LAW OF EVIDENCE

The Law of Evidence is one of the most important parts of the procedural law.
The Law of Evidence plays a very important role in the effective functioning of
the judicial system. The Law of Evidence is an indispensable part of both
substantive and procedural laws. It imparts credibility to the adjudicatory
process by indicating the degree of veracity to be attributed to 'facts' before the
forum. This paper enables the student to appreciate the concepts and
principles underlying the law of evidence and identify the recognized forms of
evidence and its sources. The subject seeks to impart to the student the skills
of examination and appreciation of oral and documentary evidence in order to
find out the truth. The art of examination and cross-examination, and the
shifting nature of burden of proof are crucial topics. The concepts brought in by
amendments to the Law of Evidence are significant parts of study in this
course.

After undergoing the study the student will be able to understand the
following:

· To design, implement and review a plan for establishing each legal element of
a given case to the required standard of proof with admissible evidence

· To plan and execute a witness examination that comports with evidentiary

standards and that persuasively establishes a fact in issue in the case; anticipate
and respond to evidentiary objections that may be raised during your examination

· To identify, articulate and assert appropriate evidentiary objections while

listening to a witness examination, and respond appropriately to questions from
the judge

· To draft and execute a witness examination for the introduction of a document

or item of proof

COURSE OUTLINE

Module I: Introduction to Evidence Law

a) Historical Evolution of the Law of Evidence- Scope, Object and Applicability of

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 - Indian Law of Evidence and English Law of
Evidence

b)Constitutional Perspective of Evidence-Golden Rule Evidence- Kinds of Evidence

c) Definition - Facts -Facts in Issue- Presume- Relevant -Distinguish Between
Relevancy and Admissibility

d) Relevancy of Facts - Closely connected facts - Res Gestae -Occasion, Cause

and Effect etc. -Motive, Preparation and Conduct- Facts Necessary to Explain or
Introduce Relevant Facts

e) Proof of Conspiracy -When facts not otherwise relevant become relevant

Module II: Admission- Confession - Dying Declaration

a) Admission- An Exception to Hearsay Rule-Requisites of an Admission-Party to

the Proceedings-Kinds of Admission-Admission Regarding State of Mind or Body

b) Oral Admission as to Content of Documents -Admission in Civil Cases-

Evidentiary Value of Admission

c) Confession-Conditions as to Confession –Kinds of Confession -Confession to

Police - Retracted Confession-Joint Trial - Distinction Between Admission And
Confession-Evidentiary Value of Confession

d) Dying Declaration-English and Indian Law Difference On Dying Declaration –

Essential Conditions for the Applicability of Dying Declaration -FIR as Dying
Declaration

e) Who can record a Dying Declaration -Multiple Dying Declarations -Evidentiary

Value of a Dying Declaration-Difference Between a Dying Declaration and a Dying
Deposition

Module III: Expert Evidence - Relevancy of Character

a) Opinion of Third Person When Relevant-Expert Witness- Value of Expert Witness

b) Expert Opinion: Corroboration- Facts Bearing Upon Expert-Opinion

c) Opinion as to Handwriting & Signature

d) Opinion as to Existence of General Custom or Right - Opinion as to Usage,Tenets-

Opinion on Relationship- Grounds of opinion

e) Character When Relevant- Relevancy of Character in Civil and Criminal Cases.

Module IV: Of Proof- Burden of Proof

a) Facts which need not be proved –Modes of Proof -Oral Evidence -Hearsay Evidence
b) Exceptions to the Rule of Hearsay Evidence- Hearsay and Circumstantial Evidence-
Difference Between Direct and Hearsay Evidence

c) Documentary Evidence - Primary and Secondary Evidence-Admissibility of electronic

Records-Public and Private Documents- Presumptions as to the Documents-Exclusion
of Oral Evidence by Documentary Evidence

d) Burden of Proof -Burden and Proof Distinction- Burden of Proof and Onus Probandi

e) Proof of Fact On Which Evidence Becomes Admissible- Burden of Proving Exception

In Criminal Cases

Module V: Presumption- Estoppel

a) Presumption- Kinds of Presumption- Proof and Presumption- Presumption as to

Document-Presumption as to Survivorship-Presumption as to Death- Presumption of
Certain Offences-

b) Presumption of Legitimacy- Presumption in Suicide Cases-Presumption of

Existence of Certain Facts-Presumption in Prosecution of Rape Cases

c) Doctrine of Estoppel- Kinds of Estoppel- Essential Conditions For Estoppel-

Promissory Estoppel- Exception to the Doctrine of Estoppel-

d) Estoppel by Tenants and Licensee- Estoppel of Acceptor of Bill of Exchange,

Bailee and Licensee-

e) Distinction Between Estoppel and Res Judicata- Distinction Between Estoppel

and Waiver

Module VI: Witnesses - Examination of Witness

a) Witnesses- Categories of Witnesses- Dumb Witness- Evidence of Prosecutix in

Rape Case- Interested Witness- Competency of Husband and wife as witnesses in
certain cases- Judges and Magistrate as Witness

b) Privileged Communications- Professional Communication-Order of Production

and examination of Witness- Judge to Decide Admissibility of Evidence

c) Examination- In –Chief- Cross –Examination- Re –Examination- Distinction

Between Examination -In- Chief, Cross- Examination And Re- Examination

d) Order of Examination- Witnesses to character- Leading Questions - Direction of

Re Examination- Cross Examination of person called to produce as document-
Question by party to his own witness
e) Question tending to Corroboration- Former Statement as Corroboration-
Refreshing Memory.

Recommended Readings:
Books:
1. M. Monir, Law of Evidence, Universal Law Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, 2018
2. Rattan Lal Dheeraj Lal, Law of Evidence, Lexis Nexis, 2018
3. Avtar Singh, Principles of Law of Evidence, Central Law Publications, 2016
4. Sarkar and Manohar, Sarkar on Evidence (1999), Wadha& Co., Nagpur 2017
5. Hong Kong Law of Evidence, Mike McConville, Dmitri Hubbard, and Arthur
McInnis, 2nd Edition,2014, Blue Dragon Press, Hong Kong

Journals/ Journal Articles:

1. Allen, R 1992, “The Myth of Conditional Relevancy”, Loyola of Los Angeles Law
Review, 25: 871–884.

2. Allen, R 1994, “Factual Ambiguity and a Theory of Evidence”, Northwestern

University Law Review, 88: 604–640.

3. Allen, R. and S. Jehl, 2003, “Burdens of Persuasion in Civil Cases:

Algorithms v. Explanations”, Michigan State Law Review, 4: 893–944.

4. Accomplice Liability for Unintentional Crimes: Remaining withinthe

Constraints of Intent by Audrey Rogers Loyola ofLos Angeles Law Review (Wol
31:1351).

5. Dr. Nirpat Patel, "The Role of DNA in Criminal investigation – Admissibility in

Indian legal system and future perspectives" IJHSSI Vol.2/Issue 7/July 2013/p. 15-
21.

Further Readings:

Books:

1. Adrain Keane, Paul M.C. Keown, "The Modern Law of Evidence", 9th Edn,
OxfordUniversity Press.

2. Albert S. Osborn, "The problem of proof", 1st Indian reprint, Universal Law
House,Delhi, 1998.

3. Bholeshwar Nath, "Cases and Material on Evidence Act, 1872", Eastern

BooksPublishers and Book Sellers, Lucknow.
4. Bridges, B.C., Vollmer, August and Monir M., "Criminal Investigation
PracticalFingerprinting, Thumb Impression, Handwriting expert testimony
OpinionEvidence", The University Book Agency, Allahabad (2000).

5. M. Monir C.J., Dr. H.K. Saharay, "Law of Evidence" (Vol. I, II), 14

Edn,UniversalLaw Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.

6. P. Murphy, Richard Glover, "Evidence" 12 Edn, Oxford University Press.

7. PhilipsEdward, "Brief Case on Law of Evidence", Cavendish

Publishing Limited,London, (1st Edn, 1996).

8. R.L. Gupta, "Law relating to identification and Expert Opinion" 4th Edn,
EasternBook Co, Lucknow.

9. R.S. Pillai, "Criminal Law", Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadhwa Co., Nagpur, 10Edn.

10. Sir Rupert Cross and Nancy Wilkins, "An Outline of the Law of Evidence", 4th Edn,
London Butterworth, 1975.

Journal/ Journals Articles

1. Allen, R. and A. Stein, 2013, “Evidence, Probability and the Burden of Proof”,
Arizona Law Review, 55: 557–60

2. Allen, R, 1991, “The Nature of Juridical Proof”, Cardozo Law Review, 13: 373–
422.

3. Garrison, A.H. (2000). A review of the behavioural science theory and its
admissibility in criminal trials" American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 23, 591- 657.

4. Kristina L. Needham, "Questioning the Admissibility of Non Scientific testimony

after Daubert: The need for increased Judicial Gatekeeping to ensure the reliability of all
Expert Testimony" 1997 FULJ Vol. 25 Issue 3, Pg. 541-578.

5. Mathiharan K, "Emergency Medicare: its Ethical and legal aspects" National

Medical Journal of India, Vol. 17, No.1 January/ Feb, 2004, 31-35 at p. 33.

6. Neeraj Tiwari, "Fair trial vis-a-vis Criminal Justice Administration: A critical

study of the Indian Criminal Justice System JLCR Vol.2(4) pp. 66-73

7. Nivedita Grover, "Development of forensic science and criminal prosecution-

India" IJSRP Vol.4 Issue 12

8. Sonia Dutt Sharma, "DNA-Dignity and Dissolution of Marriage", Helix Vol.2 :

101- 104 (2012).
9. Subhomoy Sarkar, "The Constitutional Mandate on the Right Against Self
Incrimination: A Comparative Study on the Legitimacy of Narco Analysis 2009” Cr.L.J
Vol 2 Journal/166.

10. Tess M.S. Neal, "Expert Witness preparation: What does the Literature tell us?
American Society of Trial Consultants. 2009, pg. 82.

Cases for Guidance

1. State of Maharashtra vs. Prafulla B. Desai (Dr.) (2003) 4 SCC 601
2. R. M. Malkani vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1973 SC 157
3. Mirza Akbar vs. Emperor, AIR 1940 PC 176
4. Badri Rai vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1958 SC 953
5. Mohd. Khalid vs. State of W.B. (2002) 7 SCC 334
6. JayantibhaiBhenkerbhai vs. State of Gujarat (2002) 8 SCC 165
7. Bishwanath Prasad vs. Dwarka Prasad, AIR 1974 SC 117
8. Central Bureau of Investigation vs. V.C. Shukla, AIR 1998 SC 1406
9. Veera Ibrahim vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1976 SC 1167
10. AghnooNagesia vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1966 SC 119
11. Nageshwar Shri Krishna Ghobe vs. State of Maharashtra (1973) 4 SCC 23
12. National Textile Workers’ Union vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan (1983) 1 SCC 228, 255
13. CIT v. Podar Cement (P) Ltd (1997) 5 SCC 482
14. State v. S.J. Choudhary (1996) 2 SCC 428
15. SIL Import, USA v. Exim Aides Silk Exporters (1999) 4 SCC 567

Learning Outcome:

After completion of the course students will be able to -

· To identify, assert and support objections to items of proof, using appropriate

evidentiary rules and tailoring objections to the facts at hand.

· To identify and use a range of legally specific research principles, methods and
tools to make a coherent and persuasive argument for the admission or exclusion of
a specific item of evidence, incorporating factual information and legal standards
drawn from both evidentiary rules and substantive law .

· To research, analyse and apply evidentiary standards to complex issues and

present a persuasive written and oral argument for the admission or exclusion of the
evidence.

· Articulate the processes for the adversarial examination of evidence and

differentiate between the roles of the district attorney and defense counsel in the
presentation of evidence.