QOP 2024 Activity Overview
QOP 2024 Activity Overview
Data Analysis
● Program Areas: The data includes various program areas such as "Community Policing,"
"Cultural Event," "Mentorship Program," and "Stakeholder Meeting."
● Male Participants: The average number of male participants is approximately 40.07, with a
standard deviation of 26.37. The range is from 8 to 103 participants.
Visualization Insights
● Higher Female Participation: Programs like "Women's Health & Well-being" and "Women's
Leadership & Governance" have significantly higher female participation compared to male.
● Lower Female Participation: "Stakeholder Meeting" has notably fewer female participants
compared to male participants.
● Gender-Specific Programs: Programs focused on women's issues tend to have higher female
participation.
● Opportunities for Improvement: Programs with low female participation might benefit from
targeted outreach to increase inclusivity.
Quarterly Participant Data
● Q2: Highest number of both male and female participants, with females significantly
outnumbering males.
● Q3: Lowest number of female participants, with a moderate number of male participants.
● Q4: Highest number of male participants, with a moderate number of female participants.
● Q2 shows the highest participation for both genders, indicating a peak in activity.
● Q3 has the lowest female participation, suggesting a potential area for increased
engagement.
Analysis
Visualization
● The bar chart clearly shows that Women's Health & Well-being has the highest average
number of female participants compared to other program areas.
● Key Insight: Women's Health & Well-being stands out as the program area with the highest
engagement from female participants, indicating a strong interest or need in this area.
Correlation Metrics
● Correlation Value: The correlation between the encoded ward and the total number of
participants is 1.0. This indicates a perfect positive correlation, suggesting that as the ward
changes, the number of participants changes in a perfectly predictable manner.
Visualization
● Plot Interpretation: The bar chart illustrates a perfect correlation (value of 1.0) between the
ward and the total participants, reinforcing the statistical finding.
● Perfect Correlation: There is a perfect positive correlation between the ward and the
number of participants, meaning the ward is a strong predictor of participant numbers.
● Implications: This strong correlation suggests that different wards have distinct participation
levels, which could be due to varying population sizes, interest levels, or accessibility to
activities.
Quarterly Data Analysis
Visualization of Trends
● Increase in Q2: There is a significant increase in the number of participants in Q2, reaching
the highest point at 630.
● Decrease in Q3: The number of participants drops sharply in Q3 to 360, the lowest point.
● Recovery in Q4: There is a moderate increase in Q4, with participants rising to 465.
● Peak in Q2: The data shows a peak in participation during Q2, suggesting possible seasonal
or event-driven factors.
● Cultural Event: Attracts a high average of both male (50.0) and female (50.0) participants
from all tribes.
● Celebration and Award Ceremony: Draws the highest average male (75.0) and female (75.0)
participants from all tribes.
● Women's Health & Well-being: Attracts a significant number of female participants (100.0)
from all tribes.
Visual Representation
● All Tribes: Activities like "Celebration and Award Ceremony" and "Cultural Event" show high
participation across both genders.
● Key Activities: "Celebration and Award Ceremony" and "Cultural Event" consistently attract
more participants from all tribes.
● Locations with Highest Participation: The "Schools in Ngaremara and Burat Wards" had the
highest number of participants (315), followed by "Ngaremara Community Hall" (240) and
"Burat Community Center" (230).
● Locations with Lowest Participation: The "Ngaremara District Office" had the lowest
number of participants (10).
Visualization Insights
● Prominent Locations: The bar chart highlights that locations like "Schools in Ngaremara and
Burat Wards" and "Ngaremara Community Hall" have significantly higher participation
compared to others.
● Key Locations for Engagement: Certain locations, particularly schools and community halls,
are more effective in attracting participants, suggesting they may be central or more
accessible.
● Strategic Planning: Understanding these patterns can help in planning future activities by
choosing locations that maximize participant engagement.
All Tribes:
Specific Tribes:
Visual Comparison
● The bar chart illustrates that activities targeting All Tribes have a higher average number of
female participants compared to those targeting specific tribes.
● Conversely, activities targeting Specific Tribes have a higher average number of male
participants.
● Key Insight 1: Activities targeting "All Tribes" tend to attract more female participants on
average.
● Key Insight 2: Activities targeting specific tribes tend to attract more male participants on
average.
Q9.Are there any outliers in the number of participants for any specific activity or program area?
Analysis of Outliers
● Male Participants: The mean number of male participants is 28, with a standard deviation of
32.71. Outliers were identified in activities with 5 and 75 male participants.
● Female Participants: The mean number of female participants is 85, with a standard
deviation of 22.36. Outliers were identified in activities with 50 and 100 female participants.
Visualization of Outliers
● Box Plot: The box plot highlights anomalies in total participants for specific activities. The
activities with participant numbers significantly deviating from others are visible as outliers.
● Program Areas Affected: The outliers are associated with specific activities such as "Cultural
Event" and "Women's Health & Well-being," suggesting these areas may require further
investigation to understand the cause of participant variation.
Q10.How does the participation in activities differ between the wards of Burat and Ngaremara?
Participation Summary
Visualization Insights
● Burat: Female participation (535) is significantly higher than male participation (225).
● Ngaremara: Female participation (729) also exceeds male participation (336), with a larger
overall number of participants compared to Burat.
Conclusion and Insights
● Higher Female Participation: Both wards show higher female participation, with Ngaremara
having the highest numbers.
● Overall Participation: Ngaremara has more participants overall, indicating possibly more
active engagement or larger population involved in activities compared to Burat.
Women's Economic Empowerment: This program area shows the highest participation,
particularly among female participants, indicating a strong focus on empowering women
economically.
Community Engagement Meetings: These meetings also have significant participation,
reflecting active community involvement and interest in local development.
Environmental Conservation Projects: Notable participation suggests a community
commitment to environmental sustainability.