TTS2016 ModalSplit
TTS2016 ModalSplit
Acknowledgements
The 2016 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) was conducted on behalf of 22 local, regional, provincial and transit operating agencies in the
Greater Toronto and surrounding regions. The members of the TTS Technical Committee are represented by the following agencies:
This report was prepared for the Transportation Information Steering Committee (TISC) by R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd., in partnership with
David Kriger Consultants Inc. and HDR Inc., with guidance from the Data Management Group (DMG) at the Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Toronto. The Steering Committee, formerly known as the Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection Steering Committee
(TATPDCSC), which also conducted the 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001, 2006 and 2011 TTS, is represented by the Ontario Ministry of Transportation,
Cities of Toronto and Hamilton, Regional Municipalities of Durham, Halton, Peel and York, Metrolinx and the Toronto Transit Commission. The
contributions of the above supporting agencies to the production of this report and to the ongoing work of the DMG are gratefully
acknowledged.
Further Information
The Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) are parts of an ongoing data collection program by the Transportation Information Steering
Committee (TISC). The survey data (2016, 2011, 2006, 2001, 1996, 1991 and 1986) are currently under the care of the Data Management Group.
This group is responsible for maintaining the TTS databases and making available appropriate travel information for any urban transportation
study in the area. Requests for information from the TTS, or enquiries related to the contents of this report, should be directed to the address
below.
Data Management Group
Department of Civil Engineering
University of Toronto
35 St. George Street Toronto, Ontario
M5S 1A4
Tel: (416) 978-3913
Fax: (416) 978-3941
Email: info@dmg.utoronto.ca
Web: www.dmg.utoronto.ca
Background
The first comprehensive travel survey was the 1964 Metropolitan Toronto and Region Transportation Study (MTARTS), which was an urban travel
survey using home interviews at a sample of approximately 3% of the households in the Toronto area. At that time, the survey area included
most of the urban area. Subsequently, the urban area expanded and was sub-divided into a collection of regional jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction
then undertook various travel surveys.
Urban travel on the road and transit system does not respect jurisdictional boundaries. A committee established to discuss common
transportation issues at the time of jurisdictional changes recognized this limitation. The first Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) initiated by
the coordinating committee (Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection Steering Committee) was undertaken in 1986 when it was
recognized that the fragmented approach to collecting urban travel information was not providing a complete representation.
The extensive use of the original TTS data led to the establishment of periodic updates and consequently a Transportation Tomorrow Survey
(TTS) has been conducted every five years since 1986. The 2016 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) is the seventh in a series of
comprehensive travel surveys conducted every five years in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) and surrounding areas. The TTS
contains detailed demographic information on all members of a surveyed household and a ledger of travel information for an entire weekday.
From 1986 to 2006, the survey method remained essentially the same: the survey sample was drawn from telephone subscriber directories, with
advance letters sent to inform households about the survey, and surveys conducted via telephone interview. In 2011, online surveying was
introduced to supplement the telephone interviewing, with 12% of participating households completing the survey online. In 2016, the survey
sample was drawn from a database of mailable addresses, which was matched, where possible, to telephone numbers listed in the telephone
subscriber directory. Addresses not matched to a telephone number received a survey letter inviting them to participate online or via phone
while addresses matched to a telephone number received both a letter and telephone calls. In this cycle, 36% of participating household
completed the survey via telephone interview and 64% completed the survey online. The survey questionnaire has been essentially the same in
all survey cycles, with only minor changes between cycles.
From 1986 to 2006, the data were weighted with expansion factors such that the expanded survey data represented Statistics Canada Census
counts of private dwellings occupied by usual residents. In 2011, the data were weighted such that the expanded survey data represented total
population counts by age group (which included persons living in both private and collective dwellings). In 2016, the data were weighted such
that the expanded survey data were representative of counts of private dwellings occupied by usual residents (with further adjustments to
better represent all households by dwelling type, household size, and householder gender and age groups).
Area of coverage
As the urban area surrounding Toronto continued to grow and surrounding communities became more integrated, it was apparent that a wider
area of coverage would be beneficial.
The initial TTS programs in 1986 and 1991 were initiated by government agencies in the GTHA and the area of coverage reflected that initiative.
However, because of the growing urban transportation interaction between the GTHA and the surrounding areas, other surrounding
communities were invited to participate in later surveys.
PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS
County of Peterborough
City of Kawartha Lakes
County of Wellington
City of Peterborough
Town of Orangeville
County of Dufferin
County of Simcoe
City of Brantford
City of Hamilton
County of Brant
City of Toronto
City of Guelph
City of Barrie
City of Orillia
Cycle
2016 TTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • p • p • • •
2011 TTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • p • p • • •
2006 TTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • p • p • • •
2001 TTS • • • • • • • • • • • p • p • •
1996 TTS • • • • • • • • • • p p p • • •
1991 TTS • • • • • •
1986 TTS • • • • • •
• = full coverage, p = part of jurisdiction
Survey magnitude
In the 2016 survey, a random sample of households in the survey area was provided by Canada Post from a database of mailable residential
addresses. In all previous surveys from 1986 to 2011, the random sample of households in the survey area was provided by a telephone
subscriber listing service.
In 2016, the size of the sample was determined as required to obtain a 5% sample of occupied dwelling units in all areas except the City of
Hamilton, for which a 3% sample of occupied dwelling units was targetted. In 1991, a smaller sample was obtained in developed urban areas.
Otherwise, the size of the sample was determined as required to obtain a 5% sample of the occupied dwelling units.
Survey content
All TTS are a retrospective survey of travel taken by every member (age 11 of over) of the household during the day previous to the telephone (or
web) contact. Until 2011, all information was collected by an experienced interviewer over the telephone. In 2011 and 2016, the household was
given the option of a telephone interviewer or completing the interview on-line.
The information collected and the method of collection has remained relatively consistent over the seven surveys and includes characteristics of
the household, characteristics of each person in the household, and details of the trips taken by each member of the household. Trip information
includes details of any trips taken by transit.
Before each survey, the questions asked were reviewed and some additions made, which reflect the changing interests of the participating
agencies.
INFORMATION COLLECTED
Demographic Information Travel Information
Household Characteristics Person Characteristics Nature of Trip Means of Travel
Vehicle Occupancy
Household Income
Dwelling unit type
Vehicles Available
Occupation Type
Purpose of Trip
Work at Home
2016 TTS
2011 TTS
2006 TTS
2001 TTS
1996 TTS
1991 TTS
1986 TTS
Report content
The purpose of this report is to summarize the Transportation Tomorrow Survey data for the entire survey area according to regional boundaries.
The summary provides demographic and travel characteristics presented in tabular format at two levels of detail, the entire survey area and each
of the 20 participating municipalities. In total, there are 8 cities, 6 regional municipalities, 5 counties and 1 town represented in this report.
Data from five of the six surveys, 1986, 1996, 2006, 2011, and 2016 are presented in this report. The five surveys differ in survey area as shown in
the participating jurisdictions table on page 7.
A summary of the 2016 survey data for households in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area only is presented in the 2016 TTS report, “2016,
2011, 2006, 1996 and 1986 Travel Summaries for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area” and trip matrices are presented in the 2016 TTS
report, “2016, 2011, 2006, 1996 and 1986 Transportation Tomorrow Survey Origin-Destination Matrices”.
Information in this report is based on Version 3.1 of the 1986 TTS database, Version 2.1 of the 1996 TTS database, Version 1.0 of the 2006 TTS
database, Version 1.0 of the 2011 TTS database, and Version 1.0 of the 2016 TTS database.
The information presented includes socio-demographic and travel characteristics. In addition to presenting the magnitude of the trips coming
into and leaving an area, the summary tables also describe travel characteristics such as travel purpose, trip start time, travel distance and travel
mode choice. Two time periods are reported: the morning peak travel period of 6:00 to 8:59 a.m. and the full 24-hour day (labelled in the tables
as 6-9 A.M.). In the 2016 results, medians of trip distances are determined based on all trips, including those with trip ends outside of the study
area. In earlier cycles, median trip distance calculations excluded trips with trip ends outside the study area (as there was less precision in the
geocoding of coordinates external to the study area). Definitions of terms are listed on the next page.
To reflect the fact that all numbers presented in this report are estimates based on expanded survey data, all numeric figures are rounded. Totals
and subtotals are rounded to the nearest 100 for all data presented in this report. All percentages are rounded to the nearest integer. No
information is presented for categories that have less than four observations or survey records. These categories are denoted by an asterisk (*).
Some areas were not part of the survey for all five years listed and n/a was used to denote that no information is available for a particular
municipality for a given year.
Invalid survey responses are dealt with in two ways. The response is grouped under the “other” category if one is available (travel mode, for
example). Otherwise, invalid responses are distributed proportionately (based on the valid responses) between the available categories.
For complete and detailed coverage of all aspects of the surveys, please refer to the reports available at:
http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca/reports/ttsreports.html
Data Key
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS TRIPS MADE...
Households Total number of households in the area ...BY RESIDENTS OF Survey statistics for all trips made by population residing within the
Dwelling Type Distribution of households by dwelling type: house, townhouse, or THE AREA given geography reported on.
apartment. ...TO THE AREA Survey statistics for all trips with a destination within the given
Household Size Distribution of households by the number of persons in residence at geography reported on, whether made by residents of the given
the time of the survey interview. geography or by residents of all other geographies included in the
Number of Available Distribution of households by number of vehicles available to the entire TTS survey area.
Vehicles household for personal use. Time Period Two time periods are reported: the morning peak travel period of
Household Averages: 6:00 to 8:59 a.m. and the full 24-hour day.
Persons/household Total population divided by total number of households. Trips Total estimated average trips for the reported time period on
Workers/household Total number of employed persons (full-time, part-time, work-from- weekdays (estimates based on the survey data expanded to
home) divided by total number of households. represent the total population).
Drivers/household Total number of persons in possession of a driver’s licence divided by Trip Purpose (for trips Distribution of all trips made by residents across the following
the total number of households. The calculation excludes a small % made by residents of categories:
of households for which the total number of drivers was unknown. the area):
Vehicles/household Total number of vehicles available for personal use divided by the HB-W Home-based work: Home to work and work to home.
total number of households. HB-S Home-based school: Home to school and school to home.
Trips/day/household Total number of daily trips made by persons of age 11 and over HB-D Home-based discretionary: All other home-based trips.
divided by the total number of households. N-HB Non-home-based: All trips where neither end is home.
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Trip Purpose (for trips Distribution of all trips made to the area across the following
Population Total population residing in private dwellings in the area at the time to the area): categories:
of the survey. Excludes residents living in collective dwellings (who Work Destination purpose is work.
were not surveyed). In 2011 only, the survey data were expanded to School Destination purpose is school.
represent the total population including those in collective dwellings. Home Destination purpose is to return home.
Age Distribution of population by age group. Note: may not exactly Other Other destination purpose, such as shopping, entertainment, pick
match census distributions exactly. In 2016 data, approximately 20% someone up/drop someone off, etc.
of persons 75+ were assumed to live in collective dwellings (and are Modes of travel:
not represented by the survey results). Driver Automobile driver.
Median Age 50% of the population are above and 50% are below the median age. Pass. Automobile passenger.
Daily Trips per Person Number of trips made by persons aged 11 and over divided by the Transit Public transit (local transit). If a trip uses more than one mode
number of persons aged 11 and over. category which includes public transit, then public transit is given
Daily Work Trips per Number of work trips made by employed persons divided by the preference as the primary mode. In cases where both GO Train and
Worker number of employed persons. local transit were used, GO Train is the dominant classification.
Employment Type Full time outside the home, part-time outside the home, work at GO Train GO Train. In cases where both GO Train and local transit were used,
home (full-time or part-time). GO Train is the dominant classification.
Student % of population who are students. Student status was not asked for Walk & Cycle Walk or bicycle.
persons aged 6-10, but was assumed. Other Other modes of travel. Includes motorcycle, taxi, school bus, and all
Licensed % of population with a valid driver’s licence. Persons with unknown other modes.
licence status were excluded from the calculation. Median Trip Length Trip length measured as the straight line distance between the origin
Transit % of population in possession of a valid transit pass. Persons with (km) and destination coordinates of the trip. Reported for trips with the
unknown data were excluded from the calculation. following modes: driver, passenger, transit, and GO Train.
1
As of May 2003, only 1.7% of households in Ontario had only cell phones, and only 1.2% of all Canadian households had no telephone service of any kind, Statistics Canada Residential Telephone
Service Survey (RTSS), December 2005 data release (http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/060405/dq060405b-eng.htm).
2
Statistics Canada Residential Telephone Service Survey (RTSS), December 2006 data release (http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/070504/dq070504a-eng.htm). While statistics are not available
by age specifically for 2006, by 2008 fully 35.8% of households comprised solely of 18-34 year olds had only cell phones and no land line telephone. RTSS December 2008 data release
(http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/090615/t090615c1-eng.htm).
3
The proportion of households with a traditional land-line was 71% in 2010, so likely even lower in 2011. Statistics Canada Residential Telephone Service Survey (RTSS), December 2010 data release
(http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/110405/dq110405a-eng.htm).
4
While statistics are not available specifically for 2011, by 2013 60% of households under 35 years of age were cell-phone-only households. Statistics Canada Residential Telephone Service Survey
(RTSS), December 2013 data release (http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/140623/dq140623a-eng.htm).
A new approach to data weighting was taken in 2011. Adjustments were made first to expand the number of households to represent
total apartments and non-apartments in the geographies of the study area, followed by adjustments such that the expanded survey data
represented the Census distributions of the total population by age group. The Census counts of total population by age group include
people living in collective dwellings5 so the survey results for the 2011 cycle may slightly over-represent the survey’s target population
(people living in private dwellings) and thus may slightly over-represent the number of trips made. The weighted household counts in
2011 deviated somewhat from the total private households in each study area per the Census.
The 2016 cycle also had a number of differences from previous cycles:
In 2016, an address-based sample frame was adopted in order to obtain coverage of all households, not just those with directory-listed
telephone land-lines. A portion of the random address sample was matched to listed phone numbers and received high response in both
telephone and online surveying. However, the ‘address-only’ portion of the sample, which received only a survey invitation letter, had
lower response. While it was necessary to use address-only sample to achieve coverage of cell-phone-only households, there is likely
higher non-response bias in this portion of the sample, although this is compensated for in part by data weighting.
In 2016, the proportion of all surveys completed online increased considerably, to 64% of all survey completions. If online respondents
interpreted the questionnaire differently than respondents surveyed by telephone interview, then this could have an impact on results.
A more complex approach to data weighting was taken in 2016: an iterative proportional fitting method was undertaken to adjust the
household weights according to the following controls: dwelling type, household size, and householder age by gender. As the method
employed made household-level adjustments based on the age/gender demographics of all householders, the 2016 expanded household
counts in the survey data match the Census household counts (rather than matching population as in 2011). It may also be noted that
the 2016 survey data take into account household size, whereas previous surveys may have had more variance from Census household
size distributions. If travel patterns differ for people in households of different sizes, this may have an impact on the survey estimates.
Readers may note that the 2016 survey obtained 2.3% more survey completions than were obtained in 2011, but gathered 3.5% fewer person
records (see page 8). This may be due, in part, to the ongoing trend of diminishing household sizes and, in part, to better coverage of one-person
households in the 2016 survey (the 2011 survey under-represented one-person households and over-represented two- and three-person
households). The distribution of households by dwelling type also differs from previous cycles to a greater extent than might be explained by
changes in housing stock in the intervening years (55% houses in 2016, compared to 67% in both 2011 and 2006 TTS). Whatever the reasons,
there appear to be some differences in the composition of the survey samples prior to data weighting. This may have some impact on the
comparability of results even after the data weighting applied for each survey cycle. It is unclear whether the 2016 survey data is a more or less
‘accurate’ representation of the travel behaviour of residents of private households compared to the 2011 cycle. The lower total daily trip
estimates in 2016 compared to 2011 do not necessarily indicate a reduction in total trips in actuality. Further research to explore the impacts of
changing sample frames, survey methods, and data weighting on the survey results is recommended. For the above reasons, caution should be
undertaking when comparing the results from the 2006, 2011, and 2016 survey cycles.
5
In 2011, 1.4% of the population in the study area did not live in private dwellings. In 2016, the proportion was similar, at 1.3%.
Area summaries
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 3,336,000 55% 10% 35% 25% 30% 17% 17% 11% 14% 39% 35% 9% 4% 2.6 1.5 1.8 1.5 5.3
2011 TTS 3,117,500 67% 8% 25% 19% 33% 19% 19% 10% 12% 39% 38% 8% 3% 2.7 1.5 1.8 1.5 5.7
2006 TTS 2,871,200 67% 7% 25% 21% 33% 18% 18% 10% 14% 40% 36% 8% 2% 2.7 1.4 1.8 1.5 5.8
1996 TTS 2,311,800 63% 6% 31% 21% 31% 18% 19% 11% 15% 41% 35% 7% 2% 2.7 1.4 1.7 1.4 5.7
1986 TTS 1,466,100 66% n/a 34% 19% 31% 19% 20% 11% 15% 43% 33% 7% 3% 2.8 1.5 1.7 1.4 6.0
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 4,296,000 45% 7% 4% 22% 71% 16%
4,138,300 42% 7% 5% 24% 71% 9%
Median
Male
3,719,900 43% 6% 5% 23% 70% 6%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
3,070,500 45% 6% 3% 25% 68% 5%
1,996,000 56% 5% 1% 22% 70% n/a
2016 TTS 8,822,800 12% 6% 13% 27% 27% 14% 40.0 2.3 0.74 4,526,800 33% 11% 4% 21% 65% 17%
2011 TTS 8,520,300 12% 6% 13% 28% 26% 14% 39.8 2.4 0.74 4,382,000 31% 11% 4% 22% 64% 11%
Female
2006 TTS 7,705,300 13% 7% 11% 28% 25% 15% 40.6 2.5 0.76 3,985,400 31% 11% 3% 22% 61% 8%
1996 TTS 6,271,200 15% 7% 13% 35% 19% 11% 34.8 2.5 0.79 3,200,800 31% 11% 2% 24% 58% 6%
1986 TTS 4,062,900 14% 7% 17% 35% 19% 9% 32.1 2.4 0.77 2,066,900 36% 11% 2% 21% 55% n/a
TRIPS MADE TO TTS AREA BY RESIDENTS OF THE TTS AREA (EXCLUDES DESTINATIONS EXTERNAL TO THE TTS AREA)
Trip Purpose Mode of Travel Median Trip Length (km)
Time % 24
Trips Walk &
Period hr Work School Home Other Driver Pass. Transit GO Train Other Driver Pass. Transit GO Train
Cycle
4,136,100 23.7% 55% 20% 6% 19% 60% 11% 13% 2% 10% 5% 8.1 3.5 7.7 30.5
4,070,800 22.8% 51% 22% 6% 21% 61% 13% 12% 2% 8% 4% 7.1 3.3 7.5 30.4
6:00-
3,768,100 22.9% 52% 23% 6% 20% 61% 13% 11% 2% 9% 5% 7.1 3.3 6.9 30.1
8:59 AM
2,907,500 22.2% 57% 24% 4% 15% 59% 12% 13% 1% 10% 4% 7.7 3.8 6.3 29.4
1,899,400 23.4% 68% 19% 3% 11% 56% 10% 21% 1% 9% 3% 8.1 5.0 6.5 28.0
17,435,500 22% 6% 43% 30% 64% 13% 11% 1% 8% 3% 6.2 4.4 6.6 30.8
17,835,800 17% 6% 42% 35% 64% 16% 10% 1% 6% 2% 5.4 4.1 6.6 30.8
24 Hrs 16,471,500 17% 6% 42% 34% 65% 16% 9% 1% 6% 3% 5.3 4.1 6.1 30.3
13,071,600 18% 7% 42% 33% 64% 16% 10% 1% 6% 3% 5.4 4.0 5.6 29.4
8,115,700 21% 7% 43% 29% 60% 14% 16% 1% 7% 2% 5.7 4.1 5.8 27.9
CITY OF TORONTO
The geographies depicted on the map are the former municipalities that almagamated in 1998 as the City of Toronto. These historical
geographies are still sometimes used for data comparisons with earlier cycles of the TTS data.
CITY OF TORONTO
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 18
CITY OF TORONTO
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 1,113,000 31% 6% 63% 32% 30% 16% 13% 9% 28% 48% 20% 4% 1% 2.4 1.4 1.5 1.0 4.6
2011 TTS 1,009,400 49% 6% 45% 24% 32% 19% 17% 9% 23% 49% 24% 4% 1% 2.6 1.4 1.6 1.1 5.1
2006 TTS 979,300 50% 6% 44% 27% 33% 18% 15% 8% 26% 47% 22% 4% 1% 2.5 1.3 1.5 1.1 4.9
1996 TTS 908,500 49% 4% 47% 27% 31% 17% 15% 10% 26% 47% 22% 4% 1% 2.5 1.3 1.5 1.1 5.0
1986 TTS 820,800 56% n/a 44% 24% 32% 18% 16% 10% 21% 47% 25% 5% 2% 2.6 1.5 1.6 1.2 5.3
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 1,286,500 45% 7% 4% 22% 68% 24%
1,251,300 40% 8% 5% 25% 68% 15%
Median
Male
1,161,900 41% 6% 5% 23% 67% 11%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
1,113,400 44% 6% 3% 24% 67% 7%
1,043,200 57% 5% 1% 21% 70% n/a
2016 TTS 2,671,500 11% 5% 13% 31% 26% 14% 38.8 2.2 0.76 1,385,000 35% 10% 4% 21% 57% 26%
2011 TTS 2,616,800 11% 6% 15% 29% 25% 15% 40.2 2.2 0.74 1,365,500 31% 11% 4% 23% 56% 18%
Female
2006 TTS 2,445,900 12% 6% 11% 30% 24% 18% 41.3 2.2 0.77 1,284,000 31% 9% 3% 21% 53% 13%
1996 TTS 2,305,600 13% 6% 13% 37% 19% 13% 35.3 2.3 0.80 1,192,200 32% 9% 2% 23% 51% 8%
1986 TTS 2,135,000 12% 6% 18% 34% 20% 10% 32.9 2.2 0.78 1,091,900 40% 9% 2% 19% 51% n/a
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 227,900 73% 11% 16% 19% 30% 18% 20% 12% 6% 32% 44% 13% 5% 2.8 1.6 2.0 1.8 5.6
2011 TTS 216,900 81% 8% 11% 16% 34% 20% 20% 11% 5% 32% 47% 12% 4% 2.8 1.5 2.0 1.8 6.2
2006 TTS 194,600 80% 8% 12% 17% 33% 19% 20% 10% 6% 33% 46% 11% 4% 2.8 1.5 1.9 1.7 6.3
1996 TTS 154,300 78% 6% 16% 15% 30% 20% 23% 12% 6% 35% 47% 9% 2% 2.9 1.5 1.9 1.7 6.2
1986 TTS 106,000 83% n/a 17% 13% 29% 20% 26% 12% 5% 37% 45% 10% 3% 3.0 1.6 1.9 1.7 6.8
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 309,700 45% 7% 4% 22% 71% 14%
298,200 43% 6% 5% 23% 71% 8%
Median
Male
260,900 45% 6% 5% 24% 72% 6%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
223,600 47% 5% 2% 26% 67% 4%
157,800 56% 4% 1% 23% 69% n/a
2016 TTS 634,600 13% 6% 13% 26% 28% 13% 39.9 2.3 0.72 324,900 33% 12% 4% 22% 69% 15%
2011 TTS 608,200 14% 7% 13% 27% 27% 12% 39.0 2.6 0.74 310,100 32% 11% 4% 21% 68% 9%
Female
2006 TTS 539,500 13% 8% 11% 27% 27% 13% 40.7 2.6 0.76 278,600 32% 11% 3% 23% 66% 6%
1996 TTS 450,400 19% 7% 11% 36% 17% 8% 33.8 2.6 0.78 226,800 31% 11% 2% 24% 62% 4%
1986 TTS 317,900 18% 8% 15% 36% 16% 7% 30.7 2.6 0.75 160,000 29% 12% 2% 24% 59% n/a
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 357,000 70% 12% 17% 15% 26% 20% 23% 15% 4% 30% 48% 13% 6% 3.1 1.7 2.1 1.9 5.9
2011 TTS 336,900 79% 10% 11% 11% 28% 23% 25% 13% 4% 29% 51% 12% 4% 3.1 1.7 2.1 1.9 6.6
2006 TTS 275,700 81% 9% 9% 11% 28% 21% 26% 15% 4% 29% 50% 12% 4% 3.1 1.7 2.1 1.8 6.7
1996 TTS 178,200 83% 6% 12% 12% 25% 20% 26% 17% 4% 28% 51% 12% 4% 3.2 1.6 2.1 1.8 6.8
1986 TTS 106,000 90% n/a 10% 8% 26% 21% 28% 17% 4% 28% 51% 12% 5% 3.3 1.7 2.1 1.9 7.2
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 531,800 46% 6% 5% 24% 72% 13%
503,400 44% 6% 5% 25% 72% 8%
Median
Male
418,800 45% 5% 5% 25% 71% 5%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
281,200 47% 5% 3% 28% 68% 3%
169,700 56% 4% 1% 25% 69% n/a
2016 TTS 1,091,000 13% 7% 13% 26% 28% 14% 40.7 2.2 0.74 559,200 34% 10% 4% 22% 67% 14%
2011 TTS 1,032,700 13% 7% 13% 28% 27% 12% 39.4 2.5 0.75 529,300 33% 11% 4% 23% 68% 8%
Female
2006 TTS 857,500 14% 8% 12% 28% 26% 12% 40.0 2.5 0.77 438,700 33% 10% 4% 24% 65% 6%
1996 TTS 567,700 17% 8% 13% 35% 19% 8% 34.7 2.6 0.80 286,500 32% 11% 2% 26% 64% 3%
1986 TTS 345,000 18% 8% 16% 36% 16% 6% 30.7 2.5 0.76 175,300 33% 11% 2% 24% 60% n/a
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 430,100 59% 13% 28% 16% 24% 19% 22% 19% 7% 36% 42% 12% 4% 3.1 1.7 2.1 1.7 5.8
2011 TTS 414,200 67% 11% 21% 12% 27% 21% 24% 16% 6% 37% 44% 10% 3% 3.1 1.6 2.0 1.7 6.4
2006 TTS 359,000 70% 11% 19% 13% 27% 20% 24% 16% 6% 37% 43% 10% 3% 3.1 1.7 2.0 1.7 6.5
1996 TTS 266,500 64% 10% 26% 14% 28% 20% 24% 15% 7% 37% 44% 9% 3% 3.0 1.6 1.9 1.6 6.3
1986 TTS 186,800 72% n/a 28% 12% 27% 21% 25% 14% 5% 37% 45% 10% 4% 3.1 1.7 2.0 1.7 6.8
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 663,700 46% 7% 3% 25% 69% 20%
638,400 44% 6% 4% 26% 69% 9%
Median
Male
548,300 46% 6% 4% 26% 68% 5%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
404,500 50% 5% 2% 25% 67% 4%
286,600 58% 4% 1% 24% 69% n/a
2016 TTS 1,352,100 13% 7% 14% 28% 26% 12% 37.9 2.1 0.75 688,500 33% 10% 3% 24% 61% 23%
2011 TTS 1,297,600 14% 7% 14% 29% 25% 11% 37.0 2.4 0.76 659,100 32% 10% 3% 24% 62% 11%
Female
2006 TTS 1,119,100 15% 8% 12% 31% 24% 11% 37.3 2.5 0.79 570,900 34% 9% 3% 24% 59% 6%
1996 TTS 812,500 17% 7% 13% 37% 18% 7% 33.0 2.5 0.81 408,000 35% 11% 1% 25% 59% 5%
1986 TTS 577,000 17% 8% 17% 37% 16% 5% 30.2 2.5 0.78 290,400 38% 10% 2% 23% 58% n/a
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 193,100 64% 18% 19% 20% 30% 18% 22% 11% 3% 31% 49% 12% 5% 2.8 1.6 2.0 1.8 5.9
2011 TTS 183,700 69% 15% 16% 16% 35% 20% 20% 9% 4% 31% 50% 10% 3% 2.7 1.5 1.9 1.8 6.1
2006 TTS 156,900 71% 13% 16% 17% 36% 19% 19% 9% 5% 31% 51% 10% 3% 2.7 1.5 1.9 1.8 6.3
1996 TTS 118,400 71% 10% 20% 18% 32% 19% 21% 11% 6% 34% 48% 10% 2% 2.8 1.5 1.9 1.7 6.4
1986 TTS 90,200 80% n/a 20% 14% 30% 20% 24% 12% 5% 35% 46% 11% 4% 2.9 1.6 2.0 1.8 7.3
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 262,000 46% 6% 5% 24% 72% 16%
243,600 45% 5% 6% 23% 73% 9%
Median
Male
204,800 45% 6% 6% 22% 72% 5%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
161,000 50% 5% 3% 25% 70% 4%
131,200 56% 5% 1% 25% 71% n/a
2016 TTS 539,200 14% 7% 12% 26% 27% 14% 40.3 2.5 0.73 277,200 33% 11% 5% 23% 70% 15%
2011 TTS 502,000 15% 6% 11% 29% 25% 14% 39.4 2.6 0.74 258,500 32% 11% 5% 21% 70% 8%
Female
2006 TTS 422,700 14% 7% 9% 28% 26% 15% 40.9 2.7 0.76 217,900 32% 12% 4% 21% 69% 5%
1996 TTS 328,300 17% 7% 11% 35% 21% 10% 35.7 2.8 0.79 167,300 32% 13% 2% 23% 67% 4%
1986 TTS 264,600 16% 8% 15% 33% 20% 8% 33.2 2.8 0.77 133,400 30% 13% 1% 23% 63% n/a
CITY OF HAMILTON
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 28
CITY OF HAMILTON
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 211,500 61% 12% 28% 28% 32% 16% 15% 9% 13% 39% 35% 9% 4% 2.5 1.3 1.7 1.5 5.2
2011 TTS 204,900 68% 8% 24% 23% 35% 17% 16% 8% 14% 40% 35% 8% 3% 2.5 1.3 1.7 1.5 5.4
2006 TTS 194,500 68% 8% 24% 25% 35% 16% 15% 9% 16% 41% 34% 7% 2% 2.5 1.2 1.6 1.4 5.4
1996 TTS 179,100 69% 6% 26% 25% 32% 16% 18% 9% 16% 43% 33% 6% 2% 2.6 1.2 1.6 1.4 5.4
1986 TTS 156,300 72% n/a 28% 20% 32% 18% 19% 10% 15% 45% 31% 7% 2% 2.7 1.3 1.7 1.4 6.1
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 256,900 44% 8% 3% 22% 72% 14%
252,600 39% 7% 4% 22% 70% 8%
Median
Male
236,800 39% 6% 4% 23% 69% 6%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
226,100 43% 6% 2% 24% 69% 5%
207,500 51% 4% 1% 23% 69% n/a
2016 TTS 525,500 12% 6% 13% 26% 28% 16% 40.8 2.4 0.73 268,600 32% 12% 3% 21% 67% 16%
2011 TTS 519,800 12% 6% 13% 26% 27% 16% 40.7 2.4 0.72 267,200 28% 12% 3% 21% 63% 9%
Female
2006 TTS 487,100 12% 7% 12% 26% 25% 18% 42.1 2.5 0.75 250,300 28% 12% 3% 22% 61% 7%
1996 TTS 462,000 15% 6% 13% 33% 19% 14% 35.3 2.5 0.77 235,900 26% 13% 1% 23% 58% 7%
1986 TTS 423,400 14% 7% 17% 31% 20% 11% 33.1 2.5 0.75 215,900 27% 13% 1% 21% 53% n/a
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 183,900 73% 7% 20% 73% 37% 15% 13% 7% 7% 38% 37% 12% 5% 2.4 1.3 1.8 1.7 5.1
2011 TTS 175,100 78% 6% 16% 21% 41% 17% 13% 7% 9% 38% 40% 10% 3% 2.5 1.2 1.8 1.6 5.6
2006 TTS 169,400 81% 5% 14% 23% 40% 16% 14% 7% 8% 40% 40% 9% 3% 2.5 1.2 1.8 1.6 6.1
1996 TTS 156,600 77% 4% 19% 22% 37% 17% 16% 9% 10% 41% 39% 8% 2% 2.6 1.2 1.7 1.5 5.7
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 212,200 42% 7% 3% 19% 76% 5%
208,300 37% 7% 5% 19% 74% 3%
Median
Male
201,700 40% 6% 4% 22% 74% 2%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
196,800 40% 6% 3% 25% 71% 1%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 436,900 11% 5% 12% 23% 29% 20% 45.2 2.4 0.70 224,800 29% 14% 4% 19% 74% 6%
2011 TTS 431,500 11% 6% 12% 24% 28% 19% 44.2 2.5 0.70 223,200 26% 14% 3% 18% 71% 4%
Female
2006 TTS 418,800 11% 7% 11% 24% 27% 19% 43.9 2.8 0.73 217,100 27% 13% 3% 21% 69% 3%
1996 TTS 401,700 15% 6% 13% 31% 20% 15% 36.5 2.6 0.74 204,900 24% 14% 2% 23% 65% 2%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 203,800 62% 11% 27% 24% 33% 17% 16% 10% 8% 36% 40% 11% 4% 2.6 1.5 1.8 1.7 5.7
2011 TTS 186,300 73% 9% 18% 17% 37% 18% 19% 10% 8% 36% 45% 9% 3% 2.7 1.5 1.9 1.7 6.1
2006 TTS 178,000 74% 8% 18% 19% 35% 18% 19% 9% 8% 39% 42% 8% 2% 2.7 1.5 1.8 1.6 6.4
1996 TTS 148,900 66% 8% 26% 20% 33% 18% 18% 11% 10% 41% 40% 8% 2% 2.7 1.4 1.8 1.5 6.6
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 259,300 47% 6% 4% 23% 72% 8%
248,800 44% 7% 4% 22% 72% 6%
Median
Male
232,400 46% 6% 4% 24% 71% 4%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
197,900 45% 6% 3% 27% 70% 2%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 524,500 13% 6% 14% 28% 26% 13% 38.1 2.5 0.75 265,100 34% 12% 4% 23% 70% 8%
2011 TTS 507,500 13% 6% 13% 29% 25% 13% 37.7 2.6 0.74 258,600 30% 13% 3% 22% 67% 7%
Female
2006 TTS 476,400 14% 7% 12% 29% 24% 13% 38.2 2.8 0.76 244,100 31% 13% 3% 23% 66% 4%
1996 TTS 402,200 16% 7% 15% 33% 18% 10% 33.0 2.9 0.78 204,200 29% 13% 2% 26% 63% 3%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
CITY OF GUELPH
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 34
CITY OF GUELPH
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 52,200 55% 14% 30% 27% 33% 16% 16% 8% 10% 41% 38% 8% 3% 2.5 1.4 1.8 1.5 5.6
2011 TTS 46,900 70% 11% 19% 20% 19% 17% 8% 7% 42% 42% 7% 2% 2.6 1.4 1.8 1.6 5.8
2006 TTS 42,900 69% 10% 21% 22% 36% 17% 17% 8% 10% 45% 38% 7% 2% 2.6 1.4 1.8 1.5 6.2
1996 TTS 37,000 63% 7% 30% 23% 35% 18% 17% 8% 13% 46% 36% 5% 1% 2.6 1.3 1.7 1.4 5.9
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 63,100 46% 7% 4% 24% 72% 10%
59,800 45% 7% 4% 21% 72% 5%
Median
Male
51,700 45% 6% 3% 26% 71% 7%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
45,900 45% 5% 1% 28% 68% 5%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 129,400 13% 6% 14% 29% 25% 13% 38.0 2.6 0.74 66,300 34% 13% 4% 23% 70% 11%
2011 TTS 121,700 14% 5% 12% 32% 13% 37.4 2.6 0.75 61,900 31% 12% 4% 19% 71% 6%
Female
2006 TTS 109,500 13% 7% 15% 28% 23% 14% 37.8 2.8 0.77 57,700 33% 13% 3% 27% 70% 10%
1996 TTS 94,500 15% 7% 16% 35% 15% 12% 32.8 2.7 0.78 48,500 29% 13% 2% 29% 66% 9%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
COUNTY OF WELLINGTON
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 36
COUNTY OF WELLINGTON
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 22,100 87% 4% 9% 19% 38% 16% 17% 10% 2% 26% 43% 17% 12% 2.7 1.6 2.1 2.2 5.9
2011 TTS 20,800 91% 3% 6% 13% 41% 18% 18% 10% 3% 25% 50% 16% 6% 2.7 1.6 2.1 2.0 6.2
2006 TTS 19,800 91% 1% 8% 16% 41% 18% 15% 10% 4% 28% 50% 13% 5% 2.7 1.6 2.0 1.9 6.1
1996 TTS 15,700 90% 1% 8% 16% 33% 15% 24% 12% 4% 31% 49% 13% 3% 2.9 1.5 2.0 1.8 6.1
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 29,700 46% 6% 6% 19% 77% 3%
28,000 42% 7% 8% 19% 77% 1%
Median
Male
26,400 42% 5% 9% 22% 75% 0%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
22,600 45% 4% 5% 25% 70% 1%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 59,300 11% 7% 12% 21% 32% 18% 45.3 2.5 0.71 29,600 31% 13% 6% 19% 77% 3%
2011 TTS 56,800 13% 7% 13% 22% 30% 16% 43.8 2.6 0.71 28,900 30% 12% 6% 22% 75% 1%
Female
2006 TTS 53,000 12% 8% 11% 23% 30% 16% 43.7 2.6 0.70 26,600 29% 14% 5% 21% 73% 1%
1996 TTS 45,400 17% 9% 11% 32% 21% 10% 35.1 2.6 0.73 22,800 29% 11% 3% 25% 67% 0%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
TOWN OF ORANGEVILLE
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 38
TOWN OF ORANGEVILLE
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 10,600 72% 11% 17% 22% 31% 18% 19% 10% 7% 30% 43% 13% 6% 2.7 1.6 1.9 1.8 5.5
2011 TTS 10,400 77% 8% 16% 18% 34% 21% 18% 8% 7% 34% 46% 10% 3% 2.7 1.5 1.9 1.7 6.0
2006 TTS 9,400 79% 6% 15% 17% 34% 19% 20% 10% 5% 35% 48% 10% 3% 2.8 1.6 1.9 1.7 6.3
1996 TTS 7,800 80% 5% 15% 13% 28% 24% 20% 15% 7% 35% 48% 8% 2% 3.0 1.6 1.9 1.6 6.4
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 13,700 50% 6% 3% 21% 71% 4%
13,800 48% 7% 3% 18% 71% 2%
Median
Male
12,900 50% 6% 3% 23% 69% 1%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
11,500 46% 6% 3% 26% 64% 1%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 28,300 14% 7% 13% 27% 26% 13% 38.2 2.4 0.72 14,600 35% 13% 4% 22% 69% 3%
2011 TTS 28,000 16% 6% 11% 30% 24% 11% 36.2 2.7 0.75 14,200 32% 13% 4% 19% 69% 2%
Female
2006 TTS 26,000 17% 8% 10% 31% 23% 12% 37.5 2.7 0.77 13,100 33% 11% 3% 20% 68% 1%
1996 TTS 23,500 21% 9% 13% 35% 16% 7% 31.1 2.7 0.76 11,900 31% 16% 2% 25% 63% 1%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
COUNTY OF DUFFERIN
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 40
COUNTY OF DUFFERIN
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 11,400 94% 2% 4% 15% 36% 17% 18% 13% 3% 20% 44% 21% 12% 2.8 1.7 2.2 2.2 5.3
2011 TTS 10,600 93% 2% 6% 14% 43% 18% 16% 10% 2% 22% 52% 17% 7% 2.7 1.7 2.0 2.1 5.6
2006 TTS 9,400 94% 1% 5% 13% 40% 16% 20% 11% 2% 26% 50% 16% 7% 2.8 1.7 2.0 2.0 5.8
1996 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 16,400 44% 5% 8% 21% 76% 2%
15,100 41% 5% 12% 19% 76% 1%
Median
Male
13,300 42% 5% 10% 23% 71% 0%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 32,200 13% 6% 13% 22% 32% 15% 43.0 2.1 0.69 15,800 32% 13% 6% 21% 76% 4%
2011 TTS 28,800 13% 7% 10% 24% 31% 16% 44.5 2.4 0.66 13,700 26% 14% 8% 20% 74% 0%
Female
2006 TTS 26,500 15% 9% 9% 26% 27% 14% 41.3 2.4 0.67 13,200 26% 14% 7% 23% 71% 1%
1996 TTS 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
CITY OF BARRIE
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 42
CITY OF BARRIE
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 52,500 64% 11% 25% 23% 32% 18% 17% 10% 7% 36% 41% 12% 4% 2.6 1.5 1.9 1.7 5.5
2011 TTS 50,600 74% 10% 16% 18% 36% 19% 19% 8% 7% 38% 44% 9% 2% 2.7 1.4 1.8 1.6 5.7
2006 TTS 46,500 79% 7% 13% 19% 34% 19% 19% 9% 8% 37% 46% 7% 2% 2.7 1.5 1.8 1.6 6.2
1996 TTS 28,600 70% 7% 24% 20% 36% 17% 16% 10% 10% 42% 40% 6% 2% 2.6 1.3 1.7 1.5 5.9
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 67,000 46% 8% 4% 22% 71% 6%
65,800 44% 6% 4% 23% 69% 4%
Median
Male
59,900 46% 5% 4% 23% 69% 3%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
36,700 45% 6% 2% 23% 68% 2%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 138,000 13% 7% 13% 28% 26% 13% 38.7 2.4 0.72 71,100 33% 13% 4% 21% 70% 6%
2011 TTS 135,800 14% 7% 12% 31% 24% 12% 37.1 2.5 0.71 70,000 30% 12% 4% 20% 67% 6%
Female
2006 TTS 124,700 15% 8% 11% 31% 22% 13% 37.9 2.7 0.74 64,700 30% 13% 4% 22% 65% 4%
1996 TTS 75,300 19% 7% 13% 35% 16% 10% 32.8 2.7 0.78 38,600 26% 14% 2% 24% 62% 2%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
CITY OF ORILLIA
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 44
CITY OF ORILLIA
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 13,500 59% 8% 32% 33% 36% 15% 10% 6% 9% 46% 32% 10% 3% 2.2 1.1 1.6 1.5 4.8
2011 TTS 12,800 70% 7% 23% 26% 39% 17% 11% 8% 13% 46% 33% 7% 1% 2.4 1.2 1.6 1.4 5.5
2006 TTS 12,200 74% 4% 22% 25% 41% 15% 13% 6% 12% 45% 36% 6% 2% 2.3 1.2 1.6 1.4 5.4
1996 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 14,100 37% 11% 3% 16% 73% 3%
14,300 35% 9% 3% 16% 68% 3%
Median
Male
13,300 42% 8% 4% 17% 73% 1%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 30,000 11% 5% 11% 24% 28% 22% 46.1 2.4 0.70 15,900 29% 13% 3% 15% 74% 4%
2011 TTS 30,700 11% 5% 12% 23% 28% 21% 44.9 2.6 0.70 16,400 29% 11% 4% 17% 66% 4%
Female
2006 TTS 28,700 12% 7% 10% 23% 27% 21% 44.9 2.6 0.67 15,400 30% 11% 3% 17% 66% 1%
1996 TTS 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 46
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 117,600 86% 5% 9% 21% 38% 16% 16% 9% 3% 30% 44% 15% 8% 2.6 1.4 2.0 2.0 5.1
2011 TTS 107,500 91% 3% 6% 17% 42% 18% 17% 7% 4% 31% 46% 13% 6% 2.6 1.4 1.9 1.9 5.6
2006 TTS 97,900 91% 2% 7% 17% 40% 16% 18% 9% 4% 34% 46% 11% 4% 2.7 1.5 1.9 1.8 5.9
1996 TTS 40,800 91% 2% 6% 14% 32% 18% 22% 14% 4% 31% 50% 11% 3% 2.9 1.5 1.9 1.8 5.7
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 149,600 43% 6% 5% 18% 76% 2%
139,400 40% 6% 7% 19% 75% 1%
Median
Male
128,600 41% 5% 7% 21% 73% 1%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
60,000 46% 4% 3% 24% 68% 1%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 301,500 12% 6% 11% 23% 30% 18% 44.7 2.3 0.71 151,900 30% 12% 4% 18% 76% 2%
2011 TTS 278,000 11% 6% 12% 23% 30% 17% 44.3 2.4 0.70 138,600 29% 12% 5% 18% 74% 1%
Female
2006 TTS 260,500 13% 8% 9% 26% 26% 17% 42.5 2.5 0.71 131,900 29% 12% 4% 21% 70% 1%
1996 TTS 120,100 20% 8% 10% 36% 16% 10% 33.7 2.4 0.74 60,100 27% 12% 2% 23% 63% 1%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 31,100 86% 2% 12% 25% 43% 14% 12% 6% 5% 33% 39% 15% 7% 2.4 1.2 1.8 1.9 4.6
2011 TTS 29,900 93% 1% 6% 19% 47% 16% 13% 6% 4% 29% 46% 15% 6% 2.4 1.3 1.9 2.0 5.1
2006 TTS 29,500 88% 1% 10% 21% 46% 14% 13% 6% 5% 37% 42% 11% 3% 2.4 1.2 1.8 1.7 5.2
1996 TTS 26,300 86% 2% 12% 20% 39% 14% 16% 10% 7% 39% 43% 8% 3% 2.6 1.1 1.8 1.6 5.4
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 36,200 36% 6% 7% 15% 78% 3%
36,400 35% 7% 10% 17% 80% 1%
Median
Male
34,900 34% 6% 8% 19% 77% 1%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
34,200 37% 5% 5% 24% 71% 0%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 73,400 9% 5% 10% 20% 32% 24% 50.5 2.2 0.67 37,200 27% 11% 4% 15% 76% 2%
2011 TTS 73,300 9% 6% 12% 19% 32% 22% 48.6 2.3 0.66 36,900 26% 12% 5% 17% 77% 1%
Female
2006 TTS 70,700 10% 7% 9% 22% 29% 23% 47.6 2.4 0.68 35,900 26% 11% 5% 17% 74% 0%
1996 TTS 68,200 16% 8% 11% 29% 21% 16% 37.9 2.4 0.70 34,100 21% 12% 2% 23% 66% 0%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
CITY OF PETERBOROUGH
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 50
CITY OF PETERBOROUGH
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 34,700 60% 8% 32% 31% 37% 14% 12% 6% 13% 46% 31% 6% 2% 2.3 1.2 1.6 1.4 4.8
2011 TTS 33,000 74% 5% 21% 23% 41% 16% 14% 6% 11% 44% 36% 7% 2% 2.4 1.2 1.7 1.5 5.5
2006 TTS 31,200 73% 4% 24% 27% 40% 16% 12% 6% 12% 48% 33% 6% 1% 2.3 1.1 1.7 1.4 5.7
1996 TTS 30,400 69% 4% 27% 28% 36% 14% 14% 7% 17% 48% 30% 4% 1% 2.4 1.0 1.6 1.2 5.5
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 37,400 37% 10% 5% 19% 71% 10%
37,100 33% 10% 4% 22% 72% 5%
Median
Male
32,900 37% 8% 4% 23% 74% 6%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
34,300 36% 8% 2% 27% 70% 6%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 78,300 11% 5% 14% 24% 26% 21% 42.9 2.4 0.69 40,900 29% 13% 3% 18% 71% 11%
2011 TTS 78,800 10% 6% 15% 24% 26% 20% 43.0 2.5 0.70 41,600 27% 13% 3% 21% 70% 8%
Female
2006 TTS 72,700 10% 6% 16% 21% 25% 22% 43.9 2.7 0.71 39,800 26% 13% 2% 24% 71% 9%
1996 TTS 72,500 15% 6% 16% 29% 17% 17% 35.3 2.7 0.72 38,200 21% 15% 2% 27% 65% 9%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 52
COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 17,400 96% 1% 3% 19% 43% 15% 14% 8% 1% 24% 52% 14% 9% 2.5 1.4 2.0 2.1 5.2
2011 TTS 16,600 98% 1% 2% 13% 48% 16% 14% 9% 2% 24% 51% 16% 7% 2.6 1.4 2.1 2.1 5.7
2006 TTS 17,100 95% 0% 4% 16% 47% 16% 13% 8% 2% 30% 50% 14% 4% 2.5 1.4 2.0 1.9 5.8
1996 TTS 14,900 96% * 4% 14% 38% 15% 22% 11% 2% 31% 53% 11% 4% 2.8 1.4 2.0 1.9 6.2
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 21,900 38% 6% 6% 16% 80% 3%
21,500 36% 7% 9% 20% 79% 1%
Median
Male
21,500 39% 7% 8% 20% 80% 1%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
20,900 39% 7% 5% 27% 74% 1%
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 44,100 12% 5% 10% 20% 33% 21% 48.8 2.4 0.71 22,200 29% 13% 5% 17% 78% 3%
2011 TTS 43,000 9% 7% 13% 18% 35% 19% 47.8 2.4 0.68 21,500 29% 13% 4% 20% 78% 2%
Female
2006 TTS 43,100 10% 7% 10% 21% 32% 20% 47.4 2.6 0.71 21,700 29% 12% 5% 20% 77% 1%
1996 TTS 41,600 15% 8% 11% 28% 26% 12% 38.9 2.6 0.72 20,700 26% 15% 2% 24% 69% 0%
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
CITY OF BRANTFORD
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 54
CITY OF BRANTFORD
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 39,200 66% 10% 24% 28% 34% 16% 13% 8% 9% 39% 39% 9% 3% 2.5 1.3 1.7 1.6 5.0
2011 TTS 37,500 74% 8% 18% 24% 36% 18% 15% 7% 12% 38% 40% 7% 2% 2.5 1.2 1.6 1.5 5.4
2006 TTS 35,600 77% 5% 18% 24% 37% 17% 15% 8% 11% 41% 37% 8% 2% 2.5 1.3 1.7 1.5 5.9
1996 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 46,900 43% 8% 3% 20% 70% 6%
44,900 42% 6% 3% 18% 68% 3%
Median
Male
42,000 44% 7% 3% 20% 71% 3%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 96,700 13% 6% 12% 26% 27% 16% 40.6 2.3 0.73 49,800 34% 11% 2% 19% 68% 6%
2011 TTS 93,600 13% 6% 10% 28% 27% 15% 39.3 2.5 0.74 48,700 30% 12% 2% 17% 65% 5%
Female
2006 TTS 88,800 13% 7% 11% 25% 26% 17% 41.5 2.7 0.78 46,800 30% 12% 2% 20% 65% 5%
1996 TTS 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
COUNTY OF BRANT
TTS Travel Summaries – TTS Area
March 2018 Transportation Tomorrow Survey
P a g e | 56
COUNTY OF BRANT
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Dwelling Type Household Size Number of Available Vehicles Household Averages
Townhouse
Apartment
Trips/Day
Households
Workers
Vehicles
Persons
Drivers
House
5+
4+
1
3
2016 TTS 13,500 90% 5% 5% 18% 38% 16% 18% 10% 3% 21% 45% 18% 12% 2.7 1.6 2.1 2.2 5.8
2011 TTS 13,400 92% 3% 5% 13% 43% 17% 20% 7% 3% 23% 54% 14% 6% 2.7 1.6 2.0 2.0 6.1
2006 TTS 12,200 91% 1% 8% 17% 37% 16% 19% 11% 4% 31% 43% 15% 7% 2.8 1.6 2.0 2.0 6.0
1996 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Age Employment Type
Worker
Population 18,100 47% 8% 4% 19% 76% 2%
17,500 42% 5% 10% 19% 76% 1%
Median
Male
17,000 39% 6% 9% 25% 71% 1%
11-15
16-25
26-45
46-64
0-10
65+
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2016 TTS 36,300 12% 6% 11% 22% 30% 17% 44.1 2.5 0.71 18,200 30% 12% 5% 18% 76% 1%
2011 TTS 35,600 12% 7% 12% 24% 29% 17% 42.9 2.6 0.73 18,200 31% 11% 6% 21% 73% 2%
Female
2006 TTS 34,000 14% 9% 9% 25% 26% 17% 41.3 2.5 0.69 17,000 26% 12% 6% 21% 70% 1%
1996 TTS 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
1986 TTS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a