Technische Universität Berlin ADM II – Linear and Integer Programming
Institut für Mathematik Winter Term 2010/2011
Prof. Dr. Rolf H. Möhring Christoph Hansknecht
Dr. Sebastian Stiller
10. Exercise
Due: Friday, 20.1.2012, 10.00h sharp before the first lecture.
Exercise 30 10 points
Consider the integer programming problem
maximize x1 + 2x2
subject to −3x1 + 4x2 ≤ 4
3x1 + 2x2 ≤ 11
2x1 − x2 ≤ 5
x1 , x2 ≥0
x1 , x2 integer
Sketch the feasible set and use the figure to answer the following questions:
1. What is the optimal cost of the linear programming relaxation? What is the optimal cost of
the integer programming problem and how large is the gap between the two values?
2. What is the convex hull of the feasible set of the integer program. Give the inequalities that
forms the polyhedra.
3. Compute and illustrate the first Chvátal closure in this example. What is the optimal solution
of the new linear program?
Exercise 31 5 points
In this exercise you will show that dealing with rational polyhedra is a very important assumption
for the theorems in the section 7.5.
√
(a) Let P := {(x1 , x2 ) ∈ R2 : x2 ≤ 2x1 }. Show that PI i.e. the convex hull of the all the integral
points in P does not describe a polyhedron.
√
(b) Let P := {(x1 , x2 ) ∈ R2 : x2 ≤ 2x1 , x1 ≥ 0}. Prove that P (t) = P 6= PI .
Exercise 32 5 points
The following claim provides an easy construction guidance for polyhedra with an arbitrarily
large Chvátal rank: Let P be the convex hull of three points in R2 , namely (0, 0), (0, 1) and (k, 21 ).
Prove that P (2k−1) 6= PI = P (2k) .