[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views4 pages

CS3 Assignment

The document is an assignment focused on evaluating the validity of categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams. It presents a series of syllogisms, each requiring identification of premises and conclusions, along with a determination of whether the argument is valid or invalid. The assignment includes multiple examples for analysis.

Uploaded by

jinnyonit7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views4 pages

CS3 Assignment

The document is an assignment focused on evaluating the validity of categorical syllogisms using Venn diagrams. It presents a series of syllogisms, each requiring identification of premises and conclusions, along with a determination of whether the argument is valid or invalid. The assignment includes multiple examples for analysis.

Uploaded by

jinnyonit7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

ASSIGNMENT

THE VALIDITY OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM


NAME…………………………………………………………….. ID…………………………….
NAME……………………………………………………….…..... ID…………………………….
NAME……………………………………………………….…..... ID…………………………….
NAME………………………………………………………..….... ID…………………………….
NAME…………………………………………………………...... ID…………………………….
NAME…………………………………………………………...... ID…………………………….
NAME…………………………………………………………...... ID…………………………….
NAME…………………………………………………………...... ID…………………………….

Use Venn diagrams to determine whether the following standard-form categorical


syllogisms are valid

1. All neutron stars are things that produce intense gravity. All neutron stars are
extremely dense objects. Therefore, all extremely dense objects are things that
produce intense gravity.
Premise1

Premise2

Conclusion

(VALID/INVALID)

2. No insects that eat mosquitoes are insects that should be killed. All dragonflies
are insects that eat mosquitoes. Therefore, no dragonflies are insects that should
be killed.
Premise1

Premise2

Conclusion

(VALID/INVALID)

1
3. No environmentally produced diseases are inherited afflictions. Some
psychological disorders are not inherited afflictions. Therefore, some
psychological disorders are environmentally produced diseases.
Premise1

Premise2

Conclusion

(VALID/INVALID)

4. No people who mix fact with fantasy are good witnesses. Some hypnotized
people are people who mix fact with fantasy. Therefore, some hypnotized people
are not good witnesses.
Premise1

Premise2

Conclusion

(VALID/INVALID)

5. All ozone molecules are good absorbers of ultraviolet rays. All ozone molecules
are things destroyed by chlorine. Therefore, some things destroyed by chlorine
are good absorbers of ultraviolet rays.
Premise1

Premise2

Conclusion

(VALID/INVALID)

2
(6) All lawbreakers are bad citizens, and all speeders are law
breakers. So, all speeders are bad citizens.

Premise (1).
Premise (2)
Conclusion

This argument is VALID/INVALID.

(7) No communist is democratic and some leftists are not


communists. Therefore, some democrats are leftists.

Premise (1)
Premise (2)
Conclusion
This argument is VALID/INVALID.

(8) Most cigarette smokers have lung cancer, and most people
with lung cancer die young. Consequently, most cigarette
smokers die young.

Premise (1)
Premise (2).
Conclusion
This argument is VALID/INVALID.

(9) Only fruit are good for people on a diet. Since Durian is a
kind of fruits, it is good for people on a diet.

Premise (1)
Premise (2)
Conclusion

This argument is VALID/INVALID.

(10) Only serious people are responsible as we can see that


responsible people always work hard, and all hard workers are
serious.

Premise (1)
Premise (2)
Conclusion

3
This argument is VALID/INVALID.

(11) People of high incomes without exception pay taxes. Most


movie stars have high incomes, so some taxpayers are movie
stars.

Premise (1)
Premise (2)
Conclusion

This argument is VALID/INVALID.

(12) All shops that sell inexpensive goods are crowded, and this
shop is crowded, therefore, it has a lot of low priced goods for
sale.

Premise (1)
Premise (2)
Conclusion

This argument is VALID/INVALID.

You might also like