THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF ROMAN LAW — CANON 3228

A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law.
Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted, they become fact
and are therefore said to stand true. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private
Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record - Public Service - Public Oath -
Immunity – Summons – Custody - Court of Guardians - Court of Trustees - Government as
Executor / Beneficiary - Executor De Son Tort – Incompetence - Guilt:

• 1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman
Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the
private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly
rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter
remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules.
• 2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who
have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the
Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly
and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly
rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate
public servants and therefore trustees under public oath.
• 3. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the
capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that
oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath.
Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild
members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If
challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and
cannot possibly stand under a public oath.
• 4. The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the
capacity of “public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn
a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability.
Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the
members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and
magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions.
• 5. The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and
therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness)
and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless
the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to
visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands.
• 6. The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted
stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to
be detained in custody by “Custodians”. Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of
property and “things” not flesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is
openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a
thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians.
• 7. The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a
“resident” of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your “passport” the letter
P, you are a pauper and therefore under the “Guardian” powers of the government and its
agents as a “Court of Guardians”. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to
demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before
the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore
must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates’ court.)
 • 8. The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume
you accept the office of trustee as a “public servant” and “government employee” just by
attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the
Guild and the Roman System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are
merely visiting by “invitation” to clear up the matter and you are not a government
employee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of
the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction – simply because you “appeared.”
• 9. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that
for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of
Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current
matter. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general
guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands
and you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor
(judge/magistrate.)
• 10. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused does
seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are
acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor” challenging the “rightful” judge as
Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the role of “true” executor and has the
right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting one’s position as Executor as well as
questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, but the
presumption also stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to
assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim.
• 11. The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the
law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the
judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined, or forced
into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that
you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any
contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then
the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient.
• 12. The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private
business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do not plead
or plead “not guilty”. Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of
truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer,
then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is
prepared to guarantee the amount the Guild wants to profit from you.
The above information has authority from this reality: UNIDROIT
Se also Lieber Code, lex Mercatoria, Executor Son De Tort, and research Tort Law. usufruct,
Subrogation and subjugation
Personage and Barratry are also relevant to look up. Crimes knowingly committed by the London
Law Society the BAR – we are not members of these societies.
We are Private, Loreful Hue-mans, Womb-men. <3 David.