease the safe deposit lockers (bank’s immovable property) to the clients on hire
basis. Banks allow their locker account holders the right to enjoy (make use of) the property
for a specific period against payment of rent.
Though the primary relationship between a banker and his customer is that of a
debtor and creditor or vice versa, the special features of this relationship, impose the
following additional obligations on the banker: Obligations to honour the cheques The
deposits accepted by a banker are his liabilities repayable on demand or otherwise. The
banker is, therefore, under a statutory obligation to honour his customer’s cheques in the
usual course. Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, lays down that:
“The drawee of a cheque having sufficient funds of the drawer in his hands,
properly applicable to the payment must compensate the drawer for any loss or damage
caused by such default.”
Ellinger (2006). The account of the customer in the books of the banker records all
of his financial dealings with the latter and the depicts the true state of his financial position.
If any of these facts is made known to others, the customer’s reputation may suffer and he
may incur losses also. Ellinger (2006). The banker is, therefore, under an obligation to take
utmost care in keeping secrecy about the accounts of his customers. By keeping secrecy is
meant that the account books of the bank will not be thrown open to the public or
Government officials and the banker will take all necessary precautions to ensure that the
state of affairs of a customer’s account is not made known to others by any means. Ellinger
(2006). The banker is thus under an obligation not to disclose deliberately or intentionally
any information regarding his customer’s accounts to a third party and also to take all
necessary precautions and care to ensure that no such information leaks out of the account
books. Ellinger (2006).
whatever reason banks end up releasing information that they should have kept secret.
Sometimes, the resulting breach of confidentiality is little more than technical (in other
words, nothing really flows from it), but occasionally it can have major consequences.
Ellinger (2006).
First of all, a banker’s duty of confidentiality is not absolute. The case of Tournier
v National Provincial and Union Bank of England (1924) KB 461, sets out four areas
where a bank can legally disclose information about its customer.
(iv) where the customer has agreed to the information being disclosed.
According Ellinger (2006). The duty of confidentiality extends beyond the date
when the banker-customer contracted is terminated. And exceptions to the duty can be seen
where the disclosure is under compulsion of the law. It should be noted, however, that the
duty of confidentiality on a bank is not an absolute concept. The common law recognizes
certain exceptions to the duty of confidentiality. These exceptions are mainly aimed at
preserving both the public interest and interests of the banks.
(iii) By order of the Court under the Banker’s Books Evidence Act, 1891. When
the court orders the banker to disclose information relating to a customer’s account, the
banker is bound to do so. In order to avoid the inconvenience likely to be caused to the
bankers from attending the Courts and producing their account books as evidence, the
Banker’s Books Evidence Act, 1891, provides that certified copies of the entries in the
banker’s book are to be treated as sufficient evidence and production of the books in the
Courts cannot be forced upon the bankers. According to Section 4 of the Act, “a certified
copy of any entry in a banker’s book shall in all legal proceedings be received as prima
facie evidence of the matters, transitions and accounts therein recorded in every case where,
and to the same extent, as the original entry itself is now by law admissible, but not further
or otherwise.” Thus if a banker is not a party to a suit, certified copy of the entries in his
book will be sufficient evidence. The Court is also empowered to allow any party to legal
proceedings to inspect or copy from the books of the banker for the purpose of such
proceedings.
Such order attaches the debts not secured by a negotiable instrument, by prohibiting
the creditor from recovering the debt and the debtor from the making payment thereof.
Gupta (2014, p.70). The account of the customer with the banker, thus, becomes suspended
and the banker is under an obligation not to make any payment from the account concerned
after the receipt of the Garnishee Order. Gupta (2014, p.70). The creditor at whose request
the order is issued is called the judgement- creditor, the debtor whose money is frozen is
called judgement- debtor and the banker who is the debtor of the judgement debtor is called
the Garnishee. Gupta (2014, p.70).
Gupta (2014, p.70). In simple words the garnishee is the person who is liable to pay
a debt to judgment debtor or to deliver any movable property to him. Gupta (2014, p.70).
Besides Judgment Debtor and decree Holder, Garnishee is a third person in whose hands
debt of the judgment debtor is kept. The Garnishee Order is issued in two parts: Gupta
(2014, p.70).
First, the Court directs the banker to stop payment out of the account of the
judgement- debtor. Gupta (2014, p.70). Such order, called Order Nisi, also seeks
explanation from the banker as to why the funds in the said account should not be utilized
for the judgement- creditor’s claim. Gupta (2014, p.70). The banker is prohibited from
paying the amount due to his customer on the date of receipt of the Order Nisi. Gupta
(2014, p.70). He should, therefore, immediately inform the customer so that dishonour of
any cheque issued by him may be avoided. Gupta (2014, p.70).
After the banker files his explanation, if any, the Court may issue the financial
order, called Order Absolute where the entire balance in the account or a specified amount
is attached to be handed over to the judgement- creditor. Gupta (2014, p.70). On receipt of
such an order to the banker is bound to pay the garnished funds to the judgement- creditor.
Gupta (2014, p.70). Thereafter, the banker liabilities towards his customer are discharged
to that extent. Gupta (2014, p.70). The suspended account may be revived after payment
has been made to the judgement-creditor as per the directions of the Court. Gupta (2014,
p.70).
Gupta (2014, p.70) says that the payment made by the garnishee into the court
pursuant to the notice shall be treated as a valid discharge to him as against the judgment
debtor. The court may direct that such amount may be paid to the decree holder towards
the satisfaction of the decree and costs of the execution. (Gupta, 2014, p.70).
The bank upon whom the order is served is called Garnishee. The depositor who
owes money to another person is called judgement debtor. Features of the Garnishee Order
are as under;
Gupta (2014, p.70). Where neither the garnishee makes the payment into the court,
as ordered, nor appears and shows any cause in answer to the notice, the court may order
the garnishee to comply with such notice as if such order were a decree against him. Gupta
(2014, p.70). The costs of the garnishee proceedings are at the discretion of the court.
Orders passed in garnishee proceedings are appealable as Decrees. Gupta (2014, p.70).
According to Gupta (2014, p.74). In case of his usual business, a banker receives
payments from his customer. Gupta (2014, p.74). If the latter has more than one account
or has taken more than one loan from the banker, the question of the appropriation of the
money subsequently deposited by him naturally arises. Gupta (2014, p.74). In case a
customer has a single account and he deposits and withdraws money from it frequently,
the order in which the credit entry will set off the debit entry is the chronological order, as
decided in the famous Clayton’s Case. Devaynes v Noble 35 ER 781, best known for the
claim contained in Clayton's case. Gupta (2014, p.74).
Thus the first item on the debit side will be the item to be discharged or reduced by
a subsequent item on the credit side. Gupta (2014, p.74). The credit entries in the account
adjust or set-off the debit entries in the chronological order. The rule derived from the
Clayton’s case is of great practical significance to the bankers. (Gupta, 2014, p.74).
One of the important rights enjoyed by a banker is the right of general lien. (Gupta,
2014, p.74). Lien means the right of the creditor to retain the goods and securities owned
by the debtor until the debt due from him is repaid. (Gupta, 2014, p.74). It confers upon
the creditor the right to retain the security of the debtor and not the right to sell it. (Gupta,
2014, p.74). Such right can be exercised by the creditor in respect of goods and securities
entrusted to him by the debtor with the intention to be retained by him as security for a debt
due by him (debtor). (Gupta, 2014, p.74).
(Gupta, 2014, p.74). Lien may be either (i) a general lien or, (ii) a particular lien.
(Gupta, 2014, p.74). A particular lien can be exercised by a craftsman or a person who has
spent his time, labour and money on the goods retained. (Gupta, 2014, p.74). In such cases
goods are retained for a particular debt only. (Gupta, 2014, p.74). For example, a tailor has
the right to retain the clothes made by him for his customer until his tailoring charges area
paid by the customer. (Gupta, 2014, p.74). So is the case with public carriers and the repair
shops.
A general lien, on the other hand, is applicable in respect of all amounts due from
the debtor to the creditor. (Gupta, 2014, p.74).
(i) The banker possesses the right of general lien on all goods and securities
entrusted to him in his capacity as a banker and in the absence of a contract inconsistent
with the right of lien. (Gupta, 2014, p.74). Thus, he cannot exercise his right of general lien
if – (a) the goods and securities have been entrusted to the banker as a trustee or an agent
of the customer; and (b) a contract express or implied exists between the customer and the
banker which is inconsistent with the banker’s right of general lien. (Gupta, 2014, p.74).
In other words, if the goods or securities are entrusted for some specific purpose, the banker
cannot have a lien over them. (Gupta, 2014, p.74).
Gupta (2014, p.76). The right of set-off is a statutory right which enables a debtor
to take into account a debt owed to him by a creditor, before the latter could recover the
debt due to him from the debtor. Gupta (2014, p.76). In other words, the mutual claims of
debtor and creditor are adjusted together and only the remainder amount is payable by the
debtor. Gupta (2014, p.76). A banker, like other debtors, possesses this right of set-off
which enables him to combine two accounts in the name of the same customer and to adjust
the debit balance in one account with the credit balance in the other. For example, A has
taken an overdraft from his banker to the extent of K5,000 and he has a credit balance of
K2,000 in his savings bank account, the banker can combine both of these accounts and
claim the remainder amount of K3,000 only. This right of set-off can be exercised by the
banker if there is no agreement express or implied contrary to this right and after a notice
is served on the customer intimating the latter about the former’s intention to exercise the
right of set-off. (Gupta, 2014, p.76).
As a creditor, a banker has the implied right to charge interest on the advances
granted to the customer. Gupta (2014, p.78). Bankers usually follow the practice of debiting
the customer’s account periodically with the amount of interest due from the customer.
Gupta (2014, p.76). The agreement between the banker and the customer may, on the other
hand, stipulate that interest may be charged at compound rate also. (Gupta, 2014, p.76).
1. Voluntary Termination:
The customer has a right to close his demand deposit account because of change of
residence or dissatisfaction with the service of the banker or for any other reason, and the
banker is bound to comply with this request. Gupta (2014, p.82). The banker also may
decide to close an account, due to an unsatisfactory conduct of the account or because it
finds the customer undesirable for certain reasons. Gupta (2014, p.82). However, a banker
can close an account only after giving a reasonable notice to the customer. Gupta (2014,
p.82). However, such cases of closure of an account at the instance of the banker are quite
rare, since the cost of securing and opening a new account is much higher than the cost of
closing an account. Gupta (2014, p.82). If a customer directs the banker in writing to close
his account, the banker is bound to comply with such direction. Gupta (2014, p.82). The
latter need not ask the reasons for the former’s direction. Gupta (2014, p.82). The account
must be closed with immediate effect and the customer be required to return the unused
cheques. (Gupta, 2014, p.82).
Gupta (2014, p.82) says that if an account remains un-operated for a very long
period, the banker may request the customer to withdraw the money. Gupta (2014, p.82).
Such step is taken on the presumptions that the customer no longer needs the account.
Gupta (2014, p.82). If the customer could not be traced after reasonable effort, the banker
usually transfers the balance to an “Unclaimed Deposit Account”, and the account is
closed. Gupta (2014, p.82). The balance is paid to the customers as and when he is traced.
Gupta (2014, p.82). The banker is also competent to terminate his relationship with the
customer, if he finds that the latter is no more a desirable customer. Gupta (2014, p.82).
The banker takes this extreme step in circumstances when the customer is guilty of
conducting his account in an unsatisfactory manner, i.e. if the customer is convicted for
forging cheques or bills or if he issues cheques without sufficient funds or does not fulfil
his commitment to pay back the loans or overdrafts, etc. Gupta (2014, p.82). The banker
should take the following steps for closing such an account. (Gupta, 2014, p.82).
(a) The banker should give to the customer due notice of his intention to close the
account and request him to withdraw the balance standing to his credit. Gupta (2014, p.82).
This notice should give sufficient time to the customer to make alternative arrangements.
Gupta (2014, p.82). The banker should not, on his own, close the account without such
notice or transfer the same to any other branch. (Gupta, 2014, p.82).
(b) If the customer does not close the account on receipt of the aforesaid notice, the
banker should give another notice intimating the exact date by which the account be closed
otherwise the banker himself will close the account. Gupta (2014, p.82). During this notice
period the banker can safely refuse to accept further credits from the customer and can also
refuse to issue fresh cheque book to him. Gupta (2014, p.82). Such steps will not make him
liable to the customer and will be in consonance with the intention of the notice to close
account by a specified date. (Gupta, 2014, p.82).
The banker should, however, not refuse to honour the cheques issued by the
customer, so long as his account has a credit balance that will suffice to pay the cheque.
Gupta (2014, p.83). If the banker dishonours any cheque without sufficient reasons, he will
be held liable to pay damages to his customer under Section 31 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881. Gupta (2014, p.83). In case of default by the customer to close the
account, the banker should close the account and send the money by draft to the customer.
Gupta (2014, p.83). He will not be liable for dishonouring cheques presented for payment
subsequently. (Gupta, 2014, p.83).
3. Termination by Law:
The relationship of a banker-customer can also be terminated by the process of law and
by the occurrence of the following events:
Gupta (2014, p.83). On receiving notice or information of the death of a customer, the
bank stops all debit transactions in the account. Gupta (2014, p.83). However, credits to
the account can be permitted. Gupta (2014, p.83). The balance in the account is given to
the legal representative of the deceased after obtaining the letters of administration, or
succession certificate, or indemnity bond as per the prescribed procedure, and only then,
the account is closed. (Gupta, 2014, p.83).
After receiving a garnishee order from a court or attachment order from the court, the
account can be closed as one of the options after taking the required steps. Gupta (2014,
p.83).
A lunatic/person of unsound mind is not competent to contract under law. Gupta (2014,
p.83). Since banker-customer relationship is contractual, the bank will not honour cheques
and can close the account after receiving notice about the insanity of the customer and
receiving a confirmation about it through medical reports. Gupta (2014, p.83).
SUMMARY
Payment Systems play a vital role in the economy of a country. A payment system
is a system used to settle financial transactions through the transfer of monetary value and
consist of the various mechanisms that facilitate for the transfer of funds from one party
(the payer) to another (the payee). A payment system includes the participants (institutions)
and the users (customers/clients), the rules and regulations that guide its operation and the
standards and technologies on which the system operates.
In Zambia the Payment System is regulated by the National Payment Systems Act
is an act of parliament that was enacted on 12th April, 2007. The purpose of the Act is to
provide a legal backing for the operation of the various payment mechanism in Zambia.
The Act empowers the Bank of Zambia to provide regulatory function that ensure safe,
secure and reliable.
Cash payments (notes and coins) remain the predominantly used retail payment
media in shops and between individuals and have shown a growing trend in the last few
years. There is no maximum limit to the amount of notes and coins that can be accepted as
legal tender. For non-cash payments, cheque is the predominant media used by both
individuals and corporate entities.
The main non-cash payment media used by the non-banks is the cheque. There are
other instruments like credit/debit cards which have recently been introduced by some
banks. The post office plays an important role in money transmission in rural areas through
telegraphic transfer and money orders.
The use of credit transfer is very limited. The main credit transfer are government
transfers of salaries to various civil servants’ accounts with commercial banks to reduce
issues of many individual cheques. Banks with a wide network of branches accept, at a fee,
individual credit transfers to another branch account holder. There is no developed credit
transfer system for utility companies like ZESCO (electricity bills) and ZAMTEL
(telephone bills). To some extent large corporate companies transfer certain payments by
instructing their bank to debit their account and credit the payee’s bank account. These
transfers are normally same day, large-value and settled through the central bank.
4.3.2 Cheques
Section 2 of the National Payment Systems Act No.43 of 1996 of the Laws of
Zambia defines a cheque as a bill of exchange drawn on a banker payable on demand or at
a fixed or determinable future time. Cheques are the most used payment media. Banks issue
cheques to their customers on various types of accounts on which cheques can be drawn.
Only banks with settlement accounts at the central bank issues cheques. A cheque
is an acceptable media especially for large amounts which would not be settled by cash.
However, its popularity and acceptability is limited by a number of factors, such as the
clearing period. Cheques deposited after 12:00 hours will be processed (Cleared) the
following business day and value given at 12:00 hours on the third day for local and up-
country cheques respectively and the high incidence of fraud.
A cheque is nothing but a bill of exchange with special features (i) It is always
payable on demand (A bill of exchange can be payable on demand/at sight and/or after a
specific term called as usance bill) (ii) always drawn on a specified banker i.e., the drawee
of a cheque is the banker on whom the cheque is drawn. The banker with whom the
customer holds his/her account. This drawee bank is called the paying bank.
(iii) Payee – A person whose name is mentioned in the cheque or to whom the drawee
makes payment. If drawer has drawn the cheque in favour of self, then drawer is payee.
Apart from the above three parties, others involved in payment and collection of
cheques are: (i) Endorser: The person who transfers his right to another person and
(ii) Endorsee: The person to whom the right is transferred
(1) Open Cheque: A cheque is classified as ‘Open’ when cash payment is allowed
across the counter of the bank.
(2) Bearer Cheque: A cheque which is payable to any person who holds and
presents it for payment at the bank counter is called a ‘Bearer cheque’. A bearer cheque
can be transferred by mere delivery without any endorsement.
Section 123 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1818 provides that where a cheque
bears across its face an addition of the words “and company” or any abbreviation thereof,
between two parallel transverse lines, or of two parallel transverse lines simply, either with
or without the words “not negotiable”, that addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the
cheque shall be deemed to be crossed generally. (Gupta, 2014, p.105).
Section 124 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1818 provides that where a cheque
bears across its face an addition of the name of a banker, either with or without the words
“not negotiable”, that addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the cheque shall be deemed
to be crossed specially, and to be crossed to that banker. (Gupta, 2014, p.105).
Section 126 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1818 provides that where a cheque is
crossed generally, the banker on whom it is drawn shall not pay it otherwise than to a
banker. Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker on whom it is drawn shall not pay
it otherwise than to the banker to whom it is crossed, or his agent for collection. (Gupta,
2014, p.105).
Section 130 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1818 provides that a person taking a
cheque crossed generally or specially, bearing in either case the words “not negotiable”,
shall not have, and shall not be capable of giving, a better title to the cheque than that which
the person form whom he took it had. Thus, mere writing words ‘Not negotiable’ does not
mean that the cheque is not transferable. It is still transferable, but the transferee cannot get
title better than what transferor had. (Gupta, 2014, p.105).
While cheques are the predominant non-cash payment instrument, banks and the
Government are promoting other paperless payment media such as direct debit and
standing payment order. These instruments are perceived as an improvement in providing
an efficient service to customers by reducing the number of cheques issued for salary
payments. Though currently these instructions are paper based, it is envisaged that large
organisations that generate a large number of these payments will prepare them in
electronic form for direct debiting of the organisations accounts and direct crediting of
employee accounts.
Direct debits for the settlement of utility bills has now been developed in Zambia.
A variety of cards have been issued by the major banks and one non-banks for local
use only.
Debit Cards. On bank issues debit cards to its customers which are used in the
bank itself (through its branches), hotels, filing stations and some supermarkets. The
customer’s account is debited on the use of the card.
Credit cards. One non-bank, financial institution issues a credit card to its
customers which is used in selected outlets. Customers are given a time limit within which
to settle the bill.
ATM and POS networks. Have in Zambia have introduced ATMs at some of their
branches for cash withdrawals. These ATMs are for the exclusive use of each bank except
for a few remote (rural) branches.
Post Office. The Post Office service also plays a marginal role in finds transfer
through its branch network throughout the country. The main instruments used are:
- Postal orders;
- Money order; and
- Telegraphic money transfers
These are mainly local transactions. The Post Office also plays an important role in
retail money transmission through its network for the remittance of Government
pensions to retired civil servants.
Traveller’s cheque. Most banks issue intentional traveller’s cheques like VISA,
Thomas Cook, American Express and Master Card denominated in US Dollars or
British Pounds Sterling for international travel. Local traveller’s cheques denominated
in Kwacha are issued and acceptable in most outlets and for customers’ payments.
There are two distinct interbank exchange and settlement systems, one based on
bilateral settlement (bank to bank, interbank dealing) and other based on multilateral net
clearing and settlement (through the Clearing House). The interbank dealing caters for
large-value transactions of a time critical nature and provides same day value. The Clearing
House transactions are small value cheque payments. Settlement from the interbank
dealing and the Clearing House are through the books of the central bank at the end of day.
cheques. Currently there are two clearing houses for cheques, one for local currency and
the other for foreign currency denominated in US dollars and British pounds sterling.
Section 2 of the National Payment Systems Act No.43 of 1996 of the Laws of
Zambia defines clearing house to mean a corporation, association, partnership or agency
that provides clearing or settlement services for a designated payment system but does not
include a stock exchange.
According to the National Payment Systems Act, clearing house rules means the
common rules or standardized arrangements issued by a clearing house for a payment
system that has been approved by the Bank of Zambia.
Gupta (2014, p.108). The Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 deals with negotiable
instruments like promissory notes, bills of exchanges, cheques and similar payment
instruments such as demand drafts, dividend warrants, etc. Gupta (2014, p.108). A banker
in his capacity as a banker deals with the above mentioned negotiable instruments on
different occasions. For instance, in Zambia, the National Payment Systems Act lays down
the law relating to payment of a customer’s cheque by a banker and also the protection
available to a banker. The relationship between a banker and customer, being debtor-
creditor relationship the banker is bound to pay the cheques drawn by his customer. This
duty on the part of the banker, to honour his customers’ mandate, is laid down in Section
31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. (Gupta, 2014, p.108).
Section 5 of the Cheques Act Chapter 424 of the Laws of Zambia grants protection
to a paying banker. Furthermore, sections 10, 85, 85A, 89 and 128 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 grants protection to a paying banker.
The customer who has deposited money with a bank being a creditor has the right to
ask back the money from the banker who is a debtor. The duty on the part of the banker to
pay has been laid down in Section 31 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in the
following terms:
Section 31 “The drawee of a cheque having sufficient funds of the drawer in his
hands properly applicable to the payment of such cheque must pay the cheque when duly
required to do so, and, in default of such payment, must compensate the drawer for any
loss or damage caused by such default.”
2. Sufficient funds: The banker should have sufficient funds of the drawer, i.e. there
should be sufficient credit balance in the customer’s account.
3. Properly available: The funds available in the customer’s account, should also
be properly available to the payment of the cheque. The funds may not be available to pay
the cheque if: (a) the banker has exercised his right of set off for amounts due from the
customer; (b) there is an order passed by a Court, competent authority or other lawful
authority restraining the bank from making payment.
4. When duly required to do so: The banker is duty bound to pay the cheque only
when he is duly required to do so. This means that the cheque must be properly drawn and
signed by the drawer.
5. Compensate the drawer: In case the banker refuses payment wrongfully, then he
is liable only to the drawer of the cheque and not to any endorsee or holder, except when
(a) the bank is wound up, in which case the holder becomes a creditor entitled to make a
claim; (b) the banker pays a cheque disregarding the crossing, the true owner can hold the
banker liable.
6. Loss or damage caused by default: A banker is liable to the drawer for any loss
or damage which may have occurred to the drawer due to the wrongful dishonour of the
customer’s cheque.
(a) For a paying banker to claim protection under the Negotiable Instruments Act,
one of the criteria he has to satisfy is that the payment is in due course. As to what is
payment in due course has been stated in Section 10 which reads as follows:
“Payment in due course” means payment in accordance with the apparent tenor of
the instrument in good faith and without negligence to any person in possession thereof
under circumstances which does not afford a reasonable ground for believing that he is not
entitled to, receive payment of the amount therein mentioned.
From the above definition it can be seen that payment in due course requires the
payment to be made:
Section 128 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1818 states that “where the banker on
whom a crossed cheque is drawn has paid the same in due course, the banker paying the
cheque, and in case such cheque has come to the hands of the payee the drawer thereof,
shall respectively be entitled to the same rights, and be placed in the same position in all
respects, as they would respectively be entitled to and placed in if the amount of the cheque
has been paid to and received by the true owner thereof.
Gupta (2014, p.113). Collection of cheques, bills of exchange and other instruments
on behalf of a customer is an indispensable service rendered by a banker to his customer.
Gupta (2014, p.113). When a customer of a banker receives a cheque drawn on any other
banker he has two options before him – (i) either to receive its payment personally or
through his agent at the drawee bank, or (ii) to send it to his banker for the purpose of
collection from the drawee bank. Gupta (2014, p.113). In the latter case the banker,
deputed to collect the amount of the cheque from another banker, is called the ‘collecting
banker’. Gupta (2014, p.113). He presents the cheque for encashment to the drawee banker
and on its realization credits the account of the customer with the amount so realized. Gupta
(2014, p.113).
A banker is under no legal obligation to collect his customer’s cheques but collection
of cheques has now become an important function of a banker with the growth of banking
habit and with wider use of crossed cheques, which are invariably to be collected through
a banker only. Gupta (2014, p.114). While collecting his customer’s cheques, a banker acts
either
(i) as a holder for value, or
(ii) as an agent of the customer.
The legal position of the collecting banker, therefore, depends upon the capacity in
which he collects the cheques. Gupta (2014, p.114). If the collecting banker pays to the
customer the amount of the cheque or credits such amount to his account and allows him
to draw on it, before the amount of the cheque is actually realized from the drawee banker,
the collecting banker is deemed to be its ‘holder for value’. Gupta (2014, p.114). He takes
an undertaking from the customer to the effect that the latter will reimburse the former in
case of dishonour of the cheque. (Gupta, 2014, p.114).
Section 131 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 grants protection to a collecting
banker and reads as follows:
The provisions of the above section have been applied to drafts as per Section 131 A
of the Negotiable Instruments Act. (Gupta, 2014, p.114).
4.11 Duty to open the account with references and sufficient documentary proof
Gupta (2014, p.118). The duty to open an account only after the new account holder
has been properly introduced to is too well grained into today’s banker’s mind that it would
be impossible to find an account without introduction. Gupta (2014, p.118). The necessity
to obtain introduction of a good customer is to keep off crooks and fraudsters who may
open accounts to collect forged cheques or other instruments. (Gupta, 2014, p.118).
In this regard the English Decision Ladbroke vs Todd (1914) 30 TLR 433 can be
referred to. In this case a thief stole a cheque in transit and collected the same through a
banker where he had opened an account without reference and by posing himself as the
payee whose signature the thief forged. After the cheque was collected the thief withdrew
the amount. The bank was held liable to make good the amount since it acted negligently
while opening the account in as much as it had not obtained any reference. (Gupta, 2014,
p.118).
The collecting bank has to make necessary enquiries before any third party cheques
are collected on behalf of its customer. In Ross vs London County Westminster and
Parrs Bank Ltd. [1919] 1 KB 678, cheques payable to “the Officer in charge, Estate
Office, Canadian Overseas Military Force” were used by an individual to pay off his debts.
There was an instruction in all the cheques that it was negotiable by the concerned officer.
However, it was held that the fact that the cheques were drawn in favour of the Officer in
charge should have put the banker on enquiry and since no such enquiry was made by the
banker the bank is liable on the grounds of negligence.
Gupta (2014, p.118). The collecting banker is required to take into account the status
of the customer and also the various transactions that have taken place in the customer’s
account so as to know the circumstances and the standard of living of the customer. Gupta
(2014, p.118). If for example, a person is an employee and the nature of his employment
is that of a clerk his salary would be known to the bank and any substantial credits by way
of collection of cheques would be suspected and it would be the duty of the banker to take
necessary precautions while collecting such cheques. (Gupta, 2014, p.118).
For instance, in Nu-Stilo Footwear Ltd. vs Lloyds Bank Ltd. [1956] 7 Legal
Decisions Affecting Bankers P. 121, the plaintiffs who were manufacturer of ladies
footwear were defrauded by their Secretary and Works Accountant who converted 9
cheques payable to the plaintiffs into his account. The Secretary opened the accounts in the
defendant bank in a false name and as reference gave his real name. The bank thereupon
called the reference and got a satisfactory reply which included the fact that the account
holder had recently come down from Oxford and intended setting up a business of his own.
The Secretary thereupon presented 9 cheques totally aggregating to £ 4855. Since these
cheques were drawn on the plaintiffs they sued the defendant bank who had collected the
cheques. The Court held that the collecting bank was negligent in as much as the collecting
bank did not take necessary precautions because the amounts collected were inconsistent
with the business of the account holder and therefore necessary enquires should have been
made by the bank.
4.14 Duty to verify the instruments or any apparent defect in the instruments
Sometimes the instrument which is presented for collection would convey to the
banker a warning that a customer who has presented the instrument for collection is either
committing a breach of trust or is misappropriating the money belonging to some other. In
case the banker does not heed the warning which is required of a prudent banker then he
could be held liable on the grounds of negligence as can be seen from the case of
Underwood Ltd. v Bank of Liverpool Martin Ltd. [1924] 1 KB 775, the Managing
Director of a company paid into his private account large number of cheques which were
to be paid into the company’s account and the bank was held negligent since it did not
make enquiries as to whether the Managing Director was in fact entitled to the amounts
represented by these cheques. (Gupta, 2014, p.118).
According to Gupta (2014, p.163). The trade can be classified into Inland and
International. Due to the geographical proximities of the importers and the exporters, banks
are involved in LC transactions to avoid default in payment (credit risks). Gupta (2014,
p.163). To facilitate trade and also to enable the exporter and importer to receive and pay
for the goods sold and bought, letter of credit is used as a tool. Gupta (2014, p.163). Letter
of credit mechanism that the payment and receipts (across the globe) are carried out in an
effective manner. (Gupta, 2014, p.163).
2. Issuing bank (importer’s bank which issues the LC [also known as Opening banker
of LC])
3. Beneficiary (exporter)
– Opening bank (a bank which issues the LC at the request of its customer [importer])
– Negotiating bank (the exporter’s bank, which handles the documents submitted by
the exporter. The bank also finances the exporter against the documents submitted under a
LC)
– Confirming bank (the bank that confirms the credit)
(a) Sight Credit – Under this LC, documents are payable at sight/ upon
presentation
(b) Acceptance Credit/ Time Credit – The Bills of Exchange which are drawn,
payable after a period, are called usance bills. Under acceptance credit usance bills are
accepted upon presentation and eventually honoured on due dates. (Gupta, 2014, p.119).
(c) Revocable and Irrevocable Credit – A revocable LC is a credit, the terms and
conditions of the credit can be amended/ cancelled by the Issuing bank, without prior notice
to the beneficiaries. An irrevocable credit is a credit, the terms and conditions of which can
neither be amended nor cancelled without the consent of the beneficiary. Hence, the
opening bank is bound by the commitments given in the LC. (Gupta, 2014, p.119).
(e) Back-to-Back credit – In a back to back credit, the exporter (the beneficiary)
requests his banker to issue a LC in favour of his supplier to procure raw materials, goods
on the basis of the export LC received by him. This type of LC is known as Back-to-Back
credit. Example: An Indian exporter receives an export LC from his overseas client in
Netherlands. The Indian exporter approaches his banker with a request to issue a LC in
favour of his local supplier of raw materials. The bank issues a LC backed by the export
LC. (Gupta, 2014, p.119).
(i) It should be drawn by the beneficiary on the opening bank (ii) It should clearly
indicate the amount and other details
(iii) Depending upon the LC terms a Bill of Exchange may be drawn as a sight bill
or an usance bill (iv) It should clearly indicate the LC number. (Gupta, 2014, p.165).
(c) Transport Documents: When goods are shipped from one port to another port
the transport document issued is called the bill of lading. Gupta (2014, p.165). Goods can
be transported by means of airways, roadways and railways depending upon the situations.
Gupta (2014, p.165). In case goods are transported by means of water ways, the document
is called bill of lading, by airways it is known as airway bills and by roadways called as
lorry receipt and by railways it is known as railway receipt. Gupta (2014, p.165). In case
of a single transaction, when different modes are used to transport the goods from the
beneficiary’s country to the importer’s destination, a single transport document can be used
viz., Multi model transport document. (Gupta, 2014, p.165).
For ease of reference the most commonly used document i.e., Bill of Lading is
discussed here.
Gupta (2014, p.166). The B/ L is the shipment document, evidencing the movement
of goods from the port of acceptance (in exporter’s country) to the port of destination (in
importer’s country). Gupta (2014, p.166). It is a receipt, signed and issued by the shipping
company or authorized agent. Gupta (2014, p.166). It should be issued in sets (as per the
terms of credit). (Gupta, 2014, p.166).
As per the terms and conditions of the credit, a bill of lading should clearly
indicate: Gupta (2014, p.166).
(iii) drawn to the order of the shipper, blank endorsed or in favour of the opening
banks
(iv) the gross and net weight
(b) It should be issued in the same currency in which the LC has been issued
(d) The date of issuance of the policy/ certificate should be on or before the date of
issuance of the shipment, and should clearly indicate that the cover is available from the
date of shipment
(e) Unless otherwise specified, it should be issued for an amount of 110% of CIF
value of goods
(f) The description of the goods in the policy/certificate should be as per the terms
of the credit
(g) The other important details like the port of shipment, port of destination etc
needs to be clearly indicated
Other documents:
Gupta (2014, p.166). As per the terms of LC, all required documents have to be
submitted by the beneficiary. Documents like Certificate of Origin (issued by the Chamber
of Commerce), indicates the origin of goods. The origin of goods should not be from any
prohibited nations. Gupta (2014, p.166).
Packing list, required certificates, etc. should be drawn as per the terms and
conditions of the credit. Gupta (2014, p.166).
– The Savings Bank Rules must be made available to account holders while opening
the accounts.
(i) Banks, Local Authorities and Govt. Departments (excl. public sector undertakings or
quasi Government bodies);
– Banks need not insist for the presence of account holder for making cash withdrawal of
‘self’ or bearer cheques unless circumstance so warrants.
– Only one set of photographs need be obtained and separate photographs need not be
obtained for each category of deposit.
– While opening the accounts, the account holders should be informed in transparent
manner the requirement of minimum balance and other charges, etc. Revision in charges
also needs to be advised from to time.
– Banks may purchase cheques, drafts, etc. deposited in the account for clearing in case of
suspension of clearing operations temporally or apprehension of prolonging the
suspension. This facility is extended to customers upon examining the credit worthiness,
integrity, past dealing, occupation, etc. so as to guard themselves from the possibilities of
such instrument being dishonored subsequently.
– Savings Bank Pass Books must be provided invariably to all customers. In case of
account statement, the same should be mailed to the customers regularly. These facilities
should be provided at Bank’s cost. Updating the pass book periodically should also be
arranged by the banks.
– Banks are required to issue term deposit receipt indicating therein full details, such
as, date of issue, period of deposit, due date, applicable rate of interest, etc.
– Term Deposit Receipts can be freely transferable from one office of bank to
another.
– In order to extend better service, banks should ensure sending of intimation of
impending due date of maturity well in advance to their depositors. Change in rate of
interest should be advised well in advance to the customers.
– Deposits repayable in less than three months or where the terminal quarter is
incomplete, interest should be paid proportionately for the actual number of days reckoning
the year at 365 days or 366 days in case of leap year.
– Banks may allow premature withdrawal of Term Deposits at the request of the
depositor and interest on the deposit for the period that it has remained with the bank will
be paid at the rate applicable Banks have the freedom to fix penal interest on such
withdrawal. No interest need be paid where premature withdrawal takes place before
completion of the minimum period prescribed.
– Banks may renew the frozen accounts upon obtaining suitable request letter for
renewal. No renewal receipt be issued but suitable noting may be done in the deposit
account. Renewal of the deposit may be advised to the concerned Enforcement Authority
by registered post/Speed Post/Courier. Overdue interest may be paid as per the policy
adopted by the banks.
– Banks are required to ensure that their branches invariably accept cash over the
counters from all their customers who desire to deposit cash at the counters. No product
can be designed which is not in tune with the basic tenets of banking i.e. acceptance of
cash.
– Notwithstanding the legal provisions, opening of fixed/recurring and savings bank
accounts be permitted in the name of minor with mother as guardian provided bank take
adequate safeguards in allowing operations in the accounts by ensuring that such accounts
are not allowed to be overdrawn and that they always remain in credit.
– Banks while opening current account must obtain a declaration to the effect that
the account holder is not enjoying any credit facilities with any other bank. Banks must
scrupulously ensure that their branches do not open current accounts of entities which enjoy
credit facilities (fund based or non-fund based) from the banking system without
specifically obtaining a No-Objection Certificate from the lending bank(s).
Banks should ensure that the service charges fixed are reasonable and they are not
out of line with the cost of providing such services. Customers with low volume of
transactions are not penalized.
Traditionally, insolvency legislation in Zambia has been part of the Companies Act
Chapter 388 of the Laws of Zambia. In 2017 the Parliament of Zambia enacted the
country’s first stand-alone Corporate Insolvency Act No. 9 of 2017. The new legislation
was brought into force through a Commencement Order, Statutory Instrument No. 47 of
2018, issued in June 2018. The prescribed forms for the implementation of the act were
issued in July 2019, through statutory orders No. 40 and 41 of 2019.
Part X of the Banking and Financial Services Act No. 7 of 2017 provides for
Insolvency, dissolution and liquidation of financial service providers. In particular section
2 of Act No.7 of 2017 defines insolvency as a situation where a financial service provider
—
(a) is unable to pay debts as they fall due;
Section 120 (1) of Act No. 7 of 2017 states that despite the Corporate Insolvency
Act, 2017, or any other law, an insolvent financial service provider shall not—
(b) enter into any new, or continue to conduct existing, banking or financial service
business, except that which is necessary or incidental to the orderly realization,
conservation and preservation of the assets of a financial service provider.
The insolvency provisions in the Zambian Companies Act, like those in many other
commonwealth countries are premised on English law. Many jurisdictions including
England have undertaken insolvency law reform to introduce modern and workable
concepts such as those aimed at facilitating corporate rescue, enhancing director’s
responsibility, providing for expeditious and non-court based procedures, among others.
Since a Bank is a company will still be regulated both by the provisions in the Corporate
Insolvency Act No. 9 of 2017 and the Banking and Financial Services Act No. 7 of 2017.
However, as with the legislative changes in other countries, the focus of the
reformed insolvency legislation has changed, this move has come with the recognition that
the rescue approach (rather than the traditional recovery only approach) leads to a better
overall outcome for all parties involved. The key objectives of this new insolvency act are
to:
i. aligns Zambian insolvency law with international best practice;
ii. enhance transparency and accountability in insolvency proceedings; and
iii. provide a mechanism for salvaging financially distressed but viable companies.
Insolvency provisions in the Act are in following parts, first, provisions relating to
the resolution to voluntarily wind-up or dissolve financial service provider and duties of
financial service provider on voluntary winding- up or dissolution. Secondly, notice of
voluntary winding-up or dissolution and rights of depositors and creditors. Thirdly,
distribution of assets on voluntary winding- up or dissolution.
The Corporate and Insolvency Act provides for either voluntary winding up or
winding up by the court.
Section 121(1) of the Banking and Financial Services Act No.7 of 2017
provides that a financial service provider shall not, except with the written approval of the
Bank, pass a resolution for the voluntary winding-up or dissolution of the financial service
provider in accordance with the Corporate Insolvency Act, 2017, or any other law.
(2) A financial service provider seeking the approval of the Bank for voluntary
winding-up or dissolution, in accordance with subsection (1), shall submit—
(3) The Bank shall approve a voluntary winding- up if the Bank is satisfied that the
financial service provider is solvent and has sufficient liquid assets to repay its depositors
and all its other creditors in full and without delay.
(4) Where a bank or financial institution passes a resolution for voluntary winding-
up or dissolution, the bank or financial institution shall record the date, hour and minute of
the passing of the resolution.
(5) A director, senior officer or other employee of a financial service provider who
makes a false declaration, causes or permits any false declaration to be made, contrary to
subsection (2), commits an offence and is liable, upon conviction, to a fine not exceeding
five hundred thousand penalty units or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years,
or to both.
Section 122(1) of Act No. 7 of 2017 states that if a financial service provider
receives approval from the Bank for a voluntary winding up or dissolution, the financial
service provider shall—
(a) surrender its licence to the Bank, within seven days of receipt of the approval,
and shall cease to do business and may exercise its powers only to the extent necessary to
effect its orderly winding up or dissolution in accordance with the Corporate Insolvency
Act, 2017, and this Act; and
Section 123(1) of Act No.7 of 2017 provides that a financial service provider shall,
within fourteen days after receiving approval for a voluntary winding-up or dissolution, by
registered mail, or in the prescribed manner and form notify—
(a) every depositor and creditor of the financial service provider of the intended
voluntary winding-up or dissolution; and
(b) a person entitled to funds or property held by the financial service provider as a
trustee, fiduciary, lessor of a safe-keeping facility or bailee, of the proposed winding-up or
dissolution.
(2) A notice, for the purposes of subsection (1), shall include such information as
the Bank may specify.
(3) A copy of a notice, specified in subsection (1), shall be kept and displayed in a
conspicuous place in the public part of each branch and the financial service provider shall
cause the notice to be published in the Gazette and in a newspaper of general circulation or
any other media in Zambia.
Section 124(1) of Act No.7 of 2017 states that an approval by the Bank for the
voluntary winding-up or dissolution of a financial service provider as provided in this Part,
shall not prejudice the right of a depositor or creditor to payment in full, or to the return of
funds or property held, by the financial service provider.
(2) All lawful claims shall be paid promptly and all funds and other property held
bythe financial service provider shall be returned to the rightful owners within such
maximum period as the Bank may direct in writing.
Section 125(1) of Act No. 7 of 2017 states that where the Bank considers that a
financial service provider has discharged all the obligations specified in this Act, the
remainder of its property shall be distributed to the shareholders, in accordance with the
Corporate Insolvency Act, 2017, and this Act.
(2) A distribution shall not be made, in accordance with subsection (1), before—
(a) all claims of depositors and other creditors have been paid in full;
(b)in the case of a disputed claim, the financial service provider has turned over to
the Bank, sufficient funds to meet any liability that may be judicially determined; and (c)
uncollected funds, payable to a depositor or creditor, have been turned over to the Bank to
be dealt with as unclaimed funds in accordance with this Act.
Section 126 of Act No. of 2017 provides that the Bank of Zambia may take
possession of the financial service provider being voluntarily wound-up or dissolved, if the
Bank subsequently finds out that—
(a) the assets of a financial service provider are not sufficient to fully discharge all
obligations; or
(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the Bank as liquidator of a
financial service provider shall have the power to—
(a) bring, carry on or defend an action or legal proceedings in the name and on
behalf of the financial service provider; and
(b) carry on the business of the financial service provider only for the beneficial
winding-up or dissolution of the financial service provider.
Section 132(1) of Act No. 7 of 2017 states that despite the Corporate Insolvency
Act, 2017, or any other written law, in any compulsory winding-up or dissolution of a
financial service provider the following shall be paid in priority to all other debts in the
order set:
(b) depositors;
(d) wages and salaries of employees of the financial service provider for a period
of three months;
(f) other claims against the financial service provider in such order of priority as
the Court may determine on application by the Bank.
(2) After payment of all claims submitted and accepted, the remaining claims with
interest that are not submitted within the time allowed in accordance with this Part shall be
paid, in the order of priority of their submission and at a rate to be fixed by the Bank.
(3) If the amount available for payment for any class of claims, referred to in
subsections (1) and (2), is insufficient to provide payment in full, the claims within a class
shall abate in equal proportions and for the purposes of this section each paragraph of
subsection (1) constitutes a separate class of claims and the claims referred to subsection
(2) constitute another separate class of claims.
(4) If the amount available for payment for any class of claims, referred to in
subsection (1) is insufficient to provide payment in full, the claims shall abate in equal
proportions.
(5) The Bank shall establish a scheme for the protection of depositors.
The Corporate Insolvency Act No. 9 of 2017 introduces the business rescue (BR)
route of insolvency.
ii. achieve a better outcome for the company’s creditors than is likely to be the case
if the company were to be liquidated; or
iii. realize the property of the company to make a distribution to one or more
secured or preferential creditors.
Alternatively, an affected person may apply to the court for an order to place the
company under supervision and begin Business Rescue proceedings.
The Business Rescue process benefits from a moratorium during the period of the
BR proceeding that prevents any legal or enforcement action from being taken against the
company by any other creditor. This allows the appointed administrator to execute his
mandate to rescue the business without the pressure of enforcement action or litigation
from other creditors
SUMMARY
Hudson, (1995, p.453). Security is the process by which a creditor obtains an extra
source for the repayment of his debt. In the financial context, it is an essential part of what
may loosely be described as the enforcement of claims. Hudson, (1995, p.453). he subject
is of interest to central bankers in their capacity as custodian of their countries’ financial
systems. It is not proposed to enter into the debate as to whether security is necessary,
desirable, or efficient. Hudson, (1995, p.453). It is true that much lending is unsecured.
Hudson, (1995, p.453). Markets have sprung up to provide ready sources of unsecured
credit, such as the commercial paper market. Hudson, (1995, p.453). However, lenders like
security, if they can get it, and this is the commercial reality of the situation. Hudson, (1995,
p.453).
The law of security is essentially about methods of taking and realizing collateral.
Hudson, (1995, p.458). Generally, this implies a proprietary right on the part of the creditor
in the property constituting the collateral. Hudson, (1995, p.458). To that extent, the law
of security straddles the law of property and the law of obligations. Hudson, (1995, p.458).
An exception is the guarantee, which involves the personal promise of the guarantor
without in itself creating any interests in his property. Hudson, (1995, p.458). Lenders
regard guarantees as "security," but on a strictly conceptual basis they fall outside the law
of security. Hudson, (1995, p.458).
Types of property:
Most, if not all, legal systems draw a distinction between immovable (land) and
movables (other forms of property). Hudson, (1995, p.453). Subject to that, virtually every
type of property that has an economic value is potentially available as security: land, goods,
debt and equity securities, contractual claims, cash proceeds, inventory, receivables, and
so forth. Hudson, (1995, p.453).
According to Gupta (2014, p.197). Bankers in the olden days were very much
averse to accept land and building as a security, but this prejudice has over a period of time
changed and land and building as a security has become an acceptable collateral in most
advances, more particularly to corporate customers. Gupta (2014, p.197). The advantages
and disadvantages of this form of security cannot be universally applied to all lands and it
depends on the nature of the land offered. Gupta (2014, p.197). We shall now discuss both
the advantages and disadvantages
6.1.1 Advantages
(i) The advantage that land has over other types of securities is that its value
generally increases with time. Gupta (2014, p.197). With every fall in the value of money,
the value of land goes up and due to its scant availability in developing areas its value is
bound to increase. Gupta (2014, p.197).
(ii) It cannot be shifted, a fact which sometimes is also a disadvantage. Gupta (2014,
p.197).
6.1.2 Disadvantages
The value of a building depends on several factors such as location, size of property,
state of repair, amenities, etc., and in the case of factories and industrial buildings, the
machinery, nature of industry, etc. Gupta (2014, p.197). This makes the valuation very
difficult. Buildings and the materials used in the buildings are not alike. Gupta (2014,
p.197). In fact, buildings must be valued on a conservative basis because of limited market
in the event of sale. Gupta (2014, p.197).
The banker cannot obtain a proper title unless the borrower himself has title to the
property to be mortgaged. Gupta (2014, p.197).
Land is not easily and quickly realizable, due to the lack of ready market. Gupta
(2014, p.197). It may take months to sell and sometimes if the market is not favorable, it
may fetch a lower price than what was anticipated. Gupta (2014, p.197).
Gupta (2014, p.198). The following are some of the precautions which a banker
should take before lending out money to a customer who intends to his land as security:
(i) Financial soundness of borrower: The banker should place more reliance on
the financial soundness of the borrower. Gupta (2014, p.198).
(ii) Borrower’s title: The banker should get a lawyer to verify the title to the
property and the right of the borrower to mortgage. Gupta (2014, p.198).
(iii) Enquiry regarding prior charges: The borrower should produce a certificate
from the Registrar’s office listing the charges over the property over a period of time that
the property is free from encumbrances. Gupta (2014, p.198). This is commonly
understood as non-encumbrance certificate. Gupta (2014, p.198). If any prior charges exist,
the banker’s right will be subject to such prior charges. Gupta (2014, p.198).
(iv) Valuation of the property: Valuation can be done in any of the following
ways: (a) By utilizing the services of recognized valuers who would be engineers or
architects. (b) Making enquiries with local real estate agents. (c) By local authorities. (d)
Latest sale transaction of neighbouring properties. (e) Calculations based on the annual
rental value. Gupta (2014, p.198).
(vi) Documentations: The mortgage deed must be drafted carefully considering all
the legal stipulations. It should be witnessed by at least two persons. In case of simple
mortgage, it attracts ad-valorem stamp duty. Gupta (2014, p.198).
Section 3(b) of the Companies Act No.10 of 2017 of the Laws of Zambia defines a
debenture as a document issued by a bank in the ordinary course of its banking business
that evidences or acknowledges indebtedness of the bank.
6.2.1 Advantages
(v) They rank in priority to shares and mostly secured by a charge on the company’s
property.
6.2.2 Disadvantages
(i) If interest is not paid regularly on the debentures it would affect its price and
marketability.
(ii) If the charge on property of company is not registered, the subsequent charges
will get a priority.
(i) The nature of the debentures must be ascertained, i.e., whether they are
unsecured or secured, the later, being preferred.
(ii) The borrowing powers of the company issuing the debentures must be
ascertained, and to verify that the same has not been exceeded.
(iv) The nature and value of the assets charged must be examined frequently.
(v) The banker must find out whether there are any un-cancelled redeemed
debentures.
6.3 MORTGAGES
Patel (1998). A legal mortgage is recognized by the strict law. A legal mortgage is
conditional transfer of a mortgagor’s legal interest in property. Patel (1998). This is done
by an absolute conveyance of the property to the mortgagee as security only, with a
covenant for the reconveyance of the property if the money is repaid on the fixed date.
There is no freehold tenure in Zambia. (Patel, 1998).
(i) to call in the money at any time after the day fixed for repayment and to sue the
mortgagor personally on his covenant to re-pay in the mortgage instrument if
default in payment is made.
(ii) to foreclose.
(iii)to take possession but only under a strict liability to account to the mortgagor.
(iv) to sell under his power of sale after notice has been given or on breach of some
other condition e.g to insure.
(v) This power is expressly reserved to the mortgagee by Section 66 of the Lands &
Deeds Registry Act provided the mortgage is created by a Deed and is registered in
accordance with Section 4 of the Act. Under this power to sell the mortgagee can
transfer the whole estate (Section 66(2) Cap. 185)
According Patel (1998) and equity of redemption is the date fixed for repayment is
the ‘legal date for redemption’. Patel (1998). If the mortgagor does not repay by this date
he loses his legal right to the land. Patel (1998). From this time onwards he has merely an
equitable right to redeem, amounting to an equitable interest in the property Patel (1998).
The Mortgagor’s possession of both (a) a legal right to redeem on the contract date,
and (b) an equitable right to redeem later, is called his ‘equity of redemption’, and is an
equitable interest in land which he could sell, leave by will, mortgage, etc. (Patel, 1998).
Patel (1998). In what circumstances may the mortgagee exercise his statutory
power of sale of the mortgaged property?
LS Banking Law and Practice 62 of 69
The Copperbelt University
The power is expressly provided for him under Section 65 and 66 of Cap. 185, but
can only be exercised if the mortgage was created by deed; The mortgagee may sell the
property if:
(i) The payment of the mortgage money or any part of it is in arrears for three months.
(ii) If the payment of interest is in arrears for two months.
(iii) There is breach by the mortgagor of some other condition e.g. his duty to insure the
property and;
(iv) The mortgagor has failed to put the default right even after he has been given notice
that the mortgagee will sell the property if he did not.
Patel (1998). The mortgagee has a statutory power of selling the security after the
money becomes due in certain events and this power may be modified by the parties in any
manner they choose. When the mortgagee exercises the power, the sale operates despite
the consequences of any improper exercise of the power. The statutory power of sale only
applies if the mortgage is by deed, and does not arise until the loan becomes repayable:
The events in which the mortgagee’s power of sale becomes exercisable under the
statutory provisions (i.e. apart from any special agreement between the parties) are;
(a) When notice to repay the principal has been given and not complied with within 3
months;
(b) When interest is 2 months in arrears;
(c) When there has been a breach of some provision of the mortgage deed other than
the covenant for payment of principal and interest.
6.3.4 Mortgagee’s Power to appoint a receiver
Patel (1998). The mortgagee has the statutory power to appoint a receiver, but
subject to the same conditions as apply to the exercise of the statutory power of sale. Patel
(1998). The effect of the appointment and the position of the receiver is beyond the scope
of this course, but the matter is one which can be subjected to special conditions by the
terms of the deed. Patel (1998).
6.3.12 The Appointment of a Receiver i.e. Manager
The Mortgagee can appoint a receiver without a court order. Patel (1998). The
receiver takes over the management of the property and so gets the income from it and
pays this to the mortgagee until the debt is paid off. Note: the receiver is the agent of the
mortgagor (i.e. borrower) even though the mortgagee (i.e. bank or lender) appoints him.
Patel (1998).
Gupta (2014, p.217). Fixed and floating charges are used to secure borrowing by
a company. Such borrowing is often done under the terms of a debenture issued by the
company. Gupta (2014, p.217). Charges on a company's assets must be registered with
the Registrar of Companies and may also need to be registered in some other way, e.g. a
charge on land and buildings must also be registered at the Land Registry. Gupta (2014,
p.217).
Gupta (2014, p.217). (Charges registered under the Companies Act is classified
into (i) fixed charge and (ii) floating charge.
Floating Charge is a charge that is general and not specific. Gupta (2014, p.217).
A rough definition of a floating charge is a mortgage on movable assets in general as
compared to a mortgage of a specific chattel or chattels. Gupta (2014, p.217). The charge
is not fixed on any specific asset but “floats” over a class or type of assets e.g. working
stock of a company or supermarket. Gupta (2014, p.217). A floating charge is the same
thing as a debenture but can only apply to a company, not an individual.
(i) the charge floats over present and future property of the company
(ii) it does not restrict the company from assigning the property, subject to charge
to third parties, whether by way of sale or security Therefore, a floating charge is an
equitable charge
In the case of Illingworth v Houldsworth (1304) A.C. 365, the floating charge
was defined as a charge which operates as an immediate and continuing charge on the
property charged and has the effect of charging all the property in the hands of the
borrower at the date of the charge.
“…..I certainly think that if a charge has the three characteristics that I am about
to mention it is a floating charge. (1) If it is a charge on a class on assets of a company
present and future; (2) if that class is one which, in the ordinary course of the business
of the company, would be changing from time to time; and (3) if you find that by the
charge it is contemplated that, until some future step is taken by or on behalf of those
interested in the charge, the company may carry on its business in the ordinary way as
far as concerns the particular class of assets I am dealing with.”
The special nature of the floating charge is that the company can continue to use
the assets and can buy and sell them in the ordinary course of business. Gupta (2014,
p.217). It can thus trade with its stock and sell and replace plant and machinery, etc.
without needing fresh consent from the mortgagee. Gupta (2014, p.217). The charge is
said to float over the assets charged, rather than fixing on any of them specifically. This
continues until the charge 'crystallizes', which occurs when the debenture specifies. This
will include any failure to meet the terms of the loan (non-payment, etc.), or if the
company goes into liquidation, ceases to trade, etc. Gupta (2014, p.217). When the
charge chrysalizes it fixes on the assets then owned by the company, catching any assets
acquired up to that date. Gupta (2014, p.217).
6.5 GUARANTEES
According Gupta (2014, p.119). Banks grant loans and advances (fund based) and
provide other credit facilities (non- fund based) such as, bank guarantee and letters of
credit. Gupta (2014, p.119). Non fund based limits are granted by banks to facilitate the
customers to carry on with the trading and business activities more comfortably. Gupta
(2014, p.119). Bankers can earn front end fees and these non-fund based items become
contingent liabilities for banks. (Gupta, 2014, p.119).
There are three parties to the contract of guarantee. Gupta (2014, p.119). They are
called Surety, Principal Debtor and the Creditor. These parties are also called as the
guarantor, borrower and the beneficiary. (Gupta, 2014, p.119).
Banks deal with two types of guarantees: (i) Accepted by the bank, and (ii) Issued
by the bank. (Gupta, 2014, p.119).
At the time of lending money, banks accept securities. Gupta (2014, p.119). In
addition to the tangible assets a borrower arranges to furnish a personal security given by
surety (guarantor). Gupta (2014, p.119). This is called third party guarantee, who
undertakes to pay the money to the bank inclusive of interest and other charges, if any, in
case the principal borrower fails to repay or if the borrower commits default. Gupta (2014,
p.119). Banks also obtain Corporate guarantees issued by companies who execute
corporate guarantee as authorized by the Board of Directors’ resolution. (Gupta, 2014,
p.119).
6.6.1 Shares
These may be classified into preference shares (which enjoy preference both with
regards the payment of dividend and repayment of capital) and equity shares, i.e., shares
which are not preference shares. Gupta (2014, p.119).
Advantages
Disadvantages
(i) Being easy to realize, they are fraud prone and as such they must be properly secured.
(ii) In the case of partly paid shares, the following demerits are there:
(a) The banker may have to pay the calls.
(b) Partly paid shares are subject to violent price fluctuations.
(c) They are not easily realizable because of the restricted market for such shares.
Gupta (2014, p.208). Pledge means bailment of goods for the purpose of providing
security for payment of debt or performance of promise. Gupta (2014, p.208).
For example, an agriculturist is sanctioned a gold loan by his banker. The borrower
delivers his gold ornaments to the bank as a security for the gold loan. The borrower
pledges gold ornaments to raise the loan. In this case, the agriculturist has created a valid
pledge. Gupta (2014, p.208).
(i) The person, whose goods are bailed is called pawnor or pledger, and to whom
the goods are pledged as pawnee or pledgee.
(ii) Ownership of the property is retained by the pledger, which is subject only to
the qualified interest which passes to the pledgee by the bailment.
(iii) The essential feature of a pledge is the actual or constructive delivery of the
goods to the pledgee. By constructive delivery it is meant that there will be no physical
transfer of goods from the custody of the pledger/ pawnor to the pledge/ pawnee. All that
is required is that the goods must be placed in the possession of the pawnee or of any person
authorized to hold them on his behalf.
(iv) The delivery of the goods may be ‘physical’ when goods are actually
transferred and ‘symbolic’ as in the case of delivery of the key or ‘constructive’ as in the
case of attornment.
(v) Pledge can be created only in the case of existing goods (and not on future
goods) which are in the possession of the pledger himself.
(vi) Since the possession of goods is the important feature of pledge and therefore,
pledge is lost when possession of the goods is lost.
(vii) An agreement of pledge also known as deed of pledge may be implied from
the nature of the transaction or the circumstances of the case
(viii) To protect the interests of the concerned parties the agreement in writing
should clearly indicate the terms and conditions. A valid pledge can be created by (i) the
owner of the goods (ii) a mercantile agent, subject to the following terms and conditions
are satisfied (iii) the seller of goods, who continues to hold the goods even after sale, can
create a valid pledge. The pledgee must act in good faith and without notice of the previous
sale.
6.8 LIEN
The banker has general lien on all deposits. If the deposit receipt is given as a
security for raising a loan or discharging an obligation then the lien on such deposit receipt,
is a particular lien, and it would exist till the debt is cleared or the obligation is fulfilled.
General lien covers the entire amount due to the bank from the borrower/ debtor.
A banker’s lien is also called as an implied pledge. A banker has the right to retain
and if necessary can also sell the goods and/or securities charged in his favour. As pledgee,
a banker can sell the goods/securities pledged to him.
1. In case when goods and securities are not obtained by him in the ordinary course
of business:
3. When the goods or security are left inadvertently or through oversight in the bank
premises, the banker cannot exercise his right of lien on them.
5. The banker cannot have the right of lien and right of set off at the same time.
3. Bibliography