[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views112 pages

ELS Part II

The document outlines a top-up course for TCP T3 focusing on excavation and lateral support with significant geotechnical content. It emphasizes the importance of proper design, site supervision, and monitoring to prevent failures in construction projects, illustrated by various case studies from Taiwan, China, Malaysia, and South Korea. Key topics include site supervision requirements, building works with significant geotechnical content, instrumentation, and safety issues related to excavation works.

Uploaded by

汪洋
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views112 pages

ELS Part II

The document outlines a top-up course for TCP T3 focusing on excavation and lateral support with significant geotechnical content. It emphasizes the importance of proper design, site supervision, and monitoring to prevent failures in construction projects, illustrated by various case studies from Taiwan, China, Malaysia, and South Korea. Key topics include site supervision requirements, building works with significant geotechnical content, instrumentation, and safety issues related to excavation works.

Uploaded by

汪洋
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 112

HKIE Geotechnical Division &

Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong

Top‐up course for TCP T3 on GIFW and Building Works with Significant Geotechnical Content

Excavation and Lateral Support


Part II

Ir. James Sze

Director of Infrastructure, Ove Arup & Partners HK Ltd


Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Hong Kong
Chairman, Session 2016/17, HKIE Geotechnical Division

1
Importance of Proper Design and
Site Control

2
A case in Taiwan

Video from internet


3
A case in China

Video from internet


4
A case in Malaysia

Video from internet


5
Failure of strutting system (soldier pile wall) in
South Korea

6
Failure of soldier pile wall with tie-back

Cross‐section extracted from Choi et al (2012) “A


Case Study of Micropiling for Ground Reinforcement”
7
Excessive movement
of adjacent structures
due to wall installation

Sinkhole formed by pipe pile installation

8
Typical Movement related to Excavation in HK

9
Examples of Effects on surroundings

Source from newspapers


10
Site Supervision Requirement

11
Relevant Documents for Building Works

12
Building Works with Significant GEO Content
a. site formation c. retaining structures
• blasting • diaphragm walls, sheet‐pile walls, bore‐piled
walls and pipe‐piled walls
• pre‐stressed ground anchors
• reinforced fill structures
• ground anchors in sensitive sites*
• cantilever/gravity retaining walls (H > 5 m)
• soil nails
• cut slopes (in rock or soil) (H > 3 m) d. ground treatment
• stabilization works on rock slopes • vertical drains, horizontal/raking drains

• fill slopes (compaction and installation of such • grouting and dewatering for cut and cover
surface filter/drainage layers) (H>5m, or < 5 m excavation and tunnel/shaft/cavern
high which pose a direct risk to life) construction

• reinforced fill slopes • ground water drainage works in Scheduled Area


No. 1
b. excavation and lateral support
e. demolition works affecting slopes and
• depth > 2.5 m retaining walls
• depth > 7.5 m in sensitive sites* • ground stabilization works using soil nails or
anchors

* Directorate Site Supervisor (DSS) will be required who can be RGE or Director
13 grade of the firm with RPE(G) qualification
Building Works with Significant GEO Content

f. foundation h. tunnel works*


• foundation for buildings in Scheduled Area No. 1 • cut and cover construction methods
• deep foundation for buildings in Scheduled • drill and blast methods
Areas Nos. 2 & 4 and in Designated Area of
• soft ground tunnel construction techniques
Northshore Lantau
• tunnel boring machine, micro‐tunnelling
• foundation that could affect an existing
(including directional drilling) and pipe jacking
tunnel/cavern or that could be affected by
methods
tunnel works
• associated ground support, ground treatment
g. water wells and groundwater control works
− well yield test and the effect of proposed water
extraction.

Sensitive sites are sites where the works could pose adverse impact to life and/or property.
These include sites where works could affect old buildings with shallow foundations, old
tunnels/caverns, major roads, railways, water mains, gas mains, slopes, retaining walls or
sites with history of instability.

14
Site Supervision of ELS Works

• To be provided in accordance with Technical Memorandum for


Supervision Plan and CoP for Site Supervision (depth >2.5m)
• RSE Stream only when 2.5m < D  4.5m
• RGE Stream involved when D > 4.5m
• Directorate Site Supervision (DSS) normally required for depth >7.5m in
sensitive sites
• TCP T5 and/or DSS under RGE’s stream to submit regular reports of site
observations
• Site supervision personnel and RGE shall regularly review the monitoring
trends and the actual performance of the excavation during critical stages
of the works

15
Annex to Site Supervision Form

16
Number of TCP Personnel to be deployed
CoP2009 Corrigendum issued in June 2016

17
Site Supervision Role

18
Supervision Management Framework

19
General Site Safety Issues
• Personal Protection Equipment
• Maneuvering of plants
• Working at height

20
General Site Safety Issues
• Working at height at depth – falling objects from temp. platform

Debris on platform

21
Technical Supervision

22
Checklist

23
Detailed checklist
• CoP for Site Supervision 2009 provided
guidance on inspection at various
stages of foundation, GI fieldwork and
soil nailing works.
• PNAP APP‐158 expanded into
superstructure, site formation and
Excavation & Lateral Support.
• For BD Audit purpose.

24
Detailed checklist

• AP/RSE/RGE stream inspection


according to expertise
• Some common items remain

25
Issues Causing instability

Design Issues
• Overlook unbalanced load
• Incorrect soil models
• Misunderstanding/Misinterpretation of analysis of computer program
• Inadequate waling/strutting details

Construction Issues
• Ignore the design requirement
• Poor workmanship – e.g. Incorrect strut levels, Improper welds
• Inadequate excavation sequence of works – e.g. Over‐excavation
• Ignoring monitoring data
• Unforeseen ground condition

26
Uncertainties in Excavation Works

• Variability in ground condition


• Ground response (effect on works or vice versa)
• Change in groundwater table (natural variation or work induced)
• Sequence of works – over‐excavation, phasing
• Workmanship – accuracy of wall alignment, strut levels, welds etc
• Ground settlement on wall installation
• Effectiveness and extent of dewatering
• Interaction response of adjacent structures
• Effects of previous construction work – redevelopment project

27
Typical Way to Deal with These Risks

Typical design approach


– Design parameters from previous experience
– Offset risk by using conservative assumptions
– Verify design using instrumentation results (Alert, Action & Alarm
trigger levels) – similar to Amber, Red & Black rainstorm signals

28
Things to Watch Out (Non-exhaustive List)
Before go to site When you’re on site, things to watch out
• Familiar with Code of Practice • Personal protection equipment
for site supervision • Health & safety
• Drawings and specifications • Condition survey
• Get thorough briefing from your • Contractor’s method statement
senior, key assumptions, risk • Workmanship
register list • Change of materials
• Know your duties and • Change of ground condition
responsible • Disturbance of works
• Construction sequence
• Details, welding & bolting
• Protection measures against surface
runoff
• Instrumentation, monitoring & site walk

29
Instrumentation and Monitoring

30
An example of Instrumentation Plan

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

31
Inclinometer in Wall

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

32
Typical Instruments

Cement
Grout

Inclinometer
Access Tube

Vertical Inclinometer
33
Strain gauge/Load cell in struts

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

34
Typical Instruments

Strain gauge
35
Standpipe/piezometer/observation wells

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

36
Typical Instruments

Standpipe/piezometer
37
Ground/utility settlement points

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

38
Typical Instruments

Ground/utility Settlement Point


39
Building settlement/tilting

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

40
Typical Instruments

Building/structure Settlement Point


41
Typical Instruments

Tilt Plate / tiltmeter


42
Vibrograph/Noise meter

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

43
Typical Instruments

Vibrograph for vibration monitoring

Noise Measurement (e.g. rock


excavation)

44
Comobined deposition of Instruments

Fill

Alluvium

Weathered Granite

Bedrock

45
Monitoring & Trigger Levels

• Trigger levels are used as part of the design verification process ‐


design review
• To check the actual performance of the design during construction –
risk management and control
• No standard definition for AAA values, but commonly,
Alert level = 60%, Action level = 80% & Alarm level = 100%
• Additional calculation during the course of excavation based on actual
serviceability to ensure AAA values not exceeded
• Engineering judgement are often guesses or best practice and more
detailed back‐analysis is then required in order to result in more
rational and economic design

46
Instruments – Less Common

Convergence meter / extensometer


47
Automatic Data Monitoring System (ADMS)

Motorized theodolites & digital leveling systems under


computer control by “intelligent” software gives 3
dimensional movements in “real time” together with
automatic on site and remote alarm systems.

48
Automatic Data Monitoring System (ADMS)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr6jrvjPH48

49 49
Automatic Data Monitoring System (ADMS)

A project near MTR Tai Wai Station


50
Typical settlement record with event logs

wall installation pump test & bulk excavation


0
king post

-5
Settlement (mm)

-10

-15

GS7
-20 Alert Level
Action Level
Alarm Level
-25
1/6/2007

1/7/2007

31/7/2007

30/8/2007

29/9/2007

29/10/2007

28/11/2007

28/12/2007

27/1/2008
51
Seepage issue

52
Seepage problem

Can be catastrophic !

53
Infinity Tower Case

video
54
Seepage problem – a site at Tsim Sha Tsui

before

55 flooded
Seepage problem – a site near the seafront

Flooded depth =
13m in 2 days

56
Pumping Test

57
Full-scale Pumping Test
• Pumping test is an important means to assess the seepage cut‐off
effectiveness of an embedded retaining wall in associated with any
other ground treatment measures, e.g. grouting
• Important for deep excavation since related to movements as well as
safety so requires a mock dewatering

Acceptance criteria
• Target dewatered level inside the Site
• Acceptable ground settlement outside the Site (more important)
• Acceptable groundwater drawdown outside the Site

58
Works to Facilitate Pumping Test

Installation of deep well

59
Works to Facilitate Pumping Test

Dipping of water level


inside pumping well

Switch box & valve for


pump well

60
Works to Facilitate Pumping Test

De‐silting
tank

Water meter

61
Works to Facilitate Pumping Test

Observation well & measurement of water level

62
Works to Facilitate Pumping Test

Water level measurement


outside site
Real time
measurement &
63
on screen display
Typical Pumping Test Results – a site at Tai Po

Targeted Dewatering
Level

Observation Well within Site

Acceptance criteria

64 Observation Well Outside Site


Sites near the Sea – Tidal Effect

65
Seepage due to Sheet Pile Wall Defect

66
Seepage due to Sheet Pile Wall Defect

67
Seepage due to Sheet Pile Wall Defect

68
Seepage due to Sheet Pile Wall Defect

69
Seepage due to Sheet Pile Wall Defect

Cut holes for quick set needle grouting

70
Demonstration of PU Grouting to stop water
inflow

video
71
Seepage due to Sheet Pile Wall Defect

72
Seepage due to Wall Defects

73
Seepage due
to Wall
Defects

74
Case History of Site Works –

HKPolyU School of Hotel & Tourist Management

75
General View of Site

Cross Harbour Tunnel

76
Cross-section with Inferred Geology

Typical 25m excavation Pipe pile wall + grout curtain

77
Pre-drilling for Pipe-pile Wall Construction

Key issue Things to observe / check / verify


Change in rockhead and stratigraphy across the site Soil strata/ rockhead level
78
Pipe-Pile Wall Installation

Key issues Things to observe / check


/ verify
Disturbance of • Size, thickness and
pipe pile wall material grade
installation • Observe disturbance to
adjacent to fire adjacent ground
station, roads
etc • Monitor the settlement
readings of fence wall
and ground
• Monitoring drilling rate &
air pressure
79
Pipe-Pile Wall Installation

Key issues Things to observe / check


/ verify
Extension of • Observe the pipe pile
pipe pile length with depth marks
sections, depth • Inspect the welded joints
of pipe piles and select the weld joints
to be test
• Witness the non-
destructive tests
• Measure the final depth
80
Pipe-Pile Wall Installation
Measurement of depth
of soldier pipe

H‐pile section
to act as shear
pin in rock

Key issues Things to observe / check / verify


Soldier pile (shear pin) • Installation method to ensure orientation and depth
installation at toe of pipe piles • Quality of tremie grout (strength requirement
instead of pure backfill purpose)
81
Grout Curtain behind Wall

Tube‐á‐manchettes
Steel pipe piles

82
Grout Curtain methodology

video

83
Chemical Grout – sample grout mix design
1. Grouting shall be carried out from the bottom to 1m below ground level in successive phases using
bentonite cement grout followed by chemical grout. Each rise of the double packer shall be 500mm
at each stage.
2. Envisaged mix for 1st phase bentonite‐cement grout is given below for reference:
• BENTONITE 35 kg/m3 of grout
• CEMENT 350 kg/m3 of grout
• WATER 600 litres/m3 of grout

3. Envisaged mix for 2nd phase chemical (silicate gel) grout is given below for reference:
• SODIUM SILICATE 400 kg/m3 of grout
• WATER 708 kg/m3 of grout
• REAGENT Type and dosage to ensure a gel time (depending on injection path)

4. Envisaged criteria for each phase of grouting to stop is given below for reference:
A. If grout pressure reaches 2 x effective overburden pressure , or
B. If the bentonite‐cement grout intake reaches 150 litres per linear metre of drillhole or the
chemical grout intake reaches 200 litres per linear metre without reaching the limiting grout
pressure.

5. In the event that criterion (b) is met at a pressure below criterion (a), allow time for the grout to
achieve initial set and then re‐grout the hole using the same sequence. Repeat as necessary until
criterion (a) is achieved.

84
Curtain Grout
Key issues Things to observe / check / verify
Grout curtain to ensure seepage cut-off • Grout hole position, depths
• Monitor grouting procedure, grout
intake & grouting pressure, blockage,
gel time etc
• Review pumping test results
• Settlement monitoring results

85
Pumping Test

Installation of deep well

Key issues Things to observe / check / verify


Effectiveness of seepage cut-off • Groundwater level inside & outside site
• Flow rate
86 • Settlement, inclinometer results
Excavation, Lagging & Struts

Install waling, strut and


short struts

Start excavation & install


steel plate lagging

87
Shoring System – Cross-lot with Preloading

88
Site Progress Photos 1 of 7

Site clearance
89
Site Progress Photos 2 of 7

Pre‐drilling; pipe pile wall with H‐pile shear pin installation; curtain grouting
90
Site Progress Photos 3 of 7

Demobilization of piling rigs; Deep well installation for pumping test


91
Site Progress Photos 4 of 7

Commence excavation; strutting; temporary deck erection


92
Site Progress Photos 5 of 7

10.11.2007
Temporary deck completed; Proceed excavation to 2nd strut level
93
Site Progress Photos 6 of 7

Install and preload 2nd level struts; continue excavation


94
Site Progress Photos 7 of 7

Excavation nearly reaching rockhead at approx. 20m depth with 6‐level struts
95
Interesting Stuff - Existence of Old Foundations

96
Instrumentation and Monitoring

97
Instrumentation and Monitoring (Cont’)

Site
measurement

Inclinometer monitoring
of wall deflection

General observation

98
Key Issues during Excavation Stage
Key issues Things to observe / check / verify
Waling, main strut & short • Check welds
struts • Adequate supports to waling and stiffeners in short
struts to avoid sway of waling due to resultant force
from corner strut
Pre-loading of strut • Ensure adequate preload force applied
• Avoid over pre-loading – check sign of movements
Seepage during excavation to • Rock joint mapping
from vertical rock face • General appraisal by inspection
Conflict between shoring • Counter check with latest architectural layout
works and permanent • General observation to allow earlier rectification
basement structures
Behaviour of pipe pile walls • Inclinometer results
during excavation
Movement/settlement outside • Monitoring records
site • Site walk

99
Remarks for other Sites

100
Ground Movements induced by Wall Installation
• Sheet piles – cohesionless sandfill
• Pipe piles – cohesionless sandfill, soft clay
• Diaphragm walling in boulderly fill, CDG with corestones

101
Minor detail can affect over performance

102
Fill Quality in Old Reclamation

As reported by Ir. Rupert Leung of Hyder in 2011 for


Foundation Construction of WSD Pumping Station
at Sheung Wan

103
Pile remains for Redevelopment projects

104
Construction Sequence on plan vs actual

video

105
Method of Soil Excavation

Excavator/backhoe
106
Mucking out of Soils

Grab

Removal of excavated materials


107
Method of Rock Excavation

video

108
Method of Rock Excavation - Police HQ Ph. III

Rock excavation using hand‐held tools


‐ Very slow progress
‐ Necessary to speed up the progress

Rock Excavation by
Blasting using PCF

109
Method of Rock Excavation - Blasting

video
110
Conclusion Remarks

• Appreciate various types of embedded retaining walls


• Brief understanding of the design consideration and methodology
• Appreciate the limitations / uncertainties of ELS designs
• Roles as TCP T3 in ELS works
• Appreciate of construction practices and issues that might need to pay
attention

111
End of Part II

james.sze@arup.com

112

You might also like