I Ba Nep
I Ba Nep
A:2021-22
POETRY SECTION
POEM: 1
WHEN IN DISGRACE
William Shakespeare (1564-1616)
‘When in Disgrace’ is a sonnet written by William Shakespeare. A sonnet is a poem of
fourteen lines. Friendship is its main theme the sonnet number 29 ‘When in Disgrace’.. This
sonnet is extremely revealing, psychologically and autobiographically. Shakespeare feels terribly
lonely when he is alone in the beginning. But at the end that mere thought of his friend brings him
consolation.
The first two quatrains of the sonnet portray the distressing situation of the poet.
Shakespeare was probably neither rich nor well known as a poet at the time he wrote this sonnet.
We learn more from this sonnet about Shakespeare’s resentment at the circumstances of his life:
these years 1592 and 1593 were the period of extreme discouragement. The theatres were closed
down owing to the outbreak of plague. Acting was looked upon as a disrespectable profession.
With closing of the theatres it was difficult for Shakespeare to earn his livelihood. Moreover, in
the year 1592 there came, in addition to the disgrace of fortune, the disgrace in ‘men’s eyes’ of
Robert Green, a university wit. Robert Green, who was contemptuous of the court poets, attacked
Shakespeare in print. This deathbed attack on him in print made Shakespeare much upset. Lyly
had come down to Oxford to a place already preserved for him. Christopher Marlow’s
‘Tamburlaine’ enjoyed a spectacular success on the London stage by the time he was 23. Hence
he curses his fate and holds himself responsible for the outcast state. That is why Shakespeare in
the opening itself says:
‘When, in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes,
I all alone beweep my outcast state,
…………………………………………………,
And look upon myself, and curse my fate:
While the poet is sad and dispirited, he remembers his noble friend the fortunate
young Earl. He forgets his misery and feels encouraged. He is happy like a skylark, which sings
melodiously at the break of the day. When the people are still asleep, the skylark has already left
its nest to greet the sunrise singing hymns. It is in a state of absolute joy and merriment. In the
couplet he says:
For thy sweet love remembered such wealth brings
That then I scorn to change my state with kings.
It shows poet’s love and affection for a friend who caused such a qualitative change in his life.
Like the skylark the poet will disregard his distress and sing at the gate of heavens. The poet will
not exchange the state of joy with the crown of the king.
Friendship is a source of strength, a special ‘gift of heaven’ to be preserved at any cost.
The very thought of the friend brings him abundant joy because his friend is of noble rank. He was
a great patron of art and poetry, and had been a staunch supporter and the patron of Shakespeare.
PULLEY
Pulley written by George Herbert is a religious metaphysical poem. In this poem the poet
makes an attempt to find out the true cause for man’s restlessness in this world.
When God made man at first, there was a glass of blessings standing by. He decides to
bestow on man all His blessings which the glass contains. The blessings, which the glass contains,
are not to be found anywhere in this universe at any one particular place. They are scattered in
different parts of the world. So God decides to bestow all these blessings on one single creature,
man, so that they can be availed by him in the course of his brief life on the earth.
First strength came out of the glass. Then came beauty, wisdom, honour, and pleasure.
When all the blessings had come out of the glass, God made a pause. God saw that only one
blessing remained in the glass, and it was rest. Then god decided to withhold that blessing from
man.
God said to Himself that if He were to give this precious gift ‘rest’ to man, he would
become proud possessor of all the blessings, give importance only to the gifts feel satisfied with
what he possesses, and forget the creator and giver of all these blessings. If that happens, both he
and God would be losers. Man would fail to think of God and God would be deprived of his
worship.
Therefore God said that let man keep all the other blessings except ‘rest’ i.e., peace of
mind. Without this blessing, man, in the midst of all his pleasures, would experience restlessness
and fatigue. He would always feel discontented and sad in the midst of worldly richness. If, then,
man would fail to think of God out of the goodness of his heart or natural feeling of piety, he would
feel compelled by his restlessness to think of God. In such a state, the feeling of weariness and
restlessness will act as a pulley to hoist him up to God. Thus God’s withholding the blessing of
rest from man would be good both for God and man.
POEM: 3
POEM: 4
THE FIDELITY
William Wordsworth wrote Fidelity in 1805 after ascending the Helvellyn with Walter
Scott and Humphrey Davy. In this poem Wordsworth tells the story of sublime love and fidelity
of a dog to its master and reflects fidelity of the dog.
In a mountainous region a shepherd while grazing his sheep, hears a cry. He does not know
whether the cry is of a dog or fox. The shepherded stops and searches among the scattered rocks
to find out where the cry is coming from. At a distance, he notices a ‘stirring in a brake of fern’.
He goes near and he is surprised to see a dog glancing through that green fern bush.
The shepherd is surprised because the dog is a stranger to that place. The shyness in its
behaviour shows that ‘the dog is not of mountain breed’. Its cry is also unused. Nobody is seen
around either in hollow or on height. Neither shouts nor whistle strikes his ears.
The place is ‘a cove, a huge recess’. It is still enveloped with the snow one could see a
cliff and a small mountain lake near the Helvellyn. It is far away from ‘public road or dwelling
pathway or cultivated land’. Nobody could trace a human foot or hand.
The only movement seen is the movements of a leaping fish in the lake and the only sound
heard is the crowing of ravens. The cloudy mist driven by wind covers everything like a shroud.
The shepherd stands for a while and thinks if the barking sound portends evil. Then he makes his
way through the rocks and stones following day. At a distance away he sees a human Skelton. He
is shocked and frightened and looks around with a sigh to find out the reason for the presence of
the dog and the human skeleton.
The shepherded thinks that the man must have been fallen down the steep cliff in fear. He
recalls that this man was the traveler who had passed that way along with this dog three months
back. Since the day the traveler died, the dog had kept watch over that place and his master. He
fails to understand how the dog could have lived on for these three months in this desolate place
hovering near the skeleton, repeating the same cry. The poet concludes that only the divine power
that gave the dog such love and power of endurance beyond human estimate.
ONE MARK QUESTIONS
Answer the following questions in a word, phrase of a sentence each
1. ‘Fidelity’ brings out the devotion and royalty of a ______.
Dog
2. Who is the speaker of the poem ‘Fidelity’?
The poet
3. What does the shepherded hear?
A cry as if a dog or fox
4. Where does the shepherd see the dog?
In a brake of fern.
5. Name the mountain mentioned in the poem, ‘Fidelity’.
Helvellyn
6. What does the appalled shepherd discover on the ground?
A human skeleton
7. What is the name of the Traveler who is referred in ‘Fidelity’?
Charles Gough
8. How long had the dog been with his dead master?
For three months
POEM: 5
POEM: 6
FREEDOM
POEM: 7
REFUGEE BLUES
PROSE SECTION
PROSE: 1
WITH THE PHOTOGRAPHER
Stephen Leacock (1869-1944)
With the Photographer, written by Stephen Leacock, is a humorous description of a
peculiar experience of being photographed. In this lesson the author describes the manner in which
the photos were taken in the early 50’s of 20th century.
The author goes to the studio and asks the photographer for his photograph to be taken. The
photographer, who is a drooping man in a grey suit and with the dim eye of a natural scientist,
looks at the authors without enthusiasm. The photographer tells the author to sit down and goes to
the inner room. The author waits for him patiently. In order to kill time, he reads the Ladies
companion for 1912, the Girl’s Magazine for 1902 and the Infants Journal for 1888. After an hour
the photographer comes out of the inner room and tells the author to sit down and goes behind the
machine-type camera.
After a while, the photographer tells the author that his face is quite wrong. With
annoyance, the author tells the photographer that his face is the one he has been born with and has
learnt to love it. Still, the photographer complains that the author’s head, ear and eyes are not in
the ideal shape. Then he gives a series of instructions. He tells him to open the mouth to close it,
to droop the ears, to roll the eyes, to put hands on the knees, to turn to face a little upwards, to
expand the lungs to hump the neck and contract the face. The author gets irritated and he is about
to rise from the seat, the photographer clicks his camera. When the author asks to see it, the
photographer tells him to come on next Saturday.
The author goes to the studio on the following Saturday. The photographer shows him the
photos with a touch of pride. The author is unable to recongnised his face. “Is it me?” asks the
author. “Yes, it is you” replies the photographer. He says proudly that all the features have been
adjusted to look better.
Actually the author wanted the photo to look like him. So that his friends could keep it after
his death in order to reconcile them to his loss. What he wanted is not done. So with anger and
irritation, the author tells the photographer to keep the photo with him and do whatever he likes to
do with it. He angrily rejects the photographer calling it a bubble. Finally, he breaks into tears and
leaves the studio.
PROSE: 2
WHAT IS SCIENCE?
George Orwell (1903-1950)
Science is generally associated with two meanings: (1) Generally it means exact sciences
like Physics, Chemistry, Botany, etc. (2) It is a method of thinking to get verifiable results from
observed facts. Any scientist or well-educated persons or people in general normally mean science
to be study of exact science. Therefore they assume that the scientists are more reliable and
intelligent than lawyers, men of letters, historians and others who have not received scientific
education. Orwell refuses to accept this view.
Orwell refuses to accept the fact that scientists are likely to approach the non-scientific
problems in a more objective way than those who have not received scientific education. For
example, the concept of German nationalism propagated by Hitler. Nearly all German scientists
supported Hitler’s war-mongering nationalism, helped him in building Germany’s war machine
and even accepted without questioning Hitler’s view that Germans were superior to other races.
Only a few scientists, who refused to accept Hitler’s view, were persecuted by the German
government or fled the country. But their number is smaller compared to the number of writers
and journalists.
Even a number of English scientists of England accepted uncritically the English political
and social system based of capitalism. Since they agreed with the government policy, a number of
them received awards and titles from the establishment than the artists. The few scientists who
were critical of the English political and social system were communists. The scientists, who are
honest and scrupulous in their search for truth and work feverishly day and night to discover atom
bomb, do not show the same honesty and objectivity in politics. That is why Orwell objects this
kind of scientific education and opines that mere study of exact scientists does not make a scientist
objective, critical, human and superior to others.
At present scientific education means merely the study of exact sciences, the accumulation
of more and more facts. This is done at the expense of literature, history and other subjects. The
scientists, due to professional jealously, refuse to accept call a lawyer, or a historian, or a writer of
literature a scientist if he or she adopts a rational, critical, objective, and human and scientific way
of looking at the problems of life like scientists.
Charles Kingsley dismissed science as “making nasty smell in a laboratory.” In the same
way, a young industrial chemist told the author that he ‘could not see what was the use of poetry’.
When Orwell reads about the physicists who refused to do research on atomic bombs in an
American magazine says that such were men with some cultural background, having acquaintance
with history, or literature or the arts.
ONE MARK QUESTIONS
Answer the following questions in a word, phrase of a sentence each
1. Who wrote an interesting letter published in Tribune which Orwell read?
Mr. J. Stewart Cook
2. What did Mr. J. Stewart Cook suggest in Tribune?
Scientific education is the best way to avoid the danger of ‘scientific hierarchy’
3. What does adult education tend to neglect?
4. Scientific studies in favour of literary, economic and social subjects
5. Adult education tends to neglect scientific studies in favour of literary, economic and social
subjects.
6. Who did the German scientific community as a whole make no resistance to?
Hitler
7. A number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of ___________.
Racial science
8. How did Charles Kinsley describe science?
Making nasty smell in the laboratory
9. Who described science as ‘making nasty smell in the laboratory’?
Charles Kinsley
TENSES
Tenses indicate present time, past time and future time.
There are three tenses in English.
They are:
1. Present Tense
2. Past Tense
3. Future Tense
PERSONAL PRONOUNS
TENSE TABLE
PRESNT SIMPLE PAST SIMPLE FUTURE SIMPLE
Subject+ Base form/ ‘S’ form Subject+ Past tense form of Subject+ Shall/Will + Base form
the verb
I eat. I ate. I shall eat.
We eat. We ate. We shall eat.
You eat. You ate. You will eat.
He eats. He ate. He will eat.
She eats. She ate. She will eat.
It eats. It ate. It will eat.
They eat. They ate. They will eat.
CONTINUOUS
PRESENT CONTINUOUS PAST CONTINUOUS FUTURE CONTINUOUS TENSE
TENSE TENSE
Sub+ am/is/are+ verb+ ing Sub+ was/were +verb+ ing Sub+ shall/will verb+ verb+ ing
I am eating. I was eating. I shall be eating.
We are eating. We were eating. We shall be eating.
You are eating. You were eating. You will be eating.
He is eating. He was eating. He will be eating.
She is eating. She was eating. She will be eating.
It is eating. It was eating. It will be eating.
They are eating They were eating. They will be eating.
PERFECT
PRESENT PERFECT TENSE PAST PERFECT TENSE FUTURE PERFECT TENSE
Sub+ have/has+ Past participle Sub+ had+ Past participle Sub+ shall/will have+ Past participle
I have eaten. I had eaten. I shall have eaten.
We have eaten. We had eaten. We shall have eaten.
You have eaten. You had eaten. You will have eaten.
He has eaten. He had eaten. He will have eaten.
She has eaten. She had eaten. She will have eaten.
It has eaten. It had eaten. It will have eaten.
They have eaten. They had eaten. They will have eaten.
PERFECT CONTINUOUS
PRESENT PERFECT PAST PERFECT FUTURE PERFECT CONTINUOUS
CONTINUOUS TENSE CONTINUOUS TENSE TENSE
Sub+ have/has+ been + verb+ ing Sub+ had+ been + verb+ ing Sub+ shall/will have+ been+ verb+ ing
I have been eating. I had been eating. I shall have been eating.
We have been eating. We had been eating. We shall have been eating.
You have been eating. You had been eating. You will have been eating.
He has been eating. He had been eating. He will have been eating.
She has been eating. She had been eating. She will have been eating.
It has been eating. It had been eating. It will have been eating.
They have been eating. They had been eating. They will have been eating.
NEGATIVE
THE WAYS TO FORM NEGATIVE STATEMENTS
1. Negative sentences are formed by placing ‘not’ (or n’t) after all the twenty four auxiliary
verbs.
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE
I am sick. I am not sick.
He /She is a doctor. He /She is not a doctor.
I / We/ You / / They have come I / We/ You / They have not come
2. If there are no auxiliary verbs, we put ‘do’, ‘does’, and ‘did’ after the subject, followed by
‘not’ or ‘n’t’ and followed by the base form of the main verb.
a) Simple present tense takes do/does.
b) Simple past tense takes did.
AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE
I/ We/ You/ They like sweets. I/ We/ You/ They do not like sweets.
He/ She/ It likes sweets. He/ She/ It does not like sweets.
I/ We/ You/ He/ She/ It/They liked sweets. I/ We/ You/ He/ She/ It/They did not like sweets.
3. Semi-negatives ‘few’, ‘little’ ‘never’, ‘no’, ‘none’, ‘nobody’, ‘no one’, ‘none’ ‘neither
- nor’, ‘nothing’, ‘nowhere’ ‘barely’, ‘hardly’, ‘scarcely’ ‘rarely’, and ‘seldom’ do not take
‘not’ / ‘n’t’ after them.