[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
16 views1 page

Module 3, Activity 4

Food Pende Corporation, which operates a call center for Graywich Corporation, faced a collective suit from dismissed call agents for illegal dismissal. The agents argue for piercing the corporate veil due to shared corporate officers, while Graywich defends that the agents are employed solely by Food Pende as a separate entity. The appropriateness of Graywich's defense hinges on the legal distinction between the two corporations and the applicability of the piercing the corporate veil doctrine.

Uploaded by

San San
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views1 page

Module 3, Activity 4

Food Pende Corporation, which operates a call center for Graywich Corporation, faced a collective suit from dismissed call agents for illegal dismissal. The agents argue for piercing the corporate veil due to shared corporate officers, while Graywich defends that the agents are employed solely by Food Pende as a separate entity. The appropriateness of Graywich's defense hinges on the legal distinction between the two corporations and the applicability of the piercing the corporate veil doctrine.

Uploaded by

San San
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CORPORATION LAW

Activity 4

Essay

1. Food Pende Corporation operates a call center that received orders for pizzas on behalf of
Graywich Corporation which operates a chain of pizza restaurants. The two companies have the
same set of corporate officers. After 2 years of, Food Pende corporation dismissed all its call
agents for no apparent reason. The agents filed a collective suit for illegal dismissal against
Food Pende Corporation and Graywich Corporation based on the doctrine of piercing the veil
of corporate fiction. The latter set up the defense that the agents are in the employ of Food
Pende Corporation which is a separate juridical entity. Is this defense appropriate? Explain your
answer.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

You might also like